Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice最新文献

{"title":"Wear of Enamel Antagonist to Polished vs Glazed Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Crowns (Randomized Clinical Trial).","authors":"Ibrahim S Rady, Eman M Anwar, Amira M Elsharkawy, Karim A Rabie","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3804","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3804","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of this clinical study was to assess the wear on opposing enamel caused by two processing methods of ZLS (zirconium-reinforced lithium silicate) VITA SUPRINITY crowns-polished and glaze-fired-when used to restore posterior teeth.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 26 patients requiring full coverage molar crowns. Participants were divided into two groups based on the type of occlusal surface treatment applied. Group I comprised patients who received polished ZLS crowns, while group II included those treated with glaze-fired ZLS crowns. Following final cementation, intraoral scans were performed at baseline and after 6 months, and wear measurements were analyzed using superimposition software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a 6-month follow-up, polished crowns exhibited significantly lower wear compared to glaze-fired crowns for both the restoration (<i>p</i> = 0.013, effect size = 1.344) and the antagonist enamel (<i>p</i> = 0.041, effect size = 1.026).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the study's limitations, polished ZLS crowns exhibited minimal wear on opposing teeth, whereas glazed ZLS caused greater wear on both the restoration and antagonist enamel.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>VITA SUPRINITY crowns, particularly when polished with appropriate techniques, offer favorable wear resistance for both the restoration and opposing enamel, along with excellent biocompatibility. How to cite this article: Rady IS, Anwar EM, Elsharkawy AM, <i>et al.</i> Wear of Enamel Antagonist to Polished vs Glazed Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Crowns (Randomized Clinical Trial). J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(1):18-24.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 1","pages":"18-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144036985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Trends and Collaborative Networks in the Use of Electrospun Nanofibers in Dentistry: A Bibliometric Study.","authors":"Mabel Huaman-De la Cruz, Julia Medina, Arnaldo Munive-Degregori, Katia Medina-Calderon, Fran Espinoza-Carhuancho, Frank Mayta-Tovalino","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3805","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3805","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To analyze trends and collaboration networks in the use of electrospun nanofibers in dentistry from 2019 to 2024.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A descriptive, observational study with a bibliometric approach was conducted. The inclusion criteria were documents that addressed the use of electrospun nanofibers in dentistry, published between 2019 and 2024. The search was performed in Scopus on December 30, 2024, using a specific keyword strategy. Forty-five relevant documents were identified. The selection, extraction, and analysis procedures were carried out using Bibliometrix, R Studio, and SciVal. Some metrics analysis such as the <i>h</i>-index, number of citations, and collaboration networks were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed an annual decrease of 2.64% in publication growth, with an average of 11.69 citations per document. The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and the University of British Columbia stood out for their impact. The most relevant thematic clusters were \"tissue scaffolds\" and \"nanofibers.\" Most authors had written only one paper. The most influential journals were found in Zone 1 according to Bradford's law.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings underline the importance of fostering international collaboration and focusing on high-citation areas to advance the research and application of electrospun nanofibers in dentistry.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This study highlights the clinical importance of electrospun nanofibers in dentistry, showcasing their potential to transform dental treatments. The results stress the need for international collaboration and focusing on high-impact research areas. By analyzing trends and collaborative networks, dental professionals can utilize the advantages of electrospun nanofibers, resulting in improved patient outcomes, enhanced tissue regeneration, and more effective dental therapies. This research paves the way for innovative applications and future advancements in dental materials and techniques. How to cite this article: Huaman-De la Cruz M, Medina J, Munive-Degregori A, <i>et al.</i> Trends and Collaborative Networks in the Use of Electrospun Nanofibers in Dentistry: A Bibliometric Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(1):110-116.