JBI evidence synthesis最新文献

{"title":"Mapping clinical pathways and evaluation in joint arthroplasty: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"José Miguel Seguro, Ana Cláudia Abreu, Francisco Matos, Inês Martins Esteves, Márcia Pestana Santos","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00568","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00568","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This scoping review will aim to map the clinical pathways for patients undergoing adult hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasties. The review will also map the indicators and measurement tools used to evaluate the effectiveness of these pathways.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical pathways are structured, multidisciplinary care plans designed to standardize and optimize patient care. Clinical pathways reduce clinical heterogeneity, decrease malpractice risk, ensure high-quality care, and lower costs. The evidence characterizing these pathways and their evaluation indicators remains fragmented.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>This review will consider studies of any type on hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasty; performed on adults; that describe clinical pathways, including their components, implementation, and evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A 3-step search strategy will be used to identify published and unpublished studies across multiple databases: PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Library. Gray literature will also be searched for. Studies published in English, Portuguese, and Spanish will be included, with no date limitations on the searches. Two independent reviewers will screen study titles, abstracts, and full texts, and extract data using a predefined extraction form. Data will be presented in tabular format and synthesized narratively.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/ysrw8.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2155-2161"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144795787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Methodological rigor and reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines for adults hospitalized with bacterial pneumonia: a scoping review.","authors":"Amy Hagedorn Wonder, Jan M Nick, Olayemi O Adeoye, Gurmeet Sehgal","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00565","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00565","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This scoping review describes the methodological rigor and reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for adults hospitalized with bacterial pneumonia.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;Health care professionals rely on CPGs as authoritative sources for evidence-based treatment recommendations. To increase awareness of the current state of guideline rigor and reporting quality, this scoping review focused on the management of bacterial pneumonia in hospitalized adults.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Eligibility criteria: &lt;/strong&gt;This review included national and international CPGs for the care of adult and older adult patients (18 years or above) who were male, female, or gender-diverse and hospitalized with bacterial pneumonia. Guidelines published between 2017 and 2022 for adult patients with multiple diagnoses/comorbidities were included if the primary focus was management of bacterial pneumonia in the inpatient, hospital setting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A 3-step search was conducted following the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A total of 1533 records was identified: 1524 from 8 databases (ie, CINAHL [EBSCOhost], Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase [Embase.com], Epistemonikos, Google Scholar, JBI Evidence Synthesis, PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection), and 9 from other sources (professional organizations [n=6], citation searching [n=3]). Following deduplication, 1293 titles and abstracts were screened, and 1232 were excluded. One guideline from other sources (ie, citation searching) was excluded because it was out of print and unavailable. Full-text screening was completed on 69 guidelines to determine eligibility (databases [61], other sources [8]). Of these, 54 guidelines were excluded as duplicate records, ineligible populations, or ineligible concepts. The remaining 15 national and international guidelines were included.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Guidelines were authored in 13 different countries (5 continents). All guidelines were endorsed by at least 1 professional organization, and 9 guidelines were endorsed by 2 or more organizations. Most guidelines were published in English, although, German, Russian, and Spanish guidelines were also included. The results for the AGREE II Domain 3, Rigor of Development, showed a mean score of 56% (range 15% to 90%). The AGREE II scores showed significant variability within and across all domains, which affected results of overall assessment (6 guidelines were rated high quality, 7 were rated sufficient, 2 were rated low) and reviewers' recommendations on use (2 guidelines were recommended for use in current form, 11 with modifications prior to use, and 2 were not recommended for use in current form). The RIGHT Checklist showed that 64% of guidelines included information on evidence and 56% included clear treatment recommendations. The AGREE Reporting Checklist showed that 4 guidelines addressed 1 focal area (evidence selection [n=2],","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145207918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Structured evidence summaries designed to inform decision-makers in health research: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Ariadna Auladell-Rispau, Joanne Khabsa, Danielle Pollock, Ivan Solà, Gabriel Rada, Elie A Akl, Gerard Urrutia, María Ximena Rojas-Reyes","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00357","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00357","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to identify, summarize, and describe the content and format of structured evidence summaries designed to inform clinical or policy decisions.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a need to develop a more efficient strategy to ensure that the results of the Living Evidence approach reach end users in a timely manner, thereby enhancing their role in the decision-making process.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Any article assessing the development or validation process of generating a structured evidence summary aimed at informing health decision-makers will be considered for inclusion in the review. Additionally, we will include summaries that have been published as part of the updated reports of living systematic reviews of any health-related question.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI guidance for scoping reviews and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The initial search will be conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane, as well as websites and databases specializing in health decision-making and health technology assessment, including Health Systems Evidence, Epistemonikos, NICE Evidence Search, and websites of major European health technology assessment agencies, such as the European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Finally, broader searches will be conducted in Google Scholar and the JBI Evidence-Based Practice Database to identify hard-to-find articles. Two researchers will independently screen, select, and extract documents, with findings presented both narratively and in tabular format.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/69chn.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2083-2090"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145187020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Experiences of perinatal depression screening in women during perinatal period: a qualitative systematic review protocol.","authors":"Xuemei Tao, Hua Rongyu, Patraporn Bhatarasakoon","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00557","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00557","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aims to synthesize women's experiences of perinatal depression screening.