JBI evidence synthesis最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Physical activity-based interventions in the management of dementia or cognitive impairment in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol. 撒哈拉以南非洲以身体活动为基础的痴呆或认知障碍管理干预措施:范围审查方案
IF 4.5
JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00504
Michael C Ibekaku, Lawrence Adebusoye, Lori Weeks, Parisa Ghanouni, Nazanin Nasiri, Chukwuebuka P Onyekere, Caitlin McArthur
{"title":"Physical activity-based interventions in the management of dementia or cognitive impairment in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Michael C Ibekaku, Lawrence Adebusoye, Lori Weeks, Parisa Ghanouni, Nazanin Nasiri, Chukwuebuka P Onyekere, Caitlin McArthur","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00504","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00504","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to map the existing literature on physical activity-based interventions for the management of dementia and cognitive impairment in sub-Saharan Africa.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dementia and cognitive impairment are growing public health concerns in sub-Saharan Africa, where the number of affected individuals is expected to rise significantly. Given the high rate of dementia underdiagnosis in this region, many individuals experiencing cognitive decline may not have a formal dementia diagnosis. Physical activity-based interventions, conceptualized in this review as both structured exercise programs (eg, aerobic training, resistance exercises) and unstructured physical activities (eg, walking, dancing, or daily movement-based activities), are increasingly used in cognitive impairment dementia care. However, most research in this area has been conducted in other regions, with limited knowledge of how these interventions are applied in sub-Saharan African countries.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>The review will include studies focusing on individuals with dementia or cognitive impairment, where physical activity - based interventions are implemented. The setting will be sub-Saharan African countries, with no restrictions on the language or date of publication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A comprehensive search will be conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Embase, and African Journals Online databases. Gray literature sources, including Google Scholar and Database of African Theses and Dissertations-Research (DATAD-R), will also be searched. Data will be charted and summarized descriptively, with the results presented in narrative and visual formats.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/gz65k.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2113-2123"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144209801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measures of shared decision-making for multiple long-term condition consultations: a scoping review protocol. 多个长期条件协商的共同决策措施:范围审查协议。
IF 4.5
JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-25-00028
Joanne Butterworth, Karen Mattick, Suzanne Richards, Umesh Kadam
{"title":"Measures of shared decision-making for multiple long-term condition consultations: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Joanne Butterworth, Karen Mattick, Suzanne Richards, Umesh Kadam","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00028","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00028","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to measures of shared decision-making applicable to consultations between older people living with multiple long-term conditions and health care practitioners in primary care.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The number of people living with multiple long-term conditions is expected to rise worldwide, putting pressure on primary care systems and practitioners. Patient involvement in shared decision-making is key to the provision of high-quality, patient-centered care and can enable self-management, efficiency, and effective care; however, there is a lack of pragmatic guidance. To evaluate shared decision-making in context and inform best practice, measures must be applicable for use in this population and setting.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Studies reporting any measure of shared decision-making designed and developed for use in consultations between older patients (aged ≥ 65 years) and practitioners to map the breadth of domains and content of these measures will be considered for inclusion. Studies will be limited to Westernized health care systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review will follow JBI methodology. A comprehensive search will be conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane CENTRAL, PROSPERO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and other gray literature sources. The search strategy will include keywords related to shared decision-making and measures/instruments, and will not be restricted by date or language. Data extraction and narrative analysis will be guided by the JBI framework.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/wfg4s.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2139-2147"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144972359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of health literacy interventions for knowledge, skills, and attitudes in community health workers: a systematic review protocol. 卫生素养干预措施对社区卫生工作者的知识、技能和态度的有效性:一项系统审查方案
IF 4.5
JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-25-00035
Kerwyn Jim C Chan, Jeriel R De Silos, Madelyn A Gabrieles, Michael Justin S Valles
{"title":"Effectiveness of health literacy interventions for knowledge, skills, and attitudes in community health workers: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Kerwyn Jim C Chan, Jeriel R De Silos, Madelyn A Gabrieles, Michael Justin S Valles","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00035","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00035","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of health literacy interventions compared to standard or usual educational practices for knowledge, skills, and attitudes in community health workers.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health literacy plays a crucial role in improving personal and societal health outcomes. Community health workers, who serve as cultural mediators and health educators in communities, often face gaps in formal training on health literacy. Addressing this need through evidence-based interventions is essential to enhance their competencies and support their critical roles in health care systems worldwide.