发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Frontmatter
IF 0.4 2区 哲学
JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2019-12-31 DOI: 10.1515/9781618111821-fm
{"title":"Frontmatter","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9781618111821-fm","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781618111821-fm","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42022,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88450043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Maimonides on the Eternity of the World 迈蒙尼德论世界的永恒
IF 0.4 2区 哲学
JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2019-12-31 DOI: 10.1515/9781618111821-013
Howard Kreisel
{"title":"Maimonides on the Eternity of the World","authors":"Howard Kreisel","doi":"10.1515/9781618111821-013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781618111821-013","url":null,"abstract":"Maimonides’ stance on the creation of the world has attracted considerable debate over the centuries. Those who arrived at the conclusion that Maimonides maintains an essentially Aristotelian picture of divine governance of the world, and presents an esoteric position on all the theological issues in which God is regarded as playing a personal role in human affairs, could hardly take Maimonides’ defense of creation at","PeriodicalId":42022,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87323094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Maimonides on Creation, Kant’s First Antinomy, and Hermann Cohen 迈蒙尼德论创造，康德的第一二律背反，赫尔曼·科恩
IF 0.4 2区 哲学
JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2019-03-29 DOI: 10.1163/1477285X-12341236
Mark A. Kaplowitz
{"title":"Maimonides on Creation, Kant’s First Antinomy, and Hermann Cohen","authors":"Mark A. Kaplowitz","doi":"10.1163/1477285X-12341236","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1477285X-12341236","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper describes a “double move” made by Maimonides, Kant, and Hermann Cohen when they simultaneously dismiss and resolve the cosmological problem of the origin of the universe in time in order to represent creation as a moral issue. Maimonides claims to lack a compelling metaphysical argument regarding creation. However, a reading of Maimonides inspired by the views of Hermann Cohen finds him to be a Platonist who accepts creation from absolute privation so as to establish a moral world in which revelation establishes a correlation between humans and God. For Kant, metaphysics also cannot address the origin of the universe, but he positively describes the regress towards the origin as indeterminately large to derive the unconditioned ideal of reason that supports the regulative use of reason. Cohen, therefore, follows the precedents set by Maimonides and Kant when he claims that the Jewish concept of creation is an ethical and logical problem rather than a cosmological one, even though his account of creation presupposes his era’s dominant scientific model of the eternity of the universe.","PeriodicalId":42022,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86698885","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Peace and War in Moses Maimonides and Immanuel Kant: A Comparative Study 摩西·迈蒙尼德与伊曼努尔·康德的《和平与战争》比较研究
IF 0.4 2区 哲学
JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2019-03-29 DOI: 10.1163/1477285X-12341238
F. Albertini
{"title":"Peace and War in Moses Maimonides and Immanuel Kant: A Comparative Study","authors":"F. Albertini","doi":"10.1163/1477285X-12341238","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1477285X-12341238","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Francesca Y. Albertini (1974–2011) compares Maimonides’ idea of peace, as developed in MT Sefer shofetim (Book of Judges), with Kant’s work on the notion of “eternal peace” (Zum ewigen Frieden). Both authors develop a historical vision pointed against the use of force and war in light of a framework not limited by historical time (messianic age, eternity). Despite all differences in method and historical context, the authors agree on the notion that universal ethics provides the basis of a determination of right grounded in the will. Maimonides’ universal messianism as well as Kant’s universal history emphasize the pivotal role and decisive responsibility of the human being in realizing, through reason, the reign of peace and prosperity on earth first envisioned by the biblical prophets. These utopias continue to challenge us, especially in this day and age.","PeriodicalId":42022,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77635874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Shlomo Pines on Maimonides, Spinoza, and Kant 论迈蒙尼德、斯宾诺莎和康德
