Journal of Military Ethics最新文献

{"title":"Kevlar for the Soul: Moral Theology and Force Protection","authors":"Marc LiVecche","doi":"10.1080/15027570.2024.2309768","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2024.2309768","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":39180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Military Ethics","volume":"124 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139785532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Kevlar for the Soul: Moral Theology and Force Protection","authors":"Marc LiVecche","doi":"10.1080/15027570.2024.2309768","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2024.2309768","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":39180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Military Ethics","volume":"32 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139845287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Teaching Virtues in the Military","authors":"Nancy E. Snow","doi":"10.1080/15027570.2024.2312637","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2024.2312637","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":39180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Military Ethics","volume":"23 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139805920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Teaching Virtues in the Military","authors":"Nancy E. Snow","doi":"10.1080/15027570.2024.2312637","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2024.2312637","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":39180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Military Ethics","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139865865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"War\u0000 without\u0000 Agreement: Thinking through Okeja's\u0000 Jus ad Bellum\u0000 Theory","authors":"L. Cordeiro‐Rodrigues","doi":"10.1080/15027570.2023.2287866","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2023.2287866","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":39180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Military Ethics","volume":"64 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138590899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Decision Making in Killer Robots is Not Bias Free","authors":"Teresa Limata","doi":"10.1080/15027570.2023.2286044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2023.2286044","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":39180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Military Ethics","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139202105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Moralities of Drone Violence Moralities of Drone Violence by Christian Enemark, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2023, 256 pp., open access (ebook), ISBN 978-1474490108","authors":"Karia Hartung","doi":"10.1080/15027570.2023.2283978","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2023.2283978","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":39180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Military Ethics","volume":"224 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139245165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Selective Conscientious Objection and the Prima Facie Duty Override Criteria","authors":"Logan Sisson","doi":"10.1080/15027570.2023.2264069","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2023.2264069","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTSelective conscientious objection, a refusal to participate in a specific war due to reasons of conscience, has recently gained attention. A combatant confronted with such a decision needs guidance to help decide whether and how to object. Furthermore, those judging a combatant’s objection or failure to object need guidance. After introducing the prima facie duty override criteria, I will apply the criteria to the case of selective conscientious objection. Ultimately, I argue that the jus ad bellum criteria rebranded as the prima facie duty override criteria can help provide guidance regarding selective conscientious objection.KEYWORDS: Selective conscientious objectionprima facie dutiesjus ad bellumaggressive war AcknowledgementThe majority of this came from my 2016 PhD Dissertation at the University of Virginia. Specifically, I would like to thank Tal Brewer and James Childress. I also thank those who provided me feedback at the 2018 International Society of Military Ethics (ISME). Specifically, I would like to thank Martin Cook. Additionally, I would like to thank the reviewers and editors of the Journal of Military Ethics for their feedback. Finally, the views expressed in this work are solely my own, and do not express an official viewpoint of the Air Force or Department of Defense.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 I assume the reader is already familiar with these and will not spend time discussing them. There are many variations, but I do not think the lack of a consensus lessens my overall point. I have taken my ordering from Brian Orend, but have divided “public declaration by proper authority” into two components (Citation2013, 34).Additional informationNotes on contributorsLogan SissonLogan Sisson (PhD, University of Virginia, 2016) is an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the US Air Force Academy. His research interests include just war theory, ethics, moral injury, and human rights.","PeriodicalId":39180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Military Ethics","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135853809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Can Just Wars Be Fought Proportionately? A Critique of <i>In Bello</i> Proportionality","authors":"Michael C. Hawley","doi":"10.1080/15027570.2023.2257916","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2023.2257916","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTProportionality has long been considered a pillar of just war theory, requiring that the goods achieved in an action outweigh the collateral harms it causes. In this article, I argue that the in bello principle of proportionality cannot serve its intended function of limiting the destructiveness of actions during war. I illustrate the features of war that make the in bello proportionality constraint not merely impossible to follow, but perhaps even self-defeating. I conclude by suggesting ways in which theorists and policymakers concerned with justice in war might attempt to respond to this dilemma.KEYWORDS: Just war theoryproportionalityin belloepistemological problems in war AcknowledgementsI would like to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers at JME for their insightful comments and suggestions. I would also like to thank the Michael Zuckert, Matthew Hartman, Robert Wyllie, Robert Burton, and Catherine Sims Kuiper for their feedback on earlier versions of this article.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 For instance, those used as human shields now enjoy the same status as other civilians when determining proportionality. In addition, the update included new procedures to minimize civilian casualties, such as providing warnings that an attack is coming.2 As will become apparent, this critique does not apply to ad bellum proportionality. For a good discussion of the difficulties involved in applying that principle, Brown (Citation2011).3 Unless otherwise noted, subsequent use of the term “proportionality” refers specifically to the consideration of in bello proportionality. For reasons that should become clear, the problem with in bello proportionality discussed in this article does not necessarily implicate its ad bellum counterpart.4 Although, perhaps not as old as just war thinking itself. Rory Cox (Citation2017) illustrates how ancient Egyptian doctrines of just war placed such overwhelming emphasis on ius ad bellum that no room was left for ius in bello doctrines like proportionality.5 Cf. Guelff and Roberts Citation1982, 416.6 McMahan at times distinguishes between the doctrine of proportionality and what he calls the “requirements of minimal force”. However, McMahan himself admits that in war the requirements of proportionality and minimal force blur together (McMahan Citation2009, 23). For the purposes of this argument, I make no distinction between the two.7 By this, I do not mean to reduce the idea of proportionality to a simple matter of box-ticking. Many reasonably take the purpose of just war theory to be the raising of important questions and issues as starting points to guide the thinking of combatants and policymakers. However, even if one takes this approach to just war theory, just war theorists must make sure that their questions are useful and coherent ones—rather than inherently contradictory. Otherwise, they are unhelpful as guides to thought or action.8 Cf","PeriodicalId":39180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Military Ethics","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134958234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Virtue and Applied Military Ethics: Understanding Character-Based Approaches to Professional Military Ethics","authors":"C. Anthony Pfaff","doi":"10.1080/15027570.2023.2200064","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2023.2200064","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":39180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Military Ethics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41897629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}