{"title":"Guardians of the Archive and the Memory of War in Soviet Films After the Thaw","authors":"Violeta Davoliūtė","doi":"10.1177/16118944261463977","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16118944261463977","url":null,"abstract":"This article identifies a sub-genre of the Soviet war film: a quartet of feature films released between 1964 and 1967 ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Enemy of the State</jats:italic> , <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">I Want to Believe</jats:italic> , <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Someone Else</jats:italic> ' <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">s Name</jats:italic> , and <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Dissenting Opinion</jats:italic> ) that centre on unmasking former Nazi collaborators. Produced in the USSR's western borderlands during the pivotal transition from the Khrushchev Thaw to Brezhnev-era conservatism, these films served as a cultural arena for negotiating the memory of the Great Patriotic War. They introduce a new cinematic hero: the investigator as a guardian of the archive. This figure – whether a male KGB officer, journalist, or prosecutor – embodies the post-Stalinist security apparatus's methodological shift from crude terror towards more sophisticated, prophylactic modes of social control. Using sincerity and forensic reason as strategic tools, these protagonists reinforce the state's authority as the ultimate arbiter of historical truth. The analysis traces how this archetype evolves across the four films, from an infallible state avenger to a professional who corrects bureaucratic errors and ensures that historical justice prevails. While these films helped inaugurate the Brezhnevite cult of victory, they simultaneously reveal the very anxieties they sought to quell regarding flawed archives, state fallibility and the unresolved legacy of wartime collaboration.","PeriodicalId":44275,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern European History","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148768497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Family Rift: The Brothers Johannes and Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi Between the World Wars, 1918–1939","authors":"Vaclav Horčička","doi":"10.1177/16118944261470181","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16118944261470181","url":null,"abstract":"The article provides an insightful exploration of the intellectual world of Central European aristocracy in the interwar period. Using the example of two members of the Coudenhove-Kalergi family – Pan-European Union founder Richard and his older brother Johannes – it examines how the family navigated the challenges of a highly turbulent era. It compares the approaches of the two brothers, as well as those of other family members, to the political, national and economic issues facing Central Europe. The article highlights the significance of their family background in shaping their personalities, outlining their personal strategies while also pointing out both differences and shared traits. It demonstrates that, while the brothers had a strong connection to Japan through their mother, who was of Japanese origin, they remained part of the broader Germanic milieu of Central Europe. However, they were not nationalists; on the contrary, they viewed the efforts of some nations within the former Austro-Hungarian Empire to break away from the monarchy with disdain. At the same time, the article shows that during this period, they were only half-hearted monarchists, with neither envisioning the future of Central Europe as lying in the restoration of Habsburg rule. Furthermore, the article reveals that although Johannes and Richard did not agree on political or personal matters, their fundamental ideological orientation was not significantly different. Both opposed antisemitism but were critical of liberal democracy and expressed sympathies for far-right dictatorships, particularly the Italian regime, with Johannes even showing an affinity for Nazism. In this respect, both brothers (especially Johannes) could be described as conservative revolutionaries, though they diverged on essential details.","PeriodicalId":44275,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern European History","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148709602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Power of Documents and the Genealogy of Distrust: An Introduction","authors":"Walter Sperling, Gintarė Malinauskaitė","doi":"10.1177/16118944261465603","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16118944261465603","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44275,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern European History","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148552782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Russian Writer Tolstoy, Ukrainian Filmmaker Dovzhenko and Professor Nikolaev: How the Soviet Intelligentsia Shaped the Documentation of Nazi Crimes in Liberated Kharkiv","authors":"Nathalie Moine","doi":"10.1177/16118944261463976","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16118944261463976","url":null,"abstract":"Using the biographical method, the article follows three members of the Soviet intelligentsia whose paths crossed in liberated Kharkiv: Lev Nikolaev, a professor of medicine and resident of the city who continued to keep a diary under Nazi occupation; Alexei Tolstoy, the famous writer who visited the