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 1","pages":"110-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144038386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Two Obturation Techniques and Three Endodontic Sealers in Filling Lateral Canals: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.","authors":"Mohamed Am El Sayed, Nada M El Sayed","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3813","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3813","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficiency of two obturation techniques in filling artificially designed lateral canals using three different endodontic sealers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-four resin blocks were used, each containing four main canals and eight lateral canals, with four located in the apical region and four in the coronal region. The primary canals were instrumented, and the blocks were divided into two groups (<i>n</i> = 12 per group) based on the obturation technique: Group I utilized the single-cone technique, while group II used the lateral condensation technique. Each group was further divided into three subgroups (<i>n</i> = 4 per subgroup) according to the type of sealer: subgroup A used AH Plus, subgroup B used BioRoot RCS, and subgroup C used GuttaFlow 2. After canals obturation, the lateral canals were examined under a stereomicroscope to measure penetration depths of sealers and fill percentages, with data subjected to statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lateral condensation technique achieved significantly better lateral canal filling compared with the single-cone technique (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The lateral canals in the apical region showed better filling compared with the coronal lateral canals in both obturation methods. For the lateral condensation technique, AH Plus (99.51%) and GuttaFlow 2 (99.26%) provided the highest filling performance of apical lateral canals, while BioRoot RCS (83.05%) outperformed others in filling coronal lateral canals. In the single-cone technique, BioRoot RCS (80.13%) was the most effective in the filling of the apical lateral canals, while all sealers exhibited similar performance in the filling of the coronal lateral canals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficiency of filling the lateral canals was influenced by the obturation technique, the location of lateral canals, and the type of sealer. BioRoot RCS demonstrated versatility in filling apical and coronal lateral canals, while AH Plus and GuttaFlow 2 excelled primarily in filling the apical lateral canals.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>These findings offer valuable guidance to clinicians in selecting optimal sealers and obturation techniques to enhance the filling of lateral canals. How to cite this article: El Sayed MAM, El Sayed NM. Comparative Evaluation of Two Obturation Techniques and Three Endodontic Sealers in Filling Lateral Canals: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(1):25-33.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 1","pages":"25-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144051648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss and Esthetics in Screw vs Cement-retained Single Implant Prosthesis: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Jayashree Sajjanar, Vaishnavi Mohite, Veena Benakatti, Shylesh Kumar Basaralu Shivakumar, Zehra Rana, Ravi Teja Boppana","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3742","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3742","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate marginal bone loss and esthetics in single implant zirconia prostheses of screw- and cement-retained prosthesis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An electronic search on MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science was conducted to identify randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) published within the past five years from 2018 upto January 2023. Additionally, a manual search of relevant references was performed. Two reviewers independently selected studies based on predefined inclusion criteria. Marginal bone loss values and esthetic parameters were extracted, and meta-analysis was conducted where applicable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search yielded 61 articles, of which nine articles were thoroughly analyzed, resulting in five RCTs which were included. Due to limited available data on esthetic parameters, meta-analysis could not be performed. However, 164 implants revealed that screw-retained implant restorations were more likely to retain screws than cemented ones after one year (<i>z</i>-test value = 3.18, <i>p</i> = 0.001), with a mean difference of -0.30 (95% CI).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Marginal bone loss around implants was lower in screw-retained prostheses compared to cement-retained ones. These findings support the preference for zirconia prostheses in esthetically demanding cases.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Screw-retained ceramic prosthesis exhibit optimal esthetics and minimal marginal bone loss. Cement-retained prosthesis fail in terms of marginal bone loss and esthetics due to excess cement around the prostheses. Inadvertence of excess cement removal around implant prosthesis led to inflammation of peri-implant tissue, which consequently increased probing depth. A stringent protocol in the procedure of cementation of prosthesis aids in the removal of excess cement, which reduces marginal bone loss and enhances esthetic. How to cite this article: Sajjanar J, Mohite V, Benakatti V, <i>et al.</i> Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss and Esthetics in Screw vs Cement-retained Single Implant Prosthesis: A Systematic Review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(1):103-109.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 1","pages":"103-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144050830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Clinical Performance of Strip vs Zirconia Crowns in 2-6-year-old: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Rashmi A Dongarwar, Ritesh R Kalaskar, Sandeep R Pipare, Shivani Sawant, Anija Chandanakunnummal","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3817","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3817","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess and evaluate the clinical performance of strip crowns and zirconia crowns as full coverage restorations in children aged 2-6 years, with a focus on gingival health, retention, and recurrent caries.