Indonesia Law Reform Journal最新文献

{"title":"Asset Forfeiture of Corruption Proceeds Using the Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Method: A Review of Human Rights","authors":"Wulandari, Wasis Suprayitno, K. Kurniawan, Merve Özkan Borsa","doi":"10.22219/ilrej.v3i1.24496","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v3i1.24496","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\u0000One of the state's efforts to eradicate corruption is to draw up a Bill on Asset Write-off, in which there is the regulation regarding the concept of Non-Criminal-Based Asset Write-off, which this concept can be called \"Writing Without Punishment\". The purpose of this writing is to find out how the concept of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture \"Forfeiture Without Criminalization\" can overcome corruption cases. Then to know how the human rights of the perpetrators whose assets are seized all by the state, doesn't every human being have the right to defend what they are entitled to. The method used by the author is the normative juridical method. These things are the general description of In this study, it was concluded that \"Non-Conviction Based Assets\" Forfeiture (NCB)\" in the case of confiscation of assets resulting from criminal acts of corruption intends to maximize efforts to restore / recover assets (asset recovery) for state treasury losses are for the benefit of justice with the whole community, and the mechanism does not violate Human rights are based on the barrier between the rights to property as defined regulated in \"Article 28G of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.\u0000Keywords: Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture; Corruption; Criminal Code.\u0000Abstrak\u0000Salah satu upaya negara memberantas korupsi adalah dengan lahirnya Rancangan Undang-undang Penghapusan Aset, yang didalamnya terdapat pengaturan mengenai konsep Penghapusan Aset Berbasis Non-Pidana yang konsep ini dapat disebut dengan \"Penghapusan Tanpa Hukuman\". Tujuan dari penulisan ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana konsep Penghapusan Aset Berbasis Non-Pidana \"Penghapusan Tanpa Kriminalisasi\" dapat mengatasi kasus korupsi. Kemudian untuk mengetahui bagaimana hak asasi manusia dari pelaku yang asetnya disita seluruhnya oleh negara, bukankah setiap manusia berhak membela apa yang menjadi haknya. Metode yang digunakan oleh penulis adalah metode yuridis normatif. Hal-hal tersebut merupakan deskripsi umum dalam penelitian ini, dinyatakan bahwa \"Penghapusan Aset Berbasis Non-Pidana\" dalam kasus penghapusan aset yang dihasilkan dari tindakan kejahatan korupsi bermaksud memaksimalkan upaya untuk memulihkan / mengembalikan aset (pemulihan aset) untuk kerugian kas negara demi kepentingan keadilan bersama masyarakat, dan mekanisme tersebut tidak melanggar hak asasi manusia yang didasarkan pada penghalang antara hak atas properti yang diatur dalam \"Pasal 28G Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945\".\u0000Kata kunci: Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture; Korupsi; Hukum Pidana.","PeriodicalId":404317,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Law Reform Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127154870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Regulation of Patent Protection of Computer Programs as Inventions in Indonesia","authors":"Asri Sarif, I. Y. Winatha, Raden Ani, Eko Wahyuni, Muhammad Zainuddin, “Politik Hukum, Pembentukan Pasal","doi":"10.22219/ilrej.v3i1.25940","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v3i1.25940","url":null,"abstract":"The protection of computer programs in Indonesia has been strictly regulated in the Copyright Law, but the patent obtained by Eddy Tuhirman for his program in 2017 shows that the protection of computer programs in Indonesia is not impossible. This study aims to find out how the regulation of patent protection for computer programs in Indonesia. Using normative juridical research methods, with an emphasis on analysis on applicable legal regulations and other legal sources relevant to the legal issues studied. The results of this study indicate that based on the explanation of Article 4 letter d of Law no. 13 of 2016 concerning Patents, patent protection for computer programs can still be granted on a limited basis. Patent protection is not granted to computer programs which contain only a set of instructions expressed in the form of language, code, schematic or in any other form without having a technical effect. Patents can only be granted for computer programs that have characteristics in the form of instructions, technical effects, and problem solving in the field of technology. In order to provide more legal certainty, it is suggested that the government make stricter and clearer regulations, particularly regarding the types and specifications of computer programs that can be granted patents.\u0000Abstrak\u0000Perlindungan atas program computer di Indonesia telah diatur secara tegas dalam Undang-Undang tentang Hak Cipta, namun Paten yang didapat oleh Eddy Tuhirman atas program ciptaannya pada tahun 2017 menunjukkan, bahwa perlindungan atas program koomputer di Indonesia bukan sesuatu yang tidak mungkin. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pengaturan perlindungan paten terhadap program komputer di Indonesia. Menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, dengan menitikberatkan analisis pada peraturan-peraturan hukum yang berlaku dan sumber hukum lainnya yang relevan dengan isu hukum yang diteliti. