宽容、世俗化和后形而上学思想。哈贝马斯与灯光

IF 0.1 4区文学 0 LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN

ETUDES GERMANIQUES Pub Date : 2021-05-06 DOI:10.3917/EGER.299.0425

Maiwenn Roudaut

{"title":"宽容、世俗化和后形而上学思想。哈贝马斯与灯光","authors":"Maiwenn Roudaut","doi":"10.3917/EGER.299.0425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the Enlightenment legacy of Habermas’ philosophy from the perspective of the question of tolerance. In his latest writings on religion (in particular Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion, 2005, and Nachmetaphysisches Denken II, 2012), Habermas acknowledges the new vitality of religions in Western democracies. He discusses the latest reflections of sociologists of religion on the process of secularization and its link with the modernisation of contemporary societies, which has hitherto been taken for granted. This leads him to question the potentialities of the Enlightenment and its “culture”. In doing so, is the Frankfurt philosopher indulging in a kind of “defeatism of reason” (Jean-Claude Monod)? Or should we rather see Habermas’s doubts as a testimony to his new interest in the pre-political sources of social solidarity?","PeriodicalId":41323,"journal":{"name":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","volume":"1 1","pages":"425-440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tolérance, sécularisation et pensée postmétaphysique. Habermas et les Lumières\",\"authors\":\"Maiwenn Roudaut\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/EGER.299.0425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the Enlightenment legacy of Habermas’ philosophy from the perspective of the question of tolerance. In his latest writings on religion (in particular Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion, 2005, and Nachmetaphysisches Denken II, 2012), Habermas acknowledges the new vitality of religions in Western democracies. He discusses the latest reflections of sociologists of religion on the process of secularization and its link with the modernisation of contemporary societies, which has hitherto been taken for granted. This leads him to question the potentialities of the Enlightenment and its “culture”. In doing so, is the Frankfurt philosopher indulging in a kind of “defeatism of reason” (Jean-Claude Monod)? Or should we rather see Habermas’s doubts as a testimony to his new interest in the pre-political sources of social solidarity?\",\"PeriodicalId\":41323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ETUDES GERMANIQUES\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"425-440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ETUDES GERMANIQUES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/EGER.299.0425\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/EGER.299.0425","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从宽容问题的角度考察了哈贝马斯哲学的启蒙遗产。哈贝马斯在其关于宗教的最新著作中（特别是Zwischen Naturalimus und religion，2005年和Nachmetaphysiches Denken II，2012年），承认宗教在西方民主国家中的新活力。他讨论了宗教社会学家对世俗化进程的最新思考，以及世俗化与当代社会现代化的联系，迄今为止，这一直被认为是理所当然的。这使他开始质疑启蒙运动及其“文化”的潜力。在这样做的过程中，法兰克福哲学家是否沉溺于一种“理性的失败主义”（让-克洛德·莫诺德）？还是我们应该将哈贝马斯的怀疑视为他对政治前社会团结来源的新兴趣的证明？

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Tolérance, sécularisation et pensée postmétaphysique. Habermas et les Lumières

This article examines the Enlightenment legacy of Habermas’ philosophy from the perspective of the question of tolerance. In his latest writings on religion (in particular Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion, 2005, and Nachmetaphysisches Denken II, 2012), Habermas acknowledges the new vitality of religions in Western democracies. He discusses the latest reflections of sociologists of religion on the process of secularization and its link with the modernisation of contemporary societies, which has hitherto been taken for granted. This leads him to question the potentialities of the Enlightenment and its “culture”. In doing so, is the Frankfurt philosopher indulging in a kind of “defeatism of reason” (Jean-Claude Monod)? Or should we rather see Habermas’s doubts as a testimony to his new interest in the pre-political sources of social solidarity?

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ETUDES GERMANIQUES LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： La revue Études germaniques a pour but d"informer avec un grand souci d"impartialité et d"objectivité scientifique tous ceux qui s"intéressent à la vie du monde germanique (Allemagne, Suisse, pays scandinaves et néerlandais, études yiddish et judéo-allemandes), aussi bien sur des questions qui touchent à la linguistique, à la littérature, à l"histoire, à la philosophie, à l"art, à la religion — en un mot à la civilisation — qu"à celles qui relèvent de l"actualité et qui sont étudiées dans un esprit de savants et non de partisans.