Technological risks and ethical implications of using robots in long-term care.

IF 2 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Lillian Hung, Jim Mann, Jennifer Perry, Annette Berndt, Joey Wong
{"title":"Technological risks and ethical implications of using robots in long-term care.","authors":"Lillian Hung,&nbsp;Jim Mann,&nbsp;Jennifer Perry,&nbsp;Annette Berndt,&nbsp;Joey Wong","doi":"10.1177/20556683221106917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The pandemic provides a unique opportunity to examine new directions in innovative technological approaches in long-term care (LTC) homes. While robotics could enhance staff capacity to provide care, there are potential technology risks and ethical concerns involved in technology use among older people residing in communal aged care homes. This qualitative descriptive study explores the technological risks and ethical issues associated with the adoption of robots in the specific context of LTC homes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research team including patient and family partners employed purposive and snowballing methods to recruit 30 LTC participants: frontline interdisciplinary staff, operational leaders, residents and family members, and ethics experts in dementia care. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Thematic analysis was performed to identify themes that capture empirical experiences and perspectives of a diverse group of LTC stakeholders about robotic use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technological risks include safety, increased workload, privacy, cost and social justice, and human connection. The findings offer practical insights based on the LTC perspective to contribute to the robot ethics literature. We propose a list of pragmatic recommendations, focusing on six principles (ETHICS): <b>E</b>ngagement of stakeholders, <b>T</b>echnology benefit and risk assessment, <b>H</b>arm mitigation, <b>I</b>ndividual autonomy, <b>C</b>ultural safety and justice, <b>S</b>upport of privacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is both a growing interest as well as fear in using robotics in LTC. Practice leaders need to reflect on ethical considerations and engage relevant stakeholders in making technology decisions for everyday care.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/17/c7/10.1177_20556683221106917.PMC9208036.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683221106917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Introduction: The pandemic provides a unique opportunity to examine new directions in innovative technological approaches in long-term care (LTC) homes. While robotics could enhance staff capacity to provide care, there are potential technology risks and ethical concerns involved in technology use among older people residing in communal aged care homes. This qualitative descriptive study explores the technological risks and ethical issues associated with the adoption of robots in the specific context of LTC homes.

Methods: The research team including patient and family partners employed purposive and snowballing methods to recruit 30 LTC participants: frontline interdisciplinary staff, operational leaders, residents and family members, and ethics experts in dementia care. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Thematic analysis was performed to identify themes that capture empirical experiences and perspectives of a diverse group of LTC stakeholders about robotic use.

Results: Technological risks include safety, increased workload, privacy, cost and social justice, and human connection. The findings offer practical insights based on the LTC perspective to contribute to the robot ethics literature. We propose a list of pragmatic recommendations, focusing on six principles (ETHICS): Engagement of stakeholders, Technology benefit and risk assessment, Harm mitigation, Individual autonomy, Cultural safety and justice, Support of privacy.

Conclusions: There is both a growing interest as well as fear in using robotics in LTC. Practice leaders need to reflect on ethical considerations and engage relevant stakeholders in making technology decisions for everyday care.

Abstract Image

在长期护理中使用机器人的技术风险和伦理影响。
导论:大流行提供了一个独特的机会来研究长期护理(LTC)家中创新技术方法的新方向。虽然机器人技术可以提高工作人员提供护理的能力,但在居住在公共敬老院的老年人中使用技术存在潜在的技术风险和伦理问题。本定性描述性研究探讨了在LTC家庭的特定背景下采用机器人相关的技术风险和伦理问题。方法:包括患者和家属在内的研究团队采用目的法和滚雪球法招募30名LTC参与者:一线跨学科工作人员、业务领导、住院医师和家属、痴呆护理伦理专家。进行了半结构化访谈。进行主题分析以确定主题,这些主题捕捉了LTC不同利益相关者群体关于机器人使用的经验经验和观点。结果:技术风险包括安全、工作量增加、隐私、成本和社会公正以及人际关系。这些发现提供了基于LTC视角的实用见解,为机器人伦理学文献做出了贡献。我们提出了一份务实的建议清单,重点关注六个原则(道德):利益相关者的参与、技术利益和风险评估、减轻伤害、个人自主、文化安全和正义、支持隐私。结论:在LTC中使用机器人技术的兴趣和恐惧都在增长。实践领导者需要反思道德考虑,并让相关利益相关者参与日常护理的技术决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信