Sivakumar Balasubramanian, Sandeep Guguloth, Javeed Shaikh Mohammed, S Sujatha
{"title":"A self-aligning end-effector robot for individual joint training of the human arm.","authors":"Sivakumar Balasubramanian, Sandeep Guguloth, Javeed Shaikh Mohammed, S Sujatha","doi":"10.1177/20556683211019866","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683211019866","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Intense training of arm movements using robotic devices can help reduce impairments in stroke. Recent evidence indicates that independent training of individual joints of the arm with robots can be as effective as coordinated multi-joint arm training. This makes a case for designing and developing robots made for training individual joints, which can be simpler and more compact than the ones for coordinate multi-joint arm training. The design of such a robot is the aim of the work presented in this paper.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An end-effector robot kinematic design was developed and the optimal robot link lengths were estimated using an optimization procedure. A simple algorithm for automatically detecting human limb parameters is proposed and its performance was evaluated through a simulation study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A six-degrees-of-freedom end-effector robot with three actuated degrees-of-freedom and three non-actuated self-aligning degrees-of-freedom for safe assisted training of the individual joints (shoulder or elbow) of the human arm was conceived. The proposed robot has relaxed constraints on the relative positioning of the human limb with respect to the robot. The optimized link lengths chosen for the robot allow it to cover about 80% of the human limb's workspace, and possess good overall manipulability. The simple estimation procedure was demonstrated to estimate human limb parameters with low bias and variance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The proposed robot with three actuated and three non-actuated degrees-of-freedom has a compact structure suitable for both the left and right arms without any change to its structure. The proposed automatic estimation procedure allows the robot to safely apply forces and impose movements to the human limb, without the need for any manual measurements. Such compact robots have the highest potential for clinical translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"8 ","pages":"20556683211019866"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/42/94/10.1177_20556683211019866.PMC8459188.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39475383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Zoe A Bamber, Patrick C Wheeler, Ian D Swain, Daniel Tp Fong
{"title":"Effect of 8-week treadmill running with peroneal muscle functional electrical stimulation on laterally deviated centre of plantar pressure position and star excursion balance test performance.","authors":"Zoe A Bamber, Patrick C Wheeler, Ian D Swain, Daniel Tp Fong","doi":"10.1177/20556683211021526","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683211021526","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ankle sprain is a common injury that can have long-term sequelae resulting in pain, swelling and a reduction of physical activity participation. Previous research has shown a laterally deviated centre of pressure (COP) during running gait increases the risk of lateral ankle sprain. As a method of altering COP, electrical stimulation has been considered.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A group of 14 healthy males were randomly allocated to case control groups which were single blinded. The intervention involved an 8-week training programme of functional electrical stimulation to the peroneal muscles during treadmill running, with a sham control group. Outcomes were COP position and star excursion balance test. Statistical analysis was through SPSS using a combination of MANOVA, T-tests and Wilcoxon signed rank.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in the results post intervention at max pressure for intervention M = 0.7(±0.7) and control M = -6.0 (±4.6) conditions; t(6) = -2.9, p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It has been demonstrated that FES can alter COP during max pressure in running gait after an 8-week training programme, although carry over effect appears limited and further testing is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"8 ","pages":"20556683211021526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/e1/10.1177_20556683211021526.PMC8381417.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39359246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Leire Ortiz-Fernandez, Charlotte Magnusson, Agustin Gutierrez Ruiz, Lorea Martinez Indart, Joana Sagastagoya Zabala, Juan Andres Alava Menica, Eunate Arana Arri
{"title":"Exploring attitudes towards use of technology to support stroke survivors living at home: A quantitative and qualitative content analysis study in Spain.","authors":"Leire Ortiz-Fernandez, Charlotte Magnusson, Agustin Gutierrez Ruiz, Lorea Martinez Indart, Joana Sagastagoya Zabala, Juan Andres Alava Menica, Eunate Arana Arri","doi":"10.1177/20556683211019690","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683211019690","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to better understand the attitudes towards the use of technology to support chronic stroke survivors in a home-based setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative study was used on the data obtained from a face to face survey with the sample group, incorporating quantitative statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported positive attitudes towards using technology for their own independent health management. The purpose of the home-based technology was different: source of information, supporting self-management, pharmacological treatment reminders… and differed according to age, educational level and survivor disability. Installing devices and sharing information remains a challenge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>100% of stroke survivors living in the community with any type of disability, reported that they would like to use technology as a tool to help improve their health status.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"8 ","pages":"20556683211019690"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8381459/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39359243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Holly Wilson-Jene, Anand Mhatre, Joseph Ott, Benjamin Krider, Clair Smith, Lauren Terhorst, Jonathan Pearlman
