{"title":"Les germanistes français et l’Allemagne (1925-1949)","authors":"M. Espagne","doi":"10.3917/EGER.299.0573","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3917/EGER.299.0573","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41323,"journal":{"name":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","volume":"1 1","pages":"573-577"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46051613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"L’État face au pluralisme des valeurs. Réflexions sociologiques des années 1920 en France et en Allemagne","authors":"Olivier Agard","doi":"10.3917/EGER.299.0475","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3917/EGER.299.0475","url":null,"abstract":"The contribution draws attention to the figure of the sociologist and philosopher Georges Gurvitch, an important mediator of German phenomenology in Interwar France. In the 1930s, Gurvitch developed a pluralist philosophy of law which gave social groups a decisive role in the development of law. Drawing on the writings of German sociologists (Scheler, Sinzheimer), he criticized French centralism, in which administrative standards take precedence over the plurality of social experience. In the current context, Gurvitch’s writings are an impetus to rethink the problem of cultural diversity and conflicts, and to find an alternative to the opposition between intolerant denial of diversity on the one hand, and a differentialism that tolerates intolerant behaviour in the name of cultural diversity on the other. This attempt to update the reflections on social democracy of the 1920s and 1930s ties in with the way Cecile Laborde uses the tradition of pluralist philosophy to design a republicanism that is more open to diversity, or how Sophie Guerard de Latour refers to Durkheim in order to combine the definition of a common good while taking into account the diverse reality of society.","PeriodicalId":41323,"journal":{"name":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","volume":"1 1","pages":"475-491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47738557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Actualité de la Dramaturgie de Hambourg","authors":"J. Valentin","doi":"10.3917/EGER.299.0563","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3917/EGER.299.0563","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41323,"journal":{"name":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","volume":"1 1","pages":"563-567"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45674692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Charles de Villers, avocat de Fichte dans le Spectateur du Nord (1799). Un plaidoyer pour la liberté de pensée ?","authors":"Catherine Julliard","doi":"10.3917/EGER.299.0493","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3917/EGER.299.0493","url":null,"abstract":"The study deals with an article by Charles de Villers (1765-1815) published in Le Spectateur du Nord (June 1799), a journal printed in Hamburg and also known as an organ of French emigrants. This article, entitled “Metaphysicien publiquement accuse d’atheisme”, is an advocacy of Johann Gottlieb Fichte’s Philosophy as part of the Atheism dispute. The study first addresses the different stages of the dispute and Fichte’s philosophical development in the field of religious doctrine. A second part focuses on the analysis of Villers’ arguments. Finally, the study attempts to establish the specificity of Villers’ position, which takes on the symbolic dimension of a plea for the freedom of thought, in a key period of the Late Enlightenment, when even the concept of God was called into question.","PeriodicalId":41323,"journal":{"name":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","volume":"1 1","pages":"493-508"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49039139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Comment enchaîner ? Réflexions sur le déchaînement de la pensée tolérante","authors":"G. Raulet","doi":"10.3917/EGER.299.0441","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3917/EGER.299.0441","url":null,"abstract":"Eighteenth-century intellectual debates may sometimes be used to reveal the issues at stake in contemporary ones as does for example the controversy between Mendelssohn and Christian Wilhelm Dohm about the emancipation of the Jews: what matters to Mendelssohn beyond the question of the rights of the Jews as a religious minority, is the recognition of fundamental natural rights on which the recognition of civil rights can be established.Mendelssohn opposes a communitarian misinterpretation of the issue of equal rights, rejecting thus the confusion between liberalism and laissez-faire. US-American debates on freedom of religious thought, in which religious tolerance, relativism and freedom are often used to justify discrimination, show how perfectly right he was as a man ahead of his time.Pluralism does not mean that all assertions are acceptable as a principle; in fact, quite the opposite is true: it presupposes that they are acceptable in principle, i.e. that they meet the requirement of pluralism.This article confronts Habermas’s theoretical models with Jean-Francois Lyotard’s, and analyses the contribution of Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition. Lyotard’s essential idea is to encourage the acceptance of diversity of opinion, provided it does not jeopardise democracy, and to maintain the dialogue, without surrendering to reasons that are not recognised as better ones. A