{"title":"Yeni Medya Ve Siyasal Katılım: 15 Temmuz Örneği","authors":"Lale Dündar","doi":"10.19060/gav.437774","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19060/gav.437774","url":null,"abstract":"Yeni Medya; yerel, ulusal ve uluslararasi pek cok toplumsal ve siyasal olayda etkilesimi hizlandirmasi ve topluluklarin siyasal katilimina olanak saglamasi gibi yonleriyle son yillarda demokrasiyi guclendiren araclardan biri olarak tanimlanmaktadir. Geleneksel medya platformlari ile kiyaslandiginda, vatandaslarin siyasal katilimini kolaylastiran ve hizlandiran yeni medyanin, bu yonuyle toplumsal davranis kaliplarini degistirdigi de gozlenmektedir. Turk siyasi tarihinde yasanan darbe girisimleri ve darbe sureclerinde geleneksel medya agirlikli olarak, darbelerin mesrulastirilmasi ve toplumun sindirilmesinde arac olarak kullanilirken, yeni medyanin 15 Temmuz orneginde tam tersi bir islev gordugunu soylemek mumkundur. Bu calisma 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde gerceklesen darbe girisimi surecinde olusan toplumsal tepki ve siyasal katilimda, yeni medyanin rolunu incelemekte ve yeni medya platformlarinin toplumsal davranis kaliplarinin degisimindeki etkisini 15 Temmuz ornegi uzerinden incelemektedir.","PeriodicalId":41235,"journal":{"name":"Gazi Akademik Bakis-Gazi Academic View","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2018-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68332777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"II. Dünya Savaşı Sonrasında Sovyet Talepleri ve Türkiye’nin Tepkisi","authors":"Nasrullah Uzman","doi":"10.19060/gav.437787","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19060/gav.437787","url":null,"abstract":"Turkiye, II. Dunya Savasi’na katilmadi ve aktif tarafsizlik politikasini benimsedi. Bu politikanin geregi olarak hem Mihver Devletlerle hem de Muttefik Devletlerle iliskilerini surdurdu. II. Dunya Savasi’ni Muttefik Devletlerin kazanacaginin anlasilmasi uzerine Turkiye, kurulacak yeni dunya duzeninde yalniz kalmamak ve Birlesmis Milletlere kurucu uye olarak katilabilmek icin sembolik de olsa Almanya ve Japonya’ya savas ilan etti. II. Dunya Savasi boyunca tarafsizlik politikasini surdurmek ve her iki tarafin da baskilarina ragmen savasa girmemek Turkiye acisindan oldukca zor bir surecti. Ancak Turkiye icin asil zorluk II. Dunya Savasi sonrasinda Sovyet Rusya’nin taleplerine karsi koyabilmekti. II. Dunya Savasi’ndan galip cikmis olmanin da verdigi gucle harekete gecen Sovyet Rusya, 1925 yilinda imzalanan ve her bes yilda bir yenilen Turk-Rus Dostluk Anlasmasini yenilemeyi reddettigi gibi Turkiye’den toprak ve us talebinde bulundu. Sovyet Rusya Turkiye’ye verdigi notalarla Bogazlardan us ve Kars-Ardahan’i istedi. Oysa Rusya, Montro ile Bogazlarda; Brest Litovsk, Moskova ve Kars Antlasmalari ile de Kars ve Ardahan’da Turkiye’nin egemenligini kabul ve tescil etmisti. Bu surecte Amerika ve Ingiltere’nin de destegini alan Turkiye, Sovyet Rusya’nin taleplerini reddetti; emellerinden vazgecmesi halinde Sovyet Rusya ile iyi iliskilerini surdurecegini belirtti ve egemenlik haklarini korumak icin gerekirse savasa bile hazir oldugunu ilan etti. Ancak Sovyet Rusya’nin emellerinden vazgecmemesi Turk-Rus iliskilerinin kopma noktasina gelmesine sebep oldu. Bu makalede Sovyet Rusya’nin Turkiye’den toprak ve us talepleri ve bu taleplere karsi Turkiye’nin tepkisi arsiv belgeleri, resmi yayinlar, donemin gazeteleri ve telif-tetkik eserler isiginda degerlendirilmistir.","PeriodicalId":41235,"journal":{"name":"Gazi Akademik Bakis-Gazi Academic View","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2018-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68332784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Uncovering the Party Effect in the US Congress","authors":"Alper T. Bulut","doi":"10.19060/gav.437821","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19060/gav.437821","url":null,"abstract":"Although there has been a voluminous literature on American foreign policy and its effect on several regions, research on American domestic politics has been relatively