Marilyne Daher, Fareed Khawaja, Amy Spallone, Terri L Shigle, Micah Bhatti, Nancy N Vuong, Ella J Ariza-Heredia, Victor Mulanovich, Richard E Champlin, Roy F Chemaly
{"title":"Real-World Experience With Maribavir for Treatment of Refractory or Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infection in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients and Hematologic Malignancy Patients.","authors":"Marilyne Daher, Fareed Khawaja, Amy Spallone, Terri L Shigle, Micah Bhatti, Nancy N Vuong, Ella J Ariza-Heredia, Victor Mulanovich, Richard E Champlin, Roy F Chemaly","doi":"10.1111/tid.14444","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14444","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Refractory and/or resistant (R/R) cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a serious complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Maribavir, an oral antiviral agent, was approved in November 2021 for the treatment of R/R CMV in transplant recipients. However, real-world data on the use of maribavir in HCT recipients and hematologic malignancy (HM) patients are limited. We described our early experience with the use of maribavir in the year after its Food and Drug Administration approval in HCT recipients and HM patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of all patients who received maribavir for treatment of CMV infection at our center from November 2021 to December 2022. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of CMV infection were collected for each case. Descriptive statistics were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 13 patients (11 of whom were HCT recipients and two with HM) who received a median of 58 days of maribavir therapy. While on maribavir, nine (69%) patients had a resolution of CMV infection. Treatment-emergent maribavir resistance was documented in one patient with a CMV UL97 C480F mutation. Patients with higher baseline viral loads were less likely to achieve CMV resolution compared to those with lower levels. Additionally, six patients received combination therapy with maribavir. Six patients developed dysgeusia, none requiring maribavir discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Maribavir is an effective and safe option for the treatment of R/R CMV infections in HCT recipients and HM patients. Our study highlights the complexities of managing CMV infections in this patient population and some challenges associated with maribavir therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143011501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Vitamin D Levels and the Risk of Post-Transplant Infection: Where There's Smoke, Is There Fire?","authors":"Eduardo Aparicio-Minguijón, Mario Fernández-Ruiz","doi":"10.1111/tid.14443","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14443","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143011671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abdulla Mobeireek, Ihab Weheba, Loui Ezzat, Mohammed Al Hajji, Walid Rasheed, Tusneem Elhassan, Momen Nassani, Riad El Fakih, Mahmoud Aljurf, Liju Ahmed
{"title":"Role of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy in Decision-Making in the Management of Post-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients Presenting with Pulmonary Infiltrates: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Abdulla Mobeireek, Ihab Weheba, Loui Ezzat, Mohammed Al Hajji, Walid Rasheed, Tusneem Elhassan, Momen Nassani, Riad El Fakih, Mahmoud Aljurf, Liju Ahmed","doi":"10.1111/tid.14441","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14441","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) in the management of patients presenting with pulmonary infiltrates after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value and safety of FOB at our center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included all patients with post-HSCT pulmonary infiltrates who underwent FOB between 2016 and 2019. The demographic, clinical, interventional, microbiological, and histological data and changes in management and the 6-month outcome were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 86 consecutive HSCT recipients were included. The median patient age was 34 years (range: 14-67), 53 patients (61.6%) were males. The median interval between symptom onset and FOB was 7 days (IQR: 2-17). FOB yielded a positive result in 53 patients (61.6%). The pathogen was a virus, bacteria, fungus in 29 (33.7%), 19 (22.1%), and 11 (12.8%) patients, respectively. The treatment was modified in 52 patients (60.5%) according to the FOB result. An imaging finding of \"tree-in-bud\" was associated with a positive FOB yield (p = 0.05). The timing of bronchoscopy (<4 vs. ≥5 days), graft-versus-host disease, neutropenia, and antimicrobial use had no significant effect (p > 0.05). No serious complications were encountered.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FOB led to changes in management in over half of the patients. Delay up to 1 week after presentation and empirical antimicrobials did not have any effect on the yield. FOB is a safe diagnostic tool in the post-HSCT patients with pulmonary infiltrates.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14441"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143011519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andrea Lombardi, Paolo Grossi, Malgorzata Mikulska, Maddalena Giannella, Renato Pascale, Serena Marinello, Francesca Montagnani, Elena Seminari, Silvia Corcione, Alessandra Bandera, Alessandro Bertani, Alessandra Mularoni
