Effect of Air Abrasion Techniques vs Tungsten Carbide Burs on Enamel Surface after Orthodontic Adhesive Remnant Removal.

Q3 Dentistry
Anas E Alkahlout, Reham I El-Gazzar, Marwa S Shamaa
{"title":"Effect of Air Abrasion Techniques vs Tungsten Carbide Burs on Enamel Surface after Orthodontic Adhesive Remnant Removal.","authors":"Anas E Alkahlout, Reham I El-Gazzar, Marwa S Shamaa","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study evaluated enamel surface roughness after bracket debonding and adhesive removal using three methods: Tungsten carbide burs (TCB), aluminum oxide air abrasion (AO), and sodium bicarbonate air abrasion (SB).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 90 extracted premolars were divided equally into three groups based on adhesive removal methods: TCB, AO, and SB. Procedures were performed under a 4× magnifying loupe. Surface roughness (Ra) was measured using a profilometer and atomic force microscopy (AFM) before bonding (T0). Brackets were bonded, debonded after 24 hours, and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was assessed. After adhesive removal, Ra was re-evaluated (T1), and removal time was recorded. Data were analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed no significant difference in ARI among the three groups. All methods led to a significant increase in Ra after adhesive removal (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with the highest Ra in the TCB group, followed by AO, and the lowest in SB. Atomic force microscopy analysis confirmed these findings with surface area roughness (Sa) values. Sodium bicarbonate air abrasion required the shortest adhesive removal time, followed by AO, while TCB took the longest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sodium bicarbonate air abrasion effectively removes adhesive remnants and produces the lowest surface roughness compared with other methods. Air abrasion offers a promising alternative to rotary handpieces, restoring the enamel surface to a nearly original condition and reducing the risk of permanent tooth damage.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Sodium bicarbonate air abrasion is a fast, minimally invasive method for adhesive remnant removal. It preserves enamel integrity. How to cite this article: Alkahlout AE, El-Gazzar RI, Shamaa MS. Effect of Air Abrasion Techniques vs Tungsten Carbide Burs on Enamel Surface after Orthodontic Adhesive Remnant Removal. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(4):366-372.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 4","pages":"366-372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The study evaluated enamel surface roughness after bracket debonding and adhesive removal using three methods: Tungsten carbide burs (TCB), aluminum oxide air abrasion (AO), and sodium bicarbonate air abrasion (SB).

Materials and methods: A total of 90 extracted premolars were divided equally into three groups based on adhesive removal methods: TCB, AO, and SB. Procedures were performed under a 4× magnifying loupe. Surface roughness (Ra) was measured using a profilometer and atomic force microscopy (AFM) before bonding (T0). Brackets were bonded, debonded after 24 hours, and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was assessed. After adhesive removal, Ra was re-evaluated (T1), and removal time was recorded. Data were analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences software.

Results: The results showed no significant difference in ARI among the three groups. All methods led to a significant increase in Ra after adhesive removal (p < 0.001), with the highest Ra in the TCB group, followed by AO, and the lowest in SB. Atomic force microscopy analysis confirmed these findings with surface area roughness (Sa) values. Sodium bicarbonate air abrasion required the shortest adhesive removal time, followed by AO, while TCB took the longest.

Conclusion: Sodium bicarbonate air abrasion effectively removes adhesive remnants and produces the lowest surface roughness compared with other methods. Air abrasion offers a promising alternative to rotary handpieces, restoring the enamel surface to a nearly original condition and reducing the risk of permanent tooth damage.

Clinical significance: Sodium bicarbonate air abrasion is a fast, minimally invasive method for adhesive remnant removal. It preserves enamel integrity. How to cite this article: Alkahlout AE, El-Gazzar RI, Shamaa MS. Effect of Air Abrasion Techniques vs Tungsten Carbide Burs on Enamel Surface after Orthodontic Adhesive Remnant Removal. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(4):366-372.

正畸残余黏合剂去除后空气磨蚀技术与碳化钨磨蚀对牙釉质表面的影响。
目的:采用碳化钨毛刺(TCB)、氧化铝空气磨损(AO)和碳酸氢钠空气磨损(SB)三种方法评价托槽脱粘后牙釉质表面粗糙度。材料与方法:将90颗拔除的前磨牙按粘接剂去除方式分为TCB组、AO组和SB组,在4倍放大镜下进行。在键合(T0)前,使用轮廓仪和原子力显微镜(AFM)测量表面粗糙度(Ra)。将托槽粘接,24h后去粘接,评估粘接残余指数(ARI)。去除黏合剂后,重新评估Ra (T1),并记录去除时间。使用IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences软件分析数据。结果:三组患者在ARI方面无明显差异。所有方法去除胶粘剂后Ra均显著升高(p < 0.001), TCB组Ra最高,AO组次之,SB组Ra最低。原子力显微镜分析与表面粗糙度(Sa)值证实了这些发现。碳酸氢钠气磨剂的去除时间最短,AO次之,TCB的去除时间最长。结论:碳酸氢钠气磨法能有效去除粘着物,表面粗糙度最低。空气磨损提供了一个很有前途的替代旋转机头,恢复牙釉质表面到接近原始状态,并减少永久性牙齿损伤的风险。临床意义:碳酸氢钠空气磨擦是一种快速、微创的黏合剂残留去除方法。它能保持牙釉质的完整性。alahlout AE, El-Gazzar RI, Shamaa MS.正畸残余粘接剂去除后空气磨蚀技术与碳化钨磨蚀对牙釉质表面的影响。[J]现代医学学报,2015;26(4):366-372。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信