Ethics & human research最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
An Expanded Role for IRBs in the Oversight of Research Biopsies 审查委员会在监督研究活组织检查方面的扩大作用
Ethics & human research Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500141
Laura A. Levit, Julie Kaneshiro, Jeffrey Peppercorn, Mark J. Ratain
{"title":"An Expanded Role for IRBs in the Oversight of Research Biopsies","authors":"Laura A. Levit,&nbsp;Julie Kaneshiro,&nbsp;Jeffrey Peppercorn,&nbsp;Mark J. Ratain","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500141","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eahr.500141","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Research biopsies included in cancer clinical trials have the goal of advancing scientific understanding of the biological bases of cancer and its treatments, but may offer no prospect of direct benefit to participants and often pose more than minimal risk. The research community is examining the ethics of research biopsies increasingly often, especially when they are mandatory for study participation but do not support primary study objectives and thus are “nonintegral” to the study. Ethical concerns center on the limited scientific justification supporting some biopsies, risks to research participants, and the potential for coercion and therapeutic misconception during the informed consent process. There is also a lack of comprehensive oversight of research biopsies by regulatory agencies and institutions. This paper reviews these ethical concerns, discusses the scope of federal oversight, and suggests that institutional review boards (IRBs) should assume a larger role in ensuring the ethical conduct of research biopsies. It concludes with guidance to IRBs on how to weigh the risks, benefits, and acceptability of such biopsies in different contexts that is based on a framework the American Society of Clinical Oncology developed for the inclusion of research biopsies in oncology clinical trials.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"44 5","pages":"32-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40335189","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Broad Consent—Are We Asking Enough? 广泛的同意——我们的要求够了吗?
Ethics & human research Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500140
Lisa E. Smilan
{"title":"Broad Consent—Are We Asking Enough?","authors":"Lisa E. Smilan","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500140","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eahr.500140","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Biobanks and health data repositories provide rich reservoirs of information for use in biomedical research. These repositories depend on participants donating identifiable health data and biospecimens that may be used in perpetuity by unlimited numbers of researchers for unnamed research topics. Since 1991, U.S. federal regulatory provisions, collectively known as the Common Rule, have required informed consent of participants in federally funded human subjects research, but recent changes to the Common Rule now sanction “broad consent” in the repository research context. Broad consent is not defined in the revised Common Rule; thus, researchers and their institutions are left to determine ad hoc what broad consent means and requires. Without leadership and guidance from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, stakeholders with potential conflicts of interest will reach their own conclusions and craft new and varied standards for consent. The result will be uneven protections for participants.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"44 5","pages":"22-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40335190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Developing and Implementing Electronic Consent Procedures in Response to Covid-19 Restrictions 制定和实施电子同意程序以应对Covid-19限制
Ethics & human research Pub Date : 2022-07-08 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500135
Julie R. Bromberg, Evelyn Nimaja, Andrew W. Kiragu, Karla A. Lawson, Lois Lee, Isam W. Nasr, Charles Pruitt, Stephanie M. Ruest, Michael J. Mello
{"title":"Developing and Implementing Electronic Consent Procedures in Response to Covid-19 Restrictions","authors":"Julie R. Bromberg,&nbsp;Evelyn Nimaja,&nbsp;Andrew W. Kiragu,&nbsp;Karla A. Lawson,&nbsp;Lois Lee,&nbsp;Isam W. Nasr,&nbsp;Charles Pruitt,&nbsp;Stephanie M. Ruest,&nbsp;Michael J. Mello","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500135","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eahr.500135","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The Covid-19 pandemic resulted in unprecedented restrictions on many public, private, and workplace activities throughout the United States and elsewhere. When restrictions were imposed, we were conducting a type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial in 10 pediatric trauma centers. In response to several pandemic-based restrictions, we had to develop procedures for engaging with potential research participants while limiting nonclinical, in-person interactions. This manuscript describes the procedures and challenges of obtaining electronic informed consent and assent in a multisite trauma center-based research study. We developed, tested, and trained staff to implement three options for obtaining informed consent. Twenty-five participants were enrolled in the effectiveness-implementation multisite trial during the first six months of utilization of the consent options, with eleven of these individuals enrolled using hybrid or electronic consent procedures. The challenges we identified involving electronic consent procedures included confusion over who would complete the electronic consent process and difficulties reconnecting with families. Lessons learned can strengthen electronic consent and assent procedures for future studies. More research is needed to further strengthen this process and increase its utilization.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"44 4","pages":"39-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349659/pdf/EAHR-44-39.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40494234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Perspectives from a Predominantly African American Community about Biobank Research and a Biobank Consent Form 以非洲裔美国人为主的社区对生物库研究和生物库同意书的看法
Ethics & human research Pub Date : 2022-07-08 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500134
Laura K. Sedig, E. Hill De Loney, Sarah B. Bailey, Kayte Spector-Bagdady, Bianca Ghita, Lydia Koh Krienke, Raymond Hutchinson
