{"title":"Introduction: What are pretty words?","authors":"Jennifer Syvertsen PhD, MPH, Juliet McMullin PhD","doi":"10.1111/napa.70004","DOIUrl":"10.1111/napa.70004","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Funding agencies and institutions are increasingly requiring researchers to involve communities and make their work more broadly accessible. The problem is that researchers new to health equity research, and sometimes even people who have engaged in this work for a while, may not sufficiently appreciate the challenges and systemic institutional transformations that must occur to achieve equity. To make pretty words meaningful requires a return to the transformative power and potential that was originally imbued in the concept of equity. The implementation of pretty words as a process that requires a relational framework and a commitment beyond ink on paper is central to our intervention. This special section of Annals of Anthropological Practice opens up a critical dialogue about “pretty words,” or concepts like “community-engaged research” and “diversity” that win grants and check the boxes for inclusion, but risk becoming hollow without ongoing conversations between researchers and communities. As anthropologists who study health, we are both skeptical and appreciative of the “pretty words” that characterize our efforts toward developing interdisciplinary research that seeks to build equity and address community health concerns. The power of pretty words can only be activated through reflection that leads to action, but this requires a commitment beyond the institutional expectations and individual rewards of research as usual. The essays in this special section cover diverse topics, but all are conjoined in their pursuit of not just critiquing pretty words, but outlining meaningful ways forward to reclaim the radical potential embedded in these concepts.</p>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/napa.70004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144091786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Research","authors":"Ann Marie Cheney PhD","doi":"10.1111/napa.70009","DOIUrl":"10.1111/napa.70009","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Terms like community engaged research and community-based participatory research risk losing their meaning and significance in health equity research. This article calls attention to potential overuse of such terms in applied health research with historically marginalized populations. Reflecting on essays that advocate for decolonizing research, this article considers ways to engage in research that does not enact epistemicide or the erasure of diverse ways of doing research and knowledge generation, as well as encourages the “deep work” of relationship and trust building. The author argues that research should be an ongoing and reflexive practice that works to dismantle the legacy of colonialism that has dictated, for too long, who does science and research and who generates knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/napa.70009","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144091467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Intersectionality","authors":"Alejandro Echeverria PhD","doi":"10.1111/napa.70000","DOIUrl":"10.1111/napa.70000","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this piece, I explore the “pretty word” of intersectionality to contribute to existing discussions on its usage as an analytical framework and tool among social justice projects. Through my personal queer journey in podcasting, the coming-out experience, and traversing across various spaces, I highlight the importance of incorporating a relational, embodied, and geographic perspective within intersectionality. I reveal how this perspective can unsettle common assumptions about social identities, specifically a fixed view of racialized-sexualized identities and the location of oppressions and privileges. Through various situations, movements, and reflections, I uncover an emerging approach to intersectionality that exists in relation to different spatialities and temporalities rather than in isolation. I reveal the limits of common applications of intersectionality in health equity research while also recognizing the pitfalls that some institutions and social actors fall into while promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion, including the reproduction of common ideas of victimhood and superiority. Ultimately, this article advocates for building new worlds by reworking the ways researchers and communities connect and relate with one another and themselves.</p>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/napa.70000","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144091513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Understanding familial resemblance of fingerprints: Forensic and anthropological aspects","authors":"Akansha Rana, Damini Siwan, Akashdeep Vashisht, Kewal Krishan","doi":"10.1111/napa.12231","DOIUrl":"10.1111/napa.12231","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although fingerprint analysis is widely used in forensic science investigations for personal identification, this unique feature of human beings always has something new to reveal. Genetic factors heavily influence fingerprint formation during embryonic development; therefore, there is a possibility of resemblance or inheritance of fingerprint patterns among the family members. The main objective of the present study is to understand the resemblance of fingerprint patterns among close family members, that is, father, mother, and their children. The study included 134 participants from 