Developing and Implementing Electronic Consent Procedures in Response to Covid-19 Restrictions

Q2 Social Sciences
Julie R. Bromberg, Evelyn Nimaja, Andrew W. Kiragu, Karla A. Lawson, Lois Lee, Isam W. Nasr, Charles Pruitt, Stephanie M. Ruest, Michael J. Mello
{"title":"Developing and Implementing Electronic Consent Procedures in Response to Covid-19 Restrictions","authors":"Julie R. Bromberg,&nbsp;Evelyn Nimaja,&nbsp;Andrew W. Kiragu,&nbsp;Karla A. Lawson,&nbsp;Lois Lee,&nbsp;Isam W. Nasr,&nbsp;Charles Pruitt,&nbsp;Stephanie M. Ruest,&nbsp;Michael J. Mello","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The Covid-19 pandemic resulted in unprecedented restrictions on many public, private, and workplace activities throughout the United States and elsewhere. When restrictions were imposed, we were conducting a type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial in 10 pediatric trauma centers. In response to several pandemic-based restrictions, we had to develop procedures for engaging with potential research participants while limiting nonclinical, in-person interactions. This manuscript describes the procedures and challenges of obtaining electronic informed consent and assent in a multisite trauma center-based research study. We developed, tested, and trained staff to implement three options for obtaining informed consent. Twenty-five participants were enrolled in the effectiveness-implementation multisite trial during the first six months of utilization of the consent options, with eleven of these individuals enrolled using hybrid or electronic consent procedures. The challenges we identified involving electronic consent procedures included confusion over who would complete the electronic consent process and difficulties reconnecting with families. Lessons learned can strengthen electronic consent and assent procedures for future studies. More research is needed to further strengthen this process and increase its utilization.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"44 4","pages":"39-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349659/pdf/EAHR-44-39.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & human research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.500135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic resulted in unprecedented restrictions on many public, private, and workplace activities throughout the United States and elsewhere. When restrictions were imposed, we were conducting a type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial in 10 pediatric trauma centers. In response to several pandemic-based restrictions, we had to develop procedures for engaging with potential research participants while limiting nonclinical, in-person interactions. This manuscript describes the procedures and challenges of obtaining electronic informed consent and assent in a multisite trauma center-based research study. We developed, tested, and trained staff to implement three options for obtaining informed consent. Twenty-five participants were enrolled in the effectiveness-implementation multisite trial during the first six months of utilization of the consent options, with eleven of these individuals enrolled using hybrid or electronic consent procedures. The challenges we identified involving electronic consent procedures included confusion over who would complete the electronic consent process and difficulties reconnecting with families. Lessons learned can strengthen electronic consent and assent procedures for future studies. More research is needed to further strengthen this process and increase its utilization.

Abstract Image

制定和实施电子同意程序以应对Covid-19限制
Covid-19大流行导致美国和其他地方的许多公共、私人和工作场所活动受到前所未有的限制。当实施限制时,我们在10个儿科创伤中心进行了III型混合有效性实施试验。为了应对几项基于大流行的限制,我们必须制定与潜在研究参与者接触的程序,同时限制非临床的面对面互动。本文描述了在多地点创伤中心为基础的研究中获得电子知情同意和同意的程序和挑战。我们开发、测试和培训了工作人员,以实施获取知情同意的三种选择。在使用同意选项的前六个月,25名参与者参加了有效性实施多地点试验,其中11名参与者使用混合或电子同意程序登记。我们发现的涉及电子同意程序的挑战包括,谁来完成电子同意程序的困惑,以及与家人重新联系的困难。吸取的经验教训可以加强电子同意和同意程序,为未来的研究。为了进一步加强这一过程并提高其利用率,需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethics & human research
Ethics & human research Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信