IF 0.4 2区 哲学
JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2019-03-29 DOI: 10.1163/1477285X-12341237
W. Harvey
{"title":"Shlomo Pines on Maimonides, Spinoza, and Kant","authors":"W. Harvey","doi":"10.1163/1477285X-12341237","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1477285X-12341237","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In his “Spinoza’s TTP, Maimonides, and Kant” (1968), Pines compared Spinoza’s dogmas of universal faith (TTP, 14) with Kant’s postulates of practical reason (Critique of Practical Reason, part 1). According to him, Spinoza’s dogmas, like Maimonides’ “necessary beliefs” (Guide 3:28), are postulates necessary for political welfare, and do not fall under the jurisdiction of theoretical reason. They define the faith of the common person, not that of the philosopher. Kant, in his remarks about Spinoza as an “upright skeptic,” mistakenly thought his dogmas were true beliefs, not necessary ones; and his notion of postulates of practical reason seems to have been in part influenced by his mistaken view of Spinoza’s dogmas. The transformation of Maimonides’ “necessary beliefs” into Kant’s “postulates of practical reason,” as narrated by Pines, recalls the similar transformation of “Averroism” into “Christian Averroism” in the thirteenth century. In essays written from the late 1970s until his death in 1990, Pines returned to the theme of Maimonides and Kant, and argued convincingly that Maimonides’ epistemology was “critical” in the Kantian sense. However, his related argument that Maimonides’ religious sensibility was similar to Kant’s is less convincing. Unlike Kant, Maimonides did not think that critical epistemology made room for faith, but held that it caused one to tremble in awe. Like Spinoza, he identified true faith with intellectual knowledge, not something beyond it. His distinctiveness as a philosopher is that he was a God-intoxicated Knower like Spinoza, but a critical epistemologist like Kant.","PeriodicalId":42022,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82103090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Pragmatism and Jewish Thought: Eliezer Berkovits’s Philosophy of Halakhic Fallibility 实用主义与犹太思想:Eliezer Berkovits的哈拉卡谬误哲学
IF 0.4 2区 哲学
JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2019-03-29 DOI: 10.1163/1477285X-12341239
Nadav Berman Shifman
{"title":"Pragmatism and Jewish Thought: Eliezer Berkovits’s Philosophy of Halakhic Fallibility","authors":"Nadav Berman Shifman","doi":"10.1163/1477285X-12341239","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1477285X-12341239","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Both Immanuel Kant and Moses Maimonides wrote lengthy treatments of the biblical garden of Eden. For both philosophers the biblical story served as an opportunity to address the genealogy of morals. I argue here that the two treatments offer deep insights into their respective philosophical anthropologies, that is to say, into their assessments of the human person and of moral psychology. Contrary to much that has been written about Maimonides as a proto-Kantian, I expose the profoundly different and even opposed conceptions of human nature and of reason at the heart of the respective philosophies. For Kant, the first exercise of reason in the garden is an act of rebellion that jettisons the human person from the womb of nature into a post-natural freedom. The repudiation of the natural is the beginning of an ethical life, according to Kant—a life to be dominated by respect for a human dignity beyond the natural. For Maimonides, in contrast, reason is a philosophical torah li-shmaʿ. Rational understanding is an understanding of the laws of a nature fecund with the presence of the divine. Exposing the reason inherent in nature is the only path to knowledge of God and whatever communion with the divine is available to human beings. Such knowledge transforms the heart as well as fills the mind, embedding the human person as moral actor in a God-filled universe.","PeriodicalId":42022,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79001240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
The Kant-Maimonides Constellation 康德-迈蒙尼德星座
IF 0.4 2区 哲学
JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2018-10-18 DOI: 10.1163/1477285X-12341235
David C. Tollerton
