发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

JLIS.it最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Peer review ethics in Iranian LIS scholarly journals: a comparison between views of reviewers and authors 伊朗学术期刊的同行评议伦理:审稿人和作者观点的比较
IF 0.2
JLIS.it Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI: 10.36253/jlis.it-504
R. Fattahi, Reza Rajabali Beglou, S. S. Akhshik
{"title":"Peer review ethics in Iranian LIS scholarly journals: a comparison between views of reviewers and authors","authors":"R. Fattahi, Reza Rajabali Beglou, S. S. Akhshik","doi":"10.36253/jlis.it-504","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-504","url":null,"abstract":"Peer review is one of the most efficient ways to ensure the quality of papers for possible publication in scholarly journals. However, the process of peer review is not free of bias and disorders. Many reviewers are unaware of how their attitudes towards the evaluation of scholarly papers may violate Peer Review Ethics (PRE). This paper attempts to analyze the different ethical issues influencing the job of reviewing. The research sample for this study included 7 Iranian library and information journals, 124 Iranian peer reviewers, and 34 authors. Peer reviewers and authors were asked to evaluate the most important ethical elements of peer review in Iranian LIS journals through two different questionnaires based on Rajabali Beglou et al. (2019) research.\u0000Findings showed that there was no difference among authors and reviewers in terms of gender in most PRE elements. Also, the level of experience of the authors was not significant in terms of understanding and acceptance of the PRE among reviewers and authors. However, review experiences regarding some PRE elements were significant in respondents’ viewpoints. The experiences reviewers had already gained were influential on their views about PRE. In addition, results showed that there were significant differences among reviewers and authors about the PRE elements in LIS journals. Authorship experiences had not effect on the PRE elements and the dual role of peer reviewing and authorship had no impact on their views.","PeriodicalId":42905,"journal":{"name":"JLIS.it","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78198986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Peer review: a process undergoing a required transformation 同行评审:一个经历必要转换的过程
IF 0.2
JLIS.it Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI: 10.36253/jlis.it-519
M. Guerrini, Andrea Capaccioni, Rossana Morriello, Editorial Board
{"title":"Peer review: a process undergoing a required transformation","authors":"M. Guerrini, Andrea Capaccioni, Rossana Morriello, Editorial Board","doi":"10.36253/jlis.it-519","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-519","url":null,"abstract":"The peer review process is undergoing transformation; this raises a series of challenges, some of which are discussed by the authors of the articles of this issue. Is peer review really peer? Peer review is an activity not recognized for research evaluation. The choice of referees is by no means neutral; it must be contemplate the ethical aspects of the choice.","PeriodicalId":42905,"journal":{"name":"JLIS.it","volume":"40 9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76755820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gender equality in library science and book history Italian journals: a focus on boards, authors and peer-reviewers 意大利期刊中的性别平等:对董事会、作者和同行评审的关注
IF 0.2
JLIS.it Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI: 10.36253/jlis.it-509
Valentina Sonzini
{"title":"Gender equality in library science and book history Italian journals: a focus on boards, authors and peer-reviewers","authors":"Valentina Sonzini","doi":"10.36253/jlis.it-509","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-509","url":null,"abstract":"The presence of women in Italian open access journals in library science and book history has never been subject to quantitative evaluations. As in the case of other areas in the humanities, the study of the number of women on the boards and as authors has taken second place to analyses of gender positioning in academic careers. Starting from the data entered into Wikidata by the project \"Riviste di biblioteconomia\" managed by the Wikidata Group for Museums, Archives and Libraries, the contribution presents a focus on AIB Studi, Bibliothecae.it and JLIS.it regarding the gender balance in the scientific committees and board and the number of female contributors. In conclusion, a mention concerns the small number of articles from foreign countries, in particular from Africa and South-East Asia.","PeriodicalId":42905,"journal":{"name":"JLIS.it","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82734145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Scholarly publishing and peer review in the Global South: the role of the reviewer 南半球的学术出版与同行评议:审稿人的角色
IF 0.2
JLIS.it Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI: 10.36253/jlis.it-512
P. Lor
