Moral Philosophy and Politics最新文献_第4页

In Defense of Wishful Thinking 为一厢情愿辩护

IF 0.6

Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2022-04-15 DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2021-0041

E. Prendergast

引用次数: 1

On Whose Terms? Power and Exploitation in Trade 谁说了算?贸易中的权力和剥削

IF 0.6

Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2022-0001

P. Dietsch, F. Garcia

引用次数: 0

Dissent and Legitimacy 异议与合法性

IF 0.6

Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2022-03-22 DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2021-0073

Geoffrey D. Callaghan

{"title":"Dissent and Legitimacy","authors":"Geoffrey D. Callaghan","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2021-0073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2021-0073","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract An often overlooked tension in liberal theory turns on its commitment to procedural accounts of legitimacy on the one hand, and to the robust protection of the right of citizens to dissent on the other. To the extent that one evaluates legitimate decision-making on the basis of the procedures that bear on it, determining how extra-procedural expressions of dissent fit into the picture becomes a complex undertaking. This is especially true if one accepts that protecting extra-procedural expressions of dissent is itself foundational to the overall legitimacy of the state. My aim in this paper is to explore some of the implications that follow from this tension. The paper proceeds in two parts. In the first part, I review the political grounds that support a protection on dissent. By drawing on its republican foundations, I argue that the functional role that the right to dissent serves in complex political communities is intimately connected to concerns over legitimacy. I claim that for the right to perform its function successfully, protections must be placed on both procedural and extra-procedural forms of dissent. The second part of the paper issues a direct challenge to procedural accounts of legitimacy. If a protection on citizen dissent is vital to legitimating government action, and if that protection necessarily extends to both procedural and extra-procedural forms of dissent, it follows that legitimacy cannot be captured by procedure alone—even procedures that secure the fair and equal participation by all affected parties.","PeriodicalId":37108,"journal":{"name":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","volume":"102 1","pages":"69 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80662051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Institutions and Moral Demandingness 制度与道德要求

IF 0.6

Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2022-03-07 DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2019-0012

J. Belic

{"title":"Institutions and Moral Demandingness","authors":"J. Belic","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2019-0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2019-0012","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract How much should we sacrifice for the sake of others? While some argue in favour of significant sacrifices, others contend that morality cannot demand too much from individuals. Recently, the debate has taken a new turn by focusing on moral demands under non-ideal conditions in which the essential interests of many people are set back. Under such conditions, in some views, moral theories must require extreme moral demands as anything less is incompatible with equal consideration of everyone’s interests. The insistence on the extremeness of moral demands, however, presupposes a simplistic account of non-ideal conditions as characterized mainly by the non-compliance of many individuals. Non-ideal conditions are also characterized by institutional non-compliance, whereby institutions often do not do what they ought to do. Institutional non-compliance is significant as it increases the size of moral demands significantly, thereby exacerbating the conflict between these demands and the self-interest of individuals subjected to these institutions. I argue that individuals have a meta-interest in not experiencing such internal conflicts as these can undermine their affirmation of self-respect. Meta-interest can be advanced by adopting the promotion of just institutions as an ultimate aim, as such institutions lessen the conflict and, accordingly, enable us to live more harmonious lives. Moreover, the promotion of just institutions allows us to affirm our sense of self-respect under non-ideal conditions too. Because the promotion of just institutions is in our self-interest, this is not an extreme but a moderate moral demand.","PeriodicalId":37108,"journal":{"name":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","volume":"111 1","pages":"1 - 22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79173850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Domesticating Artificial Intelligence 驯化人工智能

IF 0.6

Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2022-02-14 DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2020-0054

Luise K. Müller

引用次数: 0

The Global Governance of Artificial Intelligence: Some Normative Concerns 人工智能的全球治理:一些规范性问题

IF 0.6

Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2022-01-20 DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2020-0046

Eva Erman, Markus Furendal

{"title":"The Global Governance of Artificial Intelligence: Some Normative Concerns","authors":"Eva Erman, Markus Furendal","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2020-0046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2020-0046","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The creation of increasingly complex artificial intelligence (AI) systems raises urgent questions about their ethical and social impact on society. Since this impact ultimately depends on political decisions about normative issues, political philosophers can make valuable contributions by addressing such questions. Currently, AI development and application are to a large extent regulated through non-binding ethics guidelines penned by transnational entities. Assuming that the global governance of AI should be at least minimally democratic and fair, this paper sets out three desiderata that an account should satisfy when theorizing about what this means. We argue, first, that an analysis of democratic values, political entities and decision-making should be done in a holistic way; second, that fairness is not only about how AI systems treat individuals, but also about how the benefits and burdens of transformative AI are distributed; and finally, that justice requires that governance mechanisms are not limited to AI technology, but are incorporated into a range of basic institutions. Thus, rather than offering a substantive theory of democratic and fair AI governance, our contribution is metatheoretical: we propose a theoretical framework that sets up certain normative boundary conditions for a satisfactory account.","PeriodicalId":37108,"journal":{"name":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","volume":"1 1","pages":"267 - 291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84663021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11

‘I’m Just Stating a Preference!’ Lookism in Online Dating Profiles “我只是在说明我的偏好!”网上约会资料中的外貌歧视

IF 0.6

Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2022-01-07 DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2021-0046

S. F. Midtgaard

引用次数: 1

Rule by Automation: How Automated Decision Systems Promote Freedom and Equality 自动化规则:自动化决策系统如何促进自由和平等

IF 0.6

Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2022-01-06 DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2020-0066

Jacob Sparks, Athmeya Jayaram

引用次数: 0

Means Paternalism and the Problem of Indeterminacy 意味着家长制和不确定性问题

IF 0.6

Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2021-0032

Johan Brännmark

引用次数: 0

Subsidies, Relocations, and Social Justice 补贴、重新安置和社会公正

IF 0.6

Moral Philosophy and Politics Pub Date : 2021-10-19 DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2021-0014

S. Loriaux

{"title":"Subsidies, Relocations, and Social Justice","authors":"S. Loriaux","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2021-0014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2021-0014","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article examines Risse and Wollner’s discussion and rejection of several strategies a) in favour of developed countries subsidising their producers, and b) against the relocation of firms operating on their territory. It argues that their critical review of these strategies remains incomplete and therefore not decisive. It starts by bringing into relief two blind spots in their moral assessment of subsidies. The first concerns the imperfect nature of the general duties of global justice they focus on; the second concerns their understanding of the relation between these duties and duties of social justice. While addressing these two difficulties, it presents another possible strategy in support of subsidies, which Risse and Wollner fail to examine: the ‘equal citizenship’ strategy. This strategy is mobilised again in an assessment of Risse and Wollner’s treatment of relocations. In this context, some doubts are raised about the remedy Risse and Wollner prescribe to overcome both social injustices and exploitative relocations ― namely, the domestic redistribution by governments of the gains of international trade. It is argued that such a redistribution is both insufficient to combat social exclusion and threatened by the very practice of trade liberalisation that Risse and Wollner seek to defend.","PeriodicalId":37108,"journal":{"name":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","volume":"12 1","pages":"107 - 124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2021-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78515126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0