为书目数据库验证地理搜索过滤器:范围审查。

IF 4.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Catharina Muente, Alexander Pachanov, Julian Hirt, Lynda Ayiku, Dawid Pieper
{"title":"为书目数据库验证地理搜索过滤器:范围审查。","authors":"Catharina Muente, Alexander Pachanov, Julian Hirt, Lynda Ayiku, Dawid Pieper","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this scoping review was to identify validated geographic search filters and report on their development and performance measures.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The number of scientific publications has considerably increased. Measures to limit the search and screening efforts can be helpful to increase the efficiency of preparing systematic reviews. Search filters are useful tools for reviewers to identify reports with a common characteristic in bibliographic databases. Geographic search filters limit literature search results to a specific geographic characteristic (eg, a country or region). Searching the literature using geographic filters can be useful to find evidence about health care practices in distinct geographic regions; provide an overview of cultural, epidemiological, or health economics aspects; or to indicate inequalities in health care in a certain region. Our aim was to identify validated geographic search filters and report on their development and performance measures.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>We included reports on validated geographic search filters aiming to identify research from or about defined geographic features (eg, countries/regions or groups of them) with no restriction regarding the time frame and language of publication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was conducted in accordance with JBI methodology for scoping reviews and its methods were pre-specified in an a priori protocol. We searched PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), The InterTASC Information Specialists' Sub-Group (ISSG) Search Filter resource, and Google Scholar. The study selection process was independently conducted by 2 reviewers, encompassing both abstract and full-text screening. The data extraction included basic characteristics of the geographic search filter (eg, country/region, database), methods used to develop and validate the search filters, and their performance measures. The extracted data are tabulated and summarized narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our literature search yielded 907 hits. We included 9 reports that addressed 6 search filters for a broad range of geographic regions, including Spain, the African continent, the United Kingdom, the United States, OECD countries as a group, as well as publications in high-ranking nursing journals from countries where German is spoken. The methods used for developing geographic search filters were heterogeneous. Gold standard sets were created by database searching (n = 3; 50%) and relative recall (n = 3; 50%). Only 3 filters were created using objective methods and 2 underwent internal validation. The sensitivity of the search filters ranged from 73% to nearly 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings show that validated geographic search filters are not widely available. The identified search filters may serve as methodological outlines for the development of search filters for other countries or geographic regions. The calculation methods for specificity were different, which made a comparison difficult. Further efforts to standardize the methods for developing and validating these filters, as well as reporting, are important to increase their reliability and comparability.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework osf.io/5czhs.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validated geographic search filters for bibliographic databases: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Catharina Muente, Alexander Pachanov, Julian Hirt, Lynda Ayiku, Dawid Pieper\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBIES-24-00395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this scoping review was to identify validated geographic search filters and report on their development and performance measures.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The number of scientific publications has considerably increased. Measures to limit the search and screening efforts can be helpful to increase the efficiency of preparing systematic reviews. Search filters are useful tools for reviewers to identify reports with a common characteristic in bibliographic databases. Geographic search filters limit literature search results to a specific geographic characteristic (eg, a country or region). Searching the literature using geographic filters can be useful to find evidence about health care practices in distinct geographic regions; provide an overview of cultural, epidemiological, or health economics aspects; or to indicate inequalities in health care in a certain region. Our aim was to identify validated geographic search filters and report on their development and performance measures.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>We included reports on validated geographic search filters aiming to identify research from or about defined geographic features (eg, countries/regions or groups of them) with no restriction regarding the time frame and language of publication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was conducted in accordance with JBI methodology for scoping reviews and its methods were pre-specified in an a priori protocol. We searched PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), The InterTASC Information Specialists' Sub-Group (ISSG) Search Filter resource, and Google Scholar. The study selection process was independently conducted by 2 reviewers, encompassing both abstract and full-text screening. The data extraction included basic characteristics of the geographic search filter (eg, country/region, database), methods used to develop and validate the search filters, and their performance measures. The extracted data are tabulated and summarized narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our literature search yielded 907 hits. We included 9 reports that addressed 6 search filters for a broad range of geographic regions, including Spain, the African continent, the United Kingdom, the United States, OECD countries as a group, as well as publications in high-ranking nursing journals from countries where German is spoken. The methods used for developing geographic search filters were heterogeneous. Gold standard sets were created by database searching (n = 3; 50%) and relative recall (n = 3; 50%). Only 3 filters were created using objective methods and 2 underwent internal validation. The sensitivity of the search filters ranged from 73% to nearly 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings show that validated geographic search filters are not widely available. The identified search filters may serve as methodological outlines for the development of search filters for other countries or geographic regions. The calculation methods for specificity were different, which made a comparison difficult. Further efforts to standardize the methods for developing and validating these filters, as well as reporting, are important to increase their reliability and comparability.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework osf.io/5czhs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本范围审查的目的是确定有效的地理搜索过滤器,并报告其发展和性能指标。导言:科学出版物的数量已大大增加。限制搜索和筛选工作的措施有助于提高准备系统审查的效率。搜索过滤器是审稿人识别具有书目数据库中共同特征的报告的有用工具。地理搜索过滤器将文献搜索结果限制为特定的地理特征(例如,一个国家或地区)。使用地理过滤器搜索文献有助于找到不同地理区域的卫生保健实践的证据;提供文化、流行病学或卫生经济学方面的概述;或者表明某一地区医疗保健的不平等。我们的目标是确定经过验证的地理搜索过滤器,并报告其开发和性能度量。纳入标准:我们纳入了经过验证的地理搜索过滤器的报告,旨在识别来自或关于定义的地理特征(例如,国家/地区或群体)的研究,没有时间框架和出版语言的限制。方法:本综述按照JBI范围综述方法学进行,其方法在先验方案中预先规定。我们检索了PubMed、Embase (Elsevier)、InterTASC Information Specialists’subgroup (ISSG) Search Filter资源和谷歌Scholar。研究选择过程由2位审稿人独立进行,包括摘要和全文筛选。数据提取包括地理搜索过滤器的基本特征(例如,国家/地区、数据库)、用于开发和验证搜索过滤器的方法及其性能度量。将提取的数据制成表格并进行叙述总结。结果:我们的文献检索得到907个结果。我们纳入了9份报告,这些报告涉及6个搜索过滤器,适用于广泛的地理区域,包括西班牙、非洲大陆、英国、美国、经合组织国家作为一个整体,以及来自德语国家的高级护理期刊上的出版物。用于开发地理搜索过滤器的方法是异构的。通过数据库搜索创建金标准集(n = 3;50%)和相对召回率(n = 3;50%)。使用客观方法仅创建了3个过滤器,2个进行了内部验证。搜索过滤器的灵敏度从73%到接近100%不等。结论:研究结果表明,经过验证的地理搜索过滤器并没有广泛使用。所确定的搜索过滤器可以作为为其他国家或地理区域开发搜索过滤器的方法大纲。特异性的计算方法不同,比较困难。进一步努力使开发和验证这些过滤器以及报告的方法标准化,对于提高它们的可靠性和可比性非常重要。评审注册:Open Science Framework osf.io/ 5czs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validated geographic search filters for bibliographic databases: a scoping review.

