Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology最新文献_第5页

On the relationship between right-wing attitudes, conspiracy beliefs, and intergroup threat: Introducing an indirect measure for intergroup threat 论右翼态度、阴谋信念和群体间威胁之间的关系：引入群体间威胁的间接测度

IF 1.8

Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-06-05 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.103

Jonas Krüppel, Dahlnym Yoon, Kerstin Fieg, Petra Sharma, Andreas Mokros

{"title":"On the relationship between right-wing attitudes, conspiracy beliefs, and intergroup threat: Introducing an indirect measure for intergroup threat","authors":"Jonas Krüppel, Dahlnym Yoon, Kerstin Fieg, Petra Sharma, Andreas Mokros","doi":"10.1002/jts5.103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.103","url":null,"abstract":"Recent theoretical models stress the importance of both personal and contextual factors in the development of political extremism. One such theory is the Intergroup Threat Theory (ITT) that suggests a relationship between extremism and intergroup threat (i.e., the perception that one's ingroup is threatened by a particular social outgroup). Using an adaptation of the Semantic Misattribution Procedure (SMP), the present research aimed at replicating the results of previous studies using a novel measure. In a first study (N = 88, 77% female), self-reported intergroup threat was significantly and positively related to two types of extreme political attitudes, namely, right-wing authoritarianism and generic conspiracy beliefs. The SMP score, in contrast, was only significantly correlated to right-wing authoritarianism. In a second study, these results were replicated in a larger sample (N = 243, 68% female). Moreover, both self-reported and indirectly measured intergroup threat were related to hostile attitudes and stereotypes against immigrants. When compared to explicit intergroup threat, however, the SMP score was not incremental in the prediction of hostile attitudes against immigrants. These results support the validity of the SMP for the assessment of intergroup threat. Replications should explore the practical utility of the SMP in other samples using additional validation criteria.","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"5 4","pages":"354-365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.103","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72351162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Role of psychological ownership in job crafting, work engagement, and counterproductive behavior 心理所有权在工作制定、工作参与和反作用行为中的作用

IF 1.8

Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-06-03 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.104

Hung-Yu Tsai

引用次数: 5

Review for "Psychopathy and prejudice: The mediating role of empathy, social dominance orientation and right‐wing authoritarianism" “精神病和偏见：移情、社会支配取向和右翼威权主义的中介作用”综述

IF 1.8

Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-05-27 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.116/v1/review1

S. Stathi, Sajid Humayun, Reay Stoddart Isaac, Demi M. McCarron

引用次数: 0

Social autonomy ≠ social empowerment: The social self-restriction model 社会自主≠社会赋权:社会自我约束模式

IF 1.8

Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-05-21 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.97

Harry M. Wallace, Kevin P. McIntyre

{"title":"Social autonomy ≠ social empowerment: The social self-restriction model","authors":"Harry M. Wallace, Kevin P. McIntyre","doi":"10.1002/jts5.97","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts5.97","url":null,"abstract":"This paper introduces the social self-restriction (SSR) model, which highlights a drawback associated with the increasingly accessible privilege of social autonomy. Social autonomy enables individuals to connect with preferred social partners and avoid undesirable others. The benefits of social autonomy are undeniable; however, the SSR model makes the novel assertion that people tend to exercise social autonomy in ways that ultimately constrain their potential for social empowerment—a higher-order form of personal freedom. Attaining the ideal of high social empowerment requires both high social autonomy and high social adaptability. People with high social adaptability can feel reasonably comfortable and act competently in social environments they did not choose to inhabit. Unfortunately, people with high social autonomy are unlikely to possess high social adaptability. We propose that social autonomy undermines social adaptability by tempting people to avoid social challenges and socialize selectively with similar others in familiar contexts, a habit that limits social skill development, promotes social intolerance, and distorts social perceptions. In essence, we argue that social autonomy allows people to live in their social comfort zones, at the cost of restricting their social range. Our discussion of the SSR model incorporates evidence and perspectives from a broad range of academic disciplines, and includes consideration of opportunities for future research.","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"5 4","pages":"338-353"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.97","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44903063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Blaming immigrants to enhance control: Exploring the control-bolstering functions of causal attribution, in-group identification, and hierarchy enhancement 归咎移民加强控制:探索因果归因、群体内认同和等级强化的控制增强功能

IF 1.8

Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-05-18 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.73

Magdalena Hirsch, Susanne Veit, Immo Fritsche

{"title":"Blaming immigrants to enhance control: Exploring the control-bolstering functions of causal attribution, in-group identification, and hierarchy enhancement","authors":"Magdalena Hirsch, Susanne Veit, Immo Fritsche","doi":"10.1002/jts5.73","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts5.73","url":null,"abstract":"Blaming immigrants seems to be in part motivated by the need for control. However, three alternative explanations have been proposed as to why blaming bolsters feelings of control. First, blaming may restore a sense of an orderly world in which negative events can be attributed to a clear cause (causal attribution). Second, blaming others may strengthen in-group identities thereby facilitating group-based control (in-group identification). Finally, blaming low-status groups may enhance individuals' perceptions of dominance and superior status (hierarchy enhancement). Addressing these arguments, we conducted two survey experiments in the German context. In the first experiment, we examined the control-bolstering functions of causal attribution and in-group identification. Participants were primed with an economic crisis threat and then, given the opportunity to either blame out-groups (immigrants and managers), blame an abstract cause (globalization), or affirm their national identity. In the second experiment, we examine control enhancement in the context of political conflict and status hierarchies. Participants had the opportunity to either express prejudice toward low-status out-groups (immigrants and obese people) or indicate their opinion on the polarized issue of representation of the far-right. Both studies replicate earlier findings showing that anti-immigrant blaming and prejudice enhances the feelings of control. Neither mere causal attribution nor mere in-group identity salience produce similar control-bolstering effects. Instead, findings suggest that intergroup conflict and status differences benefit control the enhancement processes supporting accounts of both group-based control and social dominance. Findings are discussed with respect to social cohesion and the appeal of populist frames promoting antagonistic, unequal intergroup relations.","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"5 2","pages":"114-131"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.73","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43413353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

