Evaluating the Ability to Consent to Research: A Twenty-Year Track Record

Q2 Social Sciences
Mikaela Matera-Vatnick, Katherine W. Todman, Paul G. Wakim, Haley K. Sullivan, Carol Squires, Julie Brintnall-Karabelas, Samuel N. Doernberg, Marion Danis
{"title":"Evaluating the Ability to Consent to Research: A Twenty-Year Track Record","authors":"Mikaela Matera-Vatnick,&nbsp;Katherine W. Todman,&nbsp;Paul G. Wakim,&nbsp;Haley K. Sullivan,&nbsp;Carol Squires,&nbsp;Julie Brintnall-Karabelas,&nbsp;Samuel N. Doernberg,&nbsp;Marion Danis","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Occasionally, the ability of prospective research participants to consent may be uncertain. Yet standardized capacity-assessment tools may not suffice to determine the ability to consent to a particular research protocol. This study consisted of a retrospective review of the outcomes of an alternative approach used by the Ability to Consent Assessment Team at the National Institutes of Health. Of 944 individuals evaluated over 20 years (1999-2019), 70.1% were determined to have capacity to consent to participate in research. Of those who lacked capacity to consent and were subsequently evaluated for their ability to assign a surrogate, 86.0% had the ability to do so. The findings demonstrate that establishing a task-specific approach for assessing the capacity of potential participants to consent to a variety of research protocols can facilitate safe and ethically justifiable inclusion of individuals whose ability to consent is initially uncertain.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"44 2","pages":"2-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & human research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.500119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Occasionally, the ability of prospective research participants to consent may be uncertain. Yet standardized capacity-assessment tools may not suffice to determine the ability to consent to a particular research protocol. This study consisted of a retrospective review of the outcomes of an alternative approach used by the Ability to Consent Assessment Team at the National Institutes of Health. Of 944 individuals evaluated over 20 years (1999-2019), 70.1% were determined to have capacity to consent to participate in research. Of those who lacked capacity to consent and were subsequently evaluated for their ability to assign a surrogate, 86.0% had the ability to do so. The findings demonstrate that establishing a task-specific approach for assessing the capacity of potential participants to consent to a variety of research protocols can facilitate safe and ethically justifiable inclusion of individuals whose ability to consent is initially uncertain.

评估同意研究的能力:二十年的记录
有时,潜在研究参与者的同意能力可能是不确定的。然而,标准化的能力评估工具可能不足以确定同意特定研究方案的能力。本研究包括对美国国立卫生研究院同意能力评估小组采用的另一种方法的结果进行回顾性审查。在20年内(1999-2019)评估的944名个人中,70.1%被确定有能力同意参与研究。在那些缺乏同意能力并随后评估其指定代孕能力的人中,86.0%的人有能力这样做。研究结果表明,建立一种针对特定任务的方法来评估潜在参与者对各种研究方案的同意能力,可以促进将最初不确定是否同意的个人安全且在道德上合理地纳入研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethics & human research
Ethics & human research Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信