{"title":"Scholarly publishing and peer review in the Global South: the role of the reviewer","authors":"P. Lor","doi":"10.36253/jlis.it-512","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-512","url":null,"abstract":"Peer review is an integral part of contemporary scholarly publishing, especially journal publishing. Work submitted by scholars from all parts of the world is subjected to it. This includes submissions by scholars from the Global South, who wish to publish in “international” journals or in local journals which follow the same model. These authors may not be native English speakers and may be unfamiliar with the conventions of Western scholarship. Many of them conduct research and write their manuscripts under challenging circumstances. They may find it difficult to comply with the requirements of the journals to which they submit their articles. Their manuscripts quite often pose challenges to the peer reviewers. The purpose of this article is to provide some background on scholarly publishing in the Global South and the challenges those colleagues face, and to outline what this may mean for the role of the reviewer.","PeriodicalId":42905,"journal":{"name":"JLIS.it","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78635564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Open peer review: some considerations on the selection and management of reviewers 开放式同行评议:对审稿人选择与管理的几点思考
IF 0.2
JLIS.it Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI: 10.36253/jlis.it-508
Andrea Capaccioni
{"title":"Open peer review: some considerations on the selection and management of reviewers","authors":"Andrea Capaccioni","doi":"10.36253/jlis.it-508","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-508","url":null,"abstract":"Open peer review (OPR) is a type of review that has long since made space alongside the more well-known single-blind and double-blind peer reviews. Despite this, we still do not have a shared definition by the scientific community and publishers. The purpose of this paper is to offer some reflections on the selection of reviewers in OPR, a process that in its current configuration is traced back to the 19th century. After a brief overview of the best-known definitions of open peer review, the paper continues with an analysis of some aspects of reviewer selection carried out with the help of data from a recent survey.","PeriodicalId":42905,"journal":{"name":"JLIS.it","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83934529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Firenze University Press: the peer review policy of an Italian academic publisher. Interview with Fulvio Guatelli by Alessia Papa 佛罗伦萨大学出版社:意大利学术出版社的同行评议政策。Alessia Papa采访Fulvio Guatelli
IF 0.2
JLIS.it Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI: 10.36253/jlis.it-516
Fulvio Guatelli
{"title":"Firenze University Press: the peer review policy of an Italian academic publisher. Interview with Fulvio Guatelli by Alessia Papa","authors":"Fulvio Guatelli","doi":"10.36253/jlis.it-516","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-516","url":null,"abstract":"Peer review evaluates the originality and quality of a scientific work, through the judgment of a peer group, in order to preserve scientific authority and prevent the publication of poor quality manuscripts. Fulvio Guatelli, director of the Firenze University Press (FUP), one of the most innovative realities in the scientific field and one of the first publishing houses to have brought the peer review process to Italy, answers eight questions. FUP pays considerable attention to editorial practices; the FUP Scientific Cloud for Books project allows the systematic description, through a \"cloud\" of metadata, of all aspects of the scientific book (authorship, evaluation process, dissemination tools and access methods), in order to contribute to its enhancement and place it in the wake of scientific journals. FUP also aims at the dissemination of a qualitatively valid science, supporting the reviewers through collaborations, such as ReviewerCredits, which certify and reward their work. Initiatives that testify to the continuous evolution and gradual refinement process of peer review in the context of today's scientific community.","PeriodicalId":42905,"journal":{"name":"JLIS.it","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77829771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Global Trends in Knowledge Production and the Evolving Peer Review Process 知识生产的全球趋势和不断发展的同行评议过程
IF 0.2
JLIS.it Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI: 10.36253/jlis.it-515
Steven W. Witt
{"title":"Global Trends in Knowledge Production and the Evolving Peer Review Process","authors":"Steven W. Witt","doi":"10.36253/jlis.it-515","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-515","url":null,"abstract":"This essay thus seeks to provide further critique and clarity to the peer review process and the ways in which management of peer review is evolving. These changes occur within a context of massive growth in the knowledge production process: global trends, information technologies, and policies that encourage more people globally to take part in the research process. Associated with these global changes are stressors on the peer review process and particularly questions about who gets to be a peer reviewer and who has the right to produce knowledge under these processes.  Less a formal review and analysis of peer review across LIS, this essay takes the form of an autoethnographic narrative that that seeks to draw upon the researcher’s personal observations, experience, and reflections to critically examine changes to the peer review system that are taking place.","PeriodicalId":42905,"journal":{"name":"JLIS.it","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83977498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Peer review in research assessment and data analysis of Italian publications in SSD M-STO/08 (Archival science, bibliography, library science) SSD M-STO/08(档案学、目录学、图书馆学)意大利出版物研究评估与数据分析的同行评议
