{"title":"Practising Politics in a Disorderly Democracy","authors":"Kerryn Baker","doi":"10.1111/ajph.70018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.70018","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Taking as its starting point Ron May's scholarship on Papua New Guinea as a “disorderly democracy,” this article examines how politics is practised in the PNG Parliament. Using a case study of the events of late 2020, when a vote of no confidence against the Marape government was mooted but eventually failed to materialise, it adopts a practice theory lens to explore how decisions are made, how coalitions are formed and disintegrate, and how political power is won in PNG politics. It demonstrates that institutional explanations predicated on PNG's weakly institutional party system, and cultural explanations that foreground Melanesian traditions, are only part of the story. Tracing personal networks, examining new sites of political contestation, and taking account of the gendered nature of male-dominated PNG politics are also important in understanding how PNG politics is practised. The article seeks to contribute to a theory of PNG politics, highlighting that while it may be “disorderly,” it is nevertheless structured by practices and traditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45431,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Politics and History","volume":"72 1","pages":"108-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajph.70018","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147568158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“It Is Vital That We Should Not Keep It to Ourselves”: The Rats of Tobruk Association and the Siege of Tobruk in Australian National Memory","authors":"Nicole Townsend","doi":"10.1111/ajph.70021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.70021","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The siege of Tobruk is one of the most well-known Australian actions of the Second World War, enjoying special attention on Anzac Day. Its elevation within Australian national memory is by no means accidental. Rather, it is the result of decades of lobbying by the Rats of Tobruk Association (ROTA), which positioned veterans of the siege as the successors to Anzac and fought to ensure the siege was not forgotten by subsequent generations. In charting ROTA's lobbying efforts after the war, this article argues that while ROTA's successful campaign for a national memorial in Canberra ensured Tobruk's place in the national commemorative landscape, the association's development of relationships with schools across Australia has ensured the posterity of the siege in Australian popular memory at an individual level. On the other hand, ROTA's failed attempts to secure a dedicated National Day of Commemoration for the siege and legal protection for the word “Tobruk” demonstrate the dominance of Anzac within the Australian psyche, which influenced government decisions on these matters. Finally, it highlights the potential for conflict between veterans' organisations, whose interests do not always align and raise questions about which groups should determine how events are remembered.</p>","PeriodicalId":45431,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Politics and History","volume":"72 1","pages":"143-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajph.70021","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147568802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Liberalism as a Way of Political Life: The Case of George Brandis","authors":"Geoffrey Robinson","doi":"10.1111/ajph.70019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.70019","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The lawyer, politician, and diplomat George Brandis was the leading intellectual representative of moderate or “small-l” liberalism in the contemporary Liberal Party. He criticised John Howard for an ad hoc balancing of liberalism and conservatism. Brandis believed the Liberal Party necessarily included conservatives, but to him their role was to be a modest break on liberal progress rather than the advocates of a coherent alternative to liberalism. This article examines Brandis' political thought and practice and considers how his understandings of freedom, order, and progress changed in his journey from party activist to a Cabinet minister responsible for anti-terrorism, judicial appointments, and discrimination law.</p>","PeriodicalId":45431,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Politics and History","volume":"72 1","pages":"123-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajph.70019","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147570024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Spiritual Manifest Destiny: B.A. Santamaria's Political Theology","authors":"Clare Monagle","doi":"10.1111/ajph.70011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.70011","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article offers a reading of B.A. Santamaria's political theology and its role in the making of contemporary Australian political imaginaries. The article charts the shifting targets of Santamaria's critique and activism, showing his departure from the perceived communist threat to a wide-ranging attack on liberal and leftist social movements. In so doing, the article argues that Santamaria should be considered an early architect of, and advocate for, the idea and practice of the culture war in Australian politics, one that rallies conservative political actors around concepts of the traditional family, normative gender politics, and the defence of Christianity.</p>","PeriodicalId":45431,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Politics and History","volume":"72 1","pages":"3-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajph.70011","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147564504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Spiritual Manifest Destiny: B.A. Santamaria's Political Theology","authors":"Clare Monagle","doi":"10.1111/ajph.70011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.70011","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article offers a reading of B.A. Santamaria's political theology and its role in the making of contemporary Australian political imaginaries. The article charts the shifting targets of Santamaria's critique and activism, showing his departure from the perceived communist threat to a wide-ranging attack on liberal and leftist social movements. In so doing, the article argues that Santamaria should be considered an early architect of, and advocate for, the idea and practice of the culture war in Australian politics, one that rallies conservative political actors around concepts of the traditional family, normative gender politics, and the defence of Christianity.