commitment that is not hopelessly dogmatic must allow the dialogue to flow in a discursive way.","PeriodicalId":41323,"journal":{"name":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","volume":"1 1","pages":"441-460"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44183654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Tolérance, sécularisation et pensée postmétaphysique. Habermas et les Lumières","authors":"Maiwenn Roudaut","doi":"10.3917/EGER.299.0425","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3917/EGER.299.0425","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the Enlightenment legacy of Habermas’ philosophy from the perspective of the question of tolerance. In his latest writings on religion (in particular Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion, 2005, and Nachmetaphysisches Denken II, 2012), Habermas acknowledges the new vitality of religions in Western democracies. He discusses the latest reflections of sociologists of religion on the process of secularization and its link with the modernisation of contemporary societies, which has hitherto been taken for granted. This leads him to question the potentialities of the Enlightenment and its “culture”. In doing so, is the Frankfurt philosopher indulging in a kind of “defeatism of reason” (Jean-Claude Monod)? Or should we rather see Habermas’s doubts as a testimony to his new interest in the pre-political sources of social solidarity?","PeriodicalId":41323,"journal":{"name":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","volume":"1 1","pages":"425-440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43516494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Philosophische Grabenkämpfe. Zur Frage der Toleranz bei Heidegger und Jaspers während der Anfangsjahre der Weimarer Republik","authors":"D. Meyer","doi":"10.3917/EGER.299.0461","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3917/EGER.299.0461","url":null,"abstract":"Lorsque parait, au lendemain de la Premiere Guerre mondiale, la Psychologie des conceptions du monde de Karl Jaspers, se noue un vif debat intellectuel, tout particulierement avec Martin Heidegger. Ce debat gravite autour de formes distinctes de tolerance : tandis que Jaspers prone un renouvellement successif de l’existence a travers l’acceptation de l’autre, ou l’individu, pour ne pas succomber a la sclerose intellectuelle, doit chercher a se glisser dans un nouveau rapport au monde, Heidegger cherche a acceder a une forme originaire du soi qui se revele au contraire dans la confrontation a l’autre, qu’il s’agit des lors de respecter dans son alterite. Se degage a travers ce debat un antagonisme entre une forme inclusive et exclusive de la tolerance, mais il doit egalement etre percu comme la volonte de conferer a la crise profonde que traverse la pensee allemande au lendemain du conflit mondial une portee positive, de percevoir dans cette crise le moment d’une revelation existentielle.","PeriodicalId":41323,"journal":{"name":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","volume":"1 1","pages":"461-474"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48155650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"La notion de tolérance dans les milieux juifs de Metz, d’Isaïe Berr-Bing (1787) au Sermon sur la tolérance de Lazare Wogue (1840)","authors":"Claire Placial","doi":"10.3917/EGER.299.0509","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3917/EGER.299.0509","url":null,"abstract":"In his Lettre (1787), advocating political tolerance towards the Jews of France, Isaiah Berr-Bing, maskil and pupil of Mendelssohn, addresses the French Christians and asks for the emancipation of the Jews. Fifty-three years later, the young rabbi Lazare Wogue published his Sermon sur la Tolerance for his fellow believers in Metz. In the meantime, the concept of tolerance had lost its initial political meaning. It now was brought into play in the theological disputes that were stirring up the Jewish community of Lorraine. Wogue thus uses a concept inherited from the French Enlightenment outside its original context in order to prevent the split between reformists and conservatives within French Judaism.","PeriodicalId":41323,"journal":{"name":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","volume":"1 1","pages":"509-519"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42320593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Zeitwahrnehmung und Benjamin-Reminiszenzen in Lutz Seilers Erzählung Gavroche","authors":"Carola Hähnel-Mesnard","doi":"10.3917/eger.298.0311","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3917/eger.298.0311","url":null,"abstract":"L’article met d’abord en regard la critique benjaminienne de l’histoire avec le monde narre dans le recit Gavroche et y voit une critique implicite de la conception du temps dominante en RDA. Le moment privilegie symbolise par le concept de l’a-present (Jetztzeit) correspondrait a une possible experience individuelle du temps. Ce concept se retrouve dans la construction metaleptique du texte refletant sur un plan metalitteraire l’idee de l’interruption d’un ordre temporel homogene. Enfin, est egalement evoquee le lien entre l’ecriture de Seiler et le concept de rememoration qui vise a sauvegarder des elements du passe.","PeriodicalId":41323,"journal":{"name":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","volume":"1 1","pages":"311-323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70094296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}