Perspectives on Behavior Science最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Monte Carlo Analyses for Single-Case Experimental Designs: An Untapped Resource for Applied Behavioral Researchers and Practitioners 蒙特卡罗分析的单一案例实验设计:一个未开发的资源应用行为研究人员和实践者
IF 2 3区 心理学
Perspectives on Behavior Science Pub Date : 2021-11-24 DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00318-7
Jonathan E. Friedel, Alison D. Cox, Ann Galizio, Melissa J. Swisher, Megan L. Small, Sofia Perez
{"title":"Monte Carlo Analyses for Single-Case Experimental Designs: An Untapped Resource for Applied Behavioral Researchers and Practitioners","authors":"Jonathan E. Friedel, Alison D. Cox, Ann Galizio, Melissa J. Swisher, Megan L. Small, Sofia Perez","doi":"10.1007/s40614-021-00318-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-021-00318-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44993,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Behavior Science","volume":"45 1","pages":"209 - 237"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"52671540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Student Procrastination on an E-learning Platform: From Individual Discounting to Group Behavior. 电子学习平台上的学生拖延:从个人折扣到群体行为。
IF 2 3区 心理学
Perspectives on Behavior Science Pub Date : 2021-11-19 eCollection Date: 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00321-y
Michel B C Sokolowski, François Tonneau
{"title":"Student Procrastination on an E-learning Platform: From Individual Discounting to Group Behavior.","authors":"Michel B C Sokolowski,&nbsp;François Tonneau","doi":"10.1007/s40614-021-00321-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-021-00321-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most applied research on delay discounting has focused on substance use disorders, eating, or gambling. In comparison, the issue of procrastination has received little interest from quantitative behavior analysts. In the present study, conducted on an e-learning platform, a group of 295 psychology students completed a series of four tests. The students could choose the day and hour on which they completed the tests, the deadline for each test being separated from the previous one by a period of 30 days. Most students completed the test in the last days before the deadline. The group response profile across days, reminiscent of fixed-interval scalloping, was well described formally by a hyperbola, replicating previous results by Howell et al. (2006). Also, the students' individual degree of procrastination showed stability across tests, in accordance with the notion of discounting as a persistent behavioral trait, and was negatively correlated with the students' grades. Finally, the shape of the scallop observed at the group level was consistent with a lognormal density of individual degrees of impulsivity, as measured by people's delay-discounting parameter.</p>","PeriodicalId":44993,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Behavior Science","volume":" ","pages":"621-640"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8739410/pdf/40614_2021_Article_321.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39735644","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Further Analysis of Advanced Quantitative Methods and Supplemental Interpretative Aids with Single-Case Experimental Designs. 进一步分析高级定量方法和单例实验设计的辅助解释工具。
IF 2.5 3区 心理学
Perspectives on Behavior Science Pub Date : 2021-10-22 eCollection Date: 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00313-y
John Michael Falligant, Michael P Kranak, Louis P Hagopian
{"title":"Further Analysis of Advanced Quantitative Methods and Supplemental Interpretative Aids with Single-Case Experimental Designs.","authors":"John Michael Falligant, Michael P Kranak, Louis P Hagopian","doi":"10.1007/s40614-021-00313-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-021-00313-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reliable and accurate visual analysis of graphically depicted behavioral data acquired using single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) is integral to behavior-analytic research and practice. Researchers have developed a range of techniques to increase reliable and objective visual inspection of SCED data including visual interpretive guides, statistical techniques, and nonstatistical quantitative methods to objectify the visual-analytic interpretation of data to guide clinicians, and ensure a replicable data interpretation process in research. These structured data analytic practices are now more frequently used by behavior analysts and the subject of considerable research within the field of quantitative methods and behavior analysis. First, there are contemporaneous analytic methods that have preliminary support with simulated datasets, but have not been thoroughly examined with nonsimulated clinical datasets. There are a number of relatively new techniques that have preliminary support (e.g., fail-safe <i>k</i>), but require additional research. Other analytic methods (e.g., dual-criteria and conservative dual criteria) have more extensive support, but have infrequently been compared against other analytic methods. Across three studies, we examine how these methods corresponded to clinical outcomes (and one another) for the purpose of replicating and extending extant literature in this area. Implications and recommendations for practitioners and researchers are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":44993,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Behavior Science","volume":"45 1","pages":"77-99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8894533/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142044179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Some Characteristics and Arguments in Favor of a Science of Machine Behavior Analysis 支持建立机器行为分析科学的一些特点和论据
IF 2 3区 心理学
Perspectives on Behavior Science Pub Date : 2021-10-21 DOI: 10.1007/s40614-022-00332-3
M. Lanovaz
{"title":"Some Characteristics and Arguments in Favor of a Science of Machine Behavior Analysis","authors":"M. Lanovaz","doi":"10.1007/s40614-022-00332-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-022-00332-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44993,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Behavior Science","volume":"45 1","pages":"399 - 419"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42474353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Correction to: How to Be RAD: Repeated Acquisition Design Features that Enhance Internal and External Validity. 纠正:如何成为RAD:重复获取设计特征,提高内部和外部有效性。
IF 2 3区 心理学
Perspectives on Behavior Science Pub Date : 2021-10-19 eCollection Date: 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00320-z
Megan S Kirby, Trina D Spencer, John Ferron
{"title":"Correction to: How to Be RAD: Repeated Acquisition Design Features that Enhance Internal and External Validity.","authors":"Megan S Kirby,&nbsp;Trina D Spencer,&nbsp;John Ferron","doi":"10.1007/s40614-021-00320-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-021-00320-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00301-2.].</p>","PeriodicalId":44993,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Behavior Science","volume":" ","pages":"705"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8738835/pdf/40614_2021_Article_320.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39750447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to: Cochran's Q Test of Stimulus Overselectivity within the Verbal Repertoire of Children with Autism. 更正:科克伦 Q 测试自闭症儿童口语曲目中的刺激过度选择性。