{"title":"Rolling resistance of casters increases significantly after two years of simulated use.","authors":"Holly Wilson-Jene, Anand Mhatre, Joseph Ott, Benjamin Krider, Clair Smith, Lauren Terhorst, Jonathan Pearlman","doi":"10.1177/20556683211025149","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683211025149","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Manual wheelchair propulsion is associated with upper limb pain and injury, and clinical guidelines recommend minimizing propulsive force to lower health risks. One of the strategies to reduce propulsive force is by minimizing rolling resistance (RR). Product testing studies suggest that RR of casters is affected by wear and tear which could have implications on the health risk of wheelchair users. The study will investigate the relationship between caster RR and environmental exposure using standard testing protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RR of ten casters representing a range of diameters for different models of wheelchairs were measured before and after environmental exposure that includes corrosion, shock and abrasion simulating two years of community use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four casters exhibited failures during durability testing, one catastrophically. Increases to RR after corrosion, shock and abrasion exposure were statistically significant using mixed-effects modeling, and four casters had increased RR greater than 20%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many of the casters evaluated exhibited increased RR forces and failure after environmental exposure. Improved caster design and use of corrosion resistant materials may reduce these failures. In addition, modification of the provision process could include replacement casters to reduce failures and avoid breakdowns that leave manual wheelchair users stranded or injured.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"8 ","pages":"20556683211025149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/81/0c/10.1177_20556683211025149.PMC8365014.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39324127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Letter to the editor.","authors":"Andreas Kannenberg, Andreas Hahn","doi":"10.1177/2055668320981355","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2055668320981355","url":null,"abstract":"Dear Professor Johnson, As representatives of one of the manufacturers whose products were investigated, we would like to comment on the paper of J.H. Campbell, et al., “OASIS I: Retrospective analysis of four different microprocessor knee types”, published in the Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology Engineering 2020, Volume 7, pages 1–10. We commend the authors for their impressive study that is a valuable contribution to the body of evidence as it confirms the generalizability of smaller studies with microprocessorcontrolled knees (MPK) to real-life conditions in a large sample and assessed injurious falls that may serve as a solid foundation for future costeffectiveness analyses. We congratulate the authors on the big achievement to have completed a study with 602 participants successfully. Nevertheless, we believe that some points in the paper require clarification. First, the authors refer to their study as “retrospective” as the most important aspect of the study design. However, we think it would be more important to note that the study design was crosssectional, which has considerable consequences for the interpretation of data and foundation of conclusions. By nature, cross-sectional study designs assess outcomes at only one point in time and, thus, do not allow for any conclusions on causal relationships to explain the results. Therefore, all the interpretations and conclusions offered by the authors should have been clearly marked as hypotheses that require further study to confirm or reject rather than facts supported by the results. Therefore, it would have been appropriate to also discuss other possible explanations for the results, especially in lieu of the claimed “absence of bias”. Second, as there is no information on the baseline status of the patients included, the study was unable to control for a potential clinician bias in the selection of the different MPK. If clinicians preferred a certain MPK for patients with increased risk of falling and lower baseline mobility, the “parity” of outcomes would conceal a clear difference in effects of the four MPK on injurious falls and mobility. This limitation is important as there is comparative evidence that has already demonstrated that there are meaningful technical and functional differences between the MPK (e.g. Bellmann et al., 2010; Thiele et al., 2014; Thiele et al., 2019; Bellmann et al., 2019). Thus, another hypothesis to explain the results could have been that the Hanger prosthetists apparently choose MPK wisely when fitting their patients, making sure that the final outcomes of patients with different levels of baseline mobility are not significantly different. Third, we find the use of the term “parity” confusing and scientifically inadequate. “Parity” is more of a legal rather than a scientific term. The established statistical approaches to compare the differential effects and outcomes of similar interventions are equivalence and non-inferiority. However,","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"8 ","pages":"2055668320981355"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2055668320981355","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39273174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
James H Campbell, Phillip M Stevens, Shane R Wurdeman
