Jurnal Magister Hukum ARGUMENTUM最新文献

{"title":"Pengaruh Program Pengungkapan Sukarela Terhadap Kesadaran Wajib Pajak dalam UU HPP","authors":"V. Wijaya","doi":"10.24123/argu.v9i2.6163","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24123/argu.v9i2.6163","url":null,"abstract":"The voluntary disclosure program was created to provide taxpayers with the opportunity to disclose unmet tax obligations voluntarily through payments based on the disclosure of their assets. This study uses social learning theory because it is closely related to taxpayer awareness. Through tax socialization provided by the tax authorities, taxpayers obtain tax knowledge about tax law. The problem in this study is to examine the legal certainty of the voluntary disclosure program on taxpayer awareness in the HPP Law. Law Number 7 of 2021 concerning Harmonization of Tax Regulations, namely the government wants to continue to increase taxpayer voluntary compliance, the reform steps taken through the HPP Law are through several things, namely by strengthening tax administration (KUP), taxpayer voluntary disclosure programs (PPS), and broadening the tax base which aims to create justice and equality through policy improvements in income tax, VAT, excise and the introduction of carbon tax. The effect of the voluntary disclosure program in the Harmonization of Tax Regulations Act has an influence on taxpayer awareness, which can be seen in the 2022 komwasjak, the realization of tax revenue reached Rp2,034.5 trillion. Finance Minister Sri Mulyani noted that tax revenue had reached IDR 1,387.78 trillion in September 2023. This value reached 80.78% of this year's target. With the awareness of taxpayers in paying taxes, it can increase state revenue.","PeriodicalId":321458,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Magister Hukum ARGUMENTUM","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139162594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Analisis Tindakan Juan Evo Morales yang Memerintahkan Pendukungnya untuk Menghalangi Bantuan Covid-19 bagi Masyarakat Bolivia Ditinjau dari Statuta Roma 1998","authors":"Gabriel Sieto, Wisnu Ario Dewanto","doi":"10.24123/argu.v9i2.6042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24123/argu.v9i2.6042","url":null,"abstract":"Crimes against humanity are one of the four most serious international crimes regulated by the 1998 Rome Statute. Where individuals who commit them can be put on trial at the International Criminal Court (ICC) according to their jurisdiction. Currently, the State of Bolivia is receiving international attention due to allegations of crimes against humanity committed by the former president of the State of Bolivia himself. Juan Evo Morales, former President of the State of Bolivia has ordered his supporters to block or close the entry of covid-10 aid for the people of Bolivia. The goal is to cause suffering and misery for the people of Bolivia in the midst of the Covid-19 Pandemic, with full awareness that this Pandemic can impact/cause death to the Bolivians. By looking at the Rome Statute of 1998 and the jurisdiction owned by the ICC, Juan Evo Morales has committed Crimes Against Humanity and the ICC has the authority put Juan Evo Morales on trial. The research method used is Normative Legal, with Statute and Conceptual Approach. The results of the research show that the actions of Juan Evo Morales Morales, who ordered his supporters to obstruct the entry of Covid-19 aid for the people of Bolivia, is a crime against humanity in accordance with Article 7 paragraph (1) letter (k) of the 1998 Rome Statute and fulfills the jurisdiction of ICC.","PeriodicalId":321458,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Magister Hukum ARGUMENTUM","volume":"112 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139161177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Perpanjangan dan Pembaruan Hak Atas Tanah Bagi Investor di Ibu Kota Nusantara","authors":"Johanes Cahyono","doi":"10.24123/argu.v9i2.6063","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24123/argu.v9i2.6063","url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia is a developing country that is trying to carry out national development. National development in Indonesia is philosophically based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, as Pancasila is the way of life of the Indonesian nation. The essence of national development is to realize national goals, one of which concerns social welfare. Social welfare is closely related to economic development. The Indonesian nation is currently making efforts to accelerate economic development towards stability and economic growth by paying attention to aspects of economics overeignty. Efforts to accelerate economic development are achieved through investment by making maximum use of fertilization and utilization of domestic investment and foreign investment. In 2022, the Government of the Republic of Indonesia promulgated Law Number 3 of 2022 concerning the National Capital which regulates there location of the National Capital, one of which is due to the economic gap between Java and outside Java and there are studie swhich show that Jakarta is no longer able to carry out its role as the capital city. The Government of the Republic of Indonesia needs investors to support facilities and infrastructure in the new National Capital.  The Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning or the National Land Agency emphasized that it would provide convenience for land matters, spatial planning and business licensing to attract investors to invest in the National Capital City. One way to facilitate this matter is bygranting land rights in the form of building user rights for 160 (one hundred and sixty) years to investors. The convenience provided seems to only prioritize the interests of investors and if it is realized it will create legal uncertainty for investors.","PeriodicalId":321458,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Magister Hukum ARGUMENTUM","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139161655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Hutang Panai’ Sebagai Alasan Perceraian dalam Masyarat Adat Suku Bugis-Makassar","authors":"Jihan Gadis, Haris Sanjaya","doi":"10.24123/argu.v9i2.6076","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24123/argu.v9i2.6076","url":null,"abstract":"This research discusses Panai Debt as a Reason for Divorce in the Indigenous Peoples of the Bugis-Makassar Tribe (Case Study of Decision Number 30/Pdt.G/2022/Pa.Tkl. In statutory provisions and in customary law practice, there is not a single basis that explains that panai debt' can be used as a reason for divorce between husband and wife. So the reason for divorce is due to non-payment of Uang Panai. What will be examined in this study are: How is the position of Uang Panai in marriage for the Bugis-Makassar community? And can Panai debt be used as a reason for divorce? From this analysis, the position of Uang Panai' in marriage for the Bugis-Makassar community is one of the conditions that must be met by a man if he wants to marry a Bugis-Makasaar woman and Panai' debt cannot be used as a reason for divorce, panai debt is only one of the factors that causes quarrels between husband and wife which is the basis for the judge to grant the lawsuit.          Penelitian ini membahas mengenai Hutang Panai’ Sebagai Alasan Perceraian Dalam Masyarat Adat Suku Bugis-Makassar (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 30/Pdt.G/2022/Pa.Tkl. Dalam ketentuan perundang-undangan maupun dalam praktik hukum adat, tidak ada satupun dasar yang menjelaskan bahwa hutang panai’ dapat dijadikan alasan percerain antara suami dan isteri. Sehingga alasan perceraian dikarenakan tidak membayar uang panai ini sangat menarik untuk diteliti dikarenakan uang panai sendiri merupakan budaya adat yang merupakan kewajiban yang harus dibayarkan laki-laki kepada keluarga mempelai. Rumusan masalah yang akan diteliti dalam penelitian ini adalah Bagaimana kedudukan uang panai dalam perkawinan bagi masyarakat Bugis-Makassar? Dan Apakah hutang panai dapat dijadikan alasan dalam perceraian?. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yang bersifat yuridis normatif, pendekatan yang dilakukan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan kasus. Hasil dari analisa tersebut bahwa Kedudukan uang panai’ dalam perkawinan bagi masyarakat Bugis-Makassar ialah menjadi salah satu syarat yang harus dipenuhi oleh seorang laki-laki apabila ingin menikahi wanita suku Bugis-Makasaar dan Hutang panai’ tidak dapat dijadikan alasan dalam perceraian, hutang panai hanua salah satu faktor yang menyebabkan pertengkaran antara suami dan istri yang menjadi dasar bagi hakim mengabulkan gugatan tersebut.","PeriodicalId":321458,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Magister Hukum ARGUMENTUM","volume":"244 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139162966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Hukum yang Visioner sebagai Orientasi Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Menuju Indonesia Emas 2045","authors":"David Cristian Liyanto, V. Wijaya","doi":"10.24123/argu.v9i2.6143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24123/argu.v9i2.6143","url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia sedang mempersiapkan diri untuk menjadi negara maju yang ingin dicapai ketika Indonesia berusia 100 tahun pada tahun 2045. Salah satu permasalahan yang perlu diatasi menuju Indonesia Emas 2045 adalah korupsi yang masif di Indonesia Korupsi merupakan salah satu tindak pidana yang menimbulkan kerugian bagi keuangan Indonesia dimana berdasarkan data dari ICW pada tahun 2022 total kerugian negara yang dialami oleh Indonesia mencapai 42,747 triliun rupiah. Beberapa alternatif selain hukuman pidana penjara bagi pelaku tindak pidana korupsi bisa dijadikan referensi bagi Indonesia seperti di Jepang dengan menerapkan sanksi sosialnya yang menimbulkan rasa malu bagi pelaku tindak pidana korupsi, atau di Jerman yang menerapkan aturan bagi pelaku tindak pidana korupsi untuk melakukan pengembalian nilai uang korupsi kepada negara. Indonesia berusaha mengatasi disparitas dalam pemidanaan terhadap pelaku tindak pidana korupsi dengan mengeluarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 tentang Salinan Pedoman Pemidanaan Pasal 2 dan Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Aturan ini mengatur mengenai seberapa berat dan ringannya hukuman