Putting Women on a Pedestal: Rethinking Female Inclusion in Colonial Monuments

IF 0.8 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
Emma Dhondt
{"title":"Putting Women on a Pedestal: Rethinking Female Inclusion in Colonial Monuments","authors":"Emma Dhondt","doi":"10.1177/16118944251348776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As with many other types of public sculptures, there is a near-total absence of colonial monuments showing women, demonstrating a public failure to recognise their impact as colonisers and colonised people. When included at all, women are often portrayed as allegorical figures in colonial monuments. Their place is at the side-lines, serving and celebrating male colonial heroes. Indeed, very rarely is a woman at the centre of a colonial monument. But there are such monuments too. Two statues of Hannah Duston, an English colonist in North America, are illustrative examples of this; they have also become contested after the Rhodes Must Fall protests. However, recent attempts to decolonise public spaces have also increasingly tried to feminise them, not only by replacing contested monuments but by adding new female figures. This article examines how women have been included in colonial monuments by addressing both past and recent portrayals in different countries. It addresses questions of and relationships between colonial power, identity and gender, showing parallels and divergences in female inclusion in colonial monuments across different places and times.","PeriodicalId":44275,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern European History","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern European History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16118944251348776","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As with many other types of public sculptures, there is a near-total absence of colonial monuments showing women, demonstrating a public failure to recognise their impact as colonisers and colonised people. When included at all, women are often portrayed as allegorical figures in colonial monuments. Their place is at the side-lines, serving and celebrating male colonial heroes. Indeed, very rarely is a woman at the centre of a colonial monument. But there are such monuments too. Two statues of Hannah Duston, an English colonist in North America, are illustrative examples of this; they have also become contested after the Rhodes Must Fall protests. However, recent attempts to decolonise public spaces have also increasingly tried to feminise them, not only by replacing contested monuments but by adding new female figures. This article examines how women have been included in colonial monuments by addressing both past and recent portrayals in different countries. It addresses questions of and relationships between colonial power, identity and gender, showing parallels and divergences in female inclusion in colonial monuments across different places and times.
把女性放在基座上:重新思考女性在殖民纪念碑中的地位
与许多其他类型的公共雕塑一样,这里几乎完全没有展示女性的殖民纪念碑,这表明公众未能认识到她们作为殖民者和被殖民者的影响。即使被包括在内,女性也经常被描绘成殖民纪念碑中的寓言人物。她们的位置是站在边线,为男性殖民英雄服务和庆祝。事实上,很少有女性出现在殖民纪念碑的中心。但也有这样的纪念碑。北美的英国殖民者汉娜·达斯顿(Hannah Duston)的两座雕像就是一个很好的例子;在“罗德岛必须沦陷”抗议活动之后,它们也受到了质疑。然而,最近公共空间去殖民化的尝试也越来越多地试图使其女性化,不仅通过取代有争议的纪念碑,还通过增加新的女性形象。本文通过解决不同国家过去和最近的描绘,探讨了妇女是如何被纳入殖民纪念碑的。它解决了殖民权力、身份和性别之间的问题和关系,展示了不同地点和时代殖民纪念碑中女性包容的相似之处和差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信