Patricia Morris, Rose McCloskey, Alexis McGill, Lisa Keeping-Burke, Alex Goudreau, Holly Knight, Sarah Buckley, David Mazerolle, Courtney Jones
{"title":"Teaching professional writing in prelicensure health professional education programs: a scoping review.","authors":"Patricia Morris, Rose McCloskey, Alexis McGill, Lisa Keeping-Burke, Alex Goudreau, Holly Knight, Sarah Buckley, David Mazerolle, Courtney Jones","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aimed to map the literature on teaching strategies used to teach professional writing to prelicensure students enrolled in health professional programs.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health education programs must teach students how to practice professional writing as it is a fundamental skill for effective communication in health care. Professional writing is crucial for ensuring continuity of care, promoting patient safety, and meeting regulatory and institutional standards. Understanding the teaching strategies used to develop professional writing skills is important because it helps educators identify the most effective methods for preparing students for practice.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>This review considered studies on teaching strategies used by faculty at any academic institution, in any country, to teach professional writing in prelicensure health professional programs. Disciplines such as medicine, nursing, occupational therapy, pharmacy, dentistry, and veterinary medicine were included. Strategies included any intentional activity (in-person or virtual) aimed at developing students' professional writing. Professional writing included writing for the purpose of recording assessments or interventions, conveying information to a care team, communicating with patients, or demonstrating compliance with professional or institutional policies or practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review followed the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Published literature was located in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL with Full Text (EBSCOhost), ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health (ProQuest), and ERIC (EBSCOhost). A search for unpublished research reports was conducted in ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Open Access Theses and Dissertations (OATD), and OAIster (WorldCat). The reference lists of all included studies were manually back-searched for additional studies, and Google Scholar and Web of Science Core Collection were used for forward citation tracking to identify further studies. Search results were limited from 2010 to the present, and only reports written in English and French were eligible. Data were extracted from studies that met the eligibility criteria by 2 independent reviewers. Data are presented in tabular format to address findings related to the review objectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three studies from 7 countries, published between 2010 and 2025, were included. All studies examined at least 1 teaching strategy, and included 5 disciplines: nursing, medicine, pharmacy, dentistry, and veterinary medicine. Three additional studies focused on interprofessional education. A variety of strategies was used to teach professional writing, with the most common being didactic methods such as lectures, as well as checklists. These strategies included group and individualized modes of delivery and targeted a range of professional writing types, including assessments, discharge summaries, prescriptions, and patient education materials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most of the studies included in this review were published within the last 5 years, highlighting the growing recognition of the need to prepare future health care graduates to write professionally. This review reveals a gap in understanding of the most effective methods for teaching professional writing in prelicensure programs. Future research should identify the best teaching strategies and develop standardized evaluation metrics to ensure that health profession students are fully equipped to meet the writing demands of clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>OSF https://osf.io/nveqr/.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1938-1976"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This review aimed to map the literature on teaching strategies used to teach professional writing to prelicensure students enrolled in health professional programs.
Introduction: Health education programs must teach students how to practice professional writing as it is a fundamental skill for effective communication in health care. Professional writing is crucial for ensuring continuity of care, promoting patient safety, and meeting regulatory and institutional standards. Understanding the teaching strategies used to develop professional writing skills is important because it helps educators identify the most effective methods for preparing students for practice.
Eligibility criteria: This review considered studies on teaching strategies used by faculty at any academic institution, in any country, to teach professional writing in prelicensure health professional programs. Disciplines such as medicine, nursing, occupational therapy, pharmacy, dentistry, and veterinary medicine were included. Strategies included any intentional activity (in-person or virtual) aimed at developing students' professional writing. Professional writing included writing for the purpose of recording assessments or interventions, conveying information to a care team, communicating with patients, or demonstrating compliance with professional or institutional policies or practices.
