发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy Volume 9最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Bonaventure, Aristotle, and the Being of Universal Forms 博纳旺图尔，亚里士多德，和宇宙形式的存在
Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy Volume 9 Pub Date : 2021-08-20 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0005
F. V. Buren
{"title":"Bonaventure, Aristotle, and the Being of Universal Forms","authors":"F. V. Buren","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0005","url":null,"abstract":"The question of whether Bonaventure’s metaphysical thought is “Aristotelian” has long been answered with a plain “no.” Indeed, many scholars have interpreted Bonaventure as parting ways with Aristotle on a number of foundational metaphysical positions: Bonaventure adopts Augustinian seminal reasons, instead of the accounts of generation and causation found in Aristotle, and Bonaventure’s universal forms have ‘being’ independent of and prior to sensibles. While the characterization of Bonaventure as largely opposed to Aristotelianism has become standard in contemporary scholarship, this paper demonstrates quite the opposite: Bonaventure, in developing his notion of form, relies almost exclusively on his—indeed idiosyncratic—interpretation of Aristotle. Accordingly, the author argues that Aristotle’s philosophy is at the foundation of Bonaventure’s two seemingly Augustinian positions concerning seminal reasons and the ontological status of forms—as well as his distinction between the universal form and the seminal reason, which is neither a real nor a conceptual distinction.","PeriodicalId":344810,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy Volume 9","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132308751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
On Loving God Contrary to a Divine Command 论违背神的命令而爱神
Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy Volume 9 Pub Date : 2021-08-20 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0006
Eric W. Hagedorn
{"title":"On Loving God Contrary to a Divine Command","authors":"Eric W. Hagedorn","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0006","url":null,"abstract":"Among the most widely discussed of William Ockham’s texts on ethics is his Quodlibet III, q. 14. But despite a large literature on this question, there is no consensus on what Ockham’s answer is to the central question raised in it, specifically, what obligations one would have if one were to receive a divine command to not love God. (Surprisingly, there is also little explicit recognition in the literature of this lack of consensus.) Via a close reading of the text, the author argues, contrary to much of the literature, that Ockham believes that if one were given this command, one would be obligated to refrain from loving God and would also be able to fulfill this obligation without any moral wrongdoing. Among other results, this study will help clarify Ockham’s much-discussed claim that loving God is “a necessarily virtuous act.”","PeriodicalId":344810,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy Volume 9","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126162109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Productive Thoughts 生产力的思想
Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy Volume 9 Pub Date : 2021-08-20 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0007
D. Perler
{"title":"Productive Thoughts","authors":"D. Perler","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"We often experience that we have ideas in our mind, which present possible things and incite us to produce some of them. But how can our ideas be intentional? And how can they give rise to actions? In his theory of exemplar causes, Suárez examines both problems and offers a comprehensive theory. The paper first discusses his solution to the intentionality problem, arguing that he subscribes to an act theory, according to which ideas are mental acts that are about something in virtue of their specific content. The paper then reconstructs his solution to the causation problem, showing that he appeals to efficient causation: ideas are powers and hence efficient causes that immediately produce other acts, thereby triggering the production of material things. The analysis of both problems sheds light on Suárez’s broader theory of cognitive activity by showing that he takes mental acts to be intrinsically intentional and productive.","PeriodicalId":344810,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy Volume 9","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126594825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Thirteenth-Century Aristotelian Logic 13世纪亚里士多德逻辑
Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy Volume 9 Pub Date : 2021-08-20 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0004
Ana María Mora-Márquez
{"title":"Thirteenth-Century Aristotelian Logic","authors":"Ana María Mora-Márquez","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0004","url":null,"abstract":"The aims of this paper are to show (i) that thirteenth-century Aristotelian logic (AL-13) is a logical tradition that considers Aristotelian logic (AL: the logical curriculum at the University of Paris, that is, Porphyry’s Isagoge, Aristotle’s Organon, Boethius’s De divisione and De topicis differentiis, and the anonymous Sex principia) as a system that is organized around the syllogistic argument; and (ii) that AL-13 can be characterized as the study of scientific method, of which formal analyses are a part but by no means the crucial one. I give a diachronic account of AL-13, with its continuities and ruptures, by looking at the general accounts of AL by Nicholas of Paris (1230s), Albert the Great (1250s), and Radulphus Brito (1290s).","PeriodicalId":344810,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy Volume 9","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114716085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Believing Miracles in 10th–11th Century Baghdad 相信10 - 11世纪巴格达的奇迹
Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy Volume 9 Pub Date : 2021-08-20 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0002
Alexander Lamprakis
{"title":"Believing Miracles in 10th–11th Century Baghdad","authors":"Alexander Lamprakis","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0002","url":null,"abstract":"Arguments from miracles have already received significant attention in the field of Islamic philosophy and theology. However, it is not yet clear how contemporary Christian authors thought about miracles, particularly whether and under which circumstances miracles can serve as a valid source of epistemic justification. This paper aims at shedding light on the epistemology of miracles of four Christian authors belonging to the 10th–11th century network of philosophers commonly known as the ‘Baghdad School.’ The author argues that this debate is characterized by encounters with positions held among kalām theologians, and an increasing disengagement from the Christian apologetic tradition in favor of an assessment of miracles in philosophical terms.","PeriodicalId":344810,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy Volume 9","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130160390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Perception and Extramission in De quantitate animae 定量动物的知觉与外显
Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy Volume 9 Pub Date : 2021-08-19 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0001
M. Kalderon
{"title":"Perception and Extramission in De quantitate animae","authors":"M. Kalderon","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0001","url":null,"abstract":"Augustine is commonly interpreted as endorsing an extramission theory of perception in De quantitate animae. A close examination of the text shows, instead, that he is committed to its rejection. The discussion ends with some remarks about what it takes for an account of perception to be an extramission theory and with a review of the strength of evidence for attributing the extramission theory to Augustine on the basis of his other works.","PeriodicalId":344810,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy Volume 9","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130186515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Now Is Not the Time 现在不是时候
Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy Volume 9 Pub Date : 2021-08-19 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0003
A. Lammer
{"title":"Now Is Not the Time","authors":"A. Lammer","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192844637.003.0003","url":null,"abstract":"Experts on Avicenna’s natural philosophy are in agreement that for Avicenna, time exists as the result of a now which flows and which through its flow produces time. Having been a prominent interpretation of Aristotle’s account of time in the Physics, the theory of the ‘flowing now’ was known to Avicenna from ancient and late ancient commentaries, and is mentioned in his most detailed discussion of time from his seminal work The Cure. It is, however, absent from all his other accounts of time and even within his argumentation in The Cure, there are strong, heretofore neglected reasons to believe that Avicenna ultimately did not adopt this idea. This article provides a full investigation of Avicenna’s theory of the now and investigates its position within the larger context of his temporal theory, arguing—against the current consensus—that for Avicenna, time is not produced by the now through its flow.","PeriodicalId":344810,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy Volume 9","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127163576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信