Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space最新文献

{"title":"The Stuff of Soldiers: A History of the Red Army in World War II through Objects by Brandon M. Schechter (review)","authors":"Gwendal Piégais","doi":"10.1353/imp.2023.0020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2023.0020","url":null,"abstract":"to curb the popular lampooning and mockery of high party officials, but it also seems to have been consumed quite selectively by Soviet society. According to the Harvard Project, most readers of Krokodil failed to associate the journal with an inherently politicized sense of humor. Of the roughly fifty respondents who recalled being regular readers of the journal, only two mentioned its publishing anything other than cartoons and funny stories.12 Such findings suggest that many Soviet citizens did not intuitively connect Krokodil’s amusing fare with more serious issues of the day – which calls into question official humor’s ability to shape public opinion. Such observations about the popular reception of official humor are fragmentary, of course, and require further research in order to more fully test Dobrenko and JonssonSkradol’s findings. In the meantime, State Laughter should be considered a must-read for anyone interested in Soviet mass culture under Stalin.","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79837168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"From the Editors: Toward A Postnational History of Eurasia: Deconstructing Empires, Denationalizing Groupness","authors":"От Редакции, M. Laruelle, Satoshi Mizutani, Tamar Shirinian, Marco Puleri, B. Pavlish, Riccardo Nicolosi, Svetlana Suveica, Andrii Portnov, Илья Герасимов, Екатерина Мельникова, O. Dudko, V. Moskalets, Михайло Гаухман, Анатолий Кононенко, David Rainbow, D. Brandenberger, Gwendal Piégais, Андрей Ферт, Ernest Gyidel, Ivan Sablin, Irina Shevelenko, K. Yumatov, T. Logunov, Рамина Абилова","doi":"10.1353/imp.2023.0000","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2023.0000","url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY:This is a contribution to the discussion forum \"Conceptualizing Society after the Modern Territorial State and Nation.\" Marlene Laruelle agrees with the need for the decolonization of \"Eurasia\" as a political space and a research field, along with the deconstruction of Russia's \"imperialness.\" By outlining the main tropes of the ongoing discussion, she points to the ambiguity of the key categories that frame it and hence to the tensions among the various meanings of those unclarified categories. She identifies the main tension between the proclaimed emancipatory goals, both political and epistemological, of the decolonization debate and the fundamental nation-centrism of the prevailing mode of social critique.Резюме:Это эссе является частью дискуссионного форума \"Концептуализация общества после модерного территориального государства и нации\". Соглашаясь с необходимостью деколонизации \"Евразии\" как политического пространства и исследовательского поля, а также деконструкции российской \"имперскости\", Марлен Ларюэль обращает внимание на двусмысленность ключевых категорий идущей сейчас дискуссии о деколонизации и на конфликты интерпретаций этих непроясненных категорий. Главный конфликт она видит между провозглашаемыми эмансипаторскими целями дебатов о деколонизации – как в политическом, так и в эпистемологическом смысле – и фундаментальным нациецентризмом предлагаемой социальной критики.","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77784485","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Wandering Thoughts on Wandering Histories","authors":"B. Pavlish","doi":"10.1353/imp.2023.0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2023.0008","url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY:This is a contribution to the discussion forum \"Conceptualizing Society after the Modern Territorial State and Nation.\" Bogdan Pavlish offers an exposé on the early modern entanglement of polities and cultural worlds that rendered human experience ultimately incommensurable with national narratives. Constantly on the move and regularly finding themselves in contact zones, people of the era, according to Pavlish, need to be studied using an equally itinerant kind of history. Based on his research, Pavlish elaborates a mode of history writing that combines several spatial perspectives and constantly switches from one to another. Metaphorically, he characterizes such a history as nomad science, in contrast to stationary national territorial history. Instead of construing teleological narratives of fixed groups, itinerant history is structured by analytical problems and new questions that alone determine the spatial limits and unique selection of facts and circumstances for each case study.