Unpacking the social psychology of populism: A brief introductory note 揭开民粹主义的社会心理：一个简短的介绍

IF 1.8

Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-05-18 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.98

Sofia Stathi, Rita Guerra

引用次数: 4

How many different types of populists are there in Germany? An experimental approach with multiple methods 德国有多少不同类型的民粹主义者？一种具有多种方法的实验方法

IF 1.8

Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-05-18 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.70

M. Murat Ardag, Jan Philipp Thomeczek

引用次数: 0

Power to the people: Disidentification with the government and the support for populism 人民的权力：对政府的不认同和对民粹主义的支持

IF 1.8

Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-05-18 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.77

Karolina Urbanska, Samuel Pehrson, Serge Guimond

{"title":"Power to the people: Disidentification with the government and the support for populism","authors":"Karolina Urbanska, Samuel Pehrson, Serge Guimond","doi":"10.1002/jts5.77","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.77","url":null,"abstract":"Populist attitudes have been shown to predict voting behavior. These attitudes consist of a belief that everyday citizens are better judges of what is best for their own country than politicians and that the political elites are corrupt. As such, a clear “us” (pure and good everyday citizens) and “them” (the evil political elite) rhetoric is present. In the present research, we propose that identification with the government may predict whether people would vote for, and whether they have voted in the past for, a populist party (either from the political left or the political right). The present research (N = 562), carried out among French citizens, showed that lower government identification related to past voting behavior, current voting intentions and likelihood to switch from a non-populist to a populist party. Identification with the government was also negatively associated to intention to abstain from voting. Moreover, government identification was a stronger predictor of these voting-related outcomes than the recently developed populist attitudes measures. Unexpectedly, national identification was a not a significant predictor of voting behavior. In conclusion, the present research suggests that the extent to which citizens identify and feel represented by the government should be considered on par with populist attitudes in understanding support for populist parties. Perceiving that the government does not represent everyday people may be sufficient to abandon support for mainstream (non-populist) political parties.","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"5 2","pages":"79-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.77","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72362229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Populism versus the people: How citizen's social representations of home destabilize national populism's territorial vision 民粹主义与人民：公民对家园的社会表征如何破坏国家民粹主义的领土愿景

IF 1.8

Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-05-18 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.82

Kesi Mahendran, Anthony English, Sue Nieland

{"title":"Populism versus the people: How citizen's social representations of home destabilize national populism's territorial vision","authors":"Kesi Mahendran, Anthony English, Sue Nieland","doi":"10.1002/jts5.82","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts5.82","url":null,"abstract":"Can understanding social representations of home unpack the central empty signifier of populism—the “true people”? Nationalist exclusionary forms of populism use home, birthplace, and born and bred narratives to frame sections of the population as Other. “Go Home” vans in the United Kingdom, Donald Trump's use of birther rhetoric during his previous presidential candidacy and the Sweden Democrats mobilization of folkhemmet (people's home) to question migrant welfare contributions together illustrate how nationalist populism works. Populism uses threat and insecurity, related to home, to make hegemonic a protectionist and reified worldview of home as stable, bounded and historically continuous. This article examines how populist rhetoric of home compares to people's actual social representations of home. Using cross-European interviews (N = 76) we find the dynamics of home relate to three social representations—home as a threatened space, home as birthplace, and home as a lifespan journey. These are articulated through a dialogical self engaged in transnational and intergenerational dialogue. The evidence of dynamic, dialogical, and relationally continuous representations of home points to the value of further examination of alternative social representations of home. This articulation could counter protectionist rhetoric associated with both vertical (ordinary/elite) and horizontal (people/migrant) dimensions of nationalist populism.","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"5 2","pages":"146-158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.82","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48866286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

The role of collective narcissism in populist attitudes and the collapse of democracy in Hungary 集体自恋在民粹主义态度和匈牙利民主崩溃中的作用

IF 1.8

Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-05-18 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.80

Dorottya Lantos, Joseph P. Forgas

{"title":"The role of collective narcissism in populist attitudes and the collapse of democracy in Hungary","authors":"Dorottya Lantos, Joseph P. Forgas","doi":"10.1002/jts5.80","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.80","url":null,"abstract":"What are the psychological processes responsible for the recent spread of populist political systems and movements? All political systems essentially reflect the mental representations of their populations, and collective narcissism has recently emerged as a contributing factor in the rise of populism. This article presents two studies examining the role of collective narcissism in predicting populist attitudes and voting intentions in Hungary. Hungary offers a particularly important case study of state-sponsored populism and illiberalism in Europe, as this country has gone furthest in undermining democratic principles and practices within the EU. To establish the pervasive role of collective narcissism we first review the historical evidence, survey research, and narrative analyses of Hungarian political representations. We then present two empirical studies where we predicted and found that collective narcissism was a significant predictor of negative attitudes toward the EU (Study 1), conservatism, and support for the ruling populist party (Studies 1 and 2). Collective narcissism predicted these variables independently from other factors, such as in-group positivity or perceived relative deprivation. However, once conservatism was controlled for the effects of collective narcissism faded out in some cases. The results nevertheless indicate that collective narcissism plays important role in promoting populist politics. The implications of these findings for understanding the psychological appeal of populism and illiberalism are discussed.","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"5 2","pages":"65-78"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.80","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72321293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6