{"title":"Introduction: The Problem of a Philosophical Rendering of Nature and Hegel’s Philosophy of the Real","authors":"Wes Furlotte","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435536.003.0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435536.003.0001","url":null,"abstract":"-The monograph begins with an historical introduction to the problem of nature in German idealism. Subsequently, the chapter outlines the holistic quality of Hegel’s thought, and the importance he repeatedly assigns to nature within his own system. It argues that if Hegel’s system is to be taken seriously then it must be reconsidered it in terms of that which contemporary scholarship has excluded, i.e. his conception of nature. The wager is that such a move allows for a critically (re-)reading of Hegel against Hegel, offering an entirely different understanding of his late philosophy. Consequently, the book proposes to (1) generate a careful reconstruction of Hegel’s conception of nature in order to (2) critically explore what such a conception of nature must mean when considered in relation to what he advances concerning the constitution of subjectivity and social freedom. This proposal establishes the coordinates for the remainder of the monograph. The introduction functions as a break with traditional Hegel scholarship that begins with his logic (an onto-logic) and then reads the remainder of his final system in terms of the abstract dictates of ‘the concept.’ This project fundamentally concerns Hegel’s Philosophy of the Real (Realphilosophie), the actuality of nature and culture.","PeriodicalId":441197,"journal":{"name":"The Problem of Nature in Hegel's Final System","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129424781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Assimilation and the Problems of Sex, Violence, and Sickness unto Death","authors":"Wes Furlotte","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435536.003.0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435536.003.0005","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter intensifies the problem of the animal organism’s over-determination by external variables. The chapter concentrates on Hegel’s analyses of eating, sex, violence, sickness and, ultimately, death. These phenomena exemplify how the animal organism is perpetually given over to external circumstances that threaten its self-perpetuating activity. Taken together they indicate, for Hegel, the truth of organic life: it must die. Organic life must prove a necessary yet insufficient condition for the life of conceptuality proper. In other words, the life of spirit requires embodiment and more. Conceptuality can only come into a robust self-relation in something that is, simultaneously, anticipatorily grounded in nature and yet, irreducible to those grounds. The space in which such self-mediation occurs is what Hegel refers to as the life of spirit (Geist). The self-grounding system of thought proper does not find sufficient existence in the natural world because the radical exteriority of the latter is hostile to the auto-dictates of conceptuality, its self-grounding basis. The chapter concludes with a question: what must this ‘monstrous’ conception of nature mean for human culture, specifically finite subjectivity and socio-political freedom?","PeriodicalId":441197,"journal":{"name":"The Problem of Nature in Hegel's Final System","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126077455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Crime, the Negation of Right, and the Problem of European Colonial Consciousness","authors":"Wes Furlotte","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435536.003.0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435536.003.0012","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter develops an acute sense of the contingency that necessarily unfolds in the wake of Hegel’s account of personhood, specifically in terms of the structure of contract. In the pursuit of one’s own interests in terms of property, Hegel’s analysis leads to the inevitability of exchange amongst persons (contract). The chapter aims to demonstrate that because contracts are contingent upon persons’ self-interests they are prone to violation: one may just as well respect their contract as violate it. Right, framed in terms of contract, dialectically mutates into wrong and crime. The chapter that the natural dimension of the individual, understood as immediate drive etc., is crucial to criminal violations of right. Subsequently, the chapter develops a sustained critical reading of Hegel on this speculative rendering of the structure of crime. Drawing from key theorists in postcolonial and critical race studies, the chapter accentuates the problematic colonial impulse permeating Hegel’s position, exposes the ways in which it grounds criminality in the ‘natural’, ‘metaphysical’ depth of the juridical subject.","PeriodicalId":441197,"journal":{"name":"The Problem of Nature in Hegel's Final System","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115926558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Instability of Space-Time and the Contingency of Necessity","authors":"Wes Furlotte","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435536.003.