Laura van den Bosch, Karina Kaur, Rhea Varughese, Alim Hirji, Jason Weatherald, Justin Weinkauf, Dale Lien, Oscar Fernandez Garcia, Carlos Cervera Alvarez, Karen Doucette, Dima Kabbani, Kieran Halloran
{"title":"肺移植时呼吸道病毒及其与原发性移植物功能障碍的关系。","authors":"Laura van den Bosch, Karina Kaur, Rhea Varughese, Alim Hirji, Jason Weatherald, Justin Weinkauf, Dale Lien, Oscar Fernandez Garcia, Carlos Cervera Alvarez, Karen Doucette, Dima Kabbani, Kieran Halloran","doi":"10.1111/tid.70078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a form of immediate post-transplant acute lung injury associated with increased risk of mortality, and it is possible that respiratory viruses (RVs) at the time of transplant may augment this.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively studied all adult lung transplant recipients transplanted in our program from 2017 to 2020, with a primary outcome of grade 3 PGD (PGD3), defined as edema on chest X-ray and arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio <200 at 48- or 72-h post-transplant. RV status was assessed by nucleic acid amplification test on routine bronchoscopic specimens performed on day 1 post-transplant. During the pandemic, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was sampled in all donors and recipients and precluded transplant. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between RV status and PGD3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 229 patients met criteria for inclusion, and 63 patients (27%) were RV+. Twenty-seven patients (12%) developed PGD3 at 48- or 72-h. RV+ was not associated with a difference in PGD3 risk adjusted for donor age, use of cardiopulmonary bypass, or body mass index >30 (odds ratio 0.93 [95% confidence interval 0.38-2.49; p = 0.8845]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Perioperative RVs were not associated with a difference in the risk of PGD3 in our cohort. This may have implications for donor and recipient selection and preoperative evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e70078"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respiratory Viruses at Time of Lung Transplant and the Relationship to Primary Graft Dysfunction.\",\"authors\":\"Laura van den Bosch, Karina Kaur, Rhea Varughese, Alim Hirji, Jason Weatherald, Justin Weinkauf, Dale Lien, Oscar Fernandez Garcia, Carlos Cervera Alvarez, Karen Doucette, Dima Kabbani, Kieran Halloran\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tid.70078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a form of immediate post-transplant acute lung injury associated with increased risk of mortality, and it is possible that respiratory viruses (RVs) at the time of transplant may augment this.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively studied all adult lung transplant recipients transplanted in our program from 2017 to 2020, with a primary outcome of grade 3 PGD (PGD3), defined as edema on chest X-ray and arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio <200 at 48- or 72-h post-transplant. RV status was assessed by nucleic acid amplification test on routine bronchoscopic specimens performed on day 1 post-transplant. During the pandemic, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was sampled in all donors and recipients and precluded transplant. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between RV status and PGD3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 229 patients met criteria for inclusion, and 63 patients (27%) were RV+. Twenty-seven patients (12%) developed PGD3 at 48- or 72-h. RV+ was not associated with a difference in PGD3 risk adjusted for donor age, use of cardiopulmonary bypass, or body mass index >30 (odds ratio 0.93 [95% confidence interval 0.38-2.49; p = 0.8845]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Perioperative RVs were not associated with a difference in the risk of PGD3 in our cohort. This may have implications for donor and recipient selection and preoperative evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70078\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70078\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Respiratory Viruses at Time of Lung Transplant and the Relationship to Primary Graft Dysfunction.
Background: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a form of immediate post-transplant acute lung injury associated with increased risk of mortality, and it is possible that respiratory viruses (RVs) at the time of transplant may augment this.
Methods: We retrospectively studied all adult lung transplant recipients transplanted in our program from 2017 to 2020, with a primary outcome of grade 3 PGD (PGD3), defined as edema on chest X-ray and arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio <200 at 48- or 72-h post-transplant. RV status was assessed by nucleic acid amplification test on routine bronchoscopic specimens performed on day 1 post-transplant. During the pandemic, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was sampled in all donors and recipients and precluded transplant. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between RV status and PGD3.
Results: A total of 229 patients met criteria for inclusion, and 63 patients (27%) were RV+. Twenty-seven patients (12%) developed PGD3 at 48- or 72-h. RV+ was not associated with a difference in PGD3 risk adjusted for donor age, use of cardiopulmonary bypass, or body mass index >30 (odds ratio 0.93 [95% confidence interval 0.38-2.49; p = 0.8845]).
Conclusions: Perioperative RVs were not associated with a difference in the risk of PGD3 in our cohort. This may have implications for donor and recipient selection and preoperative evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal.
Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.