Moral Philosophy and Politics最新文献_第8页

Varieties of Hermeneutical Injustice: A Blueprint 解释学不公正的多样性:蓝图

IF 0.6

Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2021-01-28 DOI: 10.1515/MOPP-2020-0007

Christine Bratu, H. Haenel

引用次数: 6

The Virtues of Economic Rescue Legislation: Distributive Justice, Civil Law, and the Troubled Asset Relief Program 经济救助立法的优点:分配正义、民法和问题资产救助计划

IF 0.6

Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2020-11-18 DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2019-0039

Henry S. Kuo

引用次数: 0

Beyond Porn and Discreditation: Epistemic Promises and Perils of Deepfake Technology in Digital Lifeworlds 超越色情和名誉扫地:数字生活世界中深度造假技术的认知承诺和危险

IF 0.6

Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2020-11-11 DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2020-0024

Catherine Kerner, Mathias Risse

引用次数: 17

Frontmatter

IF 0.6

Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2020-frontmatter2

引用次数: 0

Must Realists Be Pessimists About Democracy? Responding to Epistemic and Oligarchic Challenges 现实主义者必须对民主持悲观态度吗?应对认知和寡头挑战

IF 0.6

Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2020-09-25 DOI: 10.1515/MOPP-2019-0060

Gordon Arlen, Enzo Rossi

{"title":"Must Realists Be Pessimists About Democracy? Responding to Epistemic and Oligarchic Challenges","authors":"Gordon Arlen, Enzo Rossi","doi":"10.1515/MOPP-2019-0060","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/MOPP-2019-0060","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper we show how a realistic normative democratic theory can work within the constraints set by the most pessimistic empirical results about voting behaviour and elite capture of the policy process. After setting out the empirical evidence and discussing some extant responses by political theorists, we argue that the evidence produces a two-pronged challenge for democracy: an epistemic challenge concerning the quality and focus of decision-making and an oligarchic challenge concerning power concentration. To address the challenges we then put forward three main normative claims, each of which is compatible with the evidence. We start with (1) a critique of the epistocratic position commonly thought to be supported by the evidence. We then introduce (2) a qualified critique of referenda and other forms of plebiscite, and (3) an outline of a tribune-based system of popular control over oligarchic influence on the policy process. Our discussion points towards a renewal of democracy in a plebeian but not plebiscitarian direction: Attention to the relative power of social classes matters more than formal dispersal of power through voting. We close with some methodological reflections about the compatibility between our normative claims and the realist program in political philosophy.","PeriodicalId":37108,"journal":{"name":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2020-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72597506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

Respecting Children’s Choices 尊重孩子的选择

IF 0.6

Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2020-09-21 DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2019-0046

K. Grill

引用次数: 5

The Social Injustice of Parental Imprisonment 监禁父母的社会不公

IF 0.6

Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2020-09-18 DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2019-0044

William Bülow, L. Lindblom

{"title":"The Social Injustice of Parental Imprisonment","authors":"William Bülow, L. Lindblom","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2019-0044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2019-0044","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Children of prisoners are often negatively affected by their parents’ incarceration, which raises issues of justice. A common view is that the many negative effects associated with parental imprisonment are unjust, simply because children of prisoners are impermissibly harmed or unjustly punished by their parents’ incarceration. We argue that proposals of this kind have problems with accounting for cases where it is intuitive that prison might create social injustices for children of prisoners. Therefore, we suggest that in addition to the question of whether children of prisoners are impermissibly harmed, we should ask whether the inequalities that these children endure because of their parent’s incarceration are objectionable from a social justice perspective. To answer this latter question, we examine the negative effects associated with parental imprisonment from the perspective of luck egalitarianism. We develop a luck egalitarian account that incorporates insights from the philosophy of childhood. On our account, children of prisoners might endure two different types of objectionable inequalities, since they are often deprived of resources that are important for ensuring fair equality of opportunity in adulthood, but also because they are likely to suffer inequalities in terms of childhood welfare. After defending this account, we explore its implications for policy.","PeriodicalId":37108,"journal":{"name":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2020-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86686169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Irresistible Nudges, Inevitable Nudges, and the Freedom to Choose 不可抗拒的推动，不可避免的推动，以及选择的自由

IF 0.6

Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2020-08-27 DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2020-0013

Jens Kipper

引用次数: 3

Disenfranchisement and the Capacity/Equality Puzzle: Why Disenfranchise Children but Not Adults Living with Cognitive Disabilities 剥夺公民权和能力/平等难题:为什么剥夺儿童而不是患有认知障碍的成年人的公民权

IF 0.6

Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2020-08-11 DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2019-0054

Attila Mráz

{"title":"Disenfranchisement and the Capacity/Equality Puzzle: Why Disenfranchise Children but Not Adults Living with Cognitive Disabilities","authors":"Attila Mráz","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2019-0054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2019-0054","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper, I offer a solution to the Capacity/Equality Puzzle. The puzzle holds that an account of the franchise may adequately capture at most two of the following: (1) a political equality-based account of the franchise, (2) a capacity-based account of disenfranchising children, and (3) universal adult enfranchisement. To resolve the puzzle, I provide a complex liberal egalitarian justification of a moral requirement to disenfranchise children. I show that disenfranchising children is permitted by both the proper political liberal and the proper political egalitarian understandings of the relationship between cognitive capacity and the franchise. Further, I argue, disenfranchising children is required by a minimalistic, procedural principle of collective competence in political decision-making. At the same time, I show that political equality requires the enfranchisement of all adults, regardless of cognitive capacities, and that the collective competence principle does not ground adult disenfranchisement. This justifies the progressive legal trend that holds the capacity-based disenfranchisement of adults to be incompatible with liberal democratic principles.","PeriodicalId":37108,"journal":{"name":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2020-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80302989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

The Trust Model of Children’s Rights 儿童权利信托模式

IF 0.6

Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2020-08-06 DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2019-0040

K. Pike

引用次数: 0