IF 2 3区 心理学
Perspectives on Behavior Science Pub Date : 2021-10-18 eCollection Date: 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00319-6
Lee Mason, Maria Otero, Alonzo Andrews
{"title":"Correction to: Cochran's Q Test of Stimulus Overselectivity within the Verbal Repertoire of Children with Autism.","authors":"Lee Mason, Maria Otero, Alonzo Andrews","doi":"10.1007/s40614-021-00319-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-021-00319-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00315-w.].</p>","PeriodicalId":44993,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Behavior Science","volume":"45 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8894519/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139940900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cochran's Q Test of Stimulus Overselectivity within the Verbal Repertoire of Children with Autism. 科克伦 Q 测试自闭症儿童口语曲目中的刺激过度选择性。
IF 2.5 3区 心理学
Perspectives on Behavior Science Pub Date : 2021-09-15 eCollection Date: 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00315-w
Lee Mason, Maria Otero, Alonzo Andrews
{"title":"Cochran's Q Test of Stimulus Overselectivity within the Verbal Repertoire of Children with Autism.","authors":"Lee Mason, Maria Otero, Alonzo Andrews","doi":"10.1007/s40614-021-00315-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40614-021-00315-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stimulus overselectivity remains an ill-defined concept within behavior analysis, because it can be difficult to distinguish truly restrictive stimulus control from random variation. Quantitative models of bias are useful, though perhaps limited in application. Over the last 50 years, research on stimulus overselectivity has developed a pattern of assessment and intervention repeatedly marred by methodological flaws. Here we argue that a molecular view of overselectivity, under which restricted stimulus control has heretofore been examined, is fundamentally insufficient for analyzing this phenomenon. Instead, we propose the use of the term \"overselectivity\" to define temporally extended patterns of restrictive stimulus control that have resulted in disproportionate populations of responding that cannot be attributed to chance alone, and highlight examples of overselectivity within the verbal behavior of children with autism spectrum disorder. Viewed as such, stimulus overselectivity lends itself to direct observation and measurement through the statistical analysis of single-subject data. In particular, we demonstrate the use of the Cochran <i>Q</i> test as a means of precisely quantifying stimulus overselectivity. We provide a tutorial on calculation, a model for interpretation, and a discussion of the implications for the use of Cochran's <i>Q</i> by clinicians and researchers.</p>","PeriodicalId":44993,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Behavior Science","volume":"45 1","pages":"101-121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8894513/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"52671301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Real Problem with Hypothetical Constructs. 假设构念的真正问题。
IF 2 3区 心理学
Perspectives on Behavior Science Pub Date : 2021-09-13 eCollection Date: 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00311-0
José E Burgos
{"title":"The Real Problem with Hypothetical Constructs.","authors":"José E Burgos","doi":"10.1007/s40614-021-00311-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-021-00311-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A recent discussion in this journal revolved around the issue of whether postulating internal clocks is harmful or beneficial to scientific psychology, and how. I argue that this and other discussions on the topic have yet to address the real problem: The concept of a hypothetical construct is unintelligible. Psychologists agree that all entities that constitute hypothetical constructs are unobservable, importantly different from observable entities, including overt behavior and its environment. The root issue at hand here, then, is the observable-unobservable distinction. Psychologists have implicitly but erroneously taken it for granted as sufficiently unproblematic to warrant meaningful discussions based on it, when in fact it is a pernicious untenable remnant of logical positivism. All previous discussions of hypothetical constructs in psychology have overlooked arguments against this view in the philosophy of science. These arguments are sufficiently compelling to at least question, if not cease altogether, talk of observability, unobservability, and HCs in psychology as useless, even harmful.</p>","PeriodicalId":44993,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Behavior Science","volume":" ","pages":"683-704"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8738803/pdf/40614_2021_Article_311.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39750446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
The Evidence is in the Design. 证据就在设计中。
IF 2 3区 心理学
Perspectives on Behavior Science Pub Date : 2021-09-03 eCollection Date: 2021-09-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00309-8
Janet S Twyman
{"title":"The Evidence is in the Design.","authors":"Janet S Twyman","doi":"10.1007/s40614-021-00309-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-021-00309-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To better understand the effectiveness of Direct Instruction (DI), the empirical base related to DI's instructional design components (explicit teaching, judicious selection and sequencing of examples) and principles (identifying big ideas, teaching generalizable strategies, providing mediated instruction, integrating skills and concepts, priming background knowledge, and providing ample review) are analyzed. Attention is given to the converging evidence supporting the design characteristics of DI, which has broad applicability across different disciplines, teaching methodologies, and perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":44993,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Behavior Science","volume":"44 2-3","pages":"195-223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476665/pdf/40614_2021_Article_309.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39504028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Whatever the Kid Does Is the Truth: Introduction to the Special Section on Direct Instruction. 无论孩子做什么都是真理:直接教学特别章节导言。
IF 2 3区 心理学
Perspectives on Behavior Science Pub Date : 2021-08-30 eCollection Date: 2021-09-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00314-x
William L Heward, Janet S Twyman
{"title":"Whatever the Kid Does Is the Truth: Introduction to the Special Section on Direct Instruction.","authors":"William L Heward, Janet S Twyman","doi":"10.1007/s40614-021-00314-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40614-021-00314-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44993,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Behavior Science","volume":"44 2-3","pages":"131-138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476699/pdf/40614_2021_Article_314.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39505535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信