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The current systematic review was drafted by following the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist. Major electronic databases such as PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, ProQuest, registers, or gray literature and other reports such as websites, organizations, citations, etc., were thoroughly searched to find publications from 1995 up to January 2024. Following the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) guideline: (i) Population: maxillary primary anterior teeth in 2-6-year-old children, (ii) Intervention: Zirconia crowns, (iii) Comparison: Strip crown, (iv) Outcome: plaque accumulation, gingival bleeding, recurrent caries, and crown retention were considered. Randomized clinical trial published in English comparing zirconia crowns and strip crowns among 2-6-year-old children are included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 446 studies initially identified, 441 were excluded due to duplication, non-English language, or not meeting inclusion criteria. Five studies that met the necessary criteria for quantitative and qualitative analysis were included. Zirconia crowns showed lower gingival bleeding, better retention, and no secondary caries compared to strip crowns at 3, 6, and 12 months, with minimal publication bias. However, the differences were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Zirconia crowns demonstrate reduced gingival bleeding, superior retention, and an absence of secondary caries over 6, 9, and 12 months in maxillary primary anterior teeth among children aged 2-6 years.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>In children aged 2-6 years, zirconia crowns are highly suitable for long-term restorations due to their superior durability, esthetics, and ability to enhance patient satisfaction. They are ideal for cases where functional and esthetic outcomes are priorities. Conversely, strip crowns serve as a practical option for temporary or intermediate restorations, offering a less invasive and cost-effective solution for managing primary teeth until definitive treatment is required. How to cite this article: Dongarwar RA, Kalaskar RR, Pipare SR, <i>et al.</i> Clinical Performance of Strip vs Zirconia Crowns in 2-6-year-old: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(1):93-102.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 1","pages":"93-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144049732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Scientometric Analysis of Research on Oral and Gut Microbiota and Periodontitis: Collaborative Networks, Emerging Patterns, Thematic Evolution.","authors":"Frank Mayta-Tovalino, Fran Espinoza-Carhuancho, Mabel Huaman-De la Cruz, Antonia Castro Rodríguez, Katia Luz Medina Calderon","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3814","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3814","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To perform a scientometric analysis of scientific literature related to microbiota and periodontitis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A search strategy was applied on 21 July 2024, identifying 1,069 papers from 408 different sources. However, nine articles could not be exported to SciVal due to incomplete metadata. The documents, including 722 articles, 282 reviews, 44 book chapters, among others, showed an annual growth rate of 7.53%. Bibliometrix and SciVal were used for data extraction and analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,069 papers from 408 different sources, published between 2019 and 2024, were identified. The most frequent terms in the research were \"periodontitis\", \"oral microbiome\", \"microbiome\", \"periodontal disease\", and \"dysbiosis\". According to Lotka's Law, most authors in the field contributed a small number of papers. The most cited journals in this field were \"Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology\", \"Journal of Oral Microbiology\", and \"Periodontology 2000\". Analysis of the thematic evolution shows an increasing intersection of topics in recent research, reflecting the multifaceted nature of periodontitis and its interaction with a variety of other health factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Research on periodontitis and microbiota is multifaceted, interacts with a variety of health factors, and shows a growing intersection of topics in recent research.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This study presents a detailed review of the literature on gut microbiota and periodontitis, notes on current developments, and gives hints regarding still emerging themes. Its findings may serve to continue with future guidelines or research and to understand the relationship of gut microbiota with periodontitis. How to cite this article: Mayta-Tovalino F, Espinoza-Carhuancho F, Huaman-De la Cruz M, <i>et al.</i> Scientometric Analysis of Research on Oral and Gut Microbiota and Periodontitis: Collaborative Networks, Emerging Patterns, Thematic Evolution. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(1):86-92.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 1","pages":"86-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144038385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Alkasite Restoration vs Resin-modified Glass Ionomer in Class V Carious Lesions: 1-year Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Hadeel Al-Salamony, Mai Akah, Essam A Naguib, Omaima M Safwat","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3787","DOIUrl":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3787","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim and background: </strong>The balance between mechanical properties, esthetics, and therapeutic benefits in restorative materials, especially for high-risk patients, is lacking. Effective comparative study designs are required. This randomized clinical trial evaluated the clinical performance of Alkasite bioactive restorative material vs resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) in cervical carious lesions according to United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria over 1 year.