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>The review will consider experimental and quasi-experimental studies, including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies. Studies evaluating health literacy interventions, such as training, workshops, or seminars, delivered through any modality and language will be included. Primary outcomes include community health workers' health literacy knowledge assessed through validated measures. Secondary outcomes include skills in obtaining and processing health information and health literacy attitudes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases including PubMed, Embase (Ovid), CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCOhost), Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ProQuest Central will be searched, along with gray literature sources including ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, MedRxiv, and preprints.org. Screening of reports and assessment of methodological quality will be done by at least 2 reviewers independently. Data synthesis will involve meta-analysis, where appropriate, with subgroup analyses based on socioeconomic status, intervention duration, and delivery modality. Alternative synthesis methods will be used if statistical pooling is not possible. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach will be used to assess the certainty of findings.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42025639226.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2074-2082"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144209798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of palliative care for the management of end-stage liver disease: a systematic review protocol. 缓和治疗在终末期肝病管理中的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
IF 4.5
JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00454
Harshitha Manjunath, Aditi Manoj, Bhagya S, Sahana Rani S, Chithra Venkateswaran, Denny John
{"title":"Effectiveness of palliative care for the management of end-stage liver disease: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Harshitha Manjunath, Aditi Manoj, Bhagya S, Sahana Rani S, Chithra Venkateswaran, Denny John","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00454","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00454","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this systematic review will be to evaluate the effectiveness of palliative care for treating adults with end-stage liver disease (ESLD), focusing on outcomes such as quality of life, quality of care, symptom burden, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>ESLD is a critical health issue, characterized by various devitalizing symptoms that negatively affect quality of life for patients. Palliative care, which is a specialty used to alleviate pain and control other manifestations of the disease, has been suggested across various studies for the management of quality of life and symptom burden in patients with ESLD.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>This review will include studies focusing on the use of palliative care for adults (≥18 years) with ESLD. Papers that compare palliative care with usual care or placebo will also be included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, and Web of Science will be searched for published studies. Sources to be searched for unpublished literature will include Google Scholar, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, Shodhganga, MedNar, OpenGrey, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Two independent reviewers will assess titles, abstracts, and full-text papers against the inclusion criteria. A third reviewer will resolve any discrepancies. Standardized JBI appraisal tools will be used to critically appraise eligible studies. Two independent reviewers will extract data. Meta-analysis will be conducted for outcomes, where feasible. If a meta-analysis cannot be conducted, the findings will be reported in a narrative format, adhering to the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis guidelines. Certainty of evidence will be reported using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024586855.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2104-2112"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144303111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Registered nurses' experiences of organizational change in acute care settings: a qualitative systematic review. 急症护理机构组织变革的注册护士经验:一项定性系统回顾。
IF 4.5
JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00317
Darlaine Jantzen, Lenora Marcellus, Danielle Damianos, Geraldine Irlbacher
{"title":"Registered nurses' experiences of organizational change in acute care settings: a qualitative systematic review.","authors":"Darlaine Jantzen, Lenora Marcellus, Danielle Damianos, Geraldine Irlbacher","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00317","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00317","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;The objective of this review was to describe the experiences of registered nurses (RNs) providing direct patient care in acute care settings undergoing organizational change.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;RNs, comprising the largest group of health care professionals in the hospital setting, are directly influenced by organizational change. Exploring their experiences will contribute to better strategic planning within hospital systems. An understanding of both the positive and negative experiences of ubiquitous organizational change, and the factors that mitigate negative effects, is essential to retaining precious health human resources, specifically nurses in acute care.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Inclusion criteria: &lt;/strong&gt;Qualitative studies of RNs working in direct patient care in acute care settings with experiences of organizational change were included. Quantitative studies and studies of other health care professionals, including those where midwives are not RNs, were excluded. Studies limited to organizational change that involved planned, purposeful change impacting daily nursing practice were included.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;An initial search was conducted in MEDLINE (EBSCOhost) and CINAHL (EBSCOhost), followed by a full search in CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Business Source Complete, ERIC (all via EBSCOhost), PubMed, and gray literature sources. Original searches were conducted in June 2017 and updated in July 2023. There were no search limits. We followed the JBI approach for study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and synthesis. Synthesized findings were assessed using ConQual.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Seventy-nine studies were eligible for inclusion after full-text review, but after assessing methodological quality, 5 were ineligible for lacking representation of participant voices. In total, 74 studies with 471 findings were included in the review. The earliest study was from 1987, with the majority published between 2013 and 2023. Most were phenomenological, hermeneutic, or grounded theory studies. Sixteen countries were represented in the included studies, with almost half from the US and England. The 5 synthesized findings are: i) Nurses experienced a lack of meaningful participatory approaches and effective preparation and planning; ii) Nurses identified facilitators to help them navigate change at intrapersonal, leadership, and organizational levels, with two-way communication an overarching facilitator; iii) Nurses experienced a range of affective responses in direct response to organizational change; iv) Nurses experienced impacts on their care practices, nursing identity, workload, roles, and everyday responsibilities, which influenced the quality and safety of patient care; and v) Organizational change led to altered relationships at organizational, unit, team, and nurse-patient levels.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;The quality of the included studies was high","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1977-2073"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145065943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Experiences of health care professionals in intensive care when families participate in clinician handovers: a qualitative systematic review. 家庭参与临床医生交接时重症监护卫生保健专业人员的经验:一项定性系统回顾。
