Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis最新文献_第10页

Building Usable Change Documentation 构建可用的变更文档

Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Pub Date : 1996-11-17 DOI: 10.1115/imece1996-0714

D. Plung, William P Mullins

{"title":"Building Usable Change Documentation","authors":"D. Plung, William P Mullins","doi":"10.1115/imece1996-0714","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece1996-0714","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Across the missions of the Department of Energy (DOE) the planning of work and the management of risk is a systems problem of exceptional complexity. The shift in the international balance of power at the beginning of this decade dramatically changed the parameters of risk within which the DOE operates. Just a few years earlier federal and state regulatory authority were extended to the waste and environmental aspects of the nuclear weapons complex operations. For many, this also introduced an abrupt change to the historic perception of the risks of these operations. DOE, in the Energy and Research sectors, faces changes in risk management practices as these activities, still governed by DOE’s self-regulation authority in occupational and nuclear safety, are more and more compared to private sector counterparts for cost and safety performance. DOE intends to establish a contemporary, standards-based, integrated safety management system. However, the development of guidance for simultaneous accomplishment of both global and local changes in past practices is far from risk-free. The work of Department Standards Committee provides insight to change management challenges and opportunities on a department-wide scale. The Work Smart Standards protocol developed by the Committee promotes a focus on understanding the actual work/hazards matrix as seen from the perspective of multi-disciplinary teams with concise and relevant experience of that specific work. It also draws attention to the essential role that agreements play in achieving closure on planning and the implementation of plans in the face of persistent uncertainty from a wide variety of sources.","PeriodicalId":334155,"journal":{"name":"Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis","volume":"220 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121722129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A New Twist to Learning 学习的新方法

Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Pub Date : 1996-11-17 DOI: 10.1115/imece1996-0718

Joseph P. Balkey

{"title":"A New Twist to Learning","authors":"Joseph P. Balkey","doi":"10.1115/imece1996-0718","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece1996-0718","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 ASME’s Center for Research and Technology Development is publishing a Handbook with a Human Factors Engineering Appendix for risk-based inspections of fossil fuel Plants. This paper shows the results of applying human error and long term memory models to a technique that estimates the optimum time to inspect equipment. One result is clarification of Bayes Rule and the optimum inspection technique. Another result is applying the inspection technique to retraining people. The third result is changing the method of presenting training material.\u0000 Table 1 shows how the information in this paper is presented. After a brief introduction, the idea of prior, new information, and posterior is applied to three situations: putting a golf ball, Bayes Rule, and optimizing inspections. The technique for optimizing inspections is then applied to retraining people. Finally, the idea of prior, new information, and posterior is applied as a training method.\u0000 This paper has these three goals. One, explain a technique that shows the optimum time to inspect equipment. Two, expand this technique to also show the optimum time to retrain people and a new technique to help retrain them. Three, recognize the need for collecting and maintaining failure rate data.","PeriodicalId":334155,"journal":{"name":"Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116222682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

“Appropriate Equivalent Methodology” for Pressure Relief System PHAs 减压系统pha的“适当等效方法”

Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Pub Date : 1996-11-17 DOI: 10.1115/imece1996-0707

P. Berwanger, R. Kreder

引用次数: 0

Building on Small Scale Pilots: Field Testing the Necessary and Sufficient Closure Process 建立在小规模试点:实地测试必要和充分的关闭过程

Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Pub Date : 1996-11-17 DOI: 10.1115/imece1996-0715

D. W. Short, D. Parzyck

引用次数: 0

Approaches to Accident Analysis in Recent U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Impact Statements 最近美国能源部环境影响报告中的事故分析方法

Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Pub Date : 1996-11-17 DOI: 10.1115/imece1996-0709

C. Mueller, S. Folga, B. Nabelssi

引用次数: 1

Vehicle Rollover: Assessing the Relative Importance of Risk Factors With Crash Scenario Analysis 车辆侧翻:用碰撞情景分析评估风险因素的相对重要性

Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Pub Date : 1996-11-17 DOI: 10.1115/imece1996-0699

A. Donelson, Karuna Ramachandran, M. S. Davis

引用次数: 1

Nuclear Power Reactor Safety Improvements: Mitigation Versus Emergency Preparedness 核电反应堆安全改进:缓解与应急准备

Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Pub Date : 1996-11-17 DOI: 10.1115/imece1996-0719

T. Margulies

引用次数: 0

On-Board Truck Computers and Accident Risk 车载电脑与事故风险

Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Pub Date : 1996-11-17 DOI: 10.1115/imece1996-0698

T. Ayres, A. Donelson, S. Brown, V. M. Bjelajac, W. Van Selow

引用次数: 7

IEEE Human Factors Standards Program IEEE人为因素标准计划

Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Pub Date : 1996-11-17 DOI: 10.1115/imece1996-0710

T. J. Voss

{"title":"IEEE Human Factors Standards Program","authors":"T. J. Voss","doi":"10.1115/imece1996-0710","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece1996-0710","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Within the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Subcommittee 7 (SC-7), Human Factors and Control Facilities, of the Nuclear Power Engineering Committee (NPEC) develops and maintains human factors standards. SC-7 members have extensive expertise in the human factors of nuclear generating facilities. NPEC provides funding for standards development or revision, oversees the activities of SC-7, and has power of approval for standards produced by NPEC subcommittees.\u0000 IEEE Std 1023-1988 is the upper tier document which defines the human factors tasks required to support the integration of human performance into the design process. The standard was reaffirmed in January 1995 and is to be revised within the next two years. Presently, three lower tier documents, in various stages of development, expand upon the upper tier standard. IEEE Std 845-1988 (in revision) presents methods for measurement of human performance. IEEE Std 1082 (final draft in ballot) deals with the human reliability analysis aspects of probabilistic risk assessment. IEEE Std 1289 presents human factors guidance for design of computer-based display systems.\u0000 In addition to producing and maintaining human factors standards, SC-7 has sponsored a series of conferences on human factors in power plants. The next one, “Human Factors in Power Generation: A Global Perspective,” will take place in Orlando, Florida, from June 7–12, 1997.","PeriodicalId":334155,"journal":{"name":"Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121946588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Using HTML for an Online Survey of Risk Perception: An Experience Study 使用HTML进行风险感知的在线调查:一项经验研究

Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Pub Date : 1996-11-17 DOI: 10.1115/imece1996-0700

R. Halstead-Nussloch

引用次数: 0