20 families of north India. Fingerprints from all the participants were obtained and analyzed for similarities and differences in pattern types between the parents and children to assess their strength of association. The results indicate a significant association (<i>p</i>-value < 0.05) between the fingerprint patterns of the first and second child and their mother. However, no such significance was found between the father and the children. The present study shows that there is a 40% chance of inheritance of fingerprint patterns from the mother to both the children, while the father shows 30% similarity with the first child and only 10% similarity with the second child. Whereas, only 20% of similarity was found among both the siblings. The findings of this preliminary study suggest that in certain circumstances such as mass disasters, cold cases, paternity disputes, missing persons, and so forth, forensic scientists may help to establish connections and corroborate familial relationships by studying the fingerprint patterns of family members.</p>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144091942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Beyond the GenAI gold rush: Mapping entrepreneurial tensions in the age of generative artificial intelligence","authors":"Matt Artz, Yaya Ren","doi":"10.1111/napa.70016","DOIUrl":"10.1111/napa.70016","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) emerges as the latest technological gold rush, this preliminary study examines how entrepreneurs made sense of this transformative moment in the early months of ChatGPT. Through semi-structured interviews with entrepreneurs adopting GenAI, observations of AI creators in Silicon Valley, and computational analysis of our qualitative data, as well as Twitter discourse, we reveal a complex reality beneath the media hype. While Twitter discourse initially showed entrepreneurs aligning with techno-optimistic expectations of their imagined audience, our ethnographic data exposed deeper tensions around job displacement, bias, privacy, alignment, and the more significant ethical and societal implications. The contrast between publicly oriented Twitter data and self-reflective ethnographic data exemplifies the complex ways that entrepreneurs wrestle with their identity as innovators—a tension between public displays of optimism and internal grappling with uncertainty around AI. Drawing on Madsen et al.’s concept of productive friction, we employ this framework in two complementary ways: as an analytical lens for understanding entrepreneurs’ cognitive dissonance and as a methodological principle that deliberately generates tensions through the use of traditional and computational approaches. We argue that these contradictions serve as constructive catalysts for more thoughtful innovation and adoption of Gen AI by forcing critical examination of assumptions and practices. Our mixed-methods approach, therefore, demonstrates a way to capture, analyze, and understand emerging productive frictions surrounding implications for entrepreneurship while contributing to emerging techno-anthropological discourse and approaches for studying technological transformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144091359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Decolonization","authors":"Juliet McMullin PhD","doi":"10.1111/napa.70002","DOIUrl":"10.1111/napa.70002","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Much has been written about decolonizing practices in the academy. This essay engages the conversation by focusing on the analysis phase of research to consider how research continues to be a process of colonization and epistemicide. Advances in community-engaged research (CEnR) ameliorate some issues of inclusion. Yet, institutional procedures and claims to methods that entrench a scientifically enlightened way of knowing continue to systematically exclude Indigenous knowledge and many other systems of knowledge. Indeed, Tuck and Yang's question about what is distinct and sovereign, remains. Drawing on the analysis phase of a CEnR project with Native Americans, we describe our process for centering Indigenous epistemologies. While data gathering and analysis were inclusive, we were not always successful in maintaining the community partner's sovereignty. This example demonstrates the challenges of institutions that long for us to forget that there are other ways of knowing, and the promises of relational thinking and being as anti-oppressive, though not yet decolonized research. Pausing to examine our practices during the analysis phase of research allows us to ask and enact different forms of relationality and reimagine how we come to know.</p>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/napa.70002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144091511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Resilience","authors":"Joshua Liashenko PhD","doi":"10.1111/napa.70001","DOIUrl":"10.1111/napa.70001","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Once a ubiquitous framework for assessing the capacity for recovery, perseverance, and success in the face of adversity, resilience has been met with growing critiques in its application. As a frequently used “pretty word” within health disparities research, resilience has come to signify how at-risk communities overcome hardship in ways this work argues overdetermine their labor, activist potential, and existence. This critique examines resilience through the lens of ethnographic research conducted among transgender and nonbinary healthcare providers who provide gender-affirming care within their communities. As a marginalized community