Occupational Health Science最新文献_第5页

"Are We Working (Too) Comfortably?": Understanding the Nature of and Factors Associated with Sedentary Behaviour When Working in the Home Environment. "我们工作得（太）舒适了吗？了解在家庭环境中工作时久坐行为的性质和相关因素。

IF 1.6

Occupational Health Science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-29 DOI: 10.1007/s41542-022-00128-6

Ailsa Niven, Graham Baker, Eva Coral Almeida, Samantha G Fawkner, Ruth Jepson, Jillian Manner, Sarah Morton, Glenna Nightingale, Divya Sivaramakrishnan, Claire Fitzsimons

{"title":"\"Are We Working (Too) Comfortably?\": Understanding the Nature of and Factors Associated with Sedentary Behaviour When Working in the Home Environment.","authors":"Ailsa Niven, Graham Baker, Eva Coral Almeida, Samantha G Fawkner, Ruth Jepson, Jillian Manner, Sarah Morton, Glenna Nightingale, Divya Sivaramakrishnan, Claire Fitzsimons","doi":"10.1007/s41542-022-00128-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41542-022-00128-6","url":null,"abstract":"Home working has increased due to COVID-19, but little is known about how this change has impacted the health risk behaviour of elevated sedentary time. The aim of this cross-sectional exploratory study was to assess occupational sitting behaviour when working at home, and use the Capability Opportunity Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model to identify influences on this behaviour. University staff (n = 267; 69% female; 92% white) who were predominantly working from home completed a questionnaire to assess sitting time, sitting breaks, demographic and occupational characteristics, and a 7-item COM-B questionnaire and open-ended questions to assess influences on time spent sitting whilst working from home. Data were analysed descriptively, a repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine differences in the COM-B items, and binary logistic regression was used to examine predictors of sitting time. Staff spent on average 89.5% (SD = 17.1) of their time sitting whilst working at home, and took an average of 1.36 (1.38) sitting breaks per hour. There were significant and meaningful differences in the influence of the COM factors on ability and willingness to reduce sitting behaviour (p < .0001; ηp 2 = .38), and the open-ended responses added further context. The included variables accounted for 20.7% of variance in sitting behaviour, with age, sitting breaks, motivation-automatic, and opportunity-physical contributing significantly. Working from home leads to elevated levels of sitting, and the COM-B provides a useful model to identify key influences on ability and willingness to reduce sitting. Strategies incorporating regular breaks, habit formation/reversal, and restructuring the physical environment may be beneficial.","PeriodicalId":29938,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Health Science","volume":"7 1","pages":"71-88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9708134/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9527461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Fear and Trembling While Working in a Pandemic: an Exploratory Meta-Analysis of Workers' COVID-19 Distress. 在大流行中工作时的恐惧和颤抖：工人COVID-19痛苦的探索性荟萃分析。

IF 2.4

Occupational Health Science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-28 DOI: 10.1007/s41542-022-00131-x

William P Jimenez, Ian M Katz, Elissa A Liguori

{"title":"Fear and Trembling While Working in a Pandemic: an Exploratory Meta-Analysis of Workers' COVID-19 Distress.","authors":"William P Jimenez, Ian M Katz, Elissa A Liguori","doi":"10.1007/s41542-022-00131-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41542-022-00131-x","url":null,"abstract":"The global COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the lives of workers and taken its toll on health and well-being. In line with recent calls for more inductive and abductive occupational health science research, we exploratorily meta-analyzed workers' COVID-19 distress, defined as psychological and psychosomatic strain contextualized to experiencing the virus and pandemic broadly. We identified many existing COVID-19 distress measures (e.g., Fear of COVID-19 Scale by Ahorsu et al., International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 2020; Coronavirus Anxiety Scale by Lee, Death Studies, 44(7), 393-401, 2020a) and correlates, including demographic variables (viz., gender, marital status, whether worker has children), positive well-being (e.g., quality of life, perceived social support, resilience), negative well-being (e.g., anxiety, depression, sleep problems), and work-related variables (e.g., job satisfaction, burnout, task performance). Additionally, we found preliminary evidence of subgroup differences by COVID-19 distress measure and country-level moderation moderators (viz., cultural values, pandemic-related government response) as well as COVID-19 distress's incremental validity over and above anxiety and depression. The findings-based on k = 135 independent samples totaling N = 61,470 workers-were abductively contextualized with existing theories and previous research. We also call for future research to address the grand challenge of working during the COVID-19 pandemic and ultimately develop a cumulative occupational health psychology of pandemics.Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41542-022-00131-x.","PeriodicalId":29938,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Health Science","volume":"7 1","pages":"39-69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9702905/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9527459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Enrichment and Conflict Between Work and Health Behaviors: New Scales for Assessing How Work Relates to Physical Exercise and Healthy Eating 工作与健康行为之间的充实与冲突:评估工作与体育锻炼和健康饮食关系的新量表