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan penjelasan Pasal 4 huruf d Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Paten, perlindungan paten atas program komputer masih dapat diberikan secara terbatas. Perlindungan Paten tidak diberikan kepada program computer yang hanya berisi seperangkat instruksi yang diekspresikan dalam bentuk bahasa, kode, skema, atau dalam bentuk apapun tanpa memiliki efek teknis. Paten hanya dapat diberikan untuk program komputer yang memiliki karakteristik berupa instruksi, efek teknis, dan pemecahan masalah di bidang teknologi. Untuk lebih memberikan kepastian hukum, disarankan agar pemerintah dapat membuat peraturan yang lebih tegas dan jelas, khususnya mengenai jenis dan spesifikasi program komputer yang dapat diberikan hak paten.\u0000 ","PeriodicalId":404317,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Law Reform Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114797599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Rethinking the Sovereignty Principle: Is it a Legal Provision or a Political Domain Nowadays?","authors":"Dewi Nurvianti, Aris Irawan, Fathurrahman, Sri Fridayanti","doi":"10.22219/ilrej.v3i1.25686","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v3i1.25686","url":null,"abstract":"The relation of international community currently emphasize that soveregnty princple could not more decide as the main principle in managing a territory of state, even though sovereignty is the main requirement for a state to enforce its law and to do cooperation among entities in international relations. In order to find out the exact interpretation of sovereginty principle, this article used qualitative method. This study find out that sovereignty is recognized as one of the principles in recognizing a state. This term has a political nuance, because the aspect of recognition itself is not a legal aspect but a political one. Moreover, in several cases, even though a country had proclaimed its sovereignty, there are still opportunities for a part of the territory to become independent or even to be acquired by other countries. Thus, it seems that the principle of sovereignty has a tendency as part of politics. However, the principle of sovereignty remains a legal principle based on the provisions of international law, where each country has exclusive rights in every part of its territory, namely in land, air and sea. Currently, the concept of international law has expanded to the politic of international law study, which numerous aspects of law enforcement mingle with a country's policies that are synonymous with political aspects. Additionally, that the current principle of sovereignty should be completed with another legal principle in international law.\u0000Abstrak\u0000Hubungan masyarakat internasional saat ini menekankan bahwa prinsip kedaulatan tidak dapat lagi diputuskan sebagai prinsip utama dalam pengelolaan suatu wilayah negara, padahal kedaulatan merupakan syarat utama bagi suatu negara untuk menegakkan hukumnya dan untuk melakukan kerjasama antar entitas dalam hubungan internasional. Untuk mengetahui interpretasi yang tepat dari prinsip kedaulatan, artikel ini menggunakan metode kualitatif. Studi ini menemukan bahwa kedaulatan diakui sebagai salah satu prinsip dalam pengakuan suatu negara. Istilah ini bernuansa politis, karena aspek pengakuan itu sendiri bukanlah aspek hukum melainkan aspek politik. Apalagi, dalam beberapa kasus, meski suatu negara telah memproklamasikan kedaulatannya, masih ada peluang bagi sebagian wilayahnya untuk merdeka atau bahkan diakuisisi oleh negara lain. Dengan demikian, nampaknya prinsip kedaulatan memiliki kecenderungan sebagai bagian dari politik. Namun asas kedaulatan tetap merupakan asas hukum berdasarkan ketentuan hukum internasional, dimana setiap negara memiliki hak eksklusif di setiap bagian wilayahnya, yaitu di darat, udara dan laut. Saat ini, konsep hukum internasional telah merambah ke politik kajian hukum internasional, dimana berbagai aspek penegakan hukum berbaur dengan kebijakan suatu negara yang identik dengan aspek politik. Oleh karena itu, disimpulkan bahwa asas kedaulatan yang berlaku saat ini harus dilengkapi dengan asas hukum lain dalam hukum internasional.","PeriodicalId":404317,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Law Reform Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128811675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Pluralism and Equality in the Perspective of Human Rights in Indonesia","authors":"Abustan","doi":"10.22219/ilrej.v3i1.24205","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v3i1.24205","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\u0000In the context of Indonesia's plural society, where the demand for pluralism is increasingly urgent during the democratic transition, it often raises questions about how the implementation of the principle of equality can be the foundation of democracy and the fulfillment of human rights. The purpose of writing is to analyzehow society respects pluralism/equality as part of the fulfillment of citizens' rights in a democratic country. The research method used is normative juridical by referring to legal norms contained in the constitution and legislation. The aim of the research is to identify the important dimensions that the state must consider in realizing pluralism and equality from the perspective of human rights in Indonesia. Moreover, it aims to demonstrate that in a diverse society, religious tolerance in the effort of developing religious life can still run harmoniously, dialogically, and tolerantly in the present modern Indonesia era. This is especially important for Indonesia, as it has the fourth-largest population in the world. Therefore, the presence of the state in supporting the multicultural democratic society is highly needed. \u0000Keywords: Plurality and Equality; Human Rights; and Democracy.