{"title":"Infections Management in the Lung Transplant Setting in Italy: A Web-Survey.","authors":"Andrea Lombardi, Paolo Grossi, Malgorzata Mikulska, Maddalena Giannella, Renato Pascale, Serena Marinello, Francesca Montagnani, Elena Seminari, Silvia Corcione, Alessandra Bandera, Alessandro Bertani, Alessandra Mularoni","doi":"10.1111/tid.14413","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14413","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Infections significantly impact morbidity and mortality in lung transplant (LuTx) recipients. This survey focused on documenting current practices regarding the prevention and management of infections in LuTx in Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 52-question survey was administered online in the period from December 1, 2023, to January 31, 2024, assessing center characteristics, Tx team organization, microbiological investigations, infection prevention, and management. All Italian LuTx centers were invited to participate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine out of 10 Italian LuTx centers answered. Most centers (6/9, 67%) performed LuTx only on adults. Chronic infection or colonization by Mycobacterium abscessus and Burkholderia cenocepacia is considered a contraindication to LuTx in five and two centers, respectively. For cytomegalovirus D+/R- patients, prophylaxis is used in six centers (67%), with a variable duration from 3 to 12 months. Two centers also use IgG. Three centers (33%) use a pre-emptive strategy. Four centers (45%) screen for Human herpesvirus 8 infection. Regarding antibiotic prophylaxis, most centers (6/9, 67%) utilise a dual regimen of anti-pseudomonal penicillin plus glycopeptide. The two most common durations of antibiotic prophylaxis were 72 h and 7 days, each reported by two centers (22%). Targeted prophylaxis against fungal infections is employed by a minority of centers (4/9, 44%). Inhaled amphotericin B is the most common antifungal, used as targeted prophylaxis (2/4, 50%) and universal prophylaxis (2/5, 40%). Almost all centers (8/9, 89%) involve the Tx infectious diseases specialist in the recipient management since the pre-listing period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is considerable heterogeneity in infection management among Italian LuTx centers. Establishing a shared platform for data collection and outcome evaluation is essential to improve infection management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14413"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142955729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Guilherme Santoro-Lopes, Luiz Felipe Abreu Guimarães, Wanessa Trindade Clemente, Raquel Silveira Bello Stucchi, Edson Abdala, Daniel Wagner de Castro Lima Santos, Gustavo Fernandes Ferreira, Luciana Bertocco Paiva Haddad, Ligia Camera Pierrotti
{"title":"Persisting Gaps in Cytomegalovirus Prevention and Management After Solid Organ Transplantation in a Resource-Limited Setting.","authors":"Guilherme Santoro-Lopes, Luiz Felipe Abreu Guimarães, Wanessa Trindade Clemente, Raquel Silveira Bello Stucchi, Edson Abdala, Daniel Wagner de Castro Lima Santos, Gustavo Fernandes Ferreira, Luciana Bertocco Paiva Haddad, Ligia Camera Pierrotti","doi":"10.1111/tid.14440","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14440","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains among the leading complications after solid organ transplantation (SOT). Large international surveys mainly focused on high-income countries, detected considerable variability in the management of this infection after SOT. Limited data are available from resource-limited settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was performed. All transplant programs (TP) registered at the Brazilian Organ Transplantation Society (ABTO) were invited to participate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one TP participated in the study. Of these, 59 (97%) reported using at least 1 preventive strategy (prophylaxis or preemptive therapy [PET]). Prophylaxis was reported by only 39 (64%). PET was used by 52 (85%), predominantly for R+ recipients (n = 42/61; 70%). CMV monitoring was performed weekly in only 22 of 52 (42%) TP. This was significantly more common in TP reporting turnaround times ≤72 h for quantitative nuclear acid amplification tests (p < 0.001). Intravenous (IV) ganciclovir was the predominant drug chosen for prophylaxis (21/39 TP; 54%) and for PET (44/52 TP; 77%). Lack of regular access to valganciclovir was significantly associated with the choice of IV ganciclovir for prophylaxis and PET (p = 0.002 for both comparisons). Only 8 (13%) TP had access to molecular diagnostic tests for ganciclovir resistance, and 14 (23%) had access to effective therapy for highly resistant infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that strategies to improve the management of CMV after SOT in such a resource-limited setting are needed and should include not only targeted educational programs but also initiatives to tackle economic and structural barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14440"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142955730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Zachary A Yetmar, Viengneesee Thao, David A Helfinstine, Kelly M Pennington, Raymund R Razonable
