发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Analytic Epistemology and Armchair Psychology 分析认识论与扶手椅心理学
IF 0.4 3区 文学
Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition Pub Date : 2023-01-20 DOI: 10.1007/s12136-022-00537-w
Marian David
{"title":"Analytic Epistemology and Armchair Psychology","authors":"Marian David","doi":"10.1007/s12136-022-00537-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12136-022-00537-w","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Critical comments on Guido Melchior’s book, <i>Knowing and Checking: An Epistemological Investigation</i> (2019). In the second part of his book, Melchior aims to employ his sensitivity account of the epistemic concept of <i>checking</i> to explain well-known puzzle cases about <i>knowing</i>. My comments focus on Melchior’s explanation of knowledge-closure puzzles, as exemplified by Dretske’s zebra case. I raise three critical points about the explanation Melchior proposes for puzzles of this type.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44390,"journal":{"name":"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12136-022-00537-w.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48621361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Cogito, Dreamt Characters, and Unreal Existence 我思、梦境人物与虚幻存在
IF 0.4 3区 文学
Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition Pub Date : 2023-01-12 DOI: 10.1007/s12136-023-00543-6
Michael-John Turp
{"title":"The Cogito, Dreamt Characters, and Unreal Existence","authors":"Michael-John Turp","doi":"10.1007/s12136-023-00543-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12136-023-00543-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\u0000</h2><div><p>Borges’ <i>The Circular Ruins</i> tells the story of a magician who turns out to be a character in a dream. Leibowitz (2021) argues that this scenario undermines the rational indubitability of Descartes’ <i>Cogito</i>. The magician, he argues, is an unreal appearance and therefore does not exist. I argue that Borges drew a distinction between reality and existence and that he was right to do so. There are various senses of reality and the sense in which a dreamt character is unreal poses no threat to their existence or to the indubitability of the <i>Cogito</i>. The magician is unreal because he is a mind-dependent, illusory and fake. Nonetheless, he can be certain that he thinks, therefore he is.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":44390,"journal":{"name":"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12136-023-00543-6.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43686244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Replies to the Critics of Knowing and Checking: an Epistemological Investigation 对“知道与检验”批判的回答:认识论的考察
IF 0.4 3区 文学
Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition Pub Date : 2023-01-04 DOI: 10.1007/s12136-022-00541-0
Guido Melchior
{"title":"Replies to the Critics of Knowing and Checking: an Epistemological Investigation","authors":"Guido Melchior","doi":"10.1007/s12136-022-00541-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12136-022-00541-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper replies to the comments made in <i>Acta Analytica</i> by Peter Baumann, Kelly Becker, Marian David, Nenad Miščević, Wes Siscoe, and Danilo Šuster on my <i>Knowing and Checking: An Epistemological Investigation</i> (Routledge 2019), hereinafter abbreviated as KC. These papers resulted from a workshop organized by the department of philosophy of the University of Maribor. I am very thankful to the organizers of the workshop and to the authors for their comments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44390,"journal":{"name":"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12136-022-00541-0.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10825186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Value Approaches to Virtue and Vice: Intrinsic, Instrumental, or Hybrid? 美德与罪恶的价值取向:内在的、工具的还是混合的?
IF 0.4 3区 文学
Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition Pub Date : 2023-01-03 DOI: 10.1007/s12136-022-00542-z
Timothy Perrine
{"title":"Value Approaches to Virtue and Vice: Intrinsic, Instrumental, or Hybrid?","authors":"Timothy Perrine","doi":"10.1007/s12136-022-00542-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12136-022-00542-z","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>According to one tradition, the virtues and vices should be understood in terms of their relation to value. But inside this tradition, there are three distinct proposals: virtues are intrinsically valuable; virtues are instrumentally valuable; or a hybrid proposal on which virtues are either intrinsically or instrumentally valuable. In this paper, I offer an alternative proposal inside this tradition. I propose that virtues and vices should be understood in terms of the degreed properties of being virtuous and being vicious, which I analyze in terms of the value and disvalue of actions and attitudes. I defend my proposal as the best inside this tradition by showing how it is immune from standard problems the other three proposals face.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44390,"journal":{"name":"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44677093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Précis on Knowing and Checking: an Epistemological Investigation 认识与检验的实践:认识论研究
IF 0.4 3区 文学
Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition Pub Date : 2022-12-27 DOI: 10.1007/s12136-022-00540-1
Guido Melchior
{"title":"Précis on Knowing and Checking: an Epistemological Investigation","authors":"Guido Melchior","doi":"10.1007/s12136-022-00540-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12136-022-00540-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this Précis, I provide an overview of my <i>Monograph Knowing and Checking: An Epistemological Investigation</i> (Melchior 2019), which is subject to a book symposium organized by the University of Maribor. This volume in <i>Acta Analytica</i> contains contributions by Peter Baumann, Kelly Becker, Marian David, Nenad Miščević, Robert Weston Siscoe, and Danilo Šuster along with my replies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44390,"journal":{"name":"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12136-022-00540-1.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10825187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Relativism and Intracultural Conflict 相对主义与文化冲突
IF 0.4 3区 文学
Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition Pub Date : 2022-12-26 DOI: 10.1007/s12136-022-00539-8
Michael Wreen