</p>","PeriodicalId":45431,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Politics and History","volume":"72 1","pages":"3-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajph.70011","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147564546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The McKinleys of Punch: Politics and the Press in Melbourne, 1870s to 1920s","authors":"Richard Scully","doi":"10.1111/ajph.70014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.70014","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article re-examines the <i>Melbourne Punch</i> (1855–1925; known simply as <i>Punch</i> from 1900) as a political weapon in the cut-and-thrust of Victorian, local, and national politics, in the hands of its longest-serving, but least-known proprietor, Alexander McKinley (1848–1927). Long known as a useful source for historians of Melbourne in the colonial era, and recognised as a vibrant Bohemian magazine in its early days, <i>Melbourne Punch</i> is also known as the publisher of Tom Carrington's (1843–1918) cartoons attacking the radical reforming premier Graham Berry (1822–1904). Yet the role of Carrington's employers—Alex McKinley and his brother and long-time <i>Punch</i> editor James McKinley (1847–1908)—is not well appreciated, despite it being fundamental to the political message conveyed on a weekly basis by the magazine and its contributors. Through a close study in particular of Alex McKinley's career, <i>Melbourne Punch</i> is revealed to have been much more than the stereotypically conservative magazine of scholarship to date; or a backward-looking periodical fixated on its British model out-of-touch with the coming generation of the <i>Bulletin</i> school. Rather, it was a powerful tool, indispensable to the McKinleys as nascent press barons, Land Boomers, and even budding statesmen, before the disastrous 1890s crash. Thereafter it was crucial in the rebuilding of their reputations and their power, as Alex pursued local politics and attempted to define the upper echelons of society, from the Federation era, and through the Great War, right down to the mid-1920s.</p>","PeriodicalId":45431,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Politics and History","volume":"72 1","pages":"35-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajph.70014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147567676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Religious Liberty and the Rights of White and Aboriginal Subjects in Colonial New South Wales: The Case of John Dunmore Lang","authors":"Sarah Irving-Stonebraker","doi":"10.1111/ajph.70016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.70016","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Historians have not yet adequately explored the role that ideas about religious liberty played in discussions of rights and subjecthood in colonial New South Wales, particularly in the context of debates about self-government and the status of Aboriginal people. John Dunmore Lang (1799–1878) made radical arguments for disestablishment and full religious freedom. He was also vociferous—yet paternalistic—in his defense of the full humanity of Aboriginal people. Lang's views on religious liberty have not been brought into conversation with his complex attitudes towards Aborigines, whom he saw as potential rather than full rights-bearing subjects. Through a close examination of Lang's published and unpublished work, this article argues that Lang's views on religious liberty were an outworking of a larger vision of human personhood and the entwining of civil and political rights that underpinned his work. This exploration of Lang's work is a window into a broader moment of transformation in the mid-19th-century British imperial world, in which struggles for colonial self-government were shaped by contestation over the rights of imperial subjects, and to whom these rights extended.</p>","PeriodicalId":45431,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Politics and History","volume":"72 1","pages":"92-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147566473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"An Ordeal of Peoplehood: Indigenous Australians and the Debates over Sovereignty, Treaty, and Voice","authors":"Murray Goot, Tim Rowse","doi":"10.1111/ajph.70015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.70015","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Australian government's 2009 commitment to the 2007 United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples did not make Indigenous Australians a “people.” In 2017, in the Uluru Statement from the Heart, Indigenous Australians asserted peoplehood and asked Australians to recognise this via a constitutional amendment that would have created an Indigenous Voice to Parliament and Executive. Public debate revealed Indigenous Australians to be ideologically diverse. We use survey data to document some of this, including a lack of commitment, among some, to the historical perspective underpinning the Uluru Statement. However useful it was to the No case during the Voice debate, disunity of opinion hardly disqualifies the Indigenous claim to peoplehood. More significant to Indigenous Australians was whether a single body could represent the many First Nations, and the relationship between recognising the Voice (with or without constitutional amendment) and negotiating a treaty. The No campaign, with some Indigenous support, made much of the issue of whether Indigenous Australians are “peoples” with collective rights, or a “race” made up of many individual citizens with no distinct collective rights within a liberal polity. Distaste for “race” (as concept and legal term) was found, in different forms, on both sides of the referendum debate.</p>","PeriodicalId":45431,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Politics and History","volume":"72 1","pages":"69-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajph.70015","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147567678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“It Is Vital That We Should Not Keep It to Ourselves”: The Rats of Tobruk Association and the Siege of Tobruk in Australian National Memory","authors":"Nicole Townsend","doi":"10.1111/ajph.70021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.70021","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The siege of Tobruk is one of the most well-known Australian actions of the Second World War, enjoying special attention on Anzac Day. Its elevation within Australian national memory is by no means accidental. Rather, it is the result of decades of lobbying by the Rats of Tobruk Association (ROTA), which positioned veterans of the siege as the successors to Anzac and fought to ensure the siege was not forgotten by subsequent generations. In charting ROTA's lobbying efforts after the war, this article argues that while ROTA's successful campaign for a national memorial in Canberra ensured Tobruk's place in the national commemorative landscape, the association's development of relationships with schools across Australia has ensured the posterity of the siege in Australian popular memory at an individual level. On the other hand, ROTA's failed attempts to secure a dedicated National Day of Commemoration for the siege and legal protection for the word “Tobruk” demonstrate the dominance of Anzac within the Australian psyche, which influenced government decisions on these matters. Finally, it highlights the potential for conflict between veterans' organisations, whose interests do not always align and raise questions about which groups should determine how events are remembered.</p>","PeriodicalId":45431,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Politics and History","volume":"72 1","pages":"143-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajph.70021","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147568803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Australia: A History. By Tony Abbott (Harper Collins, 2025), pp. 1–418. $49.99 (HB) ISBN 978 1 4607 6829 7.\u0000 The Shortest History of Australia. By Mark McKenna (Black Inc., an imprint of Schwartz Books Pty Ltd), pp. 1–294. $39.99 (HB) ISBN 0781 7 6064 3591.\u0000 The Idea of Australia: A Search for the Soul of the Nation. By Julianne Schultz (Allen and Unwin, 2025), pp. xix + 460. $36.00 (PB) ISBN 978 176087 9 303.","authors":"Nicholas Brown","doi":"10.1111/ajph.70044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.70044","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45431,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Politics and History","volume":"72 1","pages":"171-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147562449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}