IF 4.5
JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00154
Pauline Wong, Andree Gamble, Ruofei Chen, Ruth Endacott
{"title":"Experiences of health care professionals in intensive care when families participate in clinician handovers: a qualitative systematic review.","authors":"Pauline Wong, Andree Gamble, Ruofei Chen, Ruth Endacott","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00154","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00154","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;The objective of this review was to evaluate health care professionals' experiences when families participate in clinician handovers in adult, pediatric, and neonatal intensive care units (ICUs).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;Previous studies report the emotional distress families experience when a relative is admitted to intensive care, including an increased risk of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms after discharge. Family involvement in patient care in ICU can improve safety and quality health care outcomes. Furthermore, family participation in clinician handovers may improve satisfaction with care, staff communication, and interpersonal relationships with families. However, health care professionals' attitudes toward family participation in multidisciplinary ward rounds are diverse, and little is known about their perspectives toward family participation in clinician handovers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Inclusion criteria: &lt;/strong&gt;Studies were included if they involved health care professionals and any type of family participation during handover, from bedside presence to participation in decision-making. Clinician handovers included multidisciplinary ward rounds or nursing handovers. Settings were adult, pediatric, or neonatal intensive care units in rural or metropolitan regions in any country. Studies in other clinical contexts were excluded. Qualitative studies were included, as well as mixed methods studies if qualitative data could be clearly extracted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Databases searched included CINAHL Plus (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, Embase (Ovid), Emcare (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), ProQuest Central (including ProQuest Dissertations and Theses), Web of Science, MedNar, and Google Scholar, with limiters being English and the year range 2000 to present. The last search was in October 2024. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts and assessed the full-text articles that met inclusion criteria for methodological quality. Findings were extracted using the JBI data extraction tool and assigned a level of credibility. Meta-aggregation was used to synthesize the findings. Two reviewers discussed any disagreements to reach consensus and consulted a third reviewer when necessary.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Eleven studies published from 2003-2024 were included for data extraction. Five studies were qualitative and 6 were mixed methods. Six studies were conducted in the United States, 4 in Canada, and 1 in Australia. Three studies were in adult ICUs, 5 in pediatric, 1 in neonatal, and 2 did not specify the ICU type. All studies were on multidisciplinary bedside rounds, while none were conducted on nursing handovers. The findings revealed that health care professionals generally supported family participation in clinician handovers due to benefits such as improved communication between the health care team and families. However, they also identified barriers, includi","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1898-1937"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145070946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Experiences of rehabilitation professionals in the provision of palliative care: a qualitative systematic review protocol. 康复专业人员在姑息治疗中的经验:一个定性的系统评价方案。
IF 4.5
JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-25-00025
Jon Timothy M Rivero, Nikka Karla R Santos, Valentin C Dones Iii
{"title":"Experiences of rehabilitation professionals in the provision of palliative care: a qualitative systematic review protocol.","authors":"Jon Timothy M Rivero, Nikka Karla R Santos, Valentin C Dones Iii","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00025","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to explore the experiences of rehabilitation professionals in the provision of palliative care.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the growing recognition of the importance of rehabilitation in palliative care, the integration of rehabilitation professionals into palliative care teams is not widespread.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>This review will explore the lived experiences of rehabilitation professionals in palliative care, particularly their perceptions, challenges, rewards, and role impact. It will include qualitative and mixed methods studies conducted across diverse palliative care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for qualitative synthesis. The search strategy will include PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase (Ovid), Web of Science, PEDro, as well as gray literature sources and citation searching. The search results and study selection process will be presented using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram. Critical appraisal, data extraction, and meta-aggregation will be conducted by 2 reviewers independently. The synthesized findings and their ConQual scores will be used to inform the review's recommendations.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42025639926.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2124-2131"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144545079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Large language models and their current use in perioperative medicine: a scoping review protocol. 大型语言模型及其在围手术期医学中的应用:范围审查协议。
IF 4.5
JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-25-00003
Arnaud Romeo Mbadjeu Hondjeu, Zi Ying Zhao, Luka Newton, Anass Ajenkar, Bassam Termos, Risa Shorr, Karim Ladha, Duminda Wijeysundera, Daniel I McIsaac