\u0000Abstrak \u0000Dalam konteks masyarakat Indonesia yang plural, di mana tuntutan akan paham kemajemukan semakin mendesak pada masa transisi demokratisasi, sehingga kerap kali mengimbulkan pertanyaan bagaimana penerapan prinsip kesetaraan dapat menjadi landasan perjuangan demokrasi dan pemenuhan hak asasi manusia. Pertanyaan tersebut itulah yang menjadi fokus riset ini, yakni meneliti tentang bagaimana tatanan masyarakat menghormati kemajemukan/kesetaraan sebagai bagian dari pemenuhan hak-hak warga negara dalam sebuah negara demokrasi. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode Yuridis Normatif yaitu dengan mengacu pada norma-norma hukum yang terdapat dalam konstitusi dan peraturan perundang-undangan. Tujuan penelitian mengetahui dimensi-dimensi penting yang menjadi perhatian negara dalam mewujudkan kemajemukan dan kesetaraan dalam perspektif hak asasi manusia di Indonesia. Lebih dari itu, juga hendak menunjukkan bahwa dalam ranah masyarakat majemuk, toleransi agama dalam upaya pengembangan kehidupan beragama tetap berjalan harmonis, dialogis, dan toleran dalam era Indonesia moderen sekarang ini. Apalagi Negara Indonesia dengan jumlah populasi penduduk terbesar ke 4 di dunia. Maka dari itu, kehadiran negara dalam rangka menopang pilar masyarakat demokratis multikultural sangat diperlukan.\u0000Kata kunci: Kemajemukan dan Kesetaraan, Hak Asasi Manusia dan Demokrasi.\u0000 ","PeriodicalId":404317,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Law Reform Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132900688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Juridical Analysis of Legal Protection of Personal Data in terms of Legal Certainty","authors":"Akhmad Afridho Wira P, F. Esfandiari, W. Wasis","doi":"10.22219/ilrej.v3i1.23840","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v3i1.23840","url":null,"abstract":"Personal data is individual data that is stored, cared for, and kept true and also protected by confidentiality. There are various kinds of rules governing personal data in Indonesia but there is no one rule that specifically regulates personal data itself. The purpose of this study is to analyze the protection of personal data in terms of legal certainty. The problem in this research is how the legal protection of personal data is viewed from the Legal Certainty Principle, as well as the ius constituendum for personal data regulation in Indonesia. This study uses normative legal research using statutory and case approaches. Collection of legal materials through the method of literature study, with primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The conclusion from the results of this study shows that the current regulations still do not really provide concrete protection because personal data itself does not have laws that specifically regulate and bind it. The suggestion from this study is that there are efforts to optimize agencies or institutions that have authorization in terms of enforcing data protection laws in Indonesia.\u0000Abstrak\u0000Data pribadi adalah data perseorangan yang disimpan, dirawat, dan dijaga kebenarannya dan juga dilindungi kerahasiaanya. Terdapat berbagai macam aturan yang mengatur data pribadi tersebut di Indonesia tetapi belum ada satu aturan yang mengatur secara khusus tentang data pribadi itu sendiri. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa tentang perlindungan data pribadi ditinjau dari aspek kepastian hukum.  Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana perlindungan hukum terhadap data pribadi ditinjau dari Asas Kepastian Hukum, serta ius constituendum terhadap pengaturan data pibadi di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Pengumpulan bahan hukum melalui metode studi literatur, dengan bahan hukum primer, sekunder, maupun tersier. Kesimpulan dari hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa, aturan- aturan yang berlaku saat ini masih belum terlalu memberikan perlindungan yang konkrit karena data pribadi ini sendiri belum memiliki undang-undang yang khusus mengatur dan mengikat didalamnya. Saran dari penelitian ini adalah ada upaya optimalisasi terhadap instansi atau lembaga yang memiliki otorisasi dalam hal penegakan hukum perlindungan data di Indonesia.