Резюме:Это эссе является частью дискуссионного форума \"Концептуализация общества после модерного территориального государства и нации\". Историческая зарисовка Богдана Павлиша демонстрирует тесное переплетение разных политических и культурных миров раннего Нового времени, в результате чего человеческий опыт оказывался принципиально несоизмеримым с любыми национальными нарративами. Постоянно находящиеся в движении и регулярно оказывающиеся в зоне межкультурного контакта, люди той эпохи, по мнению Павлиша, требуют столь же \"блуждающего\" модуса исторического описания. На основании собственного исследовательского опыта Павлиш обосновывает такой способ написания истории, который сочетает в себе несколько пространственных перспектив, постоянно переключаясь с одной на другую. Метафорически он характеризует такую историю как \"номадическую науку\", в отличие от стационарной национальной \"территориальной\" истории. Вместо построения телеологических нарративов фиксированных групп странствующая история структурируется аналитическими проблемами и новыми вопросами, которые одни определяют пространственные границы и уникальный подбор фактов и обстоятельств для каждого исследования.","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79743384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"State Laughter: Stalinism, Populism, and Origins of Soviet Culture by Evgeny Dobrenko and Natalia Jonsson-Skradol (review)","authors":"D. Brandenberger","doi":"10.1353/imp.2023.0019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2023.0019","url":null,"abstract":"study of World War I, the Russian Revolution, international relations, and world history. The chapters are uniformly strong. They draw on numerous archives in multiple countries, and in several cases, provide clear historiographical statements of where they lie within the existing literature in multiple languages. The collection will be especially useful to scholars and researchers in guiding them through the existing approaches to the period, and also highlighting directions for new research. It will also provide much of interest to anyone wanting to better understand this important and tumultuous period of international relations.","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83297637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Dnipro: Some Reflections on Attempting to Write a City's Biography","authors":"Andrii Portnov","doi":"10.1353/imp.2023.0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2023.0011","url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY:This is a contribution to the discussion forum \"Conceptualizing Society after the Modern Territorial State and Nation.\" Andrii Portnov's book Dnipro: An Entangled History of a European City (Academic Studies Press, 2022) was published in late 2022. In his contribution to the forum, Portnov proposes a way of overcoming nation-centered teleological history by underscoring the incompleteness of one's object of study. To Portnov, Dnipro is important as an example of an \"unfinished city\" that is open to interpretation, depending on a scholar's research question. It should be added that Portnov's book won the 2022 Ab Imperio Award for the best study in new imperial history and the history of diversity in Northern Eurasia up to the late twentieth century.Резюме:Это эссе является частью дискуссионного форума \"Концептуализация общества после модерного территориального государства и нации\". Книга Андрея Портнова \"Днипро: переплетенная история европейского города\" (Academic Studies Press, 2022) вышла в свет в конце 2022 г. Размышляя о книге в рамках форума, Портнов предлагает еще один способ преодоления нациецентричной телеологической истории – указанием на неполноту любого объекта исследования. Для Портнова Днипро (Екатеринослав, Днепропетровск) важен как пример \"незавершенного города\", открытого для интерпретации в зависимости от исследовательского вопроса историка. Следует добавить, что книга Портнова получила ежегодную премию Ab Imperio за лучшее исследование в 2022 г. по новой имперской истории и истории разнообразия в Северной Евразии до конца ХХ в.","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84609006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Propaganda, Immigration, and Monuments: Perspectives on Methods Used to Entrench Soviet Power in Estonia in the 1950s–1980s ed. by Meelis Saueauk and Meelis Maripuu (review)","authors":"Ivan Sablin","doi":"10.1353/imp.2023.0023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2023.0023","url":null,"abstract":"several contributions are closely dealing with the matters pertaining to historical memory. The volume and the whole initiative of making the discussions among Estonian historians of the Soviet Union accessible to nonspecialists on Estonian history is very welcome. Unfortunately, the introduction does not reference any literature and therefore does not contextualize the six empirical studies in the historiographies of Estonia, the Soviet Union, state socialism, and dictatorial regimes globally that are featured in the edited volume. The studies themselves would undoubtedly be of interest to specialists in all these fields and would contribute to the respective debates. The volume opens with Hiljar Tammela’s chapter, “The Communist Party’s System for Processing Political Information in the Estonian SSR in 1944–1950,” which focuses on information acquisition by the party authorities in Estonia. As shown by Tammela in a historiographic overview, although information notes composed and compiled at different levels of party organization have been extensively used as sources by historians, little research was done on information notes themselves as the medium. Based on the materials of the district committees of the Estonian Communist Party (ECP), he then reconstructs the work of the whole Ivan SABLIN","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74461593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Russophonia as an Epistemic Challenge","authors":"Marco Puleri","doi":"10.1353/imp.2023.