Comparison of Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin and Semilunar Flap with Tuberosity Graft for Gingival Black Triangles: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Q3 Dentistry
Sanehi Punse, Prasad Dhadse, Shrishti Salian, Ruchita Patil, Pavan Bajaj
{"title":"Comparison of Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin and Semilunar Flap with Tuberosity Graft for Gingival Black Triangles: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Sanehi Punse, Prasad Dhadse, Shrishti Salian, Ruchita Patil, Pavan Bajaj","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) and semilunar coronally positioned flap (SCPF) with tuberosity connective tissue graft (T-CTG) in the management of gingival black triangles (GBTs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty patients who presented with class I and class II gingival black triangles (GBTs) were split into two groups for a randomized clinical trial: SCPF with TCTG and i-PRF. At baseline, 3, and 6 months after treatment, clinical measures such as papillary height, black triangle decrease, and periodontal pocket depth were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in clinical parameters and patient satisfaction. The i-PRF group exhibited faster healing and greater patient comfort, while the SCPF with TCTG group achieved superior aesthetic outcomes with greater black triangle closure. However, the SCPF group experienced more postoperative discomfort and required longer healing times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The i-PRF and SCPF with TCTG are effective in managing GBTs, with each having distinct advantages. i-PRF offers a minimally invasive option with enhanced healing, whereas SCPF with TCTG provides superior aesthetic results. Clinical goals and patient requirements should guide the selection of the best approach.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The study highlights two effective approaches for managing GBTs, catering to diverse clinical and patient needs. i-PRF offers a minimally invasive method with faster healing and enhanced comfort, while SCPF with graft-CTG (SCPF with T-CTG) ensures superior aesthetic outcomes, aiding personalized periodontal therapy decisions. How to cite this article: Punse S, Dhadse P, Salian S, <i>et al.</i> Comparison of Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin and Semilunar Flap with Tuberosity Graft for Gingival Black Triangles: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(4):418-425.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 4","pages":"418-425"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) and semilunar coronally positioned flap (SCPF) with tuberosity connective tissue graft (T-CTG) in the management of gingival black triangles (GBTs).

Materials and methods: Twenty patients who presented with class I and class II gingival black triangles (GBTs) were split into two groups for a randomized clinical trial: SCPF with TCTG and i-PRF. At baseline, 3, and 6 months after treatment, clinical measures such as papillary height, black triangle decrease, and periodontal pocket depth were measured.

Results: Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in clinical parameters and patient satisfaction. The i-PRF group exhibited faster healing and greater patient comfort, while the SCPF with TCTG group achieved superior aesthetic outcomes with greater black triangle closure. However, the SCPF group experienced more postoperative discomfort and required longer healing times.

Conclusion: The i-PRF and SCPF with TCTG are effective in managing GBTs, with each having distinct advantages. i-PRF offers a minimally invasive option with enhanced healing, whereas SCPF with TCTG provides superior aesthetic results. Clinical goals and patient requirements should guide the selection of the best approach.

Clinical significance: The study highlights two effective approaches for managing GBTs, catering to diverse clinical and patient needs. i-PRF offers a minimally invasive method with faster healing and enhanced comfort, while SCPF with graft-CTG (SCPF with T-CTG) ensures superior aesthetic outcomes, aiding personalized periodontal therapy decisions. How to cite this article: Punse S, Dhadse P, Salian S, et al. Comparison of Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin and Semilunar Flap with Tuberosity Graft for Gingival Black Triangles: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(4):418-425.

可注射富血小板纤维蛋白与半月瓣联合结节移植治疗牙龈黑三角的随机临床试验。
目的:评价和比较可注射富血小板纤维蛋白(i-PRF)和半月冠状定位皮瓣(SCPF)联合结节结缔组织移植(T-CTG)治疗牙龈黑三角(GBTs)的临床疗效。材料与方法:将20例1、2级牙龈黑三角(gbt)患者随机分为两组进行临床试验:SCPF合并TCTG和I - prf。在治疗后的基线、3个月和6个月,测量临床指标,如乳头高度、黑三角减少、牙周袋深度。结果:两组临床指标及患者满意度均有显著改善。i-PRF组表现出更快的愈合和更高的患者舒适度,而SCPF与TCTG组获得了更好的美学效果,黑色三角形闭合更大。然而,SCPF组经历了更多的术后不适,需要更长的愈合时间。结论:i-PRF和SCPF联合TCTG治疗GBTs有效,各有优势。i-PRF提供了微创选择,增强了愈合,而SCPF与TCTG提供了更好的美学效果。临床目标和患者需求应指导最佳方法的选择。临床意义:该研究强调了两种有效的方法来管理GBTs,满足不同的临床和患者需求。i-PRF提供了更快愈合和增强舒适度的微创方法,而SCPF与移植物- ctg (SCPF与T-CTG)确保了卓越的美学效果,有助于个性化牙周治疗决策。文章引用方式:Punse S, Dhadse P, Salian S等。可注射富血小板纤维蛋白与半月瓣联合结节移植治疗牙龈黑三角的随机临床试验。[J]中国现代医学杂志,2015;26(4):418-425。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信