Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)最新文献

{"title":"Opportunities to strengthen respiratory virus surveillance systems in Australia: lessons learned from the COVID-19 response.","authors":"Freya M Shearer, Laura Edwards, Martyn Kirk, Oliver Eales, Nick Golding, Jenna Hassall, Bette Liu, Michael Lydeamore, Caroline Miller, Robert Moss, David J Price, Gerard E Ryan, Sheena Sullivan, Ruarai Tobin, Kate Ward, John Kaldor, Allen C Cheng, James Wood, James M McCaw","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.47","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2024.48.47","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Disease surveillance data was critical in supporting public health decisions throughout the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. At the same time, the unprecedented circumstances of the pandemic revealed many shortcomings of surveillance systems for viral respiratory pathogens. Strengthening of surveillance systems was identified as a priority for the recently established Australian Centre for Disease Control, which represents a critical opportunity to review pre-pandemic and pandemic surveillance practices, and to decide on future priorities, during both pandemic and inter-pandemic periods. On 20 October 2022, we ran a workshop with experts from the academic and government sectors who had contributed to the COVID-19 response in Australia on 'The role of surveillance in epidemic response', at the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Following the workshop, we developed five recommendations to strengthen respiratory virus surveillance systems in Australia, which we present here. Our recommendations are not intended to be exhaustive. We instead chose to focus on data types that are highly valuable yet typically overlooked by surveillance planners. Three of the recommendations focus on data collection activities that support the monitoring and prediction of disease impact and the effectiveness of interventions (what to measure) and two focus on surveillance methods and capabilities (how to measure). Implementation of our recommendations would enable more robust, timely, and impactful epidemic analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141634833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"To B or not to B: how the hepatitis B surveillance case definition can misdirect public health actions.","authors":"Anna B Pierce, Simon Crouch, Edura Jalil, Adrian Alexander, Joe Sasadeusz, Victor Au Yeung, Aswan Tai, Rhonda L Stuart","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.39","DOIUrl":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.39","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Surveillance case definitions are utilised to understand the epidemiology of communicable diseases and to inform public health actions. We report a case of hepatitis B infection that meets the case definition for newly acquired infection. However, further investigation revealed that this was most likely past resolved hepatitis B infection with subsequent reactivation secondary to immunosuppression, rather than a newly acquired infection. This case highlights the importance of thorough case and clinician interviews, in combination with detailed assessment of pathology results in collaboration with treating clinicians, to determine the most appropriate public health actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141634836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The effect of COVID-19 public health measures on nationally notifiable diseases in Australia during 2020 and 2021.","authors":"Anna C Rafferty, Anna Glynn-Robinson, Dharshi Thangarajah, Ben Polkinghorne","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.26","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2024.48.26","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic prompted Australia to implement large-scale domestic lockdowns and halted international travel. However, the impact of these measures on national notifiable diseases is yet to been fully examined. In this paper, we expand on a preliminary analysis conducted in 2020, and conducted a retrospective, observational study using nationally notifiable disease surveillance system (NNDSS) data to examine if the changes identified in the first half of 2020 continued in Australia through wide-scale public health measures. We found that there was an overall reduction in most of Australia's nationally notifiable diseases over the two pandemic years during which wide-scale public health measures remained in operation, particularly for 23 social and imported diseases. We observed an increase in notifications for psittacosis, leptospirosis and legionellosis during these years. The public health measures implemented in 2020 and 2021 (including lockdowns, mask mandates, and increased hand and respiratory hygiene) may have contributed to the observed notification reductions. The outcomes of these measures' implementation provide insights into broader communicable disease control for mass outbreaks and pandemic responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141634835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Changes