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2023.0007","url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY:This is a contribution to the discussion forum \"Conceptualizing Society after the Modern Territorial State and Nation.\" Marco Puleri offers a new look at the actually existing, rather than hypothetically anticipated, form of postnational collective belonging in the post-Soviet space: the \"archipelago\" of Russian-speaking communities in different countries. This choice might seem counterintuitive, given the acute threat to national cultures and statehood coming from the ideological and political program of the \"Russian world\" promoted by the Russian Federation, which claims sovereignty over everything russkii. Puleri argues that the only means to neutralize this threat without assuming an anti-Russian but equally repressive and nationalist stance is to develop a new epistemic approach to Russian language and culture. He notes that Russophone communities in post-Soviet societies have proved their political loyalty to their countries and that the Russian language is a double-edged strategic linguistic weapon. Using Ukrainian Russian-language literature as an example, Puleri demonstrates the possibility of disconnecting the Russian language from Russia or even the Russian way of life and completely reorienting it to local cultural scenarios. The hybridization and \"diasporization\" of Russian language and culture open the way to its reconceptualization as World Russians – similar to World Englishes. This perspective necessitates the transformation of Russian studies into a transnational discipline – Russophone studies, limited neither to Russia nor to ethnic Russians.Резюме:Это эссе является частью дискуссионного форума \"Концептуализация общества после модерного территориального государства и нации\". Марко Пулери предлагает новый взгляд на реально существующую, а не гипотетическую форму постнациональной коллективной принадлежности на постсоветском пространстве: \"архипелаг\" русскоязычных сообществ в разных странах. Этот выбор может показаться парадоксальным, учитывая, какую угрозу местным национальным культурам и государственности представляет идеологическая и политическая программа \"русского мира\". Продвигая эту программу, Российская Федерация претендует на суверенитет над всем \"русским\". Пулери утверждает, что единственный способ нейтрализовать эту угрозу и при этом не оказаться в антирусской, но столь же репрессивной и националистической позиции, заключается в выработке нового эпистемологического подхода к русскому языку и культуре. Он отмечает, что русскоязычные сообщества в постсоветских странах доказали политическую лояльность своим правительствам и что русский язык может служить обоюдоострым стратегическим языковым оружием. На примере украинской русскоязычной литературы Пулери демонстрирует возможность растождествления русского языка с Россией и даже русским образом жизни и полной переориентации его на местные культурные сценарии. Гибридизация и \"диаспоризация\" русского языка открывают путь к его переосмыслению в качестве \"мировых русских","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81900085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Imagining Bosnia: Constructions of Bosnian and Bosniak Identity after the War","authors":"Riccardo Nicolosi","doi":"10.1353/imp.2023.0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2023.0009","url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY:This is a contribution to the discussion forum \"Conceptualizing Society after the Modern Territorial State and Nation.\" Riccardo Nicolosi's essay about the Balkan literature of the 1990s has remained unpublished for many years, yet it surprisingly resonates with the current debates in the field formerly known as Russian studies. Nicolosi focuses on Bosnian writers who belong to different generations – Muhamed Filipović, Rusmir Mahmutćehajić, and Dževad Karahasan. In the wake of the devastating Balkan wars, they reflect on the discourse of the Bosnian nation. Responding to Serbian nationalism as the main existential threat, Bosnian intellectuals insisted on the principally different nature of their national community. They characterized the Bosnian nation as multicultural and predicated more on religion than on any other factor. Bosnian specificity was explained by the Ottoman historical legacy and illustrated by somewhat idealized examples of early modern Ottomanism. This cultural repertoire allowed Bosnian intellectuals to criticize exclusive nationalism, embrace cultural tolerance, and advance a more humane version of nationalism. At the same time, this vision was wrought by the fundamental tension between religion and ethnicity as well as between Islamic universalism and Bosnian national separateness. It was also unclear how early modern political forms could be used at the turn of the twenty-first century. Thus, the Ottoman historical repertoire could be used to critique modern exclusive nationalism, but a whole new conceptual language needed to be elaborated to implement an alternative social order.