Peitho最新文献_第3页

Monism in Aristotle’s Metaphysics I.3–5 亚里士多德《形而上学》中的一元论

Peitho Pub Date : 2021-12-13 DOI: 10.14746/pea.2021.1.2

T. Johansen

引用次数: 1

Aristotelische Biologie. Eine Synopsis Aristotelische .生物一个Synopsis

Peitho Pub Date : 2020-12-23 DOI: 10.14746/pea.2020.1.4

Martin Mayer

引用次数: 0

Plato and Antisthenes in the Phaedo: A Reflexive Reading. Part Two 柏拉图和安提斯尼在《斐多篇:反思性阅读》中。第二部分

Peitho Pub Date : 2020-12-23 DOI: 10.14746/pea.2020.1.2

Giuseppe Mazzara

{"title":"Plato and Antisthenes in the Phaedo: A Reflexive Reading. Part Two","authors":"Giuseppe Mazzara","doi":"10.14746/pea.2020.1.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14746/pea.2020.1.2","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is not so much to show the presence of Antisthenes in the dialogue, but rather to examine that to which Plato alludes. The controversy over ideas between the two Socratics is historically very well-attested, as can already be seen in the Cratylus. Thus, it is reasonable to assume that this controversy must have affected Plato when he was writing the Phaedo: a dialogue in which the importance of ideas and his new logic is undeniable. Hence, this paper will investigate the following question: what impact could Antisthenes’ denominative and definitory logic have on the equally denominative and definitory logic presented in the Phaedo, given that the latter work in all probability preceded the Sathōn? In light of what is said in the dialogue, the answer focuses primarily on what would not be said. Thus, this study is divided into two parts: Part one shows how the so-called “second navigation” emerges as an objection to the insufficiency of the responses given by the physiologists. Tellingly, certain “common opinions” are regarded as perplexing and individuals holding them are referred to with the indeterminate tis, which – as is argued – must have included Antisthenes. Indeed, Tht. 108c7–8 reports the latter to have made common opinions a cornerstone of his denominative logic. Part two, on the other hand, is devoted to examining the so-called “final argument.” Here, Antisthenes’ presence seems somewhat more nuanced, given his incomplete knowledge of the new logic of irreversible opposites which was worked out by Plato for the purpose of demonstrating the immortality and indestructibility of the soul. On the other hand, Antisthenes is likely to have prompted Plato to specify the relationship between ideas and things in the definitory logic, since the proponent of the theory of oikeios logos refused to distinguish between the substance and its attributes, the differences and their opposites, and the opposites of opposites.","PeriodicalId":36201,"journal":{"name":"Peitho","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84907005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Un universo aperto… 一个开放的宇宙。

Peitho Pub Date : 2020-12-23 DOI: 10.14746/pea.2020.1.9

L. Rosetti

引用次数: 1

Il male in sé e il nulla in Proclo 邪恶本身，一无所有

Peitho Pub Date : 2020-12-23 DOI: 10.14746/pea.2020.1.6

V. Napoli

引用次数: 0

Melissos z Samos – doksografia i fragmenty

Peitho Pub Date : 2020-12-23 DOI: 10.14746/pea.2020.1.1

M. Wesoły