Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy最新文献_第7页

National disaster risk assessments in Europe. How comparable are they and why? 欧洲国家灾害风险评估。它们的可比性如何?为什么?

IF 3.5

Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-01-25 DOI: 10.1002/RHC3.12215

C. Pursiainen, Bjarte Rød

引用次数: 1

A qualitative study of risk perception and preparedness knowledge in two Midwestern United States communities that are located near nuclear power plants 对位于核电站附近的美国中西部两个社区的风险认知和准备知识的定性研究

IF 3.5

Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-01-13 DOI: 10.1002/RHC3.12214

Julia Crowley

引用次数: 2

Beyond Ones and Zeros: Conceptualizing Cyber Crises 超越一和零：网络危机的概念化

IF 3.5

Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy Pub Date : 2020-12-15 DOI: 10.1002/rhc3.12204

Maria F. Prevezianou

引用次数: 5

Issue Information 问题信息

IF 3.5

Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.1002/rhc3.12174

引用次数: 0

Advancing Equity in Public Administration: Prioritizing Equality of Outcomes in the COVID-19 Crisis. 促进公共行政公平:在2019冠状病毒病危机中优先考虑结果平等。

IF 3.5

Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-05 DOI: 10.1002/rhc3.12206

Danielle N Gadson

引用次数: 5

Risk Personalization: Governing Uncertain Collective Risk Through Individual Decisions 风险个性化:通过个体决策控制不确定的集体风险

IF 3.5

Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy Pub Date : 2020-11-25 DOI: 10.1002/rhc3.12208

S. Spruit, M. Bruijne, W. Pieters

{"title":"Risk Personalization: Governing Uncertain Collective Risk Through Individual Decisions","authors":"S. Spruit, M. Bruijne, W. Pieters","doi":"10.1002/rhc3.12208","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12208","url":null,"abstract":"Individuals are regularly made responsible for risks they wish to take: one can consent to processing of personal data, and decide what to buy based on risk information on product labels. However, both large ‐ scale processing of personal data and aggregated product choices may carry collective risks for society. In such situations, governance arrangements implying individual responsibility are at odds with uncertain collective risks from new technologies. We, therefore, investigate the governance challenges of what we call risk personalization: a form of governance for dealing with uncertain collective risks that allocates responsibility for governing those risks to individuals. We situate risk personalization at the intersection of two trends: governance of uncertain risk, and emphasis on individual responsibility. We then analyze three cases selected based on diversity: social media, nano materials, and Uber. Cross ‐ case comparison highlights issues of risk personalization pertaining to (i) the nature of the risk, (ii) governance arrangements in place, and (iii) mechanisms for allocating responsibility to individuals. We identify governance challenges in terms of (i) meaningful choice, (ii) effectiveness in mitigating risk, and (iii) collective decision making capacity. We conclude that the risk personalization lens stimulates reflection on the effectiveness and legitimacy of risk governance in light of individual agency.","PeriodicalId":21362,"journal":{"name":"Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/rhc3.12208","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44254913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Stretch‐Thinking Loops: A New Technique for Scenario Planning 拉伸-思维循环:一种场景规划的新技术

IF 3.5

Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy Pub Date : 2020-10-15 DOI: 10.1002/rhc3.12205

B. Brooks, S. Curnin

{"title":"Stretch‐Thinking Loops: A New Technique for Scenario Planning","authors":"B. Brooks, S. Curnin","doi":"10.1002/rhc3.12205","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12205","url":null,"abstract":"In crisis management, scenario planning is a necessity in our volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous world. Strategic planners need to be able to imagine future environments even in the most uncertain conditions. The scale of potential scenarios and associated management suggests that those involved will require innovative planning techniques. To support innovation in strategic planning, we have combined the research on creativity, divergent thinking, and creative constraints to design a method called “Stretch‐Thinking Loops.” This technique uses iterative thinking approaches that identify broad scenarios, the likely consequences, and the potential constraints, and then uses this information to identify new opportunities and innovations to support scenario planning. We report on the development of this technique in the context of crisis management and its application in a collaborative project with an Australian State Government that explored a series of post‐COVID‐19 recovery scenarios for a 12‐month time horizon. The proposed Stretch‐Thinking Loops are not just limited to crisis management but offer all organizations a structured method to enhance their capability to engage in divergent‐thinking for future scenario planning.","PeriodicalId":21362,"journal":{"name":"Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/rhc3.12205","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48848976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Factors Affecting Disaster Resilience in Oman: Integrating Stakeholder Analysis and Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping 影响阿曼抗灾能力的因素：整合利益相关者分析和模糊认知映射

IF 3.5

Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy Pub Date : 2020-10-06 DOI: 10.1002/rhc3.12201

Suad Al‐Manji, J. Lovett, G. Mitchell

{"title":"Factors Affecting Disaster Resilience in Oman: Integrating Stakeholder Analysis and Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping","authors":"Suad Al‐Manji, J. Lovett, G. Mitchell","doi":"10.1002/rhc3.12201","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12201","url":null,"abstract":"Planning for community resilience to disasters is a process that involves co ‐ ordinated action within and between relevant organizations and stakeholders, with the goal of reducing disaster risk. The effectiveness of this process is influenced by a range of factors, both positively and negatively, that need to be identified and understood so as to develop organizational capacity to build community resilience to disaster. This study investigates disaster planning and management in Oman, a country facing significant natural hazards, and with a relatively new system of institutional disaster management. Fuzzy cognitive mapping integrated with stakeholder analysis is used to identify relevant factors and their inter ‐ relationships, and hence provides an improved understanding of disaster governance. Developing an improved understanding of the complexity of this institutional behavior allows iden tification of opportunities to build greater resilience to disaster through improved planning and emergency response. We make recommendations for improved disaster management in Oman relating to governance (including improved plan dissemination and closer working with community organ -izations), risk assessment, public education, built environment development, and financing for disaster resilience. 25.4 percent, hazards 20.6 percent, with 19 percent of factors common to three It also shows that the community factors have a wide ‐ ranging on the","PeriodicalId":21362,"journal":{"name":"Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2020-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/rhc3.12201","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46771998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

Disaster Risk Perception of University Students 大学生灾害风险认知

IF 3.5

Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI: 10.1002/RHC3.12202

Sefa Mızrak, Ramazan Aslan

引用次数: 10

The CMS Emergency Preparedness Rule: Challenges for Rural Medical Centers CMS应急准备规则：农村医疗中心面临的挑战

IF 3.5

Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI: 10.1002/RHC3.12203

Leslie C. Sloan, O. Obisesan

引用次数: 0