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Perinatal depression is common for women during the perinatal period. The rate of untreated perinatal depression is high, and the consequences are serious. Targeted depression screening for perinatal women offers the potential to identify and treat undiagnosed patients and help prevent perinatal depression's detrimental consequences.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Articles from all settings will be considered. This review will include qualitative data from qualitative research and mixed methods articles that explore women's experiences of perinatal depression screening. Participants are women who accept perinatal depression screening, regardless of age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search strategy will include CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Clinical Key, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Embase, PubMed, and Scopus. Two independent reviewers will cross-check the search outcomes and eligible articles and verify additional articles that are suitable for analysis. Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest) will be used to identify gray literature. The JBI approach will be used for literature selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024606518.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"23 10","pages":"2132-2138"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145245342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Economic evaluation synthesis: time for a methodological update to support equitable decision-making.","authors":"Yuri Jadotte, Denny John, Suzy Lockwood, Norma Bulamu, Ghislaine van Mastrigt, Luke Vale, Judith Gomersall, Dru Riddle, Sonia Hines","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00430","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-25-00430","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"23 10","pages":"1895-1897"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145245486","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Health care professionals' experiences and perceptions of making treatment decisions for older adults with memory loss: a qualitative systematic review.","authors":"Kimberly Shapkin, Karen MacKinnon, Esther Sangster-Gormley, Bernadette Zakher, Lorelei Newton, Jayna Holroyd-Leduc","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00486","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00486","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This systematic review aimed to appraise and synthesize evidence about licensed health care professionals' experiences and perceptions of treatment decision-making affecting older people with memory loss and comorbid conditions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;Treatment decision-making affecting older people with memory loss and comorbid conditions presents significant challenges for health care professionals as existing clinical practice guidelines and health care services are designed to focus on managing single-disease conditions. The complexity of balancing comorbid conditions, in addition to memory loss, has led to increased research in this area. Given the growing body of literature exploring health care professionals' decision-making, a synthesis of this evidence is needed to provide clearer insights and inform practice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Eligibility criteria: &lt;/strong&gt;This review considered qualitative studies that explored licensed health care professionals' treatment decisions when providing care for older people (over 65 years) living with memory loss and comorbid conditions. We considered studies conducted across community and clinical settings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A 3-step search strategy was used in May 2022 to identify published and unpublished studies across the CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), Scopus, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest). Additionally, relevant websites were searched using keywords to identify gray literature. Searches covered all available literature from database inception using a combination of controlled vocabulary (MeSH and CINAHL headings) and keywords to capture qualitative studies, with an updated search conducted in June 2023. Two independent reviewers completed the title/abstract and full-text screening, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis. Findings classified as unequivocal or credible were grouped into categories that were synthesized to generate a comprehensive set of findings. The ConQual approach was applied to assess confidence in qualitative research synthesis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Fourteen studies published between 2006 and 2022 met the eligibility criteria. A total of 76 findings were extracted and grouped into 8 categories. Three synthesized findings were assembled from the findings: i) Health care professionals experience uncertainty and perceive older people with memory loss in ways that influence their treatment decision-making; ii) Communication challenges and contextual factors unique to older persons, families, and health service organizations influences health care professionals' treatment decision-making affecting older people with memory loss and comorbid conditions; and iii) health care professionals identify processes to support safeguarding older people with memory loss in treatment decision-making.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Health care professionals' treat","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145207895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Mapping the provision of care by nurse practitioners in virtual health care clinics: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Jennifer Splane, Shelley Doucet, Melissa Rothfus, Ruth Lavergne, Ruth Martin-Misener","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00290","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00290","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to chart the evidence in relation to the provision of care by nurse practitioners in virtual clinics.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic prompted health care systems, providers, and patients to rapidly shift to virtual care settings. Four years later, virtual care continues to be a focal point of health care delivery with the ensuing spread of both hybrid models (ie, a blend of in-person and virtual care) and virtual clinics (ie, virtual-only service-delivery platforms with built-in electronic medical records). Nurse practitioners are identified globally as essential components to the effective and sustainable delivery of health care models. While both virtual care and nurse practitioners are recognized as critical cornerstones of health care innovation, there is a gap in what is known about care provision by nurse practitioners in virtual clinics.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Articles exploring care provided by nurse practitioners in virtual health care clinics will be included. Eligible articles will focus on characteristics of the nurse practitioner and their provision of virtual care, as well as the barriers and facilitators to care provision. Clinic settings will include those that offer longitudinal and/or episodic care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The search strategy includes published and unpublished articles without date restrictions. Databases to be searched include MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses for gray literature. Data will be extracted and organized using a tool informed by the PEPPA conceptual framework and reported in a narrative and tabular summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/uf6qg.