in norovirus incidence in Victoria, Australia, 2022: are we back to normal yet after COVID?","authors":"Leesa D Bruggink, Bruce Thorley","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.29","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2024.48.29","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>There were 108 norovirus-positive outbreaks in 2022, with 45 (41.7%) occurring during the first quarter (Q1), January-March. Aged care facilities accounted for 44.4% of norovirus-positive outbreaks; 43.5% were in childcare settings. Overall, the GII.P31/GII.4 genotype was the most common, involved in 39.4% of outbreaks; however, there were shifts in the most common genotype across the year. In Q1, the GII.P31/GII.4 genotype accounted for 73.3% of typed outbreaks, but by Q3 (July-September) the GII.P7/GII.6 was the most prominent genotype at 45.0%. In Q4 (October-December), the dominant genotype had changed again to GII.P16/GII.4 (52.6%). While the incidence of norovirus outbreaks in 2022 was average regarding overall prevalence and genotype diversity, there are still ongoing effects from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in relation to seasonality, outbreak demographics and specimen referral.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141634832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Tracking trends in the Top End: clindamycin and erythromycin resistance in Group A Streptococcus in the Northern Territory, 2012-2023.","authors":"Joanne Nixon, Jann Hennessy, Rob W Baird","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.31","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2024.48.31","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This retrospective study reviewed the macrolide resistance rates of Group A Streptococcus (GAS) isolates in the Northern Territory from 2012 to 2023. Clindamycin and erythromycin resistance rates peaked in 2021, at 6.0% and 12.2% respectively, and then returned to near baseline at 1-2% in 2023. Increased resistance rates were identified in the Top End of Australia from mid-2020, followed 15 months later by high rates in central Australia in 2022. Factors associated with resistant isolates were living in a rural region and of age 18 years and older. Possible explanations include a transient clonal introduction of a resistant GAS strain to the Northern Territory from 2020 to 2022. Ongoing surveillance is required to monitor regional trends and identify temporal variations in resistant isolates.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141634837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"ATAGI targeted review 2023: Vaccination for preventing influenza in Australia.","authors":"Chisato Imai, Sanjay Jayasinghe, Jocelynne McRae, Jean Li-Kim-Moy, Clayton Chiu, Kristine Macartney, Penelope Burns, Kristy Cooper, Allen C Cheng, Katherine Gibney, Michelle Giles, Cheryl Jones, Tony Korman, Bette Liu, Nigel W Crawford","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.25","DOIUrl":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Annual seasonal influenza epidemics cause substantial disease and economic burden worldwide. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020 and 2021, influenza activity significantly declined. However, influenza resurged in Australia following the relaxation of non-pharmaceutical interventions, with increased influenza virus circulation in early 2022 coinciding with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 variant wave. Together with other respiratory virus diseases, these disease impacts on the Australian population and healthcare system have re-emphasised the importance of influenza vaccination and control. We aim to provide an overview of the current seasonal influenza vaccination program in Australia and summarise evidence and considerations underpinning potential future immunisation strategies. Influenza causes disproportionately higher morbidity and mortality in young children and older adults. Other populations at elevated risk from influenza include Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, pregnant women, and people with certain underlying medical conditions. All Australians aged ≥ 6 months are recommended to receive influenza vaccine every year. The National Immunisation Program (NIP) provides free vaccine for eligible at-risk populations. While approximately 70% of older adults had received influenza vaccine in 2022, coverage in other age groups remains suboptimal. There are several key unmet needs and challenges, but also potential strategies for enhancing the influenza vaccination program in Australia. Improved monitoring and evaluation, including the use of relevant linked datasets for such purposes, is imperative to better understand variations in coverage and vaccination impact in specific populations. Adoption of evidence-based strategies, such as culturally appropriate resources that consider the characteristics of diverse Australian populations, may also help to achieve higher vaccine coverage rates. Additionally, greater vaccine uptake across the population could be facilitated by expanding the NIP-eligible population where cost-effective, and adopting the use of more effective and different types of vaccines when available.