{"title":"Response to: Letter to editor regarding: OASIS 1: Retrospective analysis of four different microprocessor knee types by Campbell et al.","authors":"James H Campbell, Phillip M Stevens, Shane R Wurdeman","doi":"10.1177/20556683211022232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683211022232","url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, Thank you for the opportunity to address the comments recently submitted in response to our recently published analysis: “OASIS 1: Retrospective analysis of four different microprocessor knee types.” The letter clearly articulates five points of discussion to which we would address our response. First, regarding the assertion that we refer to the retrospective nature of our study as the most important aspect of the study design, this is incorrect. It is specifically the cross-sectional nature of the study design that is most salient. The letter notes “cross-sectional study designs assess outcomes at only one point in time and, thus, do not allow for any conclusions on causal relationships to explain the results.” We would submit that we are very clear to not note causality, and indeed pose many statements in hypothetical context. For example, regarding findings with mobility, we have deliberately noted that the data would ‘suggest that when improved mobility is considered a primary aim for MPK prescription’ clinicians could consider all models of knees. The suggestive language is preferred over stronger, more absolute language. The authors of the letter later comment on the potential for clinically meaningful differences with relation to the findings for injurious falls despite lack of statistical significance. They suggest we “neglected” these differences, and that we “stopped short of drawing the conclusion.” We agree with the emphasis on clinically meaningful differences. However, the two statements made in the letter are contradictory as initially the letter places emphasis on posing discussion points more as hypotheses needing further testing. The language throughout the manuscript is consistent, the data would ‘suggest that when stability and falls reduction is considered a primary aim for MPK prescription’, clinicians may consider the C-Leg or Orion. Regarding “absence of bias,” we are misquoted in the letter. The manuscript specifically states “absent of potential bias due to manufacturer funding or publication.” Nowhere within the manuscript do we state that the study is without bias. As mentioned within the manuscript, the study design carries inherent biases such as selection bias, and our falls questionnaire is subject to recall bias. There is also potential for observation bias with patients performing outcomes for their clinicians. We contend, while manufacturers certainly publish studies with attempts at minimizing bias, there will always be a need for additional studies that would not carry the same potential for confirmation bias, or pressure of publication bias. In the second point of the letter, it is noted that the “study was unable to control for a potential clinician bias in the selection of the different MPK.” We acknowledged selection bias in the manuscript, but there is great value in the increased ecological validity when examining the outcomes of more than 600 MPK users. The third point raised in the letter","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"8 ","pages":"20556683211022232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/20556683211022232","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39273176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Grigore Burdea, Nam Kim, Kevin Polistico, Ashwin Kadaru, Doru Roll, Namrata Grampurohit
{"title":"Novel integrative rehabilitation system for the upper extremity: Design and usability evaluation.","authors":"Grigore Burdea, Nam Kim, Kevin Polistico, Ashwin Kadaru, Doru Roll, Namrata Grampurohit","doi":"10.1177/20556683211012885","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20556683211012885","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Design and test the usability of a novel virtual rehabilitation system for bimanual training of gravity supported arms, pronation/supination, grasp strengthening, and finger extension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A robotic rehabilitation table, therapeutic game controllers, and adaptive rehabilitation games were developed. The rehabilitation table lifted/lowered and tilted up/down to modulate gravity loading. Arms movement was measured simultaneously, allowing bilateral training. Therapeutic games adapted through a baseline process. Four healthy adults performed four usability evaluation sessions each, and provided feedback using the USE questionnaire and custom questions. Participant's game play performance was sampled and analyzed, and system modifications made between sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants played four sessions of about 50 minutes each, with training difficulty gradually increasing. Participants averaged a total of 6,300 arm repetitions, 2,200 grasp counts, and 2,100 finger extensions when adding counts for each upper extremity. USE questionnaire data averaged 5.1/7 rating, indicative of usefulness, ease of use, ease of learning, and satisfaction with the system. Subjective feedback on the custom evaluation form was 84% favorable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel system was well-accepted, induced high repetition counts, and the usability study helped optimize it and achieve satisfaction. Future studies include examining effectiveness of the novel system when training patients acute post-stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"8 ","pages":"20556683211012885"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1c/53/10.1177_20556683211012885.PMC8373277.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39334753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ann David, StephenSukumaran ReethaJanetSureka, Sankaralingam Gayathri, Salai Jeyseelan Annamalai, Selvaraj Samuelkamleshkumar, Anju Kuruvilla, Henry Prakash Magimairaj, Skm Varadhan, Sivakumar Balasubramanian
