Ecological Crises and Ecopolitics Research in Australia

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q1 HISTORY
Matt McDonald, Susan Park, Kirsty Anantharajah, Anthony Burke, Danielle Celermajer, Megan C. Evans, Robyn Eckersley, Robyn Gulliver, Rebecca McNaught, Wesley Morgan, Melodie Ruwet, Jonathan Symons, David Schlosberg, Anselm Vogler
{"title":"Ecological Crises and Ecopolitics Research in Australia","authors":"Matt McDonald,&nbsp;Susan Park,&nbsp;Kirsty Anantharajah,&nbsp;Anthony Burke,&nbsp;Danielle Celermajer,&nbsp;Megan C. Evans,&nbsp;Robyn Eckersley,&nbsp;Robyn Gulliver,&nbsp;Rebecca McNaught,&nbsp;Wesley Morgan,&nbsp;Melodie Ruwet,&nbsp;Jonathan Symons,&nbsp;David Schlosberg,&nbsp;Anselm Vogler","doi":"10.1111/ajph.13016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It is difficult to exaggerate the scale of contemporary ecological crises. These challenges, particularly climate change, necessitate new modes of politics and policy, even potentially new institutions, that seem anathema to the emphases of traditional accounts of environmental political science. In this paper, we explore contemporary ecopolitics research in Australia that is attempting to come to terms with the reality of ecological crises and the geological epoch of the Anthropocene. Showcasing a range of scholarship in this area, we argue that contemporary Australian ecopolitics research identifies and engages with a wide range of <i>sites</i> of politics and a significant number of (consequential) political <i>actors</i>. It recognises the need to engage directly with key institutions while also extending our gaze to the environment movement, community groups, financial institutions, local governments, and consumers. It acknowledges that sites of politics extend from the way ecological crises are framed in public debate to policy management, practices of private corporations and even to individual patterns of consumption. And it argues for an expansive conception of <i>ethics</i> beyond currently living human communities, a vision which arguably better meets the reality of ecological crises and the Anthropocene epoch.</p>","PeriodicalId":45431,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Politics and History","volume":"71 1","pages":"147-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajph.13016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Politics and History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajph.13016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is difficult to exaggerate the scale of contemporary ecological crises. These challenges, particularly climate change, necessitate new modes of politics and policy, even potentially new institutions, that seem anathema to the emphases of traditional accounts of environmental political science. In this paper, we explore contemporary ecopolitics research in Australia that is attempting to come to terms with the reality of ecological crises and the geological epoch of the Anthropocene. Showcasing a range of scholarship in this area, we argue that contemporary Australian ecopolitics research identifies and engages with a wide range of sites of politics and a significant number of (consequential) political actors. It recognises the need to engage directly with key institutions while also extending our gaze to the environment movement, community groups, financial institutions, local governments, and consumers. It acknowledges that sites of politics extend from the way ecological crises are framed in public debate to policy management, practices of private corporations and even to individual patterns of consumption. And it argues for an expansive conception of ethics beyond currently living human communities, a vision which arguably better meets the reality of ecological crises and the Anthropocene epoch.

澳大利亚的生态危机与生态政治研究
我们很难夸大当代生态危机的规模。这些挑战,尤其是气候变化,需要新的政治和政策模式,甚至是潜在的新制度,这似乎是传统环境政治科学所强调的诅咒。在本文中,我们探讨了澳大利亚当代生态政治研究,这些研究试图与生态危机的现实和人类世的地质时代达成协议。通过展示这一领域的一系列学术成果,我们认为当代澳大利亚生态政治研究识别并参与了广泛的政治场所和大量(重要的)政治行动者。它认识到有必要直接与关键机构接触,同时将我们的目光扩展到环境运动、社区团体、金融机构、地方政府和消费者。它承认,政治场所从生态危机在公共辩论中的框架延伸到政策管理、私营公司的做法,甚至个人消费模式。它还提出了一种超越当前人类社会的广泛的伦理概念,这种愿景可以更好地满足生态危机和人类世时代的现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Politics and History presents papers addressing significant problems of general interest to those working in the fields of history, political studies and international affairs. Articles explore the politics and history of Australia and modern Europe, intellectual history, political history, and the history of political thought. The journal also publishes articles in the fields of international politics, Australian foreign policy, and Australia relations with the countries of the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信