最近美国能源部环境影响报告中的事故分析方法

C. Mueller, S. Folga, B. Nabelssi
{"title":"最近美国能源部环境影响报告中的事故分析方法","authors":"C. Mueller, S. Folga, B. Nabelssi","doi":"10.1115/imece1996-0709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A review of accident analyses in recent U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) was conducted to evaluate the consistency among approaches and to compare these approaches with existing DOE guidance. The review considered several components of an accident analysis: the overall scope, which in turn should reflect the scope of the EIS; the spectrum of accidents considered; the methods and assumptions used to determine frequencies or frequency ranges for the accident sequences; and the assumptions and technical bases for developing radiological and chemical atmospheric source terms and for calculating the consequences of airborne releases. The review also considered the range of results generated with respect to impacts on various worker and general populations. In this paper, the findings of these reviews are presented and methods recommended for improving consistency among EISs and bringing them more into line with existing DOE guidance.","PeriodicalId":334155,"journal":{"name":"Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaches to Accident Analysis in Recent U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Impact Statements\",\"authors\":\"C. Mueller, S. Folga, B. Nabelssi\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/imece1996-0709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n A review of accident analyses in recent U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) was conducted to evaluate the consistency among approaches and to compare these approaches with existing DOE guidance. The review considered several components of an accident analysis: the overall scope, which in turn should reflect the scope of the EIS; the spectrum of accidents considered; the methods and assumptions used to determine frequencies or frequency ranges for the accident sequences; and the assumptions and technical bases for developing radiological and chemical atmospheric source terms and for calculating the consequences of airborne releases. The review also considered the range of results generated with respect to impacts on various worker and general populations. In this paper, the findings of these reviews are presented and methods recommended for improving consistency among EISs and bringing them more into line with existing DOE guidance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":334155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece1996-0709\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece1996-0709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对最近美国能源部(DOE)环境影响声明(eis)中的事故分析进行了回顾,以评估各种方法的一致性,并将这些方法与现有的DOE指导进行比较。检讨考虑了事故分析的几个组成部分:整体范围,而整体范围应反映环境影响报告书的范围;所考虑的事故范围;用于确定事故序列的频率或频率范围的方法和假设;以及制定大气放射性和化学源项和计算空气传播释放后果的假设和技术基础。审查还审议了对各种工人和一般人口的影响所产生的一系列结果。在本文中,介绍了这些审查的结果,并建议了改善eis之间一致性并使其更符合现有DOE指南的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Approaches to Accident Analysis in Recent U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Impact Statements
A review of accident analyses in recent U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) was conducted to evaluate the consistency among approaches and to compare these approaches with existing DOE guidance. The review considered several components of an accident analysis: the overall scope, which in turn should reflect the scope of the EIS; the spectrum of accidents considered; the methods and assumptions used to determine frequencies or frequency ranges for the accident sequences; and the assumptions and technical bases for developing radiological and chemical atmospheric source terms and for calculating the consequences of airborne releases. The review also considered the range of results generated with respect to impacts on various worker and general populations. In this paper, the findings of these reviews are presented and methods recommended for improving consistency among EISs and bringing them more into line with existing DOE guidance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信