scarce. Due to its significant impact on foreign policy formation, the Presidency received a lot of scholarly attention. This paper, on the other hand, focuses on another important actor in American foreign and domestic policy: The United States Congress. In this respect, we specifically aim to contribute to the literature on American Congress which aims to uncover the party effect on legislative behavior. Current studies on the topic usually rely on rollcall votes. Although this method has been quite popular, recent studies indicate problems in terms of measuring the true effect of the party. Hence, this study proposes an alternative method which has been widely used in the European Politics literature. The proposed methods involves using expert surveys to determine the level of party effect.","PeriodicalId":41235,"journal":{"name":"Gazi Akademik Bakis-Gazi Academic View","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2018-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48113479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Osmanlı Arşiv Belgelerine Göre Afrika’da Türk- Fransız Mücadelesi: Canet Sorunu (1906-1912)","authors":"Abdullah Özdağ","doi":"10.19060/gav.437814","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19060/gav.437814","url":null,"abstract":"Sanayi devrimiyle yeni bir dunya duzeninin kurulmaya baslandigi 19. yuzyilda batili devletler dunyanin bircok bolgesini somurgeleri altina almislardir. Somurgecilik faaliyetleri kara kita Afrika’nin da kapisini calmis, Ingiltere ve Fransa’nin onculugunde kitanin bircok bolgesi batili devletler tarafindan taksim edilmistir. Ingiliz ve Fransiz nufuz bolgelerinin Turk idaresindeki bolgelerle catismasi Osmanli idaresiyle taraf devletlerin iliskilerini belirleyen en onemli etkenlerden biri olmustur. Ingilizlerin Sudan ve Misir, Fransizlarin Cezayir, Tunus ve Orta Afrika’daki faaliyetleri sadece Osmanli tarihi acisindan degil ayni zamanda Afrika tarihi hatta somurgecilik tarihi acisindan da onemli bir kirilma noktasini olusturmustur. Bu baglamda bu calismada kaleme alinan Canet Sorunu da Fransizlarin genislemeci politikalarinin bir sonucu olarak Sahra’da Turk-Fransiz cekismesini gostermektedir. Fransizlarin Kuzey Afrika ile Orta Afrika somurgelerini birbirine baglamak ve ticaret yollarini kendi lehine Cezayir topraklarina cevirmek amaciyla Sahra’ya nufuz etme cabasi buyuk bir merkez olmadigi hâlde jeopolitik oneminden dolayi Canet’i 20. yuzyilin baslarinda tarih sahnesine cikarmistir. Taraf devletlerin Canet’i kendi nufuz bolgelerinden kabul etmeleri ve zaman zaman sert guce basvurmalari meselenin onemini artiran etkenlerden olmustur. Ancak yinede taraflarin diplomatik yollarla meselenin cozumune egilmis olmalari ozellikle bu soruna dikkate deger farkli bir bakis kazandirmistir. Bu arada Sahra’nin vazgecilmez aktoru Tevarikler de Turk-Fransiz iliskilerinde belirleyici rol oynamistir. 1906’dan itibaren belirgin bir sekilde su yuzune cikan Canet Sorunu, 1912 tarihinde Osmanli Devleti’nin Afrika kitasini terk etmesiyle Fransizlar lehine sona ermistir.","PeriodicalId":41235,"journal":{"name":"Gazi Akademik Bakis-Gazi Academic View","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2018-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68332991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Son Osmanlı-Avusturya Mücadelesinde Değişen Dengeler ve Ziştovi Antlaşması","authors":"Zülfiye Koçak","doi":"10.19060/GAV.437817","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19060/GAV.437817","url":null,"abstract":"Osmanli diplomasisine Bec ya da Nemce olarak gecen Avusturya ile olan fiili iliskiler 1526 Mohac Meydan Savasi ile baslamis ve 1791 Zistovi Antlasmasi ile sona ermisti. Bu antlasma iki ulke arasindaki catismali iliskileri onemli oranda sonlandirmis ve daha uzun vadeye yayilan dostluk iliskilerinin bir anlamda baslangicini olusturmustur. Bu calismada 1787-1792 Osmanli Rus ve Avusturya savasinin nedenleri ile bu savas sonucunda Avusturya’yla imzalanan Zistovi Antlasmasi ele alinmistir. Calismanin ana kaynaklarini Basbakanlik Osmanli Arsivi’nde bulunan