Amina White, Christine Grady, Margaret Little, Kristen Sullivan, Katie Clark, Monalisa Ngwu, Anne Drapkin Lyerly
{"title":"IRB Decision-Making about Minimal Risk Research with Pregnant Participants","authors":"Amina White, Christine Grady, Margaret Little, Kristen Sullivan, Katie Clark, Monalisa Ngwu, Anne Drapkin Lyerly","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500100","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eahr.500100","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pregnant individuals are often excluded from research without clear justification, even when the research poses minimal risk of harm to the fetus. Little is known about institutional review board (IRB) decision-making practices when reviewing such research. We conducted a survey of current and former IRB personnel in the United States to elicit their interpretations of “minimal risk”—a formal regulatory category—and to identify factors that may influence IRB decisions to approve or disapprove research involving pregnant participants. Study results revealed some consensus among IRB members about the risk level of individual research procedures and hypothetical study vignettes. However, we uncovered important variations not only in the assessment of risk but also in the willingness of IRB members to approve minimal risk research that includes pregnant women. Based on our findings, guidance is needed to assist IRB members in characterizing risk, applying federal regulations, and appropriately ensuring the inclusion or justified exclusion of pregnant people in research.</p>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"43 5","pages":"2-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/eahr.500100","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39413349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Paul Calle, Peter Blanckaert, Sabine Lemoyne, Robert Rubens
{"title":"Opt-Out Design for an Observational Toxicology Study Involving Intoxicated Patients at a Dance Music Event","authors":"Paul Calle, Peter Blanckaert, Sabine Lemoyne, Robert Rubens","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500103","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eahr.500103","url":null,"abstract":"<p>At electronic dance music events in Belgium in 2013 to 2015, seemingly intoxicated patients were included without their informed consent in an observational toxicology study when the attending physicians determined that they needed treatment with an intravenous line. All included patients received an information letter inviting them to contact the principal investigator (PI) to obtain more information about the study and/or to inform the PI that they wanted to be excluded from it. Overall, 238 patients were included in the study. Nine participants (4%) responded to the information letter, either on their own or through their parent; none of them asked to be excluded from the study. All respondents expressed their gratitude for the information they received. The opt-out study design seemed to be acceptable to the patient-participants, and it provided a fuller picture of the drug-related medical incidents at such music events than what could likely be achieved through a study that includes only people who explicitly choose to participate. These findings may help institutional review boards when evaluating study designs involving recreational drug use, especially at electronic dance music events. Nevertheless, we warn against extrapolation to other settings where informed consent is difficult to obtain.</p>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"43 5","pages":"36-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/eahr.500103","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39413350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Inevitability and Ethics of Inaccurate Screening in Clinical Trials: A Call for Research and Guidance","authors":"David Wendler","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500098","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eahr.500098","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate screening of potential research participants is vital to ensuring the scientific, regulatory, and ethical appropriateness of clinical trials. Yet there are no definitive screening tests for many conditions, and many screening tests, even when implemented correctly, yield some inaccurate results. Sponsors, researchers, and review committees thus routinely face the question of when it is acceptable to approve and conduct clinical trials that rely on screening measures that are known to exclude some eligible individuals and to include some ineligible ones. This article calls attention to and proposes preliminary guidance to address this important issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"43 4","pages":"37-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/eahr.500098","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9311344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Erin Turbitt, Ainsley J. Newson, Barbara B. Biesecker, Benjamin S. Wilfond
{"title":"Enrolling Children in Clinical Trials for Genetic Neurodevelopmental Conditions: Ethics, Parental Decisions, and Children's Identities","authors":"Erin Turbitt, Ainsley J. Newson, Barbara B. Biesecker, Benjamin S. Wilfond","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500097","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eahr.500097","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Knowledge of genetic mechanisms contributing to neurodevelopmental conditions is advancing. This is informing development of new drugs to treat or ameliorate these conditions, through targeting underlying genetic pathways. Drugs are tested in clinical trials, necessitating parents to engage with decisions about whether to enroll their child. In this article, we consider important ethical issues to anticipate as clinical research opportunities in genetic neurodevelopmental conditions arise. For example, genetic pathways targeted by the drugs may interact with valued character and personality traits. It is essential that recruitment and consent processes are optimized for families who will grapple with whether these novel drug treatments interact with their child's personality and authentic identity. We call for focused social science research and further normative analysis so that parents are better supported to make informed choices. Additionally, clinical research regulators should have a sound understanding of the contextual experiences regarding how this population of parents engages with decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"43 4","pages":"27-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/eahr.500097","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39125428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lucinda Manda-Taylor, Eric Umar, Robert C. Stewart, Macdonald Kufankomwe, Genesis Chorwe-Sungani, Owen C. Mwale, Demoubly Kokota, Joyce Nyirenda, Kazione Kulisewa, Martyn Pickersgill
{"title":"Developing Biopsychosocial Research on Maternal Mental Health in Malawi: Community Perspectives and Concerns","authors":"Lucinda Manda-Taylor, Eric Umar, Robert C. Stewart, Macdonald Kufankomwe, Genesis Chorwe-Sungani, Owen C. Mwale, Demoubly Kokota, Joyce Nyirenda, Kazione Kulisewa, Martyn Pickersgill","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500095","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eahr.500095","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Interest in maternal mental health research is growing around the world. Maternal mental health research studies in Malawi have, for instance, sought to determine and establish the incidence and prevalence of depression and anxiety in pregnant people and the factors that contribute to experiences of these states. This article reports stakeholder perspectives on potential community concerns with biopsychosocial mental health research (which might include collecting blood samples) in Malawi. These perspectives were generated through a town hall event that featured five focus group discussions with various participants. In this article, we reflect on key themes from these discussions, demonstrating the endurance of long-standing concerns and practices around autonomy, consent, and the drawing of blood. We conclude by arguing that, while maternal mental health research conducted in Malawi could benefit Malawian women and children, consultation with community stakeholders is necessary to inform whether and how such research should be conducted.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"43 4","pages":"11-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/eahr.500095","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39125429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Luke Gelinas, Walker Morrell, Sarah A. White, Barbara E. Bierer
