SSD M-STO/08(档案学、目录学、图书馆学)意大利出版物研究评估与数据分析的同行评议

IF 0.2 Q2 Arts and Humanities

JLIS.it Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI:10.36253/jlis.it-510

Rossana Morriello

{"title":"SSD M-STO/08(档案学、目录学、图书馆学)意大利出版物研究评估与数据分析的同行评议","authors":"Rossana Morriello","doi":"10.36253/jlis.it-510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nSince the introduction of research assessment systems at institutional level in the 1980s, the ongoing debate on the roles and functions of peer review and bibliometrics has been vivid and lively. In the first part of the article, the main lines over time of this debate are traced, and a reflection on the epistemic functions of peer review and citations is proposed. In Italy, the first research assessment exercise (VTR) was based on peer review only, while the following ones (VQR) were based on different methods for bibliometric disciplines and non-bibliometric disciplines, namely bibliometric indicators and peer review. Starting from a data analysis on Italian publications, and using as a sample data from M-STO/08 (Archival science, bibliography and library science) area, the essay shows some trends and changes in publication habits in HSS. Conclusions open a perspective on revitalization of peer review as a solid qualitative method for research assessment.\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":42905,"journal":{"name":"JLIS.it","volume":"122 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer review in research assessment and data analysis of Italian publications in SSD M-STO/08 (Archival science, bibliography, library science)\",\"authors\":\"Rossana Morriello\",\"doi\":\"10.36253/jlis.it-510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\n\\nSince the introduction of research assessment systems at institutional level in the 1980s, the ongoing debate on the roles and functions of peer review and bibliometrics has been vivid and lively. In the first part of the article, the main lines over time of this debate are traced, and a reflection on the epistemic functions of peer review and citations is proposed. In Italy, the first research assessment exercise (VTR) was based on peer review only, while the following ones (VQR) were based on different methods for bibliometric disciplines and non-bibliometric disciplines, namely bibliometric indicators and peer review. Starting from a data analysis on Italian publications, and using as a sample data from M-STO/08 (Archival science, bibliography and library science) area, the essay shows some trends and changes in publication habits in HSS. Conclusions open a perspective on revitalization of peer review as a solid qualitative method for research assessment.\\n\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":42905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JLIS.it\",\"volume\":\"122 6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JLIS.it\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-510\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JLIS.it","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

自20世纪80年代在机构层面引入研究评估制度以来，关于同行评议和文献计量学的作用和功能的争论一直是生动活泼的。在文章的第一部分，追踪了这场争论的主线，并对同行评议和引文的认知功能提出了反思。在意大利，第一次研究评价工作(VTR)仅基于同行评议，而随后的研究评价工作(VQR)基于文献计量学科和非文献计量学科的不同方法，即文献计量指标和同行评议。本文从对意大利出版物的数据分析出发，以M-STO/08(档案学、目标学和图书馆学)领域的样本数据为例，展示了HSS出版习惯的一些趋势和变化。结论为重振同行评议作为一种可靠的研究评价定性方法开辟了前景。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Peer review in research assessment and data analysis of Italian publications in SSD M-STO/08 (Archival science, bibliography, library science)

Since the introduction of research assessment systems at institutional level in the 1980s, the ongoing debate on the roles and functions of peer review and bibliometrics has been vivid and lively. In the first part of the article, the main lines over time of this debate are traced, and a reflection on the epistemic functions of peer review and citations is proposed. In Italy, the first research assessment exercise (VTR) was based on peer review only, while the following ones (VQR) were based on different methods for bibliometric disciplines and non-bibliometric disciplines, namely bibliometric indicators and peer review. Starting from a data analysis on Italian publications, and using as a sample data from M-STO/08 (Archival science, bibliography and library science) area, the essay shows some trends and changes in publication habits in HSS. Conclusions open a perspective on revitalization of peer review as a solid qualitative method for research assessment.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

JLIS.it INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： JLIS.it is an academic journal of international scope, peer-reviewed and open access, aiming to valorise international research in Library and Information Science. Contributions in LIS, Library and Information Science, are welcome.