belgeler ile Londra Parlamento Arsivi’nde bu antlasmaya dair tutulan kayitlar olusturmaktadir. Her iki arsivde bulunan kayitlar karsilastirilarak durumun farklilasip farklilasmadigindan hareketle Osmanli-Avusturya tarihsel iliskilerinin bir kesiti degerlendirilmeye calisilmistir.","PeriodicalId":41235,"journal":{"name":"Gazi Akademik Bakis-Gazi Academic View","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2018-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68333100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Adam Smith’in Devlet Anlayışı Üzerine Kuramsal Bir İnceleme","authors":"K. Zorlu, Hale Kırmızıoğlu","doi":"10.19060/gav.437768","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19060/gav.437768","url":null,"abstract":"Bu calismanin amaci, sosyal bilimlerdeki en onemli yapilardan biri olan devlete ve onun islevlerine isik tutmaktir. Uzerine yapilan tartismalarin son bulmadigi ve her sosyal bilim acisindan ayri ayri tanimi yapilan bu buyuk yapinin toplumsal islevleri kesinlesmemistir. Bu amacla calismada devlet hakkindaki genel bakis acilarinin yani sira devleti ozellikle ekonomik alandaki fonksiyonlari acisindan ele alip inceleyen Adam Smith’in fikirleri on plana alinmistir. Cunku Adam Smith’in devlet anlayisi, doneminde one cikan diger ana akim iktisadi dusunurlerden farkli bir icerik sunmaktadir. Calismada Smith’in dusunce sistemini ve yonetsel bakimdan devlete bakisini anlamak icin oncelikle iki temel yapitindaki – Ahlaki Duygular Teorisi ve Uluslarin Zenginligi – goruslerine ve bu goruslerle ilgili yazindaki diger tartismalara yer verilmistir.","PeriodicalId":41235,"journal":{"name":"Gazi Akademik Bakis-Gazi Academic View","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2018-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47914650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Avrupa ve Amerika Birleşik Devletleri Arasındaki İlişkide Dönüşümler (2001-2017)","authors":"Cengiz Di̇nç, N. Esentürk","doi":"10.19060/GAV.437764","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19060/GAV.437764","url":null,"abstract":"Bu calismada, son 15 yilda, Avrupa’nin Amerika Birlesik Devletleri’yle iliskisinin nasil sekillendigi tarihsel perspektiften hareketle agirlikli olarak siyasi acidan incelenmektedir. Bu baglamda, 11 Eylul saldirisi, Irak ve Afganistan mudahaleleri, tek kutuplulugun zayiflamasinin ardindan olusan yeni konjonkturde ABD’de baslayan ve dunya capinda etkileri gorulen kuresel finansal kriz, kuresel capta terorle mucadele gibi konularin Avrupa ve ABD arasindaki transatlantik iliskilerin seyrini bu acilardan nasil etkiledigi analiz edilmektedir. Kasim 2016’da yapilan secimlerde Donald Trump’in Baskan secilmesinin ardindan yeni donemde Avrupa ve ABD arasindaki iliskilerin izleyecegi muhtemel yolla da ilgili degerlendirmelerde bulunulmaktadir. Iliskide, Soguk Savas bitiminden sonra oldugu gibi yine bir uzaklasma donemine girilmistir. Baskan Trump’in Avrupa Birligine, Avrupalilarin NATO’ya yaptiklari katkinin azligina, ticari acidan yapilanlara yonelik ciddi elestirileri vardir. Diger yandan Rusya’dan gittikce rahatsizlik duyan bir Avrupa, kendi aleyhine bir ABD-Rusya yakinlasmasindan endise etmektedir. Bu durumda iliskilerdeki kritik noktalara vurgu yapilarak iliskilerin kopmamasi icin her iki tarafin mevcut sartlarda nasil davranabileceklerine iliskin ongorulerde de bulunulmustur.","PeriodicalId":41235,"journal":{"name":"Gazi Akademik Bakis-Gazi Academic View","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2018-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68332744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Güney Anadolu Kıyılarında Hristiyan Korsanlar (1604-1608)","authors":"Mikail Acıpınar","doi":"10.19060/gav.379609","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19060/gav.379609","url":null,"abstract":"16. yuzyilin son ceyregi Akdeniz icin yeni bir doneme isaret etmektedir. Bu, bircok tarihcinin hemfikir oldugu uzere, ‘korsan savaslarinin’ buyuk deniz savaslarinin yerini aldigi yeni bir donemdi. Korsan savaslari cesitli sekillere burunmus olsa da en onemli