{"title":"Relativism and Intracultural Conflict","authors":"Michael Wreen","doi":"10.1007/s12136-022-00539-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12136-022-00539-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A number of arguments against moral relativism are based on the reality of intracultural conflict or the related possibility of sliding down a slippery slope and out the door of morality altogether. The first batch of arguments draws upon the evident fact that cultures are not unitary or homogenous but contain subgroups at odds with each other. The second batch is based on the claim that if moral truth is relativized to a culture, consistency demands that it eventually be relativized to the individual, and with that comes the end of morality. In this paper, (A) moral relativism is first defined, clarified, and defended—these preliminaries being necessary, given what follows—and (B) the common but infrequently discussed arguments mentioned above are distinguished, exposed, explained, evaluated, and ultimately rejected.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44390,"journal":{"name":"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41700066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Descartes vs. the Scholastics: Lessons from Contemporary Philosophy and Cognitive Neuroscience 笛卡尔与经院哲学家:来自当代哲学和认知神经科学的教训
IF 0.4 3区 文学
Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI: 10.1007/s12136-022-00536-x
Yakir Levin
{"title":"Descartes vs. the Scholastics: Lessons from Contemporary Philosophy and Cognitive Neuroscience","authors":"Yakir Levin","doi":"10.1007/s12136-022-00536-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12136-022-00536-x","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract  </h2><div><p>The\u0000demise of the scholastic worldview and the rise of the mechanistic one may give the impression of a parallel demise of the scholastic explanatory framework. In this paper, I argue that this impression is wrong. To this end, I first outline Descartes’ representative and particularly sharp mechanistic criticism of the scholastic notion of explanation. Deploying conceptual machinery from contemporary philosophy of science, I then suggest a reconstruction of the scholastic notion that is immune to Descartes’ criticism. Based on this reconstruction, I reinterpret the dispute between Descartes and the scholastics as one that concerns the extent of two legitimate conceptions of explanation. Finally, I outline a contemporary dispute within cognitive neuroscience that reflects the Cartesian-scholastic one as thus reinterpreted, thereby showing that aspects of the world may well require a scholastic-like approach for their explanation. The aim of this paper, then, is to shed light on a most important philosophical-<i>cum</i>-scientific historical controversy from a modern perspective, but also to highlight the deep historical roots of a related contemporary dispute. Based on this, the paper also seeks to draw a substantial philosophical conclusion concerning the issue under dispute in both controversies.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":44390,"journal":{"name":"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12136-022-00536-x.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44032852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Checking and the Argument from Inquiry 校核与探究论证
IF 0.4 3区 文学
Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition Pub Date : 2022-10-19 DOI: 10.1007/s12136-022-00532-1
Robert Weston Siscoe
{"title":"Checking and the Argument from Inquiry","authors":"Robert Weston Siscoe","doi":"10.1007/s12136-022-00532-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12136-022-00532-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44390,"journal":{"name":"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42675176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Classic Inherence Theory of Attributes: Its Theses and Their Errors 经典属性内在论的命题及其错误
IF 0.4 3区 文学
Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition Pub Date : 2022-10-07 DOI: 10.1007/s12136-022-00534-z
D. W. Mertz
{"title":"The Classic Inherence Theory of Attributes: Its Theses and Their Errors","authors":"D. W. Mertz","doi":"10.1007/s12136-022-00534-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12136-022-00534-z","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Primary to both ontology and epistemology is the attributional union that properties and relations have with their subjects. Yet, the tradition’s understanding of attribution has been assessed as shallow, and its contemporary analysis deemed locked in a non-progressing stalemate. Central here is the historically dominant <b><i>in</i></b><i>herence</i>/<i>constituent</i> construal of attribution, what, I argue, has remained obscure and unattended as to its background assumptions and their implications. On the analysis offered herein, I make precise and detail errors of the defining assumptions of inherence theory and the <i>two-tiered nature</i> it requires of attribution. Brought into relief will be the four elements involved in every attributional union, and what are the errors in a sequence of collapsing identities among them that define inherence theory. Along the way, clarification and warrant is provided for the alternative theses and their implications defining an <b><i>ad</i></b><i>herence</i> theory of attribution, key features synopsized in the last section.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44390,"journal":{"name":"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46486362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Cognitive Basis of the Conditional Probability Solution to the Value Problem for Reliabilism 可靠性值问题条件概率解的认知基础
IF 0.4 3区 文学
Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition Pub Date : 2022-10-05 DOI: 10.1007/s12136-022-00533-0
Erik J. Olsson, Trond A. Tjøstheim, Andreas Stephens, Arthur Schwaninger, Maximilian Roszko
{"title":"The Cognitive Basis of the Conditional Probability Solution to the Value Problem for Reliabilism","authors":"Erik J. Olsson,&nbsp;Trond A. Tjøstheim,&nbsp;Andreas Stephens,&nbsp;Arthur Schwaninger,&nbsp;Maximilian Roszko","doi":"10.1007/s12136-022-00533-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12136-022-00533-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The value problem for knowledge is the problem of explaining why knowledge is more valuable than mere true belief. The problem arises for reliabilism in particular, i.e., the externalist view that knowledge amounts to reliably acquired true belief. Goldman and Olsson argue that knowledge, in this sense, is more valuable than mere true belief due to the higher likelihood of future true beliefs (produced by the same reliable process) in the case of knowledge. They maintain that their solution works given four empirical assumptions, which they claim hold “normally.” However, they do not show that their assumptions are externalistically acceptable; nor do they provide detailed evidence for their normality claim. We address these remaining gaps in Goldman and Olsson’s solution in a constructive spirit. In particular, we suggest an externalist interpretation of the assumptions such that they essentially spell out what it means for a broad range of organisms capable of belief-like representations to be epistemically adapted to their environment. Our investigation also sheds light on the circumstances in which the assumptions fail to hold and knowledge therefore fails to have extra value in Goldman and Olsson’s sense. The upshot is a deeper understanding of their solution as a contribution to naturalized epistemology and a strengthened case for its empirical validity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44390,"journal":{"name":"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12136-022-00533-0.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46598328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信