Objective: The purpose of this scoping review was to identify validated geographic search filters and report on their development and performance measures.

Introduction: The number of scientific publications has considerably increased. Measures to limit the search and screening efforts can be helpful to increase the efficiency of preparing systematic reviews. Search filters are useful tools for reviewers to identify reports with a common characteristic in bibliographic databases. Geographic search filters limit literature search results to a specific geographic characteristic (eg, a country or region). Searching the literature using geographic filters can be useful to find evidence about health care practices in distinct geographic regions; provide an overview of cultural, epidemiological, or health economics aspects; or to indicate inequalities in health care in a certain region. Our aim was to identify validated geographic search filters and report on their development and performance measures.

Inclusion criteria: We included reports on validated geographic search filters aiming to identify research from or about defined geographic features (eg, countries/regions or groups of them) with no restriction regarding the time frame and language of publication.

Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with JBI methodology for scoping reviews and its methods were pre-specified in an a priori protocol. We searched PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), The InterTASC Information Specialists' Sub-Group (ISSG) Search Filter resource, and Google Scholar. The study selection process was independently conducted by 2 reviewers, encompassing both abstract and full-text screening. The data extraction included basic characteristics of the geographic search filter (eg, country/region, database), methods used to develop and validate the search filters, and their performance measures. The extracted data are tabulated and summarized narratively.

Results: Our literature search yielded 907 hits. We included 9 reports that addressed 6 search filters for a broad range of geographic regions, including Spain, the African continent, the United Kingdom, the United States, OECD countries as a group, as well as publications in high-ranking nursing journals from countries where German is spoken. The methods used for developing geographic search filters were heterogeneous. Gold standard sets were created by database searching (n = 3; 50%) and relative recall (n = 3; 50%). Only 3 filters were created using objective methods and 2 underwent internal validation. The sensitivity of the search filters ranged from 73% to nearly 100%.

Conclusion: The findings show that validated geographic search filters are not widely available. The identified search filters may serve as methodological outlines for the development of search filters for other countries or geographic regions. The calculation methods for specificity were different, which made a comparison difficult. Further efforts to standardize the methods for developing and validating these filters, as well as reporting, are important to increase their reliability and comparability.

Review registration: Open Science Framework osf.io/5czhs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信