liberated city as a member of the Soviet Extraordinary Investigation Commission on Nazi crimes, receiving, among other things, a copy of Nikolaev's occupation diary, and the filmmaker Oleksandr Dovzhenko, whose teams filmed Professor Nikolaev for his documentary on liberated Ukraine. These three figures represent distinct socio-cultural backgrounds and political views, despite their shared public allegiance to Stalinism. As the article will show, their contributions to Soviet documentation of Nazi crimes were intertwined with their differing visions of both the Nazi occupation and the future of Soviet Ukraine, and, at the same time, overshadowed by their own positioning within Stalinist terror.","PeriodicalId":44275,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern European History","volume":"158 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2026-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148538977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"War Crime Evidence and Cold War Games: The 1978 Miami Trial of a Soviet Treblinka Guard","authors":"Vanessa Voisin","doi":"10.1177/16118944261463974","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16118944261463974","url":null,"abstract":"Nazi crimes prosecutions for most crimes committed in Eastern Europe – including the extermination centres on occupied Polish territory – depended heavily upon evidence that could only be gathered in the countries of the Soviet bloc. Recent scholarship has addressed the extent to which the Cold War dynamics impeded, or, on the contrary, fostered East-West cooperation in the punishment of Nazi war criminals, particularly after the death of Stalin and the opening of a new stage in the history of Nazi crimes accountability (the Ulm trial of 1958 and the Jerusalem trial of 1961). This article uses the case of a former Ukrainian SS guard and Trawniki man, Fedorenko, to reflect on the Soviet strategy of discrediting the Western countries that unwillingly or unknowingly offered shelter to perpetrators in the immediate postwar years.","PeriodicalId":44275,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern European History","volume":"216 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148409012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Subways and Citizens. Negotiating Citizenship Through Greater Stockholm's Subway System (1950s–1970s)","authors":"André Klaassen","doi":"10.1177/16118944251413936","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16118944251413936","url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that Greater Stockholm's subway system functioned as a material space to govern passengers into diligent welfare citizens, fit for life in a modern Swedish welfare society. It also shows that this was a contingent process, which was marked by conflicting answers to the moral question of how to live and how to act. Beginning with the expansion of the subway system in postwar Stockholm, the article explores how its development aligned with ideals of collectivism and social welfare. It then analyses the use of cultural and commercial policies, as well as disciplinary strategies to educate passengers into conforming and informed commuter citizens. Finally, the article addresses how countercultural protest groups challenged these prescribed subject positions by using the subway in ways that transgressed the virtues of welfare subjectivity. By materializing citizenship through Greater Stockholm's subway system, this article highlights how the terms and conditions of life in a modern Swedish welfare society were formulated, challenged and negotiated through seemingly mundane practices, such as commuting, and spaces, like Stockholm's modern subway system.","PeriodicalId":44275,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern European History","volume":"12 1","pages":"194-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2026-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148285641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Liquidating Architecture: Demolition and the Danish ‘Ghetto’, 1960 to 2018","authors":"Jennifer Mack","doi":"10.1177/16118944261439682","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16118944261439682","url":null,"abstract":"The Danish government's notorious 2018 policy document, ‘One Denmark without Parallel Societies’, targeted dozens of neighbourhoods as ‘ghettos’ and proposed solutions to eradicate them: privatisations, renovations and, most controversially, demolitions. In this article, I trace discourse and policies in government documents over the period from the 1960s to 2018 to follow their promotion of three forms of ‘liquidation’ <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">(afvikling).</jats:italic> First, modernist housing and landscapes built during mid- and late twentieth century signalled tangible evidence of welfare-state triumphs and ideals of utopian social progress through construction in concrete, turning liquid concrete to solid housing. By the 1980s and 1990s, such districts were understood as ‘problems’ to be solved through legislation and social programs and possible sites of liquid capital accumulation. Finally, the government has recently argued for their demolition, yet relied on stigmatizing descriptions and dubious statistics, including the areas’ numbers of so-called ‘non-Western’ residents to promote this ‘liquidation’ ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">afvikling</jats:italic> ). In following this history, I probe how demolition evolved into a preferred and celebrated means of addressing social conditions and unwanted (modernist) architecture, along with its construction in words, not walls.","PeriodicalId":44275,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern European History","volume":"9 1","pages":"164-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2026-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148285642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexander Nützenadel, Nikolaus Wolf, Heike Wieters, Mathieu Fulla, Aleksandra Komornicka, Silvia von Steinsdorff, Hartmut Kaelble