IF 3.1

Occupational Health Science Pub Date : 2022-12-23 DOI: 10.1007/s41542-022-00134-8

S. Sonnentag, Maria U. Kottwitz, Theresa J S Koch, Jette Völker

引用次数: 0

Correction to: Alert at Work? Perceptions of Alertness Testing and Recommendations for Practitioners 更正:在工作中保持警觉?警觉性测试的认识和对从业人员的建议

IF 3.1

Occupational Health Science Pub Date : 2022-12-14 DOI: 10.1007/s41542-022-00139-3

Rebecca M. Brossoit, Tori L. Crain, Shalyn C. Stevens, Jacqueline R Wong, Lori Guasta

引用次数: 0

Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Brief Resilience Scale in Deployed and Non-Deployed Soldiers 部署与非部署士兵简短弹性量表的因素结构与测量不变性

IF 3.1

Occupational Health Science Pub Date : 2022-12-11 DOI: 10.1007/s41542-022-00138-4

O. Cabrera, Benjamin J. Trachik, M. Ganulin, M. Dretsch, A. Adler

引用次数: 0

Newcomer Drinking Behavior and Immediate Post-College Earnings Growth: Does Occupational Social Intensity Make a Difference? 新人饮酒行为与大学毕业后的收入增长:职业社会强度有影响吗?

IF 3.1

Occupational Health Science Pub Date : 2022-12-08 DOI: 10.1007/s41542-022-00126-8

Ronit Montal-Rosenberg, Peter A. Bamberger, Mo Wang, M. Larimer, Samuel B. Bacharach

引用次数: 0

How and When do Employees Energize Their Team Members? The Role of Team Boosting Behaviors 员工如何以及何时激励团队成员?团队促进行为的作用

IF 3.1

Occupational Health Science Pub Date : 2022-12-06 DOI: 10.1007/s41542-022-00137-5

Denise J. Fortuin, A. Bakker, H. van Mierlo, Paraskevas Petrou, E. Demerouti

引用次数: 0

Do Goal Setting and Implementation Intentions Affect Detachment and Next-Day Fatigue? 目标设定和执行意图会影响疏离和第二天的疲劳吗?

IF 3.1

Occupational Health Science Pub Date : 2022-12-06 DOI: 10.1007/s41542-022-00135-7

W. van Eerde, Sjir Uitdewilligen, Ute R. Hülsheger, B. Schreurs

引用次数: 0

Workplace Supported Recovery from Substance Use Disorders: Defining the Construct, Developing a Model, and Proposing an Agenda for Future Research. 工作场所支持的药物使用障碍康复：定义结构、开发模型并提出未来研究议程。

IF 1.6

Occupational Health Science Pub Date : 2022-12-05 DOI: 10.1007/s41542-022-00123-x

Michael R Frone, L Casey Chosewood, Jamie C Osborne, John J Howard

{"title":"Workplace Supported Recovery from Substance Use Disorders: Defining the Construct, Developing a Model, and Proposing an Agenda for Future Research.","authors":"Michael R Frone, L Casey Chosewood, Jamie C Osborne, John J Howard","doi":"10.1007/s41542-022-00123-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41542-022-00123-x","url":null,"abstract":"Substance use disorders (SUDs) represent a critical public and occupational health issue. Therefore, understanding the process of SUD recovery has become an issue of growing importance among substance use and recovery professionals. Nonetheless, despite the acknowledged importance of employment for SUD recovery, little conceptual or empirical work exists on how the workplace might support or undermine SUD recovery. In this article, we address this limitation in several ways. First, to promote a better understanding of SUD recovery for occupational health researchers, we provide a brief overview of the nature of a SUD, prior definitions of SUD recovery, and general themes associated with the recovery process. Second, we develop a working definition of workplace supported recovery. Third, we present a heuristic conceptual model showing how the workplace might impact the SUD recovery process. Fourth, using this model and research from the substance use and occupational health literatures, we develop a series of general research propositions. These propositions highlight broad directions requiring more detailed conceptualization and empirical research to understand better how work conditions may support or undermine the process of employee SUD recovery. Our overarching goal is to motivate innovative conceptualization and research on workplace supported recovery from SUDs. Such research may inform the development and evaluation of workplace interventions and policies supporting SUD recovery and highlight the benefits of workplace supported SUD recovery for employees, employers, and communities. Research on this issue may allow occupational health researchers to impact a significant societal and occupational health issue.","PeriodicalId":29938,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Health Science","volume":"6 4","pages":"475-511"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10193449/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9499834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Facilitating Employee Recovery From Work: The Role of Leader-Member-Exchange 促进员工从工作中恢复:领导-成员-交换的作用

IF 3.1

Occupational Health Science Pub Date : 2022-12-02 DOI: 10.1007/s41542-022-00132-w

Judith Volmer, E. Schulte, C. Fritz

引用次数: 1