pidana terhadap tindak pidana korupsi berdasarkan kategori “kerugian keuangan negara atau perekonomian negara, tingkat kesalahan, dampak, dan keuntungan, rentang penjatuhan pidana, keadaan – keadaan yang memberatkan dan meringankan, penjatuhan pidana, dan ketentuan lain yang berkaitan dengan penjatuhan pidana.”","PeriodicalId":321458,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Magister Hukum ARGUMENTUM","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139161347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"ANALISIS YURIDIS PEMBERIAN DENDA KEPADA PERUSAHAAN YANG TIDAK MEMBAYAR UPAH PEKERJA BERDASARKAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 36 TAHUN 2021 TENTANG PENGUPAHAN","authors":"Analisis Yuridis, Pemberian Denda Kepada, perusahaan yang, Tidak Membayar, Upah Pekerja, Berdasarkan Peraturan, Pemerintah Nomor","doi":"10.24123/argu.v9i1.5724","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24123/argu.v9i1.5724","url":null,"abstract":"Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis upaya penyelesaian pekerja terkait upah yang tidak dibayarkan oleh perusahaan. Berbagai macam cara dilakukan para pengusaha sebagai pemilik perusahaan untuk menghindari pembayaran upah kepada pekerja dengan berbagai cara, seperti penundaan pembayaran upah kepada pekerja pemotongan upah secara pihak dan berbagai bentuk lainnya. Para pekerja yang selama ini menjadi korban dari adanya upaya pengusaha yang tidak membayarkan upah, kemudian terus berusaha mendapatkan haknya setelah melakukan kewajiban bekerja. Upaya tersebut diantaranya melakukan mediasi dengan perantara pemerintah. Pemerintah melakukan berbagai cara dengan membuat undang-undang yang bertujuan untuk melindungi hak para pekerja. Undang-Undang tersebut adalah adanya Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 36 Tahun 2021 Tentang Pengupahan. PP No. 36 Tahun 2021 tentang Pengupahan menjelaskan tentang peran pemerintah dalam memberikan sanksi berupa dendan kepada perusahaan yang tidak membayar upah kepada pekerja.","PeriodicalId":321458,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Magister Hukum ARGUMENTUM","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129302470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Mantan Direktur Perusahaan Yang Tagihannya Ditolak Dalam Pencocokan Piutang","authors":"Salsabila Alfitria, Jurnal berjudul Perlindungan, Hukum Bagi, Mantan Direktur, Perusahaan yang Upahnya, Tidak Dibayarkan, dan Tagihannya, Ditolak Dalam, Pencocokan Tagihan","doi":"10.24123/argu.v9i1.5765","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24123/argu.v9i1.5765","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \u0000The journal entitled Legal protection for former directors whose wages are not paid and whose bills are rejected in bill matching discusses the issue of whether legal protection is for ex-directors whose wages are not paid and whose bills are rejected in matching bills. The research method uses conceptual approach which means solves problems using literature and views of legal scholars and also using statue approach which means solves problems using applicable laws and regulations. The results of the study stated that the refusal to submit a bill submitted by the former director for unpaid wages is a debt because it will not erase a debt if there is no fulfillment by paying the owed wages to the former director according to what was agreed. Then Legal protection for former directors whose wages are not paid and whose bills are rejected in bill matching can be obtained through 2 (two) forms, namely preventive legal protection accommodated by the Civil Code, the Bankruptcy Law and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, the Labor Law and Constitutional Court Decision Number 67/PUU-XI/2013. Then repressive legal protection can be carried out in the form of other lawsuits based on the explanation of Article 3 paragraph (1) UUK-PKPU, which is filing a lawsuit against the board relating to the debtor's assets.","PeriodicalId":321458,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Magister Hukum ARGUMENTUM","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115224886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PIHAK KETIGA DALAM ACTIO PAULIANA","authors":"Albertus Hansen Setyabudi, Sylvia Janisriwati, Irta Windra Syahrial","doi":"10.24123/argu.v9i1.5771","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24123/argu.v9i1.5771","url":null,"abstract":"Actio Pauliana is a term for the cancellation of a legal action carried out by the debtor because the legal action can harm the creditor and is not required to be carried out. Actio Pauliana is closely related to bankruptcy law because it can have implications for the process of settling bankrupt assets of debtors who are undergoing the bankruptcy process. In the settlement of bankruptcy assets, the curator will conduct an examination of the ownership of the debtor's bankrupt property which will be used to resolve the bankruptcy process to its creditors. If Actio Pauliana's lawsuit is granted, as a result, the legal action of the debtor being sued by Actio Pauliana will be canceled. The canceled legal action involves a third party in transactions in general and creates an