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of Outpatient COVID-19 Therapies in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.","authors":"Zachary A Yetmar, Viengneesee Thao, David A Helfinstine, Kelly M Pennington, Raymund R Razonable","doi":"10.1111/tid.14436","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14436","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple outpatient therapies have been developed for COVID-19 in high-risk individuals, but solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients were not well represented in controlled clinical trials. To date, few comparative studies have evaluated outcomes between outpatient therapies in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study using de-identified administrative claims data from OptumLabs Data Warehouse. Patients were included if they were age ≥ 18 years, diagnosed with COVID-19 between January 2022 and December 2023, and underwent SOT prior to COVID-19. The primary outcome was 30-day hospitalization. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to account for potential confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>4192 SOT recipients with COVID-19 were identified. 1403 received an outpatient COVID-19 therapy, including anti-spike monoclonal antibodies (N = 748, 53.3%), molnupiravir (N = 327, 23.3%), ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir (N = 217, 15.5%), or remdesivir (N = 141, 10.0%). In weighted analysis compared to no treatment, anti-spike monoclonal antibodies (hazard ratio [HR] 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.55; p < 0.001), molnupiravir (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36-0.89; p = 0.013), and nirmatrelvir (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.89; p = 0.020) were associated with reduced hospitalization risk, while remdesivir (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.50-1.98; p = 0.992) was not. Hospitalization rates were similar between the treatment agents, apart from remdesivir showing a higher risk compared to anti-spike monoclonal antibodies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Outpatient COVID-19 therapies were largely associated with improved outcomes among SOT recipients. These treatment agents showed similar rates of 30-day hospitalization, except for remdesivir. The choice of outpatient COVID-19 therapy in SOT recipients should primarily account for patients' individual circumstances and drug-drug interactions rather than differential therapeutic efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142955726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mario Fernández-Ruiz, Marcos Nuévalos, Isabel Rodríguez-Goncer, Estéfani García-Ríos, Tamara Ruiz-Merlo, Natalia Redondo, Hernando Trujillo, Esther González, Natalia Polanco, José María Caso, Eduardo Aparicio-Minguijón, Francisco López-Medrano, Rafael San Juan, Amado Andrés, Pilar Pérez-Romero, José María Aguado
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance of Two Different Techniques to Quantify CMV-Specific Cell-Mediated Immunity in Intermediate-Risk Seropositive Kidney Transplant Recipients.","authors":"Mario Fernández-Ruiz, Marcos Nuévalos, Isabel Rodríguez-Goncer, Estéfani García-Ríos, Tamara Ruiz-Merlo, Natalia Redondo, Hernando Trujillo, Esther González, Natalia Polanco, José María Caso, Eduardo Aparicio-Minguijón, Francisco López-Medrano, Rafael San Juan, Amado Andrés, Pilar Pérez-Romero, José María Aguado","doi":"10.1111/tid.14437","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14437","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kidney transplant (KT) recipients at intermediate risk for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection constitute a potential target for individualized prevention strategies informed by the CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMV-CMI). The optimal method for the functional assessment of CMV-CMI in this group remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 74 CMV-seropositive KT recipients that did not receive T-cell-depleting induction and were managed by preemptive therapy. CMV-CMI was monitored at baseline and months 1, 3, 6, and 12 by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) and a interferon (IFN)-γ-release assay (QuantiFERON-CMV [QTF-CMV]). Both methods were compared for discriminative capacity (areas under the receiving operating characteristic curve [auROCs]) and diagnostic accuracy to predict protection against high-level (≥1000 IU/mL) CMV DNAemia and/or disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen patients (24.3%) experienced high-level CMV DNAemia or disease. There were no significant differences in the discriminative capacity to predict protection of CMV-specific CD8+ (auROC: 0.719) and CD4+ T-cell counts (auROC: 0.664) enumerated by ICS and IFN-γ production measured by QTF-CMV (auROC: 0.666). Optimal cutoff values of ≥9.8 CMV-specific CD4+ T-cells/µL and ≥5.7 CD8+ T-cells/µL by ICS yielded excellent specificity (95.7% and 86.9%, respectively) and positive predictive values (PPVs) (>98.0%), but a sensitivity below 60%. A reactive QTF-CMV (IFN-γ ≥0.2 IU/mL) provided good sensitivity (81.6%) and PPV (92.5%), at the expense of a poor specificity (22.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The discriminative capacity to predict immune protection against clinically relevant CMV infection among intermediate-risk KT recipients was comparable for ICS and QTF-CMV. A selected ICS threshold may provide better specificity than the interpretative cut-off values currently recommended for QTF-CMV.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14437"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142955727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Active Left Neck Tuberculosis: A Case Report.","authors":"Ying He, Yan Deng, Hai Yi","doi":"10.1111/tid.14435","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14435","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14435"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142955725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}