\u0000 ","PeriodicalId":404317,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Law Reform Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127811146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Legal Protection for Workers who Have Harmed Employers","authors":"Sonia Amelia, Ega Permatadani, I. Rosida, Rifda Ayu Akmaliya, Anang Dony Irawan","doi":"10.22219/ilrej.v3i1.24464","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v3i1.24464","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to find out how legal protection for workers has harmed employers so that workers have been laid off. The type of research used in this study is normative research using the nature of the law approach as well as the theoretical point of view from scientific books and journals that function to provide solutions to existing legal problems. The results show that even though Article 164 paragraph (3) of Law Number 13 of 2003 must provide severance pay, award money, and services during the employee's working period and provide compensation. When workers are proven to be unproductive at work or have problems with the detriment of the employer, the employer can take action to terminate the employment relationship with the worker. From there, the Law does not prohibit companies from taking efficiency measures, but these efficiency actions are no longer valid if there are procedures or reasons that are not in accordance with the applicable regulatory requirements. With the existence of Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower, I hope that it can implement various national instruments that have been ratified, for example labor rights. This ambiguity makes the Indonesian people have to have strong policies and regulations on labor rights regulations, so that they can restore the wheels of Indonesia's slumping economy.\u0000Keywords: Labor; Legal Protection; Termination of Employment.\u0000 \u0000Abstrak\u0000Tujuan penelitian yakni untuk mengetahui bagaimana perlindungan hukum bagi para pekerja yang telah merugikan pengusaha sehingga sampai para pekerja di PHK. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif dengan memakai sifat pendekatan Undang-Undang serta sudut pandang teoritis dari buku dan jurnal ilmiah yang berfungsi untuk memberikan solusi terhadap permasalahan hukum yang ada. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Saat pekerja terbukti tidak produktif dalam bekerja atau memiliki masalah sampai merugikan pengusaha disitu pengusaha bisa mengambil tindakan untuk memutuskan hubungan kerja dengan pekerja. Dari situ Undang-Undang tidak melarang perusahaan untuk melakukan tindakan efisiensi namun tindakan efiensi tersebut menjadi tidak berlaku lagi jika ada prosedur atau alasan yang tidak sesuai dengan syarat peraturan yang berlaku. Adanya Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan saya harap bisa melaksanakan berbagai instrument nasional yang telah diratifikasi contohnya hak hak tenaga kerja. Ketidakjelasan tersebut membuat bangsa Indonesia harus memiliki kebijakan dan peraturan yang kuat atas peraturan hak para tenaga kerja, sehingga bisa mengembalikan roda perekonomian Indonesia yang terpuruk ini.\u0000Kata Kunci: Tenaga Kerja; Perlindungan Hukum; Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja.","PeriodicalId":404317,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Law Reform Journal","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127925453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Legal Consequences of Marriage Agreement to Interested Third Parties","authors":"Rhesita Ayu Sophia Dewi, Herwastoeti, Dwi Ratna Indri Hapsari","doi":"10.22219/ilrej.v3i1.25362","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v3i1.25362","url":null,"abstract":"Marriage is a bond that forms a family within society and the state. With the existence of marriage can realize the welfare and happiness between humans. In a marriage, the husband or wife certainly brings assets called innate assets. So, before the marriage takes place, the prospective husband and wife make a marriage agreement which is a form of agreement made between one party and another and there is no coercion from any party. This study aims to find out how the process of making a marriage agreement deed and to find out whether the marriage agreement has legal consequences for third parties. The type of research used is empirical juridical with primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques with interviews and observation. The results of the study show that in Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, what is unanimously mixed are assets acquired during marriage. As for inherited assets, they remain under the authority of each unless mutually agreed upon by the husband and wife to be united in joint property. In the marriage agreement besides binding the husband and wife, the marriage agreement is also binding on third parties. So, this is a third party is very interested.\u0000Abstrak\u0000Perkawinan merupakan ikatan yang membentuk suatu keluarga di dalam lingkungan masyarakat dan negara. Dengan adanya perkawinan dapat mewujudkan kesejahteraan dan kebahagiaan antar manusia. Dalam suatu perkawinan suami atau istri tentunya membawa harta yang disebut harta bawaan. Maka sebelum perkawinan berlangsung para calon suami dan isteri membuat perjanjian perkawinan yang merupakan salah satu wujud dari perjanjian yang dibuat antara satu pihak dengan pihak yang lain dan tidak ada paksaan dari pihak manapun. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana proses dalam pembuatan akta perjanjian perkawinan serta untuk mengetahui apakah perjanjian perkawinan memiliki akibat hukum bagi pihak ketiga. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis empiris dengan data perimer dan data skunder. Teknik pengumpulan data dengan wawancara dan observasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam Undang – Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan, yang dicampurkan secara bulat adalah harta yang diperoleh selama perkawinan. Sedangkan untuk harta bawaan tetap di bawah kekuasaan masing-masing kecuali disepakati bersama oleh suami dan istri untuk disatukan dalam harta bersama. Dalam perjanjian pernikahan selain mengikat pasangan suami-istri tersebut, perjanjian perkawinan juga mengikat terhadap pihak ketiga. Maka hal ini pihak ketiga sangat berkepentingan.