{"title":"Quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units.","authors":"Ann David, StephenSukumaran ReethaJanetSureka, Sankaralingam Gayathri, Salai Jeyseelan Annamalai, Selvaraj Samuelkamleshkumar, Anju Kuruvilla, Henry Prakash Magimairaj, Skm Varadhan, Sivakumar Balasubramanian","doi":"10.1177/20556683211019694","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683211019694","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accelerometry-based activity counting for measuring arm use is prone to overestimation due to non-functional movements. In this paper, we used an inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based gross movement (GM) score to quantify arm use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this two-part study, we first characterized the GM by comparing it to annotated video recordings of 5 hemiparetic patients and 10 control subjects performing a set of activities. In the second part, we tracked the arm use of 5 patients and 5 controls using two wrist-worn IMUs for 7 and 3 days, respectively. The IMU data was used to develop quantitative measures (total and relative arm use) and a visualization method for arm use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the characterization study, we found that GM detects functional activities with 50-60% accuracy and eliminates non-functional activities with >90% accuracy. Continuous monitoring of arm use showed that the arm use was biased towards the dominant limb and less paretic limb for controls and patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The gross movement score has good specificity but low sensitivity in identifying functional activity. The at-home study showed that it is feasible to use two IMU-watches to monitor relative arm use and provided design considerations for improving the assessment method.<b>Clinical trial registry number:</b> CTRI/2018/09/015648.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"8 ","pages":"20556683211019694"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/20556683211019694","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39208378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Madeline Hallewell, Davide Salanitri, Mirabelle D'Cruz, Sue Cobb, Lorenzo Picinali, Emily Frost, Stefano Tamascelli, Harshada Patel
{"title":"Dartanan: Prototype evaluations of a serious game to engage children in the calibration of their hearing aid functionalities.","authors":"Madeline Hallewell, Davide Salanitri, Mirabelle D'Cruz, Sue Cobb, Lorenzo Picinali, Emily Frost, Stefano Tamascelli, Harshada Patel","doi":"10.1177/20556683211021527","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683211021527","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It is notoriously difficult to obtain a perfect fitting of hearing aids (HAs) for children as they often struggle to understand their hearing loss well enough to discuss the fitting adequately with their audiologist. Dartanan is an 'edutainment' game developed to help children understand the functions of their HA in different sound contexts. Dartanan also has elements of a leisure game for all children, in order to create an inclusive activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Game prototypes were evaluated during two formative evaluations and a summative evaluation. In total 106 children with and without hearing loss in Italy, Spain and the UK played Dartanan. A built-in virtual HA enabled children with hearing loss to use headphones to play.<b>Results and conclusions:</b> During the formative stages, feedback was discussed during focus groups on factors such as the audiological aspects, the extent to which children learned about HA functions, accessibility and usability, and this feedback was presented to the developers. After redevelopment, a summative evaluation was performed using an online survey. It was concluded that the game had met the goals of helping children understand their HA functionalities and providing an inclusive activity. User-evaluations were crucial in the development of the app into a useful and useable service.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"8 ","pages":"20556683211021527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/20556683211021527","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39208379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anuprita Kanitkar, Sanjay T Parmar, Tony J Szturm, Gayle Restall, Gina Rempel, Nilashri Naik, Neha Gaonkar, Nariman Sepehri, Bhavana Ankolekar
{"title":"Reliability and validity of a computer game-based tool of upper extremity assessment for object manipulation tasks in children with cerebral palsy.","authors":"Anuprita Kanitkar, Sanjay T Parmar, Tony J Szturm, Gayle Restall, Gina Rempel, Nilashri Naik, Neha Gaonkar, Nariman Sepehri, Bhavana Ankolekar","doi":"10.1177/20556683211014023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683211014023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A computer game-based upper extremity (CUE) assessment tool is developed to quantify manual dexterity of children with Cerebral Palsy (CP). The purpose of this study was to determine test-retest reliability of the CUE performance measures (success rate, movement onset time, movement error, and movement variation) and convergent validity with the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale version 2 (PDMS-2) and the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five children with CP aged four to ten years were tested on two occasions two weeks apart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CUE performance measures of five chosen object manipulation tasks exhibited high to moderate intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) values. There was no significant difference in the CUE performance measures between test periods. With few exceptions, there was no significant correlation between the CUE performance measures and the PDMS-2 or the QUEST test scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high to moderate ICC values and lack of systematic errors indicate that the CUE assessment tool has the ability to repeatedly record reliable performance measures of different object manipulation tasks. The lack of a correlation between the CUE and the PDMS-2 or QUEST scores indicates that performance measures of these assessment tools represent distinct attributes of manual dexterity.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"8 ","pages":"20556683211014023"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/20556683211014023","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39090847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}