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141634834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Australian Rotavirus Surveillance Program Annual Report, 2022.","authors":"Celeste M Donato, Susie Roczo-Farkas, Sarah Thomas, Nada Bogdanovic-Sakran, Eleanor A Lyons, Julie E Bines","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.27","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2024.48.27","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This report from the Australian Rotavirus Surveillance Program describes the circulating rotavirus genotypes identified in children and adults during the period 1 January to 31 December 2022. After two years of a lower number of stool samples received as a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, this reporting period saw the highest number of samples received since the 2017 surveillance period, with samples received from all states and territories. During this period, 1,379 faecal specimens had been referred for rotavirus G- and P- genotype analysis, of which 1,276 were confirmed as rotavirus positive. In total, 1,119/1,276 were identified as wildtype rotavirus, 155/1,276 identified as the Rotarix vaccine strain and 2/1,276 that could not be confirmed as vaccine or wildtype due to sequencing failure. Whilst G12P[8] was the dominant genotype nationally among wildtype samples (28.2%; 315/1,119), multiple genotypes were identified at similar frequencies including G9P[4] (22.3%; 249/1,119) and G2P[4] (20.3%; 227/1,119). Geographical differences in genotype distribution were observed, largely driven by outbreaks reported in some jurisdictions. Outbreaks and increased reports of rotavirus disease were reported in the Northern Territory, Queensland, and New South Wales. A small number of unusual genotypes, potentially zoonotic in nature, were identified, including: G8P[14]; G10[14]; caninelike G3P[3]; G6P[9]; and G11P[25]. Ongoing rotavirus surveillance is crucial to identify changes in genotypic patterns and to provide diagnostic laboratories with quality assurance by reporting incidences of wildtype, vaccine-like, or false positive rotavirus results.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141459771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Surveillance of adverse events following immunisation in Australia annual report, 2021.","authors":"Catherine Glover, Lucy Deng, Claire Larter, Catherine Brogan, Olivia Richardson, Yuanfei Anny Huang, Elspeth Kay, Kristine Macartney, Nicholas Wood","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.1","DOIUrl":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This report summarises Australia's spontaneous surveillance data for adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) for 2021 reported to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and describes reporting trends over the 22-year period 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2021. This report excludes AEFI reports featuring pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, which are reported separately. There were 3,452 AEFI reports for non-COVID-19 vaccines administered in 2021, an annual AEFI reporting rate of 13.4 per 100,000 population compared with 14.9 per 100,000 population in 2020. This small decrease in the AEFI reporting rate in 2021 could potentially be related to an increased focus on COVID-19 vaccines and related AEFI, which are not included in this report. AEFI reporting rates for individual vaccines in 2021 were similar to 2020, as were the most commonly reported adverse events. Of the six deaths following vaccination in 2021 reported to the TGA, none were found to have a causal relationship with vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141459778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Australian vaccine preventable disease epidemiological review series: Hepatitis B, 2000-2019.","authors":"Nicole Sonneveld, Joanne Jackson, Aditi Dey, Stephen B Lambert, Katrina K Clark, Benjamin C Cowie, Kristine Macartney, Frank Beard","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.44","DOIUrl":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.44","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;Hepatitis B vaccination was nationally funded for adolescents in 1996, with inclusion of universal infant immunisation under the National Immunisation Program (NIP) in May 2000. This study describes hepatitis B epidemiology in Australia in the two decades since 2000.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This article analyses newly-acquired (within the prior 24 months) and unspecified (all other) hepatitis B notifications (2000-2019) from the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System; acute hepatitis B hospitalisations (2001-2019) from the National Hospital Morbidity Database; and acute (2000-2019) and chronic (2006-2019) hepatitis B deaths from the Australian Bureau of Statistics and Australian Coordinating Registry. Rates over the reporting period were described overall, and by age group, sex, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status (Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander versus other [neither Aboriginal nor Torres Strait Islander, unknown or not stated]). Trend analyses were performed using Poisson or negative binomial regression. Additional analyses were performed for the cohort born after May 2000.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results and discussion: &lt;/strong&gt;The annual all-age notification rate per 100,000 per year declined (p &lt; 0.001) from 2.13 in 2000 to 0.65 in 2019 for newly-acquired hepatitis B and from 38.3 to 22.3 for unspecified hepatitis B (likely to predominantly represent chronic hepatitis B). Newly-acquired and unspecified hepatitis B notification rates were lowest among children aged &lt; 15 years. The most substantial reductions in notification rates of newly-acquired hepatitis B were among adolescents aged 15-19 years and young adults aged 20-24 and 25-29 years (respectively 17-, 11-, and 7-fold); these age groups also recorded the most substantial reductions in unspecified hepatitis B notifications (respectively 5-, 3.5-, and 2-fold). Newly-acquired hepatitis B notification and acute hepatitis B mortality rates were two- to threefold higher in males than females. The all-age newly-acquired hepatitis B notification rate in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people decreased twofold between 2000 and 2019, but remained threefold higher than in other people. Acute hepatitis B hospitalisations also declined over the study period (p &lt; 0.001) and followed similar patterns. There were no acute or chronic hepatitis B deaths among people born after May 2000; this cohort featured 52 newly-acquired and 887 unspecified hepatitis B notifications. Due to lack of data on country of birth (and hence eligibility for infant vaccination under the NIP or overseas programs), vaccination status and likely transmission routes, we were unable to assess factors contributing to these potentially preventable infections.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;Adolescent and infant immunisation under the NIP has led to significant reductions in notification rates of newly-acquired hepatitis B, and in acute hepatitis B hospitali","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141459772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Surveillance of adverse events following immunisation in Australia, COVID-19 vaccines, 2021.","authors":"Catherine Glover, Lucy Deng, Claire Larter, Catherine Brogan, Olivia Richardson, Yuanfei Anny Huang, Elspeth Kay, Kristine Macartney, Nicholas Wood","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.2","DOIUrl":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This report summarises Australia's spontaneous (passive) surveillance data for adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in 2021 reported to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). The TGA strongly promoted and facilitated adverse event reporting in preparation for, and during, the COVID-19 vaccine rollout as a core component of the most intensive vaccine safety monitoring ever conducted in Australia. There were 111,348 AEFI reports for COVID-19 vaccines administered in 2021, an annual AEFI reporting rate of 271.4 per 100,000 doses of COVID-19 vaccines administered to people aged ≥ 12 years. The annual AEFI reporting rate for non-COVID-19 vaccines in 2021 was 30.6 per 100,000 doses administered to people of all ages. Overall, the most frequently reported symptoms were headache, adverse events classified as 'gastrointestinal nonspecific symptoms and therapeutic procedures', myalgia, pyrexia and fatigue, which were consistent with common expected adverse events following COVID-19 vaccines used in Australia. The most commonly reported adverse events of special interest were myocarditis and/or pericarditis, followed by thrombosis and thromboembolism, and anaphylaxis. Of all COVID-19 vaccine AEFI reports, 762 (0.7%) included a fatal outcome, of which over 80% were in people aged ≥ 60 years. Thirteen deaths reported in 2021 were assessed as likely to be causally linked to vaccination. This report confirms the value of spontaneous post-marketing vaccine pharmacovigilance, especially in the context of new vaccines using novel vaccine technologies and near whole-of-population pandemic vaccination programs. The most frequently reported AEFI for COVID-19 vaccines were common, mild and temporary (lasting 1 or 2 days), and consistent with clinical trial and active surveillance data. Ongoing safety monitoring detected rare, unexpected conditions, such as myocarditis/pericarditis and thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), which were investigated and confirmed as safety signals, resulting in changes to vaccine recommendations and product information. The outcomes of TGA monitoring were published in weekly vaccine safety reports. Overall, COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring provided critical information on the risks of vaccine related adverse events that enabled decisionmakers to undertake informed risk-benefit assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141459712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}