{"title":"Online Research Participant Communication: Balancing Benefits and Risks","authors":"Luke Gelinas, Walker Morrell, Sarah A. White, Barbara E. Bierer","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500094","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eahr.500094","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Online communication has emerged as an important vehicle for participant interaction during the course of clinical research. At the same time, such communication has been identified as a source of risks both for participants and the scientific integrity of clinical trials. Although strategies for mitigating these risks have become a focus in the research community, missing from the discussion has been a sustained and sympathetic effort to understand the various benefits of online communication for participants themselves. In this article, we provide a taxonomy of the benefits of online communication for participants and argue that attempts to mitigate the risks of online communication by discouraging or placing limits on such communication are generally unadvisable. Instead, we advance a context-sensitive approach that emphasizes education and several actionable recommendations for preserving the benefits of online participant communities while mitigating the risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"43 4","pages":"2-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/eahr.500094","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39127323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"An Argument for Reinterpreting the Benign Behavioral Intervention Exemption","authors":"Ian Tully","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500096","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eahr.500096","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent changes to the Common Rule have helped reduce regulatory burden on researchers conducting minimal risk research. However, in this paper, I propose a way of minimizing burden further within the existing confines of the current regulations. I focus my discussion on the newly created “benign behavioral interventions” category of exempt research, arguing that this exemption from the federal regulations governing research with human subjects should be more expansively interpreted by the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections (SACHRP) than is currently the case. Specifically, I argue against the restriction, advocated by SACHRP, that the exemption exclude “physical (bodily) tasks” unless they are “incidental to the behavioral intervention.” This restriction, I argue, is problematically vague and does no significant moral work. Acceptance of my proposed reinterpretation of “benign behavioral interventions” would, I hope, result in a significant reduction in regulatory burden for minimal risk research.</p>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"43 4","pages":"20-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/eahr.500096","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39127322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Advance Research Directives: Dementia Researchers' Views on a Prototype Directive and Implementation Strategies","authors":"Nola Ries, Elise Mansfield","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500091","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eahr.500091","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Advance research directives (ARDs) enable people to document preferences for future research participation in the event of incapacity. This article reports on interviews with 11 dementia researchers in Australia that focused on the content of a prototype ARD and processes for making and using ARDs. Participants agreed that an ARD template should provide information to explain research and the rationale for making a directive, allow the person to nominate trusted individuals to be involved in future decisions, and record the person's general willingness or unwillingness to be involved in research. Providing a list of various research activities elicits preferences and risk tolerances in more detail. Priority groups for ARD implementation include people with a diagnosis involving progressive cognitive impairment and people interested in research. Researchers and health and legal professionals have a role in promoting ARDs. Our findings suggest that, as a voluntary strategy, ARDs could promote appropriate inclusion in research.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"43 3","pages":"10-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/eahr.500091","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39004197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Amy Corneli, Carrie B. Dombeck, Kevin McKenna, Sara B. Calvert
{"title":"Stakeholder Experiences with the Single IRB Review Process and Recommendations for Food and Drug Administration Guidance","authors":"Amy Corneli, Carrie B. Dombeck, Kevin McKenna, Sara B. Calvert","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500092","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eahr.500092","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The revised Common Rule requires using a single institutional review board (sIRB) for U.S.-based, multisite, nonexempt, federally conducted or supported research with human participants. The 21st Century Cures Act directs the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to harmonize differences between HHS and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations governing research with humans. Anticipating that the FDA may update its 2006 centralized IRB guidance, we conducted interviews with 34 stakeholders engaged in FDA-regulated clinical research to identify benefits and challenges of using sIRBs and to gather recommendations for revising the FDA's guidance. The main benefits were consistency and standardization, speed and efficiency, and streamlining and simplification. The main challenges were uncertainty at local institutions, including addressing local context; decreased timeliness of the research review process; variable processes; and insufficient communication. Several recommendations for FDA guidance focused on the local context and communication plans. Findings suggest that the sIRB review process may be gaining efficiency although challenges remain.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"43 3","pages":"26-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/eahr.500092","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39004198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"American Indian and Alaska Native Enrollment in Clinical Studies in the National Institutes of Health's Intramural Research Program","authors":"Deionna Vigil, Ninet Sinaii, Barbara Karp","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500090","DOIUrl":"10.1002/eahr.500090","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Clinical studies conducted by the National Institutes of Health's Intramural Research Program (NIH-IRP) provide eligible individuals with access to innovative research treatments that may not otherwise be available. The NIH-IRP's mission is to include all Americans, including American Indians and Alaska Natives, in its clinical research. This study is the first to provide data about inclusion of American Indians/Alaska Natives in NIH-IRP clinical studies. We analyzed data from the more than 1,800 NIH-IRP protocols active in 2014 and 2017. We found that the absolute number of American Indian/Alaska Native enrollees increased between 2014 and 2017 but remained at 1% of all participants, a disproportionately low level. The number of clinical studies that enrolled American Indian/Alaska Native individuals similarly did not change. NIH efforts to expand participation of American Indians/Alaska Natives in clinical studies has often focused on research within their communities or on health needs specific to these groups. Those efforts should expand to include processes and protections for the proportionate and ethical inclusion of American Indians and Alaska Natives who individually enroll in studies that are not specific to American Indians, Alaska Natives, or their tribal nations.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"43 3","pages":"2-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/eahr.500090","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38935328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}