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145207851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Teaching professional writing in prelicensure health professional education programs: a scoping review.","authors":"Patricia Morris, Rose McCloskey, Alexis McGill, Lisa Keeping-Burke, Alex Goudreau, Holly Knight, Sarah Buckley, David Mazerolle, Courtney Jones","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00255","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00255","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This review aimed to map the literature on teaching strategies used to teach professional writing to prelicensure students enrolled in health professional programs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;Health education programs must teach students how to practice professional writing as it is a fundamental skill for effective communication in health care. Professional writing is crucial for ensuring continuity of care, promoting patient safety, and meeting regulatory and institutional standards. Understanding the teaching strategies used to develop professional writing skills is important because it helps educators identify the most effective methods for preparing students for practice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Eligibility criteria: &lt;/strong&gt;This review considered studies on teaching strategies used by faculty at any academic institution, in any country, to teach professional writing in prelicensure health professional programs. Disciplines such as medicine, nursing, occupational therapy, pharmacy, dentistry, and veterinary medicine were included. Strategies included any intentional activity (in-person or virtual) aimed at developing students' professional writing. Professional writing included writing for the purpose of recording assessments or interventions, conveying information to a care team, communicating with patients, or demonstrating compliance with professional or institutional policies or practices.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This review followed the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Published literature was located in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL with Full Text (EBSCOhost), ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health (ProQuest), and ERIC (EBSCOhost). A search for unpublished research reports was conducted in ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Open Access Theses and Dissertations (OATD), and OAIster (WorldCat). The reference lists of all included studies were manually back-searched for additional studies, and Google Scholar and Web of Science Core Collection were used for forward citation tracking to identify further studies. Search results were limited from 2010 to the present, and only reports written in English and French were eligible. Data were extracted from studies that met the eligibility criteria by 2 independent reviewers. Data are presented in tabular format to address findings related to the review objectives.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Thirty-three studies from 7 countries, published between 2010 and 2025, were included. All studies examined at least 1 teaching strategy, and included 5 disciplines: nursing, medicine, pharmacy, dentistry, and veterinary medicine. Three additional studies focused on interprofessional education. A variety of strategies was used to teach professional writing, with the most common being didactic methods such as lectures, as well as checklists. These strategies included group and individualized modes of delivery and targeted a range of professional writing types,","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1938-1976"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144972445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Physical activity-based interventions in the management of dementia or cognitive impairment in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Michael C Ibekaku, Lawrence Adebusoye, Lori Weeks, Parisa Ghanouni, Nazanin Nasiri, Chukwuebuka P Onyekere, Caitlin McArthur","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00504","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00504","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to map the existing literature on physical activity-based interventions for the management of dementia and cognitive impairment in sub-Saharan Africa.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dementia and cognitive impairment are growing public health concerns in sub-Saharan Africa, where the number of affected individuals is expected to rise significantly. Given the high rate of dementia underdiagnosis in this region, many individuals experiencing cognitive decline may not have a formal dementia diagnosis. Physical activity-based interventions, conceptualized in this review as both structured exercise programs (eg, aerobic training, resistance exercises) and unstructured physical activities (eg, walking, dancing, or daily movement-based activities), are increasingly used in cognitive impairment dementia care. However, most research in this area has been conducted in other regions, with limited knowledge of how these interventions are applied in sub-Saharan African countries.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>The review will include studies focusing on individuals with dementia or cognitive impairment, where physical activity - based interventions are implemented. The setting will be sub-Saharan African countries, with no restrictions on the language or date of publication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A comprehensive search will be conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Embase, and African Journals Online databases. Gray literature sources, including Google Scholar and Database of African Theses and Dissertations-Research (DATAD-R), will also be searched. Data will be charted and summarized descriptively, with the results presented in narrative and visual formats.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/gz65k.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2113-2123"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144209801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Measures of shared decision-making for multiple long-term condition consultations: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Joanne Butterworth, Karen Mattick, Suzanne Richards, Umesh Kadam","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00028","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00028","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to measures of shared decision-making applicable to consultations between older people living with multiple long-term conditions and health care practitioners in primary care.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The number of people living with multiple long-term conditions is expected to rise worldwide, putting pressure on primary care systems and practitioners. Patient involvement in shared decision-making is key to the provision of high-quality, patient-centered care and can enable self-management, efficiency, and effective care; however, there is a lack of pragmatic guidance. To evaluate shared decision-making in context and inform best practice, measures must be applicable for use in this population and setting.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Studies reporting any measure of shared decision-making designed and developed for use in consultations between older patients (aged ≥ 65 years) and practitioners to map the breadth of domains and content of these measures will be considered for inclusion. Studies will be limited to Westernized health care systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review will follow JBI methodology. A comprehensive search will be conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane CENTRAL, PROSPERO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and other gray literature sources. The search strategy will include keywords related to shared decision-making and measures/instruments, and will not be restricted by date or language. Data extraction and narrative analysis will be guided by the JBI framework.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/wfg4s.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2139-2147"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144972359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}