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435536.003.0003","url":null,"abstract":"The second chapter shifts from a general outline of the thesis concerning nature’s extrinsicality in order to substantiate its plausibility. It begins with a reconstruction of the basal categories with which Hegel’s philosophy of nature begins, i.e. space and time. Hegel frames space and time in terms of indeterminacy and externality such that we cannot speak of a distinct unit(y), or internality, of space or time, both features which are crucial to conceptuality and subjectivity. In this special sense, Hegelian nature begins in a void. Space-time displays an utter failure at auto-articulation. The chapter then outlines the duplicitous signification of Hegel’s analysis. It argues that while Hegel’s analysis is fundamentally concerned with conceptual discourse it is not solely concerned with discourse. Consequently, at an ontological level, the striking contingency of Hegelian nature. There is no necessity in advance that this or that thing emerges though definite ones certainly do, e.g. the objects of physics and those of mechanics. Instead, there is a contingent array of objects that thought references and then must, retroactively, construct an account of their necessary interrelations. However, this necessity is one that is posited retroactively and so displays the contingency of thought’s narrative concerning necessity.","PeriodicalId":441197,"journal":{"name":"The Problem of Nature in Hegel's Final System","volume":"9 27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125439345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Problem of Nature’s Spurious Infinite within the Register of Animal Life","authors":"Wes Furlotte","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435536.003.0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435536.003.0004","url":null,"abstract":"Moving to Hegel’s writings on “Organics”, this chapter develops an acute sense of the paradoxical implications that follow from the fundamental exteriority and indeterminacy characteristic of Hegelian nature. Concentrating on Hegel’s writings on animal life, the chapter reveals that the organism’s self-referential structure is consistently given over to various forms of external determination that analogically reflect the externality permeating the categories of space and time. This collapse into exteriority proves dangerous to the interiority constituting organic life. By extension, such collapse is dangerous to the animal organism’s status as one of the primary upsurges of freedom within the matrices of material nature. The upshot of Hegel’s account of organic life is revealingly significant: nature’s exteriority and indeterminacy function as crucial preconditions for the emergence of freedom within nature and yet they also serve to perpetually threaten the very reality of that same freedom. This paradoxical tension constitutes a fundamental problem which the remainder of the monograph seeks to systematically explore, both in terms of Hegel’s anthropology and political philosophy.","PeriodicalId":441197,"journal":{"name":"The Problem of Nature in Hegel's Final System","volume":"183 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131891004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Treatment as (re-)Habituation: From Psychopathology to (re-)Actualised Subjectivity","authors":"Wes Furlotte","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435536.003.0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435536.003.0009","url":null,"abstract":"Chapter eight outlines how Hegel’s analysis seeks to overcome the problem of nature entailed by his conception of mental illness. It offers, therefore, a reconstruction of Hegel’s analysis of the category of habit. The chapter outlines the duplicitous signification of habit. First, habit expresses spirit’s liberating activity. It binds, unifies, the body’s manifold of instincts and drives as a singular whole. Second, spirit’s reconstructive activity takes the shape of a natural effect. The chapter argues that Hegel’s concept of habit shows itself as crucial to the problem of psychopathology and therefore nature: it combines the multitude of natural drives etc. within the unified simplicity of a subjective totality. Habit, therefore, is the grounding process that allows for the stabilized (re-)emergence of the subject out of its over-immersion in natural determinations. A close reading of habit, however, reveals that there is nothing that guarantees the problem of nature has been permanently ‘sublated.’ To the contrary, the chapter contends that what Hegel’s analysis shows is how closely bound the problem of nature is to his conception of finite subjectivity and freedom. Taking this to be the case allows for this question: how does nature factor in objective spirit, i.e. the political register?","PeriodicalId":441197,"journal":{"name":"The Problem of Nature in Hegel's Final System","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125002498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"An Introduction to the Problem of Surplus Repressive Punishment","authors":"Wes Furlotte","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435536.003.0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435536.003.0010","url":null,"abstract":"Opening Part III, chapter nine begins historically. It situates Hegel’s political writings in relation to Hobbes, Rousseau, Kant, and to a lesser degree Fichte. Paying careful attention to the Philosophy of Right’s full title, and its introduction, while also acknowledging both “metaphysical” and “non-metaphysical” readings of Hegel’s political philosophy, the chapter gestures towards Hegel’s account of “Abstract Right”, specifically the category of personhood, as a fertile point of departure for pursuing the problem of nature from within Hegel’s political philosophy.","PeriodicalId":441197,"journal":{"name":"The Problem of Nature in Hegel's Final System","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130146716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The ‘Non-Whole’ of Hegelian Nature: Extrinsicality and the Problems of Sickness and Death","authors":"Wes Furlotte","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435536.003.