{"title":"Contentious Integration: Conflicts in the History of the European Union","authors":"Alexander Nützenadel, Nikolaus Wolf, Heike Wieters, Mathieu Fulla, Aleksandra Komornicka, Silvia von Steinsdorff, Hartmut Kaelble","doi":"10.1177/16118944261441165","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16118944261441165","url":null,"abstract":"This Forum examines conflict as a constitutive feature of European integration, challenging the view that current tensions are unprecedented. It adopts a long-term perspective, emphasizing how enduring conflicts over distribution, identity, and political sovereignty shape the integration process, particularly during periods of enlargement and institutional change. Drawing on diverse historical case studies, the contributions analyse how these tensions manifest across social groups, political institutions, and economic actors.","PeriodicalId":44275,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern European History","volume":"184 1","pages":"124-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2026-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148290260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reimagining the Fabric of Community: Dense-Low Housing Architecture as a Medium for Decentralization and Civic Participation in 1970s Welfare Denmark","authors":"Mikkel Høghøj","doi":"10.1177/16118944261439688","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16118944261439688","url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to examine the intersection of dense-low housing architecture and welfare politics in 1970s Denmark. Although scholars have investigated the role of architecture and housing in the expansion of the welfare state and later neoliberal restructurings, little attention has been given to the ways in which dense-low housing architecture and non-profit housing estates more broadly functioned as experimental platforms for the reimagining of community and decentralization in the context of the welfare state's crisis in the period. Focusing on two housing estates – Galgebakken and Gadekæret – the article identifies two central linkages between housing architecture, shifting welfare values and everyday life. First, the article shows how the design of Galgebakken and Gadekæret intertwined with the implementation of new models for resident democracy in the non-profit housing sector, rendering the housing estates as central sites for developing the meaning of local democracy and civic participation in everyday life. Secondly, the article points to the importance of emotions, particularly nostalgia, in shaping how non-profit housing architecture could emerge as models for community-making and civic participation in 1970s Denmark. In exploring these linkages, the article not only shows how non-profit housing estates came to work as platforms for envisioning, interpreting and practising new welfare values of community and decentralization on an everyday scale, but it also demonstrates the capacity of housing architecture in mediating new relations between materiality, emotions and welfare.","PeriodicalId":44275,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern European History","volume":"22 1","pages":"218-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148285656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Pram Countries: Baby Carriages From Symbols of Good Motherhood to Gender Equal Parenting in the Nordic Countries","authors":"Byron Z. Rom-Jensen","doi":"10.1177/16118944261440005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16118944261440005","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores prams and strollers, also called baby carriages and buggies, as material objects and fabricated images in the Nordic region. Prams are frequently associated with a Nordic gender equality model, a development that this article argues is of recent vintage. For much of the late-19th and 20th centuries, prams in the Nordic countries were linked primarily with motherhood, despite shifting notions of what constituted childcare, gender roles and the welfare state. In tracing the development of prams, their usage and the narratives that surrounded them, this article examines prams’ evolution from highly gendered objects to avatars of Nordic exceptionality. Pram usage came to represent vital characteristics of a new Nordic model that developed around the turn of the millennium and which carried a reputation for equality between men and women, including in gender-neutral parenting. In following these developments, the article contends that the history of prams presents a useful perspective for exploring the material contestations and the impact of welfare states, as well as the Nordic model concept.","PeriodicalId":44275,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern European History","volume":"33 1","pages":"239-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148285662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}