Measures of shared decision-making for multiple long-term condition consultations: a scoping review protocol.

IF 4.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-07 DOI:10.11124/JBIES-25-00028
Joanne Butterworth, Karen Mattick, Suzanne Richards, Umesh Kadam
{"title":"Measures of shared decision-making for multiple long-term condition consultations: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Joanne Butterworth, Karen Mattick, Suzanne Richards, Umesh Kadam","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to measures of shared decision-making applicable to consultations between older people living with multiple long-term conditions and health care practitioners in primary care.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The number of people living with multiple long-term conditions is expected to rise worldwide, putting pressure on primary care systems and practitioners. Patient involvement in shared decision-making is key to the provision of high-quality, patient-centered care and can enable self-management, efficiency, and effective care; however, there is a lack of pragmatic guidance. To evaluate shared decision-making in context and inform best practice, measures must be applicable for use in this population and setting.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Studies reporting any measure of shared decision-making designed and developed for use in consultations between older patients (aged ≥ 65 years) and practitioners to map the breadth of domains and content of these measures will be considered for inclusion. Studies will be limited to Westernized health care systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review will follow JBI methodology. A comprehensive search will be conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane CENTRAL, PROSPERO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and other gray literature sources. The search strategy will include keywords related to shared decision-making and measures/instruments, and will not be restricted by date or language. Data extraction and narrative analysis will be guided by the JBI framework.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/wfg4s.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2139-2147"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-25-00028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to measures of shared decision-making applicable to consultations between older people living with multiple long-term conditions and health care practitioners in primary care.

Introduction: The number of people living with multiple long-term conditions is expected to rise worldwide, putting pressure on primary care systems and practitioners. Patient involvement in shared decision-making is key to the provision of high-quality, patient-centered care and can enable self-management, efficiency, and effective care; however, there is a lack of pragmatic guidance. To evaluate shared decision-making in context and inform best practice, measures must be applicable for use in this population and setting.

Eligibility criteria: Studies reporting any measure of shared decision-making designed and developed for use in consultations between older patients (aged ≥ 65 years) and practitioners to map the breadth of domains and content of these measures will be considered for inclusion. Studies will be limited to Westernized health care systems.

Methods: This scoping review will follow JBI methodology. A comprehensive search will be conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane CENTRAL, PROSPERO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and other gray literature sources. The search strategy will include keywords related to shared decision-making and measures/instruments, and will not be restricted by date or language. Data extraction and narrative analysis will be guided by the JBI framework.

Review registration: OSF https://osf.io/wfg4s.

多个长期条件协商的共同决策措施:范围审查协议。
目的:本范围审查的目的是了解与共同决策措施有关的证据的程度和类型,这些措施适用于在初级保健机构中患有多种长期疾病的老年人之间的咨询。导言:预计世界范围内患有多种长期疾病的人数将会增加,这将给初级保健系统和从业人员带来压力。患者参与共同决策是提供高质量、以患者为中心的护理的关键,可以实现自我管理、效率和有效的护理;然而,缺乏务实的指导。为了评估背景下的共同决策并为最佳实践提供信息,必须采取适用于这一人群和环境的措施。入选标准:研究报告了任何共同决策的措施,这些措施设计和开发用于成人患者和从业人员之间的会诊,以绘制这些措施的领域广度和内容。研究将仅限于西方化的卫生保健系统。没有语言和日期限制。方法:本综述将遵循JBI方法。将在PubMed、Embase、CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、Cochrane系统评价数据库、Cochrane CENTRAL、PROSPERO、ClinicalTrials.gov和其他灰色文献来源中进行全面搜索。搜索策略将包括与共同决策和措施/工具相关的关键字,并且不受日期或语言的限制。数据提取和叙事分析将以JBI框架为指导。评审注册:OSF https://osf.io/wfg4s。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信