Fear and Trembling While Working in a Pandemic: an Exploratory Meta-Analysis of Workers' COVID-19 Distress.

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
William P Jimenez, Ian M Katz, Elissa A Liguori
{"title":"Fear and Trembling While Working in a Pandemic: an Exploratory Meta-Analysis of Workers' COVID-19 Distress.","authors":"William P Jimenez,&nbsp;Ian M Katz,&nbsp;Elissa A Liguori","doi":"10.1007/s41542-022-00131-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the lives of workers and taken its toll on health and well-being. In line with recent calls for more inductive and abductive occupational health science research, we exploratorily meta-analyzed workers' COVID-19 distress, defined as psychological and psychosomatic strain contextualized to experiencing the virus and pandemic broadly. We identified many existing COVID-19 distress measures (e.g., Fear of COVID-19 Scale by Ahorsu et al., <i>International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction</i>, 2020; Coronavirus Anxiety Scale by Lee, <i>Death Studies, 44</i>(7), 393-401, 2020a) and correlates, including demographic variables (viz., gender, marital status, whether worker has children), positive well-being (e.g., quality of life, perceived social support, resilience), negative well-being (e.g., anxiety, depression, sleep problems), and work-related variables (e.g., job satisfaction, burnout, task performance). Additionally, we found preliminary evidence of subgroup differences by COVID-19 distress measure and country-level moderation moderators (viz., cultural values, pandemic-related government response) as well as COVID-19 distress's incremental validity over and above anxiety and depression. The findings-based on <i>k</i> = 135 independent samples totaling <i>N</i> = 61,470 workers-were abductively contextualized with existing theories and previous research. We also call for future research to address the grand challenge of working during the COVID-19 pandemic and ultimately develop a cumulative occupational health psychology of pandemics.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41542-022-00131-x.</p>","PeriodicalId":29938,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Health Science","volume":"7 1","pages":"39-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9702905/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-022-00131-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The global COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the lives of workers and taken its toll on health and well-being. In line with recent calls for more inductive and abductive occupational health science research, we exploratorily meta-analyzed workers' COVID-19 distress, defined as psychological and psychosomatic strain contextualized to experiencing the virus and pandemic broadly. We identified many existing COVID-19 distress measures (e.g., Fear of COVID-19 Scale by Ahorsu et al., International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 2020; Coronavirus Anxiety Scale by Lee, Death Studies, 44(7), 393-401, 2020a) and correlates, including demographic variables (viz., gender, marital status, whether worker has children), positive well-being (e.g., quality of life, perceived social support, resilience), negative well-being (e.g., anxiety, depression, sleep problems), and work-related variables (e.g., job satisfaction, burnout, task performance). Additionally, we found preliminary evidence of subgroup differences by COVID-19 distress measure and country-level moderation moderators (viz., cultural values, pandemic-related government response) as well as COVID-19 distress's incremental validity over and above anxiety and depression. The findings-based on k = 135 independent samples totaling N = 61,470 workers-were abductively contextualized with existing theories and previous research. We also call for future research to address the grand challenge of working during the COVID-19 pandemic and ultimately develop a cumulative occupational health psychology of pandemics.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41542-022-00131-x.

在大流行中工作时的恐惧和颤抖:工人COVID-19痛苦的探索性荟萃分析。
2019冠状病毒病全球大流行扰乱了工人的生活,损害了他们的健康和福祉。根据最近对更多归纳性和溯因性职业健康科学研究的呼吁,我们探索性地荟萃分析了工人的COVID-19痛苦,将其定义为经历病毒和大流行的心理和心身压力。我们确定了许多现有的COVID-19痛苦措施(例如,Ahorsu等人的COVID-19恐惧量表,国际心理健康与成瘾杂志,2020;冠状病毒焦虑量表(Lee, Death Studies, 44(7), 393-401, 2020a)及其相关因素,包括人口统计变量(即性别、婚姻状况、工人是否有孩子)、积极幸福感(如生活质量、感知到的社会支持、复原力)、消极幸福感(如焦虑、抑郁、睡眠问题)和与工作相关的变量(如工作满意度、倦怠、任务绩效)。此外,我们发现了COVID-19痛苦测量和国家级调节调节因子(即文化价值观,与大流行相关的政府反应)以及COVID-19痛苦超过焦虑和抑郁的增量效度的亚组差异的初步证据。研究结果基于k = 135个独立样本,共计N = 61,470名工人,并与现有理论和先前的研究联系起来。我们还呼吁未来开展研究,以应对在COVID-19大流行期间工作的巨大挑战,并最终建立大流行的累积职业健康心理学。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,提供地址为10.1007/s41542-022-00131-x。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
9.70%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信