Methods: This review followed the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Published literature was located in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL with Full Text (EBSCOhost), ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health (ProQuest), and ERIC (EBSCOhost). A search for unpublished research reports was conducted in ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Open Access Theses and Dissertations (OATD), and OAIster (WorldCat). The reference lists of all included studies were manually back-searched for additional studies, and Google Scholar and Web of Science Core Collection were used for forward citation tracking to identify further studies. Search results were limited from 2010 to the present, and only reports written in English and French were eligible. Data were extracted from studies that met the eligibility criteria by 2 independent reviewers. Data are presented in tabular format to address findings related to the review objectives.
Results: Thirty-three studies from 7 countries, published between 2010 and 2025, were included. All studies examined at least 1 teaching strategy, and included 5 disciplines: nursing, medicine, pharmacy, dentistry, and veterinary medicine. Three additional studies focused on interprofessional education. A variety of strategies was used to teach professional writing, with the most common being didactic methods such as lectures, as well as checklists. These strategies included group and individualized modes of delivery and targeted a range of professional writing types, including assessments, discharge summaries, prescriptions, and patient education materials.
Conclusion: Most of the studies included in this review were published within the last 5 years, highlighting the growing recognition of the need to prepare future health care graduates to write professionally. This review reveals a gap in understanding of the most effective methods for teaching professional writing in prelicensure programs. Future research should identify the best teaching strategies and develop standardized evaluation metrics to ensure that health profession students are fully equipped to meet the writing demands of clinical practice.
目的:本综述旨在梳理有关卫生专业预科学生专业写作教学策略的文献。健康教育课程必须教会学生如何练习专业写作,因为这是医疗保健中有效沟通的基本技能。专业写作对于确保护理的连续性、促进患者安全以及满足监管和机构标准至关重要。了解用于培养专业写作技能的教学策略是很重要的,因为它可以帮助教育者确定最有效的方法,让学生为实践做好准备。资格标准:本综述考虑了在任何国家的任何学术机构的教师使用的教学策略的研究,这些策略用于在获得执照前的卫生专业课程中教授专业写作。包括医学、护理、职业治疗、药学、牙科和兽医学等学科。策略包括任何旨在发展学生专业写作的有意活动(面对面的或虚拟的)。专业写作包括以记录评估或干预、向护理团队传达信息、与患者沟通或证明对专业或机构政策或实践的遵守为目的的写作。方法:本综述采用JBI方法进行范围综述。已发表的文献位于MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase (Ovid)、CINAHL全文(EBSCOhost)、ProQuest护理与联合健康(ProQuest)和ERIC (EBSCOhost)。对未发表的研究报告进行了搜索,包括ProQuest dissertation and dissertation, Open Access dissertation and dissertation (oad)和OAIster (WorldCat)。人工对所有纳入研究的参考文献列表进行反向检索,以寻找更多的研究,并使用谷歌Scholar和Web of Science Core Collection进行转发引用跟踪,以确定进一步的研究。搜索结果限于2010年至今,并且只有用英语和法语撰写的报告才符合条件。数据由2位独立审稿人从符合资格标准的研究中提取。数据以表格形式呈现,以说明与审查目标有关的调查结果。结果:纳入了来自7个国家的33项研究,发表于2010年至2025年之间。所有研究至少检查了一种教学策略,包括护理、医学、药学、牙科和兽医学5个学科。另外三项研究侧重于跨专业教育。教授专业写作的策略多种多样,最常见的是说教式的方法,如讲座和清单。这些策略包括小组和个性化的交付模式,并针对一系列专业写作类型,包括评估、出院摘要、处方和患者教育材料。结论:本综述中纳入的大多数研究都是在最近5年内发表的,这突显了越来越多的人认识到为未来的卫生保健毕业生做好专业写作准备。这篇综述揭示了在理解执照前课程中最有效的专业写作教学方法方面的差距。未来的研究应确定最佳的教学策略,并制定标准化的评估指标,以确保卫生专业学生完全具备满足临床实践写作需求的能力。评审注册:OSF https://osf.io/nveqr/。