Резюме:Это эссе является частью дискуссионного форума \"Концептуализация общества после модерного территориального государства и нации\". Написанное Риккардо Николози много лет назад и посвященное балканской литературе 1990-х годов, эссе удивительно резонирует с современными дебатами в дисциплине, ранее известной как \"русистика\". Николози уделяет основное внимание трем боснийским писателям, принадлежащим к разным поколениям, – Мухамеду Филиповичу (Muhamed Filipović), Русмиру Махмутчехаичу (Rusmir Mahmutćehajić) и Джеваду Карахасану (Dževad Karahasan). После завершения войн на Балканах они размышляли о новом дискурсе боснийской нации. Реагируя на сербский национализм как на главную экзистенциальную угрозу, боснийские интеллектуалы настаивали на принципиально ином характере своей национальной общности. Они характеризовали боснийскую нацию как мультикультурную и опирающуюся на религию в большей степени, чем на какой-либо другой фактор. Боснийская специфика объяснялась османским историческим наследием и иллюстрировалась несколько идеализированными примерами османизма раннего Нового времени. Этот культурный репертуар позволял боснийским интеллектуалам критиковать эксклюзивный национализм, поддерживать культурную толерантность и продвигать более гуманную версию национализма. В то же время в эту перспективу был заложен фундаментальный конфликт межд","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89307730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"After the Empire, before the Nation-State: The Case of Bessarabia in Transition (1917–1922)","authors":"Svetlana Suveica","doi":"10.1353/imp.2023.0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2023.0010","url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY:This is a contribution to the discussion forum \"Conceptualizing Society after the Modern Territorial State and Nation.\" Svetlana Suveica presents the main takeaways from her book Post-imperial Encounters: Transnational Designs of Bessarabia in Paris and Elsewhere, 1917–1922 (De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2023). The book opens a unique window on the postimperial transition that Suveica characterizes as \"in-betweenness\" – in-between the crumbled Russian Empire and the yet nonexistent nation-state. She focuses on the old imperial and postrevolutionary Bessarabian elites, who were concerned that the new world order, increasingly dominated by nation-states, would obliterate Bessarabia's particularity. The old elites were particularly prone to identifying this particularity with the Russian imperial regime and, therefore, they cherished plans for the restoration of the empire, siding with Russian monarchist émigrés. This was a major miscalculation, since the Russian Whites entertained a nationalist vision of Russia and had little concern for old imperial particularism. Thus, Bessarabian elites found themselves between the two nationalizing projects, Romanian and Russian, and became discontented with their competing claims for assimilating Bessarabia.Резюме:Это эссе является частью дискуссионного форума \"Концептуализация общества после модерного территориального государства и нации\". Светлана Сувейкэ представляет в форуме основные выводы из своей новой книги \"Постимперские встречи: транснациональные проекты Бессарабии в Париже и вне его, 1917–1922\" (De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2023). Книга предлагает уникальную перспективу на ситуацию постимперского транзита, который Сувейкэ характеризует как \"промежуточность\" (in-betweenness) – между рухнувшей Российской империей и еще не существующим национальным государством. В поле ее внимания находятся старая имперская и новая постреволюционная бессарабские элиты, которые были обеспокоены утратой Бессарабией своей обособленности и своеобычности в новом мировом порядке, в котором начинали доминировать национальные государства. Старая элита отождествляла своеобразие Бессарабии с российским имперским режимом и поэтому лелеяла планы восстановления империи, примыкая к русской монархической эмиграции. Этот расчет был основан на заблуждении, потому что русские белоэмигранты придерживались националистических взглядов на Россию и не были заинтересованы в возрождении старого имперского партикуляризма. Таким образом, бессарабские элиты оказались между двумя национализирующими проектами, румынским и русским, испытывая недовольство по поводу их конкурирующих планов по ассимиляции Бессарабии.","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90685320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Переплетенная история города в стране с переплетенной историей","authors":"Михаил Гаухман","doi":"10.1353/imp.2023.0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2023.0016","url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY:This review essay discusses Andrii Portnov's book Dnipro: An Entangled History of a European City (Academic Studies Press, 2022) that won the 2022 Ab Imperio Award for the best study in new imperial history and the history of diversity in Northern Eurasia up to the late twentieth century. The essay places the book in broader historiographic context.","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80921550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}