experiencing transphobia and increasing structural barriers to life-affirming and life-saving healthcare, trans healthcare workers embody many tenets of resilience in how they are recast as medical authorities rather than victims. The aim of this intervention is to disentangle socio-cultural meanings and expectations associated with the application of resilience. This work argues resilience presupposes colonial and cis-heteronormative progress narratives in which trans people's capacity to overcome oppression renders their labor and advocacy as tied to perceived static conditions of transphobia. Through reexamining the use of resilience in health disparities research, researchers can better center communities in which they are engaged while avoiding monolithic representation and uncritical interpretation of oppressive systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/napa.70001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144091512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Ethnographies of global health governance and diplomacy: A practical guide","authors":"Rachel Irwin","doi":"10.1111/napa.70014","DOIUrl":"10.1111/napa.70014","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the past two decades, medical anthropology has increasingly turned its attention to the global, including ethnographic fieldwork at global health mega-events and the processes behind global health initiatives. Similar developments have taken place in political and legal anthropology, with researchers looking at United Nations organizations, transnational epistemic communities, and other global sites of policy-making. Ethnographic methods have also become popular in International Relations, particularly in research on diplomatic practices. Despite the need for and interest in ethnographic research on global health diplomacy, governance, and politics, there are practical and ethical challenges to doing fieldwork in “global” spaces. In this essay, I discuss defining and accessing the field, everyday life in the field, and ethical challenges. I draw upon examples from over a decade of fieldwork at and around the World Health Organization (WHO). I also discuss how other ethnographers have approached global health diplomacy, governance, and politics.</p>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/napa.70014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144091696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Inclusion","authors":"Grecia L. Perez","doi":"10.1111/napa.70006","DOIUrl":"10.1111/napa.70006","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Economic inclusion is generally regarded as a desirable goal for historically marginalized communities, but a critical reading of this goal raises important questions: who is included and/or excluded? And what are the power relations that structure decisions about the form of inclusivity in any economic development process? In this essay, I reflect on my community-engaged research with Just San Bernardino (Just SB), a coalition of nine community-based and union organizations that formed in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic to redefine initiatives toward genuine forms of economic inclusion. This research documented long-standing community frustrations and mismatched understandings of priorities among communities, grant-making organizations, and governmental agencies. The research led Just SB to develop a <i>People's Plan for an Inclusive Economy</i> and a companion <i>People's Dictionary</i> to lay the groundwork for a shared understanding of key terms and their goals. Reflecting on this grassroots research process, I suggest that economic inclusion has no monolithic definition, but rather must be grounded in multiple social worldviews if we are to generate meaningful change.</p>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/napa.70006","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144091514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Education","authors":"Yolanda Moses PhD","doi":"10.1111/napa.70010","DOIUrl":"10.1111/napa.70010","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in the university are increasingly valorized, but have we made progress in supporting diverse faculty and students? Synthesizing contributions in this issue that advocate for meaningful faculty diversity and genuine forms of care in the university, this essay reflects on why, even after decades of such diversity initiatives, higher education still struggles with the underrepresentation of minority scholars. Even as legal frameworks such as the Government Issued Bill (GI Bill) (in its seven iterations to date) have shifted toward greater inclusion and the Civil Rights movement opened new pathways that continue to expand today, we must go beyond counting diverse bodies in the academy toward meaningful practices that allow diverse scholars to thrive. Drawing on Moten and Harney's notion of the undercommons urges us to reflect and take action in our own teaching and research roles in the system to build spaces of radical refusal and collective dissent that challenge traditional ideas about the role of the university in society. Such a project requires centering students in their own learning, putting higher education within a larger late capitalism neoliberal context, and holding administrators accountable for their leadership and support of diversity initiatives. Collectively, such actions have the potential to move the university toward the sustained and genuine diversity and inclusion efforts we need to remain relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144091466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}