{"title":"Assessing beyond grades: unravelling the implications on student learning and engagement in higher education","authors":"Keai Lim","doi":"10.1080/02602938.2024.2314703","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2314703","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":437516,"journal":{"name":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","volume":" 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139790639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessment: a call to reconsider the “originality” of students’ work","authors":"Jiahui Luo (Jess)","doi":"10.1080/02602938.2024.2309963","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2309963","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":437516,"journal":{"name":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139806283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessment: a call to reconsider the “originality” of students’ work","authors":"Jiahui Luo (Jess)","doi":"10.1080/02602938.2024.2309963","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2309963","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":437516,"journal":{"name":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","volume":"12 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139866482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"ChatGPT performance on multiple choice question examinations in higher education. A pragmatic scoping review","authors":"P. Newton, Maira Xiromeriti","doi":"10.1080/02602938.2023.2299059","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2299059","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":437516,"journal":{"name":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139527199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Evolution of feedback ecology: reshaping students’ conceptions and practices in feedback literacy","authors":"A. Tam","doi":"10.1080/02602938.2023.2246701","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2246701","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":437516,"journal":{"name":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114729837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
P. Dawson, Zi Yan, A. Lipnevich, Joanna Tai, D. Boud, Paige Mahoney
{"title":"Measuring what learners do in feedback: the feedback literacy behaviour scale","authors":"P. Dawson, Zi Yan, A. Lipnevich, Joanna Tai, D. Boud, Paige Mahoney","doi":"10.1080/02602938.2023.2240983","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2240983","url":null,"abstract":"Feedback can be powerful, but its effects are dependent on what students do. There has been intensive research in recent years under the banner of ‘feedback literacy’ to understand how to help students make the most of feedback. Although there are instruments to measure feed-back literacy, they largely measure perceptions and orientations rather than what learners actually do. This paper documents the development and validation of the Feedback Literacy Behaviour Scale (FLBS), which is a self-report instrument intended to measure students’ feedback behaviours. A framework for feedback literacy was constructed with five factors: Seek Feedback information (SF), Make Sense of information (MS), Use Feedback information (UF), Provide Feedback information (PF), and Manage Affect (MA). An initial set of 45 questions were reviewed in an iterative process by feedback experts, resulting in 39 questions that were trialled with 350 student participants from four countries. Our final survey of 24 questions was generally supported by confirmatory factor and Rasch analyses, and has acceptable test-retest reliability. The FLBS provides a more robust way for educators and researchers to capture behavioural indicators of feed-back literacy and the impact of interventions to improve it.","PeriodicalId":437516,"journal":{"name":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129632719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexandra Farazouli, T. Cerratto Pargman, K. Bolander-Laksov, C. McGrath
{"title":"Hello GPT! Goodbye home examination? An exploratory study of AI chatbots impact on university teachers’ assessment practices","authors":"Alexandra Farazouli, T. Cerratto Pargman, K. Bolander-Laksov, C. McGrath","doi":"10.1080/02602938.2023.2241676","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2241676","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":437516,"journal":{"name":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","volume":"143 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126916249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Exploring Chinese EFL undergraduates’ academic emotions in giving and receiving peer feedback on writing","authors":"Wenlei Zhu, Shulin Yu, Yao Zheng","doi":"10.1080/02602938.2023.2235635","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2235635","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract From a positive psychology perspective, this case study explores learners’ academic emotions in giving and receiving peer feedback on second language writing and the possible influences of emotions on learners’ uptake of peer feedback. The data were collected from five undergraduates at a Chinese university, including semi-structured interviews, stimulated recalls, peer feedback, students’ essays and observation notes. Using content analysis, the study revealed 24 academic emotions, including positive, neutral and negative emotions. Positive emotions were found to improve the number and quality of revisions, whereas negative emotions could not necessarily impede learners’ revision operations. The findings suggest the dynamic interplay among learners’ positive emotions, positive characteristics and harmonious writing community.","PeriodicalId":437516,"journal":{"name":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127880870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The impact of rubrics and scripts on self-regulation, self-efficacy and performance in collaborative problem-solving tasks","authors":"J. Fraile, María Gil-Izquierdo, Eva Medina-Moral","doi":"10.1080/02602938.2023.2236335","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2236335","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Rubrics and scripts are tools that can promote self-assessment. Although similar, rubrics and scripts differ in the metacognitive processes they support, their cognitive demands, how students use them and their focus. While there is ample evidence of the positive effects of rubrics, there is less research on the impact of scripts and their use in collaborative tasks. We aimed to compare the effects of rubrics and scripts on self-regulation, self-efficacy, academic performance and students’ perceptions when used in group tasks on econometrics. A total of 134 university students participated in a quasi-experiment under three conditions (rubrics, scripts, control). Positive effects on self-regulation were found for the experimental groups, and a positive impact on self-efficacy only for the rubric group. Additionally, as previous academic performance differed among conditions, difference-in-differences analysis was employed. In the rubric condition, the students that started from very high levels of academic achievement benefited more from using the rubric. In contrast, in the script condition, it was the students with intermediate or high levels of academic performance who experienced the greatest benefits from employing the script.","PeriodicalId":437516,"journal":{"name":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117125860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}