IF 0.2
JLIS.it Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI: 10.36253/jlis.it-510
Rossana Morriello
{"title":"Peer review in research assessment and data analysis of Italian publications in SSD M-STO/08 (Archival science, bibliography, library science)","authors":"Rossana Morriello","doi":"10.36253/jlis.it-510","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-510","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000\u0000\u0000Since the introduction of research assessment systems at institutional level in the 1980s, the ongoing debate on the roles and functions of peer review and bibliometrics has been vivid and lively. In the first part of the article, the main lines over time of this debate are traced, and a reflection on the epistemic functions of peer review and citations is proposed. In Italy, the first research assessment exercise (VTR) was based on peer review only, while the following ones (VQR) were based on different methods for bibliometric disciplines and non-bibliometric disciplines, namely bibliometric indicators and peer review. Starting from a data analysis on Italian publications, and using as a sample data from M-STO/08 (Archival science, bibliography and library science) area, the essay shows some trends and changes in publication habits in HSS. Conclusions open a perspective on revitalization of peer review as a solid qualitative method for research assessment.\u0000\u0000\u0000","PeriodicalId":42905,"journal":{"name":"JLIS.it","volume":"122 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85573565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Towards peer review as a group engagement 将同行评审作为一种团队参与
IF 0.2
JLIS.it Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI: 10.36253/jlis.it-511
A. Bonaccorsi
{"title":"Towards peer review as a group engagement","authors":"A. Bonaccorsi","doi":"10.36253/jlis.it-511","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-511","url":null,"abstract":"I discuss from an economic perspective two of the most recent suggestions to reform the peer review system: (a) payment to referees; (b) ex post peer review. I show that strong economic arguments militate against these ideas. With respect to payment to referees I use results from the economic analysis of prosocial behavior and the private production of public goods, which show that the supply of monetary incentives has the paradoxical effect of reducing the willingness of agents to collaborate, insofar as they substitute intrincic motivation with extrinsic motivation. With respect to ex post peer review, I show that it fails to offer sufficient incentives to researchers, since it is anonymous, depersonalized, and weak in its marginal impact on publishing decisions. I take this argument to criticize the lack of theorizing, in the side of radical proponents of Open access, about the conditions for transition from the subscription model to the Open model. It is this lack of critical attention to economic arguments that has led to the unintended but dramatic outcome of a net increase in the cost of scientific publishing, as documented in very recent papers. Finally, I advance a proposal for admitting payments to referees, but not as individuals but as groups of researchers. I offer this idea to open discussion.","PeriodicalId":42905,"journal":{"name":"JLIS.it","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74927521","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
This issue is dedicated to Luigi Balsamo 这一期是献给Luigi Balsamo的
IF 0.2
JLIS.it Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI: 10.36253/jlis.it-520
Editorial board
{"title":"This issue is dedicated to Luigi Balsamo","authors":"Editorial board","doi":"10.36253/jlis.it-520","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-520","url":null,"abstract":"Luigi Balsamo was a librarian, a bibliographical superintendent, an AIB member, a professor of Bibliography, the editor of \"La Bibliofilia\", and an important international personality, especially in the Anglo-Saxon and Iberian area, author of numerous writings on public libraries and the history of books, including 'La bibliografia. Storia di una tradizione' (translated both in English and in Spanish). Less well known is his interest in poetry, which he cultivated from his youth. The liryc 'Autumn' is part of an unpublished collection, entirely private and hitherto jealously guarded within the family circle. ","PeriodicalId":42905,"journal":{"name":"JLIS.it","volume":"28 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72392946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信