{"title":"Perspectives from a Predominantly African American Community about Biobank Research and a Biobank Consent Form","authors":"Laura K. Sedig,&nbsp;E. Hill De Loney,&nbsp;Sarah B. Bailey,&nbsp;Kayte Spector-Bagdady,&nbsp;Bianca Ghita,&nbsp;Lydia Koh Krienke,&nbsp;Raymond Hutchinson","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500134","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eahr.500134","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Minority populations have been underrepresented in clinical trials, as well as in research biobanks that are created to conduct research with participants' biospecimens and related medical and research data. Biobank research raises issues about informed consent and privacy and the confidentiality of participants' personal data. Our study involved three focus groups of 10 adults each that were conducted in a medically underserved, predominantly African American community to elucidate questions and concerns regarding an institutional biobank. Transcripts from the discussion were qualitatively analyzed. Three main themes that arose from the focus groups included the importance of trust, the importance of the community in research, and suggestions to improve trust. The concerns identified in this study provide a starting point for future research to help research institutions become more trustworthy to the communities they serve.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"44 4","pages":"26-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10108213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Privacy Risks in Microbiome Research: Public Perspectives before and during a Global Pandemic 微生物组研究中的隐私风险:全球大流行之前和期间的公众观点
Ethics & human research Pub Date : 2022-07-08 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500132
Andrea Shin, Huiping Xu
{"title":"Privacy Risks in Microbiome Research: Public Perspectives before and during a Global Pandemic","authors":"Andrea Shin,&nbsp;Huiping Xu","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500132","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eahr.500132","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We assessed public perspectives of microbiome research privacy risks before and after a nationwide emergency was declared in the United States regarding the Covid-19 pandemic. From January to July of 2020, we conducted an online survey of perceived privacy risks of microbiome research among U.S. adults. Among 3,106 participants (the preemergency group), most expressed that the microbiome posed privacy risks similar to those associated with DNA (60.3%) or medical records (50.6%) and that they would prefer detailed explanations (70.2%) of risk in consent materials. Only 8.9% reported moderate to high familiarity with microbiome privacy risks. In adjusted analyses, individuals who participated in the study after the Covid-19 emergency was declared (the Covid-19 emergency group) were less likely to express that microbiome privacy risks were similar to those of DNA or medical records and more likely to report familiarity with the privacy risks of microbiomes. There was a trend toward increased concern after the Covid-19 emergency was declared (p = 0.053). Overall, the study revealed that many U.S. adults believe that microbiome privacy risks are similar to those associated with DNA or medical records, and they prefer detailed explanations in consent documents. Individuals who participated after the Covid-19 emergency was declared reported greater knowledge of microbiome privacy risks but had more concern.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"44 4","pages":"2-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40494774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Big Health Data Research and Group Harm: The Scope of IRB Review 健康大数据研究与群体危害:IRB审查范围
Ethics & human research Pub Date : 2022-07-08 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500130
Megan Doerr, Sara Meeder
{"title":"Big Health Data Research and Group Harm: The Scope of IRB Review","authors":"Megan Doerr,&nbsp;Sara Meeder","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500130","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eahr.500130","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Much of precision medicine is driven by big health data research—the analysis of massive datasets representing the complex web of genetic, behavioral, environmental, and other factors that impact human well-being. There are some who point to the Common Rule, the regulation governing federally funded human subjects research, as a regulatory panacea for all types of big health data research. But how well does the Common Rule fit the regulatory needs of this type of research? This article suggests that harms that may arise from artificial intelligence and machine-learning technologies used in big health data research—and the increased likelihood that this research will affect public policy—mean it is time to consider whether the current human research regulations prohibit comprehensive, ethical review of big health data research that may result in group harm.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"44 4","pages":"34-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eahr.500130","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40482537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Ethical Considerations during the Informed Consent Process for Acute Ischemic Stroke in International Clinical Trials 国际临床试验中急性缺血性卒中知情同意过程中的伦理考虑
Ethics & human research Pub Date : 2022-07-08 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500133
Tiffany Bellomo, Jennifer Fokas, Noah Tsao, Clare Anderson, Christopher Becker, Rachel Gioscia-Ryan, William Meurer
