Informed Consent for Placebo-Controlled Trials: Do Ethics and Science Conflict?

Q2 Social Sciences
Hope A. Feldman, James A. Feldman, Charles C. Miller, Garrett Walsh, Jon E. Tyson
{"title":"Informed Consent for Placebo-Controlled Trials: Do Ethics and Science Conflict?","authors":"Hope A. Feldman,&nbsp;James A. Feldman,&nbsp;Charles C. Miller,&nbsp;Garrett Walsh,&nbsp;Jon E. Tyson","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The use of a placebo has been considered the best method for controlling bias in a prospective randomized clinical trial and provides the most rigorous test of treatment efficacy for evaluating a medical therapy. Placebos commonly produce clinically important effects particularly in studies where the primary outcomes are subjective. Yet the potential beneficial or harmful effects of placebos are often not addressed in designing a clinical trial, calculating the sample size, seeking consent, or interpreting clinical trial results. In this manuscript, we use an actual study to indicate three approaches that might be considered in seeking informed consent for placebo-controlled trials, and we explore the fundamental ethical and scientific complexities involved with each.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"44 5","pages":"42-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & human research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.500142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of a placebo has been considered the best method for controlling bias in a prospective randomized clinical trial and provides the most rigorous test of treatment efficacy for evaluating a medical therapy. Placebos commonly produce clinically important effects particularly in studies where the primary outcomes are subjective. Yet the potential beneficial or harmful effects of placebos are often not addressed in designing a clinical trial, calculating the sample size, seeking consent, or interpreting clinical trial results. In this manuscript, we use an actual study to indicate three approaches that might be considered in seeking informed consent for placebo-controlled trials, and we explore the fundamental ethical and scientific complexities involved with each.

安慰剂对照试验的知情同意:伦理与科学冲突吗?
在前瞻性随机临床试验中,使用安慰剂被认为是控制偏倚的最佳方法,并为评估药物治疗提供了最严格的治疗效果测试。安慰剂通常会产生重要的临床效果,特别是在主要结果是主观的研究中。然而,在设计临床试验、计算样本量、征求同意或解释临床试验结果时,往往没有考虑到安慰剂潜在的有益或有害影响。在本文中,我们使用一项实际研究来指出在寻求安慰剂对照试验的知情同意时可能考虑的三种方法,并探讨了每种方法所涉及的基本伦理和科学复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethics & human research
Ethics & human research Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信