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-eight high-risk adult patients with Class V cavities in anterior or premolar teeth were randomly assigned to two groups (<i>n</i> = 14 each). The first group received restorations with an RMGI. In contrast, using a selective etching technique and a universal adhesive, the second group was restored with a bulk-fill alkasite. All materials were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions. The restorations were evaluated at baseline (1 week), after 6 months, and after 12 months using modified USPHS criteria. Data were recorded and statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding the primary outcome of marginal integrity, no statistically significant difference was found between the alkasite and RMGI restorations at any follow-up interval. However, within the RMGI group, a statistically significant change in marginal integrity was observed across different follow-up periods. All secondary outcomes showed no statistically significant differences in either intragroup or intergroup comparisons at the various follow-up intervals, except for anatomic form, where a statistically significant difference was observed within the RMGI group over different follow-up periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both restorations have shown similar clinical performance over a year, indicating their effectiveness in cervical restorations. Alkasite restoration can successfully replace RMGI for cervical restorations in patients with a high caries index.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This study addressed the need for restorative materials that balance mechanical strength, esthetics, and therapeutic benefits in high-risk patients. Alkasite restorations are promising alternatives to RMGI. The findings will guide material selection for enhanced functionality, esthetics, and long-term caries prevention.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>NCT04716517. How to cite this article: Al-Salamony H, Akah M, Naguib EA, et al. Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Alkasite Restoration vs Resin-modified Glass Ionomer in Class V Carious Lesions: 1-year Randomized Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(12):1127-1134.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"25 12","pages":"1127-1134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143626214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Effect of Open Flap Debridement with and without LLLT in Patients with Periodontitis on Wound Healing, GCF ALP Levels, and Clinical Parameters.","authors":"Ritika Gupta, Sachit A Arora, Gunjan Gupta, Rupali Kalsi, Kumar Saurav, Shivesh K Mishra, Simran Saluja, Srishti Wadhwa","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3790","DOIUrl":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3790","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The tenet of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) as an adjunct to surgical periodontal therapy [open flap debridement (OFD)] on clinical parameters, gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels in GCF and wound healing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty subjects afflicted with chronic periodontitis showing evidence of horizontal bone loss on the radiograph, pocket probing depth (PPD) between 4 and 7 mm, and ≥20 natural teeth present in the oral cavity were included in the study. In every patient, OFD+LLLT was done in one quadrant and OFD in another was performed. The clinical parameters were assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 months visits while the GCF sample was collected at baseline visit and 6 months recall. Wound healing indices were recorded 1-week post-op surgery for each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed an evident improvement in all the clinical parameters [pocket probing depth, gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), and CAL] from baseline-6 months values; however, no statistically significant difference was seen on the intergroup comparison. Wound healing was statistically significantly superior in the OFD + LLLT group in comparison to the OFD group, indicating a positive effect of lasers on healing. Gingival crevicular fluid ALP levels in the two groups decreased after 6 months and a statistically significant reduction in the laser group indicated an anti-inflammatory effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results clearly indicated the efficacy of lasers in terms of acceleration of wound healing and control of inflammation.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Lasers as an adjunct to surgical periodontal therapy evidently have an anti-inflammatory effect (decrease in GCF ALP levels) as well as accelerate the wound healing process. How to cite this article: Gupta R, Arora SA, Gupta G, <i>et al</i>. Effect of Open Flap Debridement with and without LLLT in Patients with Periodontitis on Wound Healing, GCF ALP Levels, and Clinical Parameters. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(12):1148-1155.