{"title":"The Kant-Maimonides Constellation","authors":"David C. Tollerton","doi":"10.1163/1477285X-12341235","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1477285X-12341235","url":null,"abstract":"Responding to Zachary Braiterman’s and Daniel Garner’s ideas on post-Holocaust religious thought, the author proposes a new model of relationships between theodicy and antitheodicy in which divine perfection is no longer privileged as the single key factor. Building on Peter Berger’s and Clifford Geertz’s treatments of the problem of evil, it is suggested that focusing on meaning-making and tradition can result in a stratified view of theodicy–antitheodicy more able to engage with the dynamics of several well-known thinkers associated with religious responses to the Holocaust.","PeriodicalId":42022,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2018-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76768602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
God, Being, Pathos: Abraham Joshua Heschel’s Theological Rejoinder to Heidegger 上帝、存在、悲情:亚伯拉罕·约书亚·赫歇尔对海德格尔的神学反驳
IF 0.4 2区 哲学
JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2018-04-30 DOI: 10.1163/1477285X-12341298
Daniel M. Herskowitz
{"title":"God, Being, Pathos: Abraham Joshua Heschel’s Theological Rejoinder to Heidegger","authors":"Daniel M. Herskowitz","doi":"10.1163/1477285X-12341298","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1477285X-12341298","url":null,"abstract":"Martin Heidegger’s philosophy has elicited many theological responses; some enthusiastic, others critical. In this essay I provide an organized and critical analysis of Abraham Joshua Heschel’s theological critique of and rejoinder to the thought of the German philosopher. By looking at Heschel’s 1965 Who is Man? as well as earlier and later texts, I demonstrate the way in which Heschel presents his biblical theology as an alternative to Heidegger’s philosophy.","PeriodicalId":42022,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2018-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77866826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
“A Community Should Be Present as He Prays so that He Can Bind Himself with Their Soul”: R. Nahman’s Vision of the Birds and Its Origins in the Zohar “一个社区应该在他祈祷的时候在场，这样他就可以把自己和他们的灵魂捆绑在一起”:R. Nahman对鸟类的看法及其在光辉之书中的起源
IF 0.4 2区 哲学
JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2018-04-30 DOI: 10.1163/1477285X-12341297
Moshe Goultschin
{"title":"“A Community Should Be Present as He Prays so that He Can Bind Himself with Their Soul”: R. Nahman’s Vision of the Birds and Its Origins in the Zohar","authors":"Moshe Goultschin","doi":"10.1163/1477285X-12341297","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1477285X-12341297","url":null,"abstract":"During his final years, R. Nahman of Bratslav endeavored to find a solution for the paradox of unrealized messiahs. His solution was outlined in his dream about birds in December 1806, on the Sabbath of Parashat Va-yeḥi . This dream was influenced by his reading of a story told in the Zohar, Parashat Va-yeḥi , of a “vision of birds” of R. Yehudah, a disciple of R. Shimon bar Yohai, that exemplifies the crisis experienced by the circle of disciples of R. Shimon following his death. The essay elaborates on the connections between the dream and the Zohar story and their influence on R. Nahman’s messianic endeavor.","PeriodicalId":42022,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2018-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91014981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
the Sefer as a challenge to Reception Theories Sefer是对接受理论的挑战
IF 0.4 2区 哲学
JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2018-04-30 DOI: 10.1163/1477285X-12341296
Iddo Dickmann
{"title":"the Sefer as a challenge to Reception Theories","authors":"Iddo Dickmann","doi":"10.1163/1477285X-12341296","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1477285X-12341296","url":null,"abstract":"The talmudic sages granted the legal status of sefer (book) to five texts: the Torah, tefillin , the get , the mezuzah , and the Scroll of Esther. These texts share two features: they have a ritualistic format and use, and they are the only sacred texts that demonstrate mise en abyme —the trait of literary self-containing. These two traits turn the rabbinic book into a radical case of “open work”: the sefer consists of both textual signs and the actual body of an empirical reader; its pragmatic level is not bracketed out in favor of the semiotic one. I argue that Deleuze’s reception theory best accounts for the sefer .","PeriodicalId":42022,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF JEWISH THOUGHT & PHILOSOPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2018-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/1477285X-12341296","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72529631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信