obligation for the third party to return the debtor's bankrupt property. The formulation of the problem in this research is what is the legal protection for third parties in Actio Pauliana's lawsuit. The purpose of writing this thesis is to fulfill one of the requirements to obtain a Bachelor of Law degree at the Faculty of Law, University of Surabaya. The writing of this study uses a normative juridical legal research type, from legal research carried out with this method, the results obtained that legal protection for third parties in the Actio Pauliana lawsuit gives a third party the right to get back the object that has been received by the debtor or its replacement value or the price of the goods. which has been paid to the debtor. Meanwhile, for the lack of the replacement value of the object or the price of the goods that have been paid by a third party to the Debtor, the third party in the Actio Pauliana lawsuit may appear as a Concurrent Creditor.","PeriodicalId":321458,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Magister Hukum ARGUMENTUM","volume":"40 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114027678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"RELEVANSI HUKUM ADMINISTRASI NEGARA DENGAN PERATURAN DAERAH (PERDA) JAWA TENGAH NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2019 MENGENAI PENYELENGGARAAN PENDIDIKAN PANCASILA","authors":"Aurel Latifa, Fatma Ulfatun Najicha","doi":"10.24123/argu.v9i1.5756","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24123/argu.v9i1.5756","url":null,"abstract":"Pancasila is the cornerstone of national and state ideology in the affairs of the country and state. The Indonesian populace still does not comprehend the significance of the values included in Pancasila, which prevents its proper implementation. Spreading the nation's ideals involves education in a significant way. Throughout Indonesia, the implementation of education must be a means to promote Pancasila values as well as an antidote to foreign values that are anti-Pancasila. This study analyzes Regional Regulation Number 1 Central Java Education Implementation in Central Java in 2019 as a means to socialize Pancasila values. To address these issues, legal research techniques are employed. the material was obtained through literature research and analyzed qualitatively. Conclusions are made using the deductive method. based on data analysis it can be concluded that the Central Java Regional Regulation No. 1/2019 is generally not against Pancasila values, but this Perda requires revision of the preamble and some articles to make it a more effective tool for implementing Pancasila. value for society.","PeriodicalId":321458,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Magister Hukum ARGUMENTUM","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123990702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Kebijakan Pajak Karbon Sebagai Strategi Pembangunan Ekonomi Berkelanjutan","authors":"Marchethy Riwani Diaz, Jennifer Kurnia Putri, Hwee Kwan, Heru Saputra Lumban Gaol","doi":"10.24123/argu.v9i1.5763","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24123/argu.v9i1.5763","url":null,"abstract":"The decline in the earth's climate was the cause for the birth of the 2015 Paris Agreement which was ratified by Indonesia through Law Number 16 of 2016 concerning the Paris Agreement on the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change as a form of commitment from the government to address climate problems in Indonesia. One of the strategic efforts made by the government is to implement a carbon tax policy to reduce the increase in carbon emissions which was accommodated in Article 13 of Law Number 7 of 2021 concerning Harmonization of Tax Regulations. The implementation of a carbon tax policy is an implementation of Pancasila economic principles which focus on creating sustainable economic development by harmonizing the balance between economic growth and improving environmental quality. The implementation of the carbon tax policy is also a manifestation of the fifth precept of Pancasila which aims to fulfill the constitutional rights of the people as stipulated in Article 28H paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia by creating corrective justice in the economic and environmental fields. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the application of carbon tax policies in order to achieve the goals of sustainable economic development in Indonesia. The writing method used is juridical-normative using statutory and conceptual approaches. The data used is secondary data through literature study on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of this paper show that the implementation of carbon tax policies is in line with Pancasila economic principles and is a strategic effort in creating a green investment climate, as well as increasing state revenue from the tax sector. However, strengthening is needed in terms of substance, structure, and legal culture in implementing the policy.","PeriodicalId":321458,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Magister Hukum ARGUMENTUM","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114760543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}