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435536.003.0002","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter outlines the rejection that has followed Hegel’s philosophy of nature for the last two hundred years. It stresses how, when considered at all, Hegel’s writings on nature are read to be derived from Schelling’s innovations in nature-philosophy. The consequences have been dire for Hegel’s account of nature. Either (1) scholars downplay its relevance, or; (2) they read it in terms of a ‘strong’ correspondence between nature, on the one hand, and the movements of thought, on the other. Therefore, the chapter argues, we do not know what a distinctly Hegelian reading of Hegel’s position might look like, let alone offer. Fundamentally challenging these entrenched interpretations, the chapter underlines the repeated textual evidence that allows one to read Hegel’s philosophy of nature in exactly the opposite direction. Consequently, the chapter emphasizes passages throughout the entirety of the text characterizing nature as weak, impotent (Ohnmacht), and even irrational. The chapter thereby clears the space for a distinct reading of Hegelian nature: it is reticent to the systematic dictates of conceptuality and therefore lacks the encompassing necessity demanded by thought.","PeriodicalId":441197,"journal":{"name":"The Problem of Nature in Hegel's Final System","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128796017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Embodiment: Spirit, Material– Maternal Dependence, and the Problem of the in utero","authors":"Wes Furlotte","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435536.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435536.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"Chapter six, in turn, begins to critically read Hegel against Hegel. It reads his notion of spirit (beginning with finite subjectivity) in terms of the concept of nature established in Part I. The chapter argues that the problem nature poses for subjective spirit presents itself in two ‘symptomatic’ moments of Hegel’s anthropology. First, in his analysis of subjectivity’s embodiment, its “primordial grasp on the world.” Second, in his analysis of the fetus-mother dynamic. Reconstructing both analyses, the chapter argues that they reveal spirit as over-immersed in exterior determinations and unable to assert itself as an autarkic center, as subject. Over-immersion in its environmental milieu, the chapter argues, is the problem of spirit’s origins, i.e. the problem of nature. It must move beyond this displacement in externality. However, there are no facile guarantees that this will transpire in the concrete actuality of life. Therefore, the origin of spirit is a developmental confrontation with nature and a protracted attempt to break with it.","PeriodicalId":441197,"journal":{"name":"The Problem of Nature in Hegel's Final System","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121154294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Conclusion: Freedom within Two Natures, or, the Nature–Spirit Dialectic in the Final System","authors":"Wes Furlotte","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435536.003.0014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435536.003.0014","url":null,"abstract":"Concluding, the monograph attempts to address the major objections that might be raised against this rereading of Hegel’s final system. Specifically, it responds to the claim that such a reading conflates the inchoate activity of spirit in nature with nature itself and so proceeds by way of conflation. Resisting this criticism, the conclusion returns to crucial passages from Hegel’s writings on nature that explicitly characterize nature as impotent and radically external—two features antithetical to the concept of spirit. Consequently, the conclusion argues that there must be a reticent independence assigned to the domain of nature that is not the result of misreading Hegel’s mature philosophy. Instead, this reticence is the very expression of material nature and it functions as a problem for the project of spirit, a problem which permeates the entirety of Hegel’s final system, specifically his philosophy of the real (Realphilosophie). The conclusion then highlights three symptomatic expressions of nature’s paradoxical and problematic status. Subsequently, the conclusion also shows how spirit’s project of freedom persistently transgresses two distinct senses of nature.","PeriodicalId":441197,"journal":{"name":"The Problem of Nature in Hegel's Final System","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115716493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}