{"title":"Large language models and their current use in perioperative medicine: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Arnaud Romeo Mbadjeu Hondjeu, Zi Ying Zhao, Luka Newton, Anass Ajenkar, Bassam Termos, Risa Shorr, Karim Ladha, Duminda Wijeysundera, Daniel I McIsaac","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00003","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-25-00003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aims to map existing evidence on the applications of large language models (LLMs) in perioperative care, including the types of technologies employed, the clinical tasks they support, and the evidence gaps that may influence their future adoption.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The perioperative period-encompassing care from surgical planning through postoperative recovery-is complex and time-sensitive, requiring rapid, accurate, and context-specific decision-making to optimize patient outcomes. LLMs offer new opportunities to streamline workflows, enhance clinical decision support, and personalize patient education. However, their implementation also raises concerns, including risks of error, ethical challenges, and biases inherent in training data. A systematic overview of current applications is needed to guide safe and effective integration of LLMs into perioperative care.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>This review will include studies of any design, including randomized and non-randomized trials, case reports, and letters presenting primary data on the use of LLMs in perioperative contexts. Eligible settings span the perioperative continuum, from preoperative assessment and surgical planning to intraoperative support, discharge, and recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will adhere to the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A peer-reviewed search strategy will be used in the databases MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), EBM Reviews (Ovid), and Scopus. Two reviewers will independently identify eligible studies at title and abstract stage and then screen for full texts. Information on study details will be charted in duplicate onto standardized data collection forms. Results will be presented using descriptive summaries, frequency tables, and visual plots that highlight the extent of evidence and remaining gaps.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/a3tkw/.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2091-2103"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12517723/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145186950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Experiences of parents of children with cleft lip and/or cleft palate: a qualitative systematic review protocol. 唇裂和/或腭裂患儿父母的经验:一项定性系统评价方案。
IF 4.5
JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00429
Shingo Ueki, Yuichi Nakayama, Yuta Koto
{"title":"Experiences of parents of children with cleft lip and/or cleft palate: a qualitative systematic review protocol.","authors":"Shingo Ueki, Yuichi Nakayama, Yuta Koto","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00429","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00429","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review will assess and synthesize the available qualitative evidence on the experiences of parents of children with cleft lip, cleft palate, or cleft lip and palate.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Parents of children with cleft lip and/or palate often experience emotional concerns such as shock or denial upon learning of their child's condition. The parents may also experience challenges related to physical issues such as feeding difficulties, surgical procedures, and speech articulation disorders. By understanding these experiences, we aim to suggest potential resources or enhancements of care for these parents.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>We will consider all primary studies reporting on the experiences of biological parents of children under 18 years with cleft lip and/or palate. We will focus on qualitative research as well as mixed methods studies that incorporate qualitative data. Experiences in any context will be included, regardless of the parents' age, sex/gender, or type of cleft lip and/or palate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will search for published and unpublished studies across 5 databases and 1 website: MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), DANS-Easy, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, and the American Cleft Palate Craniofacial Association. The reference lists of studies selected for critical appraisal will also be examined for additional relevant studies. There will be no restrictions on language or publication date. Two independent reviewers will screen studies for inclusion, assess methodological quality using the JBI critical appraisal checklist, extract data, and perform meta-aggregation. Confidence in the synthesized findings will be assessed according to the ConQual approach.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024584995.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"23 10","pages":"2148-2154"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145245508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Health care professionals' communication of safety-netting advice to patients with musculoskeletal conditions: a scoping review protocol. 卫生保健专业人员向肌肉骨骼疾病患者提供安全网建议的沟通:范围审查方案。
IF 4.5
JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2025-09-24 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00517
Christopher Horler, Geraldine Leydon, Lisa Roberts
{"title":"Health care professionals' communication of safety-netting advice to patients with musculoskeletal conditions: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Christopher Horler, Geraldine Leydon, Lisa Roberts","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00517","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00517","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aims to summarize the empirical evidence related to safety-netting communication in musculoskeletal health care practice.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Safety-netting involves sharing information with patients to help them identify the need to seek further help from a health care professional if their condition persists or worsens. There is limited guidance for how safety-netting should be delivered to patients with musculoskeletal conditions, which could result in variability in practice and suboptimal patient health outcomes. Understanding the current evidence base will inform further research into developing practice guidance to improve patient care.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Research articles and PhD theses that describe the practice of health care professionals sharing safety-netting advice to adults with musculoskeletal conditions will be eligible for inclusion. Articles focused on care delivered by students will be excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search will be conducted across 4 electronic databases (MEDLINE, AMED, Web of Science, and CINAHL), Google Scholar, PEDro, PhD theses databases, and reference lists of the included studies. The search will be limited to English-language articles published within the last 10 years. A minimum of 2 researchers will screen the titles and abstracts of the literature for eligibility before extracting data independently using an adapted version of the JBI data extraction tool. Data will be analyzed descriptively, and the findings will be reported in a narrative summary with corresponding tables and graphs.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/63w5u.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145186975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信