yonunu Musluman- Hristiyan cekismeleri olusturmaktaydi. Malta, Ispanya ve Santo Stefano Şovalyeleri’nin basini cektigi farkli korsan gruplarinin Osmanlilara yonelik yogun saldirilari Akdeniz’in hemen her kosesini etkisi altina almisti. Medici Grandukalarina bagli Tarikat Şovalyeleri’nin akinlari da Guney Akdeniz kiyilarina kadar ulasmaktaydi. Bu calismada Hristiyan korsanlarin Guney Anadolu kiyilarina ve ozelikle Santo Stefano Şovalyelerinin 1606 yilinda Ayas, Anamur, Finike ve Alanya’ya yonelik yagma akinlari uzerinde durulacaktir.","PeriodicalId":41235,"journal":{"name":"Gazi Akademik Bakis-Gazi Academic View","volume":"11 1","pages":"183-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2017-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48393745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Analysis of the Regional Sub-Systems” in International Relations: South and East Asia as a Regional Sub-System","authors":"R. Karaca, Müge Yüce","doi":"10.19060/gav.379605","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19060/gav.379605","url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the “regional sub-system” analysis that aims to emphasize regional dynamics in the field of International Relations with a theoretical and applied approach. It has been aimed to prove that the South and East Asia region, which was subject to the examination within the scopes of the fundamental hypotheses of regional sub-system analysis, have a unique structure that differs from the global system, while having important contact points with the global system. According to the findings of the study, the South and East Asia subsystem exhibits a view where the “balance of power” is emphasized more than other regions, and where China emerges as the dominant economic and political power.","PeriodicalId":41235,"journal":{"name":"Gazi Akademik Bakis-Gazi Academic View","volume":"11 1","pages":"157-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2017-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48985521","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Regional Hegemony Quests in the Middle East from the Balance of Power System to the Balance of Proxy Wars: Turkey as Balancing Power for the Iran - Saudi Rivalry","authors":"Muharrem Ekşi","doi":"10.19060/GAV.379597","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19060/GAV.379597","url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the Iran-Saudi rivalry within the context of the changing balance of power in the Middle East. The main research questions were determined to be what the dynamics of the Iran-Saudi rivalry are and what type of role Turkey may play within the rivalry between the two countries. Three essential arguments were developed within this context. The first argument is that the regional balances were broken by the US occupation of Iraq in 2003 and by the ‘Arab Spring’ process resulting in the regional hegemony rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia. The second one is that Iran desired to utilize the Arab Spring process as an opportunity to become a regional hegemonic power. On the other hand, the policy of the US to withdraw from and leave the Middle East to its allies Israel and Saudi Arabia caused King Salman bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud to adopt a regional leadership policy. Within this framework, the study argued that the rivalry to become the new regional hegemon of the Middle East resurged between Iran and Saudi Arabia, the two historic rival powers of the Middle East. The third argument is that the rivalry between the two countries was mainly in the form of a proxy war but resulted in the fact that the balance of power struggle in the region reached to the proxy war balance as no country managed to outcompete the other.","PeriodicalId":41235,"journal":{"name":"Gazi Akademik Bakis-Gazi Academic View","volume":"11 1","pages":"133-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2017-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68332175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}