\u0000 ","PeriodicalId":404317,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Law Reform Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131690000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Settlement of Brand Rights Disputes Through the Commercial Court in Indonesia: Study of Surabaya Court Decision","authors":"I. G. M. Yogiswara, L. L. Lombok, Asrul Ibrahim Nur, I. G. B. I. Kumara, Ni Nyoman Sri Purnama Sutianti","doi":"10.22219/ilrej.v2i3.23754","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v2i3.23754","url":null,"abstract":"Brands play a significant role in economic development because they help consumers identify the origin of a product or service. Brand ownership is acknowledged at the time of brand registration with the Directorate General of Intellectual Property. The first prerequisite for registering a brand is ensuring that it possesses all of its attributes. Therefore, some characteristics distinguish it from other brands. Despite these regulations, brand infringements still occur. One of them is the disagreement between PT. Gudang Garan and PT. Gudang Baru, whose brands are comparable. Therefore, a study on Indonesian law enforcement in resolving brand issues is required. The current study employed normative legal research and normative juridical methodologies. Using descriptive qualitative data analysis, the study focused on laws and regulations. The Surabaya Commercial Court determined, based on a dispute between PT. Gudang Garan and PT Gudang Baru, that PT. Gudang Baru breached Article 21 Paragraph 1 of Law No. 20 of 2016, declaring the Gudang Baru brand comparable to the well-known Gudang Garan brand. As a result, the Gudang Baru brand was revoked, and to ensure a deterrent effect, DGKI ordered any application for registration of a brand that resembles PT. Gudang Garan be denied.","PeriodicalId":404317,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Law Reform Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123306591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Public Participation in the Law-Making in the Digitalization Era","authors":"Dodi Jaya Wardana, H. Bachtiar","doi":"10.22219/ilrej.v2i3.23764","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v2i3.23764","url":null,"abstract":"Technology can play an important role and provide a useful tool for creating informed and active citizens, thereby contributing to democracy from the ground up. The shift from e-governance to e-democracy has become an important example of the capacity of technology to influence public law as a whole. There are at least four methods that can be used to participate in public participation in law-making, namely digitally: Interactive Applications, Legislative Crowdsourcing, and Utilizing Big Data. There are at least 2 (two) ways that the community can conventionally take to get involved in forming the law, namely active participation, and passive participation. Through active participation, the public takes the initiative to participate in the process of forming legislation products by attending general meetings, and public debates, as well as writing open letters in the mass media addressed to the apparatus in charge of discussing the Draft Law. Passive participation means that participation initiatives come from outside the community.","PeriodicalId":404317,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Law Reform Journal","volume":"520 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116265871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Implementation of Intellectual Property Registration for Startups in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0 in Pontianak","authors":"Tri Atika Febriany, Heru Yudi Kurniawan, Deni Setiyawan","doi":"10.22219/ilrej.v2i3.23309","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v2i3.23309","url":null,"abstract":"The development of thinking supported by the ease of obtaining information in real-time with the assistance of a smartphone has changed a person’s pattern of life and the way to socialize. With the current technology, face-to-face socialization has been shifted to video calls. Not only socializing patterns, trading patterns have also been affected. Today trading process is not only held conventionally (buyers come to the store), but also by using the available applications. Through the applications, we can buy goods without having to leave the house. The presence of this change cannot be separated from the role of technology-based startups which create an application offering a variety of convenience services. The growth of the nation’s startups has now penetrated the world market. Some Indonesian startups have a valuation of US $ 1 billion and are included in the Unicorn class such as Tokopedia, Buka Lapak, and Traveloka. Now Go-Jek has also entered the Decacorn class. To protect their business, businessmen need to register their brands for intellectual property. Considering the importance of intellectual property in the industrial revolution 4.0, the researchers carried out this research to protect digital startups in Pontianak, especially in terms of intellectual property registration.","PeriodicalId":404317,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Law Reform Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131266296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}