虚拟卫生保健诊所中执业护士提供护理的映射:范围审查协议。

IF 4.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jennifer Splane, Shelley Doucet, Melissa Rothfus, Ruth Lavergne, Ruth Martin-Misener
{"title":"虚拟卫生保健诊所中执业护士提供护理的映射:范围审查协议。","authors":"Jennifer Splane, Shelley Doucet, Melissa Rothfus, Ruth Lavergne, Ruth Martin-Misener","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to chart the evidence in relation to the provision of care by nurse practitioners in virtual clinics.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic prompted health care systems, providers, and patients to rapidly shift to virtual care settings. Four years later, virtual care continues to be a focal point of health care delivery with the ensuing spread of both hybrid models (ie, a blend of in-person and virtual care) and virtual clinics (ie, virtual-only service-delivery platforms with built-in electronic medical records). Nurse practitioners are identified globally as essential components to the effective and sustainable delivery of health care models. While both virtual care and nurse practitioners are recognized as critical cornerstones of health care innovation, there is a gap in what is known about care provision by nurse practitioners in virtual clinics.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Articles exploring care provided by nurse practitioners in virtual health care clinics will be included. Eligible articles will focus on characteristics of the nurse practitioner and their provision of virtual care, as well as the barriers and facilitators to care provision. Clinic settings will include those that offer longitudinal and/or episodic care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The search strategy includes published and unpublished articles without date restrictions. Databases to be searched include MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses for gray literature. Data will be extracted and organized using a tool informed by the PEPPA conceptual framework and reported in a narrative and tabular summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/uf6qg.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping the provision of care by nurse practitioners in virtual health care clinics: a scoping review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Splane, Shelley Doucet, Melissa Rothfus, Ruth Lavergne, Ruth Martin-Misener\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBIES-24-00290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to chart the evidence in relation to the provision of care by nurse practitioners in virtual clinics.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic prompted health care systems, providers, and patients to rapidly shift to virtual care settings. Four years later, virtual care continues to be a focal point of health care delivery with the ensuing spread of both hybrid models (ie, a blend of in-person and virtual care) and virtual clinics (ie, virtual-only service-delivery platforms with built-in electronic medical records). Nurse practitioners are identified globally as essential components to the effective and sustainable delivery of health care models. While both virtual care and nurse practitioners are recognized as critical cornerstones of health care innovation, there is a gap in what is known about care provision by nurse practitioners in virtual clinics.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Articles exploring care provided by nurse practitioners in virtual health care clinics will be included. Eligible articles will focus on characteristics of the nurse practitioner and their provision of virtual care, as well as the barriers and facilitators to care provision. Clinic settings will include those that offer longitudinal and/or episodic care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The search strategy includes published and unpublished articles without date restrictions. Databases to be searched include MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses for gray literature. Data will be extracted and organized using a tool informed by the PEPPA conceptual framework and reported in a narrative and tabular summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/uf6qg.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这一范围审查的目的是图表的证据与提供护理的护士从业人员在虚拟诊所。2019冠状病毒病大流行促使医疗保健系统、提供者和患者迅速转向虚拟医疗环境。四年后,随着混合模式(即面对面护理和虚拟护理的结合)和虚拟诊所(即内置电子病历的纯虚拟服务提供平台)的普及,虚拟护理继续成为医疗保健服务提供的焦点。护士从业人员在全球范围内被确定为有效和可持续提供卫生保健模式的重要组成部分。虽然虚拟护理和执业护士都被认为是卫生保健创新的关键基石,但在虚拟诊所中执业护士提供的护理方面存在差距。入选标准:文章探讨护理从业人员提供的护理在虚拟卫生保健诊所将包括在内。合格的文章将集中在执业护士的特点和他们提供的虚拟护理,以及障碍和促进护理提供。诊所设置将包括那些提供纵向和/或偶发护理。方法:本综述将遵循JBI方法进行范围综述。搜索策略包括没有日期限制的已发表和未发表的文章。灰色文献检索数据库包括MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO和ProQuest。将使用PEPPA概念框架提供的工具提取和组织数据,并以叙述和表格摘要的形式报告。评审注册:OSF https://osf.io/uf6qg。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping the provision of care by nurse practitioners in virtual health care clinics: a scoping review protocol.

Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to chart the evidence in relation to the provision of care by nurse practitioners in virtual clinics.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted health care systems, providers, and patients to rapidly shift to virtual care settings. Four years later, virtual care continues to be a focal point of health care delivery with the ensuing spread of both hybrid models (ie, a blend of in-person and virtual care) and virtual clinics (ie, virtual-only service-delivery platforms with built-in electronic medical records). Nurse practitioners are identified globally as essential components to the effective and sustainable delivery of health care models. While both virtual care and nurse practitioners are recognized as critical cornerstones of health care innovation, there is a gap in what is known about care provision by nurse practitioners in virtual clinics.

Eligibility criteria: Articles exploring care provided by nurse practitioners in virtual health care clinics will be included. Eligible articles will focus on characteristics of the nurse practitioner and their provision of virtual care, as well as the barriers and facilitators to care provision. Clinic settings will include those that offer longitudinal and/or episodic care.

Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The search strategy includes published and unpublished articles without date restrictions. Databases to be searched include MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses for gray literature. Data will be extracted and organized using a tool informed by the PEPPA conceptual framework and reported in a narrative and tabular summary.

Review registration: OSF https://osf.io/uf6qg.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信