Q4 Arts and Humanities
Peitho Pub Date : 2020-12-23 DOI:10.14746/pea.2020.1.1
M. Wesoły
{"title":"Melissos z Samos – doksografia i fragmenty","authors":"M. Wesoły","doi":"10.14746/pea.2020.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are several recent and noteworthy studies on the testimonies and fragments of Melissos of Samos: Laks-Most (2016), Brémond (2017). Furthermore, one can learn a great deal about Melissos from the lectures and discussions undertaken in the framework of “Eleatica 2012” (Mansfeld A. et al. 2016). When taken together, these studies enable us to fully appreciate Melissos’ original work in terms of its sources, its audacious arguments and its later criticisms. Melissos is here presented as a spokesman of the Eleatic school in an order that aims to do justice to the ancient testimonies that relate and refute his arguments as well as to the verbatim fragments (these are given here in the original). For the sake of clarity, however, various secondary testimonies have been omitted.","PeriodicalId":36201,"journal":{"name":"Peitho","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peitho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/pea.2020.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近有几项值得注意的关于萨摩斯岛Melissos的证词和片段的研究:Laks-Most (2016), br mond(2017)。此外,人们可以从“Eleatica 2012”(Mansfeld a . et al. 2016)框架下的讲座和讨论中学到很多关于Melissos的知识。这些研究结合在一起,使我们能够充分欣赏梅利索斯的原创作品,包括其来源、大胆的论点和后来的批评。梅利索斯在这里是作为埃利亚学派的发言人出现的,目的是为了公正地对待古代的证词,这些证词与他的论点有关,并反驳了他的论点,以及逐字逐句的片段(这些都在原文中)。不过,为清楚起见,省略了各种次要证词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Melissos z Samos – doksografia i fragmenty
There are several recent and noteworthy studies on the testimonies and fragments of Melissos of Samos: Laks-Most (2016), Brémond (2017). Furthermore, one can learn a great deal about Melissos from the lectures and discussions undertaken in the framework of “Eleatica 2012” (Mansfeld A. et al. 2016). When taken together, these studies enable us to fully appreciate Melissos’ original work in terms of its sources, its audacious arguments and its later criticisms. Melissos is here presented as a spokesman of the Eleatic school in an order that aims to do justice to the ancient testimonies that relate and refute his arguments as well as to the verbatim fragments (these are given here in the original). For the sake of clarity, however, various secondary testimonies have been omitted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Peitho
Peitho Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信