{"title":"Ethical Considerations during the Informed Consent Process for Acute Ischemic Stroke in International Clinical Trials","authors":"Tiffany Bellomo,&nbsp;Jennifer Fokas,&nbsp;Noah Tsao,&nbsp;Clare Anderson,&nbsp;Christopher Becker,&nbsp;Rachel Gioscia-Ryan,&nbsp;William Meurer","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500133","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eahr.500133","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We sought to investigate the experiences of researchers in existing active-control trials in acute ischemic stroke comparing investigational therapy to tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in order to identify the approaches and challenges in obtaining informed consent. Out of 401 articles evaluated, 14 trials met inclusion criteria. Trial representatives were contacted to complete a survey concerning the consent process. None of the 14 trials published materials related to the informed consent process. Trials with 75% to 100% of patients directly consented had shorter door-to-treatment (DTT) times than trials that directly consented less than 50% of patients. Trials that had translators available (for recruiting participants who were not native speakers in the local language) and translated consent documents had longer DTT times. The study findings suggest that differences in the standards of informed consent internationally may allow more patients with moderate strokes to provide direct consent without delaying DTT time. Future trials should emphasize transparency to the public and scientific community in the informed consent process.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"44 4","pages":"14-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40494775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Influence of Dispositional Optimism on Ethically Salient Research Perspectives: A Pilot Study 性格乐观对伦理显著性研究视角的影响:一项初步研究
Ethics & human research Pub Date : 2022-05-11 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500126
Jane Paik Kim, Sangeeta Mondal, Tenzin Tsungmey, Katie Ryan, Laura B. Dunn, Laura Weiss Roberts
{"title":"Influence of Dispositional Optimism on Ethically Salient Research Perspectives: A Pilot Study","authors":"Jane Paik Kim,&nbsp;Sangeeta Mondal,&nbsp;Tenzin Tsungmey,&nbsp;Katie Ryan,&nbsp;Laura B. Dunn,&nbsp;Laura Weiss Roberts","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500126","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eahr.500126","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Research participants should be drawn as fairly as possible from the potential volunteer population. Underlying personality traits are underexplored as factors influencing research decision-making. Dispositional optimism, known to affect coping, physical health, and psychological well-being, has been minimally studied with respect to research-related attitudes. We conducted an exploratory, online survey with 151 individuals (with self-reported mental illness [n = 50], physical illness [n = 51], or neither [n = 50]) recruited via MTurk. We evaluated associations between dispositional optimism (assessed with the Life Orientation Test—Revised) and general research attitudes, perceived protectiveness of five research safeguards, and willingness to participate in research using safeguards. Strongly optimistic respondents expressed more positive research attitudes and perceived four safeguards as more positively influencing willingness to participate. Optimism was positively associated with expressed willingness to participate in clinical research. Our findings add to a limited literature on the influence of individual traits on ethically salient research perspectives.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"44 3","pages":"12-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9436640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
When Is a Change Significant? The Update Problem of Apps in Medical and Behavioral Research 什么时候变化是重要的?医学和行为研究中应用程序的更新问题
Ethics & human research Pub Date : 2022-05-11 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500118
Carmel Shachar, Sara Gerke, Walker Morrell, Aaron Kirby, I. Glenn Cohen, Barbara E. Bierer
{"title":"When Is a Change Significant? The Update Problem of Apps in Medical and Behavioral Research","authors":"Carmel Shachar,&nbsp;Sara Gerke,&nbsp;Walker Morrell,&nbsp;Aaron Kirby,&nbsp;I. Glenn Cohen,&nbsp;Barbara E. Bierer","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500118","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eahr.500118","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Digital applications (apps) are commonly used across the research ecosystem. While apps are frequently updated in the course of clinical and behavioral research, there is limited guidance as to when an app update should trigger action related to human research participant protections and who should be responsible for monitoring and reviewing these updates. We term this the “update problem” and argue that, while it is the principal investigator's duty to track all relevant updates, the level of involvement and re-review by the institutional review board (IRB) of an approved research protocol should vary depending on whether the update may be classified as minor, not minor, or significant. Minor updates require at most annual notification of the IRB, updates that are not minor require prompt notification of the IRB, and significant updates may require full board re-review or another response. We also suggest how these policies might be implemented.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"44 3","pages":"2-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eahr.500118","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73218400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ethical Considerations for Parent-Adolescent Dyadic Research 亲子二元研究的伦理考量
Ethics & human research Pub Date : 2022-05-11 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500127
Kemesha Gabbidon, Tiffany Chenneville, Wendy Rote
{"title":"Ethical Considerations for Parent-Adolescent Dyadic Research","authors":"Kemesha Gabbidon,&nbsp;Tiffany Chenneville,&nbsp;Wendy Rote","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500127","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eahr.500127","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Over the last few years, the use of dyadic research methods has expanded considerably. One area that has benefited from this type of research is the study of the family unit, particularly parent-adolescent dyads. Dyadic research allows investigators to assess relationship dynamics, processes, and congruences within a family unit, as well as the distinct experiences of each member of the dyad. However, like all emerging and expanding areas of human subjects research, parent-adolescent dyadic research faces several ethical challenges. Given the advantages of parent-adolescent dyadic research for examining family relational processes, this article addresses ethical challenges experienced by dyadic researchers that often temper interests in applying these approaches. Drawing on the scholarly literature and the authors’ experiences conducting parent-adolescent dyadic research, we discuss heightened and unique ethical challenges that arise in this area of inquiry and provide recommendations on how to best navigate those issues.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"44 3","pages":"24-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89946990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信