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"25 12","pages":"1148-1155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143626256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"An Appraisal of Dental Students' Perception of Integrating Reflective Practice into the Curriculum: A Pre-Post Intervention Study.","authors":"Nagla'a Abdel-Wahed, Hanadi Sabban, Hanadi Khalifa, Khadijah Turkistani","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3798","DOIUrl":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3798","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate dental students' perception of reflective practice before and after an educational intervention. Second, to investigate how it might be more effectively incorporated into dental education.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A 2-hour session for reflective writing instructions was done as a group discussion and feedback between the instructor and the learners. A template for reflection based on Gibbs' reflective cycle was used. Fifty-one third-year dental students (academic year 2023-2024) participated in this study. Forty-four students consented and filled out an anonymous pre-session electronic survey. The survey comprised two parts including demographics (two questions) and reflective skills related part (11 questions). Twenty-nine students consented and filled out an anonymous post-session electronic survey. The survey included the same parts as the previous, as well as added opinion-related questions (2 questions).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reflective practice was significantly appreciated among students who thought it was \"extremely important\" for dental education (<i>n</i> = 22, 75.8%). Moreover, most students (<i>n</i> = 17, 58.6%) believed it should be \"completely integrated\" into the curriculum. The methods applauded for reflective practice were group discussion (<i>n</i> = 23, 79.3%), reflective writing journal (<i>n</i> = 19, 65.5%), and an online platform (<i>n</i> = 8, 27.6%). There was a statistically significant difference in the evaluation of dental students' perception of reflective practice before and after the session, favoring progress in reflective skills related to their capacity for self-assessment, reflection-on-action, and peer learning. Pre-session sex disparity was resolved after the session.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dental students' perception of reflective practice enhanced after the educational intervention, and they favored its integration into the curriculum by organized group discussion.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This study supports the growing consensus that establishing reflective practice is a necessary element of becoming a healthcare professional and the recognition of reflective practice as part of continuous professional development for dental professionals. How to cite this article: Abdel-Wahed N, Sabban H, Khalifa H, <i>et al</i>. An Appraisal of Dental Students' Perception of Integrating Reflective Practice into the Curriculum: A Pre-Post Intervention Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(12):1084-1091.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"25 12","pages":"1084-1091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143626210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Push-out Bond Strength of Two Bioceramic Sealers after Using Various Final Irrigation Solutions: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.","authors":"Arwa S Alnoury, Mohammad K Abdalwassie, Muhannad W Alawbthani, Lina O Bahanan, Maher S Hajjaj","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3789","DOIUrl":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3789","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study assessed how different final irrigation solutions impact the push-out bond strength (PBS) of EndoSequence Bioceramic (BC) and cerafill BC sealers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty single-root lower premolars were selected and decoronated. The root canals were then cleaned and shaped chemo-mechanically using ProTaper files up to F5, with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite applied between each file for rinsing. Subsequently, the teeth were categorized into four primary groups of 20 each, distinguished by their final irrigation solution. Group A utilized 17% glycolic acid (GA), group B used a 5% apple vinegar solution, group C employed 17% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), and group D used saline. Each group was further divided into two subgroups of 10 teeth each, based on the type of BC sealer applied-Cerafill BC sealer for subgroup a, and EndoSequence BC sealer for subgroup b. Two dentin disks were then obtained from the middle third of each root (<i>n</i> = 20) and subjected to the PBS test. Upon completion of this test, the dentin disks were scrutinized under a stereomicroscope to determine the mode of failure for each disk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of EndoSequence BC sealer in obturation led to the apple vinegar final irrigation group exhibiting significantly higher PBS than the GA and saline solution groups. Furthermore, when implemented with cerafill BC sealer, the EDTA final irrigation solution group displayed the greatest PBS, showing a significant difference compared with the GA and saline solution groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Apple vinegar solution could be a potential alternative to EDTA as a chelating agent during root canal treatment, though further research is required.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The EDTA and apple vinegar are effective at removing smear layers, which improves sealer penetration and prevents obturation materials dislodgment. How to cite this article: Alnoury AS, Abdalwassie MK, Alawbthani MW, <i>et al</i>. Push-out Bond Strength of Two Bioceramic Sealers after Using Various Final Irrigation Solutions: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(12):1092-1098.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"25 12","pages":"1092-1098"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143626336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}