{"title":"Editor's introduction—October 2024","authors":"Catherine Warrick","doi":"10.1111/dome.12343","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dome.12343","url":null,"abstract":"<p>It's tempting to describe this issue of the <i>Digest of Middle East Studies</i> in marketing terms: now with 60% more articles than our issues have traditionally included! It's a supersized value pack! But the point, of course, isn't the size of the issue, but the timeliness and quality of the interesting scholarly presented here. The eight articles in this issue cover a wide range, as our articles always do, topically and geographically and methodologically. From a clear-eyed assessment of Jordanian electoral reform law and policy (particularly relevant in light of the current election season) to a quantitative study of regional military spending to a thoughtful examination of the concept of heritage in Saudi poetry, these articles span the wide field of politics and policy.</p><p>Our first article addresses the much-discussed issue of Jordanian electoral reform, a subject that continually absorbs the attention of Jordanians, scholars of Jordan, and other observers alike. Why has so much reform law and policy produced so little actual reform? The authors explain that reform initiatives have served “more to provide the regime with narratives of superficial reform than to achieve real change” (Bani Salameh et al., <span>2024</span>). This does not mean, of course, that nothing changes, but to understand what the elections laws and reform committees really mean, we must be attentive to their larger political use as well as their narrower practical effects.</p><p>Narratives and their political importance are also examined in Kertcher and Lewin's study (<span>2024</span>) of media coverage of Saudi Arabia's humanitarian aid. The authors argue that the Saudi government uses a “diversionary benevolent media strategy,” framing its humanitarian aid in particular ways for different audiences. This strategic approach to media coverage helps to establish politically useful narratives that increase the country's prestige with international audiences and bolster regime support with domestic audiences.</p><p>Media coverage is also at issue in Yefet and Friedberg's article (<span>2024</span>) examining the imbalance in the quantity and type of coverage of men and women members of parliament in Egypt. They find that while media coverage does perpetuate conservative views of women and a hierarchical masculine/feminine distinction, this coverage exists alongside more progressive coverage of women parliamentarians, making for a more complex media landscape. This has implications for the shaping of public opinion about women's roles in politics.</p><p>A straightforward and important policy question is the subject of Nadan's study (<span>2024</span>): are population policies in Arab countries largely ineffective? He examines both pro-natalist and anti-natalist policies in countries over a period from the 1970s to the 1990s to establish what effect these approaches had on national birthrates. He finds that population policy has less effect than is expected, an int","PeriodicalId":43254,"journal":{"name":"Digest of Middle East Studies","volume":"33 4","pages":"330-332"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dome.12343","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142443489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A diversionary benevolent media strategy: Lobbying Saudi Arabia's humanitarian aid in Arabic and English\u0000 转移视线的仁慈媒体策略:阿拉伯语和英语报道中的沙特阿拉伯人道主义援助游说\u0000 Una estrategia mediática benévola y distractora: Cabildear para obtener ayuda humanitaria de Arabia Saudita en árabe e inglés","authors":"Chen Kertcher, Roi Lewin","doi":"10.1111/dome.12339","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dome.12339","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Humanitarian aid is often accompanied by broad media coverage. In academic research, there is a dominant bias toward Western studies on the topic. Following studies that emphasize the negative role of autocratic regimes using their media to frame threats as an intra-state diversionary strategy, this study contributes to our understating of how autocratic regimes use the media and illuminates how they employ a diversionary benevolent strategy in the media through framing humanitarian activities. We illustrate this theory by using the case of media strategy models used by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) that frame its provision of humanitarian aid to global and national audiences. The empirical approach is based on an analysis of 263 articles from four leading Saudi newspapers published online in English and Arabic. The result indicates that the KSA encourages two different diversionary benevolent strategies. The first strategy is aimed at increasing the KSAs international community prestige, focusing on mediatization that depicts its alliance with global efforts while employing “threat” strategy towards its adversaries. The second strategy is aimed mainly at Saudi nationals with the purpose of increasing their support of the royal family.</p>","PeriodicalId":43254,"journal":{"name":"Digest of Middle East Studies","volume":"33 4","pages":"346-360"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142443471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}