{"title":"Melissos z Samos – doksografia i fragmenty","authors":"M. Wesoły","doi":"10.14746/pea.2020.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are several recent and noteworthy studies on the testimonies and fragments of Melissos of Samos: Laks-Most (2016), Brémond (2017). Furthermore, one can learn a great deal about Melissos from the lectures and discussions undertaken in the framework of “Eleatica 2012” (Mansfeld A. et al. 2016). When taken together, these studies enable us to fully appreciate Melissos’ original work in terms of its sources, its audacious arguments and its later criticisms. Melissos is here presented as a spokesman of the Eleatic school in an order that aims to do justice to the ancient testimonies that relate and refute his arguments as well as to the verbatim fragments (these are given here in the original). For the sake of clarity, however, various secondary testimonies have been omitted.","PeriodicalId":36201,"journal":{"name":"Peitho","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peitho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/pea.2020.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近有几项值得注意的关于萨摩斯岛Melissos的证词和片段的研究:Laks-Most (2016), br mond(2017)。此外,人们可以从“Eleatica 2012”(Mansfeld a . et al. 2016)框架下的讲座和讨论中学到很多关于Melissos的知识。这些研究结合在一起,使我们能够充分欣赏梅利索斯的原创作品,包括其来源、大胆的论点和后来的批评。梅利索斯在这里是作为埃利亚学派的发言人出现的,目的是为了公正地对待古代的证词,这些证词与他的论点有关,并反驳了他的论点,以及逐字逐句的片段(这些都在原文中)。不过,为清楚起见,省略了各种次要证词。
There are several recent and noteworthy studies on the testimonies and fragments of Melissos of Samos: Laks-Most (2016), Brémond (2017). Furthermore, one can learn a great deal about Melissos from the lectures and discussions undertaken in the framework of “Eleatica 2012” (Mansfeld A. et al. 2016). When taken together, these studies enable us to fully appreciate Melissos’ original work in terms of its sources, its audacious arguments and its later criticisms. Melissos is here presented as a spokesman of the Eleatic school in an order that aims to do justice to the ancient testimonies that relate and refute his arguments as well